| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |





* Graduate Group in Biophysics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720;
Life Sciences Division, Donner Laboratory, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720;
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Stanley/Donner ASU, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3206; and
Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Robert M. Glaeser, E-mail: rmglaeser{at}lbl.gov.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Like wild-type bR, bR(D85S) contains an all-trans retinal chromophore bound via a protonated Schiff-base linkage to K216 on helix G. In wild-type bR, the ion pumping cycle begins with photoisomerization of the retinal to the 13-cis configuration. The cycle then progresses thermodynamically downhill through a series of spectroscopically identifiable intermediate states that ultimately return the protein to its resting state and the retinal to its initial all-trans configuration. As is wild-type bR, bR(D85S) is also a light-driven ion pump; however, the single amino acid substitution permits the protein to pump anions from the extracellular side of the membrane into the cell and unlike wild-type bR its catalytic cycle does not involve Schiff-base deprotonation (Brown et al., 1996
; Sasaki et al., 1995
).
As a means to gain more insight about the ion pumping process, we previously crystallized a halide-pumping mutant of bacteriorhodopsin, bR(D85S), in its halide-free state (Rouhani et al., 2001
). Here, we describe the crystal structure of bR(D85S) with a bromide ion bound in its ground-state binding site. In conjunction with the previously determined structure of the halide-free state (Rouhani et al., 2001
), this study reveals structural changes that occur during the initial substrate-binding step of halide-ion transport, and suggests some design principles that may apply more generally to other ion pumps.
Specifically, these results, in conjunction with the previously solved structures of intermediate states in the wild-type photocycle, suggest that bR(D85S) facilitates active transport via a four-step process. First, the substrate must diffuse into the binding site past a dynamic gate consisting of the side chain of R82. Second, the halide ion makes an ion pair with the protonated Schiff base in the binding site, and in so doing induces a conformational change that latches the dynamic gate in a closed conformation. Third, the energy of the absorbed photon forces a small displacement of the protonated Schiff base, through isomerization of the retinal chromophore. The resulting charge separation raises the potential energy of the substrate to a level higher than it would have on the opposite side of the membrane and thus leads to ion transport. Finally, the protein relaxes back to its ground state.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Data collection and model building
Crystals were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and irradiated on beamline 8.3.1 of the advanced light source (ALS) with a 30-µm collimated x-ray beam. Five crystals were used to collect the halide data set. The halide-bound crystals belong to the C2221 space group with average unit cell dimensions in angstroms (Å) of a = 52.50, b = 121.33, and c = 73.87, whereas the previously described halide-free crystals have a unit cell of a = 51.80, b = 121.30, and c = 85.70. A Quantum 210 CCD detector was used to collect images. Data reduction was performed by the Elves scripts (Holton, 2002
). Diffraction data were integrated with MOSFLM (Leslie, 1992
) and subsequently scaled with SCALA (Collaborative Computation Project, 1994
). Molecular replacement using 1KGB (Facciotti et al., 2001
) as the starting search model, without the retinal, water, and lipid molecules, was performed by the program CNS Version 1.1 (Brunger et al., 1998
). Refinement with CNS and model building using the program O (Jones et al., 1991
) together with annealed simulated omit, |Fo| - |Fc|, and 2|Fo| - |Fc| maps reduced the values of R and Rfree to their final values (Table 1). The final model was analyzed with PROCHECK (Laskowski et al., 1993
) and MOLPROBITY (Richardson, 2002
) and exhibits good stereochemistry.
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
The halide binding site of bR(D85S) differs from the halorhodopsin-binding site, where D238, the homolog to residue D212 in bacteriorhodopsin, remains negatively charged when a halide ion is in the binding site. This is because the halorhodopsin aspartate does not interact directly with the halide ion, but serves instead as a counterion to the Schiff base and indirectly, through an ordered water molecule, to R108 (Kolbe et al., 2000
). Another difference is that in bR(D85S) only one water molecule interacts with the bound bromide ion, whereas three water molecules had been reported in the binding site of halorhodopsin (Kolbe et al., 2000
). These differences in polar interactions within the binding site, and the need to protonate D212, are likely to account for the lower halide binding affinity, over a narrower pH range, of the D85S mutant relative to halorhodopsin.
Structural rearrangements caused by halide binding
A comparison of the halide-bound and halide-free (Rouhani et al., 2001
) forms of bR(D85S) reveals that, after bromide binding, the structure on the cytoplasmic side remains as it was in the halide-free form. On the extracellular side, however, bromide binding induces a variety of side-chain movements (Fig. 2 A). One of the most notable movements involves the side chain of R82, which is best modeled with two distinct and nearly equally occupied conformations (Fig. 3). In what we presume is the functional conformation, CB-CD-CG swing downward in concert with a small shift in backbone position, whereas the guanidinium group itself rotates to a more upward-facing orientation, reminiscent of the conformation adopted in the ground state of wild-type bacteriorhodopsin. In the second rotamer conformation, the side chain of R82 adopts a downward facing structure reminiscent of that adopted in the halide-free form. Residues W138 and W189 also change rotamer conformations between the halide-free and halide-bound states by flipping about
1 and about both
1 and
2, respectively, resulting in a local reorganization of the interhelical hydrogen bonds. In the bromide-bound structure, the OH of Y83 (helix C) accepts a hydrogen bond from the NE1 of W189 (helix F), whereas in the halide-free state Y83 forms a hydrogen bond with the backbone carbonyl of I119 (helix D). The reorganization of Y83 and the formation of its hydrogen bond with W189 is facilitated by rotations about both
1 and
2 for W189, during which the residue breaks a
-bond with the indole ring of W138. These changes in hydrogen bonding allow W138 to break a hydrogen bond with the carbonyl oxygen of G122 (helix D) and rotate about
1 to form a new hydrogen bond with the carbonyl oxygen of P186 (helix F). The net result is that substrate binding eliminates two hydrogen bonds that helix D makes with its neighboring helices, while establishing one new cross-helix-bundle hydrogen bond between helices C and F. These rotamer switches involving R82, W138, and W189 in the bromide-bound form of bR(D85S) regenerate the same bonding arrangement that occurs in the functionally equivalent ground state of wild-type bR.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The use of the buried formal charge of R82 to prepay the Born energy of the anionic substrate during transit to the binding site contrasts with the mechanism used by ion channels to overcome the Born energy barrier for ion transport. The structures of the potassium and chloride channels (Doyle et al., 1998
; Dutzler et al., 2002
) have revealed that polar peptide-backbone residues of the "pore-loop" sequence are used, rather than buried counterions, to create an environment for a dehydrated ion that is almost equivalent, energetically, to that of its fully hydrated state (Berneche and Roux, 2001
).
A key difference between these two mechanisms for lowering the Born energy barrier is that the pore design lacks any way to prevent backflow of the transported ion, and thus it is compatible only with passive (downhill) diffusion of substrate ions. On the other hand, a design that uses rotamer switching of a charged side-chain residue, R82 in the case of bR(D85S), as a flexible gate would allow substrate-induced conformational changes to latch the gate in a single, frozen conformation and thereby prevent backflow during subsequent steps in the pumping cycle. In halorhodopsin, the homologous residue, R108, is also known to block extracellular access to the binding site and would, therefore, also need to move to allow anion access to the binding site (Kolbe et al., 2000
). Thus, R108 in halorhodopsin could also serve as a dynamic ion-pairing gate. In addition, the recently published structure of the Ca2+ ATPase in the substrate-free state (Toyoshima and Nomura, 2002
) also reveals an access tunnel that is capped by a potential counter ion, in this case the carboxyl group of E309. Upon Ca2+ binding, E309 appears to switch rotamer conformations (Toyoshima et al., 2000
) in a way that again suggests this residue plays a role that is functionally equivalent to what we propose for R82 in bR(D85S).
Although we suggest that the bromide binding induced helix repacking could functionally close the extracellular side of the protein, the repacking that is observed does not return all of the helices to the positions occupied in the resting state of wild-type bR. We suspect that the observed repacking thus represents an incomplete closure of the extracellular side in which dual occupancy of rotamer conformations can still exist for the gate, R82. As a result substantial backflow of halide ions could still occur in this mutant. The poor pumping efficiency of bR(D85S), accompanied by a measured component of backflow of chloride ion (Kalaidzidis and Kaulen, 1997
), may thus be explained by the differences in helix packing that remain between bR(D85S) and wild-type bR in their respective resting states. The inability of bR(D85S) to completely close the extracellular side is not surprising since a single protein engineering step, (mutating D85 to S) can not be expected to optimize all aspects of halide-ion transport to the extent that evolution has done for halorhodopsin.
The structures of bR(D85S) and hR both reveal that charge-charge interaction is a key component of ion binding in these pumps. The same mechanism of ion binding is also seen in the Ca2+ ATPase, a cation pump, where there is a direct charge-charge interaction between substrate and a cluster of aspartate and glutamate carboxyl groups (Toyoshima et al., 2000
). We suggest that direct charge-charge interactions in the binding site could serve an important mechanistic function for ion pumps, beyond merely trapping the substrate in the binding site. The use of externally supplied energy to switch either the position or the orientation of a side-chain counter ion (or in our case the protonated Schiff base of the retinal group), by even a small amount, can raise the potential energy of the substrate ion and even draw it on to the next site.
As a concrete example, we can model what the consequence might be after isomerization of the retinal group in the bR(D85S) mutant by assuming the structural changes to be similar to what occurs in the M intermediate of bacteriorhodopsin. This assumption will only be valid if the reaction coordinate of the halide-pumping mutant, when expressed in terms of a progression of structural changes in the protein, remains similar to that of wild-type bacteriorhodopsin. This is similar to the assumption made when interpreting the structural features of trapped photointermediates of proton-pumping mutants within the context of the wild-type photocycle (Luecke et al., 2000
, 1999a
).
It is generally accepted that the photon energy is initially stored in the retinal chromophore in the form of torsion of the normally planar polyene chain (Braiman and Mathies, 1982
; Lanyi and Schobert, 2002
; Schobert et al., 2002
; Smith et al., 1985
), and that the Schiff-base nitrogen atom is gradually displaced from its original position as this torsion is relaxed (Facciotti et al., 2001
; Luecke et al., 1999a
). We have therefore used the atomic model of a late M intermediate (Luecke et al., 1999a
) to estimate the amount of charge separation that might occur between the protonated Schiff base and the bromide anion in the D85S mutant. Alignment of the late M structure to our atomic model of the bromide-bound resting state of bR(D85S) was carried out in two ways. In the first, the RMSD between the retinal ring of the two models was minimized, whereas in the second, the RMSD between selected CA atoms of the two models was minimized.
According to the first method of alignment, the distance between the halide anion (were it to remain fixed) and the midpoint of the NH bond of the Schiff-base cation would increase to
1.4 times their separation in the ground state, while in the second method of alignment the distance increases by a factor of 1.6 (Fig. 5). If we take even the smaller amount of displacement, the Born energy cost for this small amount of charge separation would actually be
40% of the favorable Coulomb interaction that is involved in forming the initial ion pair. The bromide ion could avoid the high cost of this charge separation by moving to a position that is closer to the displaced Schiff-base cation, of course, ultimately moving to the cytoplasmic side of the retinal group. Even then, however, the anion would remain at a higher potential energy than in the resting state, for it would no longer be solvated in this new position by the S85 or D212 polar groups.
|
|
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This work was supported in part from a National Institutes of Health grant GM51487.
Submitted on December 4, 2002; accepted for publication March 17, 2003.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Berneche, S., and B. Roux. 2001. Energetics of ion conduction through the K+ channel. Nature. 414:7377.[Medline]
Betancourt, F. M., and R. M. Glaeser. 2000. Chemical and physical evidence for multiple functional steps comprising the M state of the bacteriorhodopsin photocycle. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1460:106118.[Medline]
Braiman, M., and R. Mathies. 1982. Resonance Raman spectra of bacteriorhodopsin's primary photoproduct: evidence for a distorted 13-cis retinal chromophore. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 79:403407.
Brown, L. S., R. Needleman, and J. K. Lanyi. 1996. Interaction of proton and chloride transfer pathways in recombinant bacteriorhodopsin with chloride transport activity: implications for the chloride translocation mechanism. Biochemistry. 35:1604816054.[Medline]
Brunger, A. T., P. D. Adams, G. M. Clore, W. L. DeLano, P. Gros, R. W. Grosse-Kunstleve, J. S. Jiang, J. Kuszewski, M. Nilges, N. S. Pannu, R. J. Read, L. M. Rice, T. Simonson, and G. L. Warren. 1998. Crystallography + NMR system: a new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 54:905921.[Medline]
Collaborative Computation Project. 1994. The Ccp4 suiteprograms for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 50:760763.[Medline]
Doyle, D. A., J. Morais-Cabral, R. A. Pfuetzner, A. Kuo, J. M. Gulbis, S. L. Cohen, B. T. Chait, and R. MacKinnon. 1998. The structure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of K+ conduction and selectivity. Science. 280:6977.
Dutzler, R., E. B. Campbell, M. Cadene, B. T. Chait, and R. MacKinnon. 2002. X-ray structure of a ClC chloride channel at 3.0 A reveals the molecular basis of anion selectivity. Nature. 415:287294.[Medline]
Facciotti, M. T., S. Rouhani, F. T. Burkard, F. M. Betancourt, K. H. Downing, R. B. Rose, G. McDermott, and R. M. Glaeser. 2001. Structure of an early intermediate in the M-state phase of the bacteriorhodopsin photocycle. Biophys. J. 81:34423455.
Herzfeld, J., and J. C. Lansing. 2002. Magnetic resonance studies of the bacteriorhodopsin pump cycle. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 31:7395.[Medline]
Hille, B. 1984. Ionic Channels of Excitable Membranes. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.
Holton, J. M. 2002. http://ucxray.berkeley.edu/
jamesh/elves/.
Honig, B. H., and W. L. Hubbell. 1984. Stability of "salt bridges" in membrane proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 81:54125416.
Iwata, S., J. W. Lee, K. Okada, J. K. Lee, M. Iwata, B. Rasmussen, T. A. Link, S. Ramaswamy, and B. K. Jap. 1998. Complete structure of the 11-subunit bovine mitochondrial cytochrome bc(1) complex. Science. 281:6471.
Iwata, S., C. Ostermeier, B. Ludwig, and H. Michel. 1995. Structure at 2.8-angstrom resolution of cytochrome c oxidase from Paracoccus denitrificans. Nature. 376:660669.[Medline]
Jardetzky, O. 1966. Simple allosteric model for membrane pumps. Nature. 211:969970.[Medline]
Jones, T. A., J. Y. Zou, S. W. Cowan, and Kjeldgaard. 1991. Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. Acta Crystallogr. A. 47:110119.
Kalaidzidis, I. V., and A. D. Kaulen. 1997. Cl-dependent photovoltage responses of bacteriorhodopsin: comparison of the D85T and D85S mutants and wild-type acid purple form. FEBS Lett. 418:239242.[Medline]
Karplus, M., and J. A. McCammon. 1986. The dynamics of proteins. Sci. Am. 254:4251.[Medline]
Kleywegt, G. J., and T. A. Jones. 1994. Detection, delineation, measurement and display of cavities in macromolecular structures. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 50:178185.[Medline]
Kolbe, M., H. Besir, L. O. Essen, and D. Oesterhelt. 2000. Structure of the light-driven chloride pump halorhodopsin at 1.8 angstrom resolution. Science. 288:13901396.
Koradi, R., M. Billeter, and K. Wuthrich. 1996. MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Graph. 14:5155.
Lanyi, J. K., and B. Schobert. 2002. Crystallographic structure of the retinal and the protein after deprotonation of the Schiff base: the switch in the bacteriorhodopsin photocycle. J. Mol. Biol. 321:727737.[Medline]
Laskowski, R. A., M. W. Macarthur, D. S. Moss, and J. M. Thornton. 1993. PROCHECKa program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26:283291.
Leslie, A. G. W. 1992. Recent changes to the MOSFLM package for processing film and image plate data. CCP4 and ESF-EACMB Newsletter on Protein Crystallography. 26.
Luecke, H. 2000. Atomic resolution structures of bacteriorhodopsin photocycle intermediates: the role of discrete water molecules in the function of this light-driven ion pump. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta-Bioenergetics. 1460:133156.
Luecke, H., B. Schobert, J. P. Cartailler, H. T. Richter, A. Rosengarth, R. Needleman, and J. K. Lanyi. 2000. Coupling photoisomerization of retinal to directional transport in bacteriorhodopsin. J. Mol. Biol. 300:12371255.[Medline]
Luecke, H., B. Schobert, H. T. Richter, J. P. Cartailler, and J. K. Lanyi. 1999a. Structural changes in bacteriorhodopsin during ion transport at 2 angstrom resolution. Science. 286:255260.
Luecke, H., B. Schobert, H. T. Richter, J. P. Cartailler, and J. K. Lanyi. 1999b. Structure of bacteriorhodopsin at 1.55 angstrom resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 291:899911.[Medline]
Nollert, P., and E. M. Landau. 1998. Enzymic release of crystals from lipidic cubic phases. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 26:709713.[Medline]
Oesterhelt, D., and W. Stoeckenius. 1973. Functions of a new photoreceptor membrane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 70:28532857.
Perkins, G. A. 1992. Trapping the M1 and M2 substates of bacteriorhodopsin for electron diffraction studies. PhD thesis. University of California, Berkeley, Berkley, CA.
Richardson, J. S. 2002. http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu/molprobity/.
Rouhani, S., J. P. Cartailler, M. T. Facciotti, P. Walian, R. Needleman, J. K. Lanyi, R. M. Glaeser, and H. Luecke. 2001. Crystal structure of the D85S mutant of bacteriorhodopsin: model of an O-like photocycle intermediate. J. Mol. Biol. 313:615628.[Medline]
Royant, A., K. Edman, T. Ursby, E. Pebay-Peyroula, E. M. Landau, and R. Neutze. 2000. Helix deformation is coupled to vectorial proton transport in the photocycle of bacteriorhodopsin. Nature. 406:645648.[Medline]
Royant, A., P. Nollert, K. Edman, R. Neutze, E. M. Landau, E. Pebay-Peyroula, and J. Navarro. 2001. X-ray structure of sensory rhodopsin II at 2.1-A resolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:1013110136.
Sasaki, J., L. S. Brown, Y. S. Chon, H. Kandori, A. Maeda, R. Needleman, and J. K. Lanyi. 1995. Conversion of bacteriorhodopsin into a chloride ion pump. Science. 269:7375.
Sass, H. J., G. Buldt, R. Gessenich, D. Hehn, D. Neff, R. Schlesinger, J. Berendzen, and P. Ormos. 2000. Structural alterations for proton translocation in the M state of wild-type bacteriorhodopsin. Nature. 406:649653.[Medline]
Schobert, B., J. Cupp-Vickery, V. Hornak, S. Smith, and J. Lanyi. 2002. Crystallographic structure of the K intermediate of bacteriorhodopsin: conservation of free energy after photoisomerization of the retinal. J. Mol. Biol. 321:715726.[Medline]
Smith, S. O., J. Lugtenburg, and R. Mathies. 1985. Determination of retinal chromophore structure in bacteriorhodopsin with resonance Raman spectroscopy. J. Membr. Biol. 85:95109.[Medline]
Soulimane, T., G. Buse, G. P. Bourenkov, H. D. Bartunik, R. Huber, and M. E. Than. 2000. Structure and mechanism of the aberrant ba(3)-cytochrome c oxidase from Thermus thermophilus. EMBO J. 19:17661776.[Medline]
Subramaniam, S., and R. Henderson. 2000. Molecular mechanism of vectorial proton translocation by bacteriorhodopsin. Nature. 406:653657.[Medline]
Tittor, J., U. Haupts, C. Haupts, D. Oesterhelt, A. Becker, and E. Bamberg. 1997. Chloride and proton transport in bacteriorhodopsin mutant D85T: different modes of ion translocation in a retinal protein. J. Mol. Biol. 271:405416.[Medline]
Toyoshima, C., M. Nakasako, H. Nomura, and H. Ogawa. 2000. Crystal structure of the calcium pump of sarcoplasmic reticulum at 2.6 angstrom resolution. Nature. 405:647655.[Medline]
Toyoshima, C., and H. Nomura. 2002. Structural changes in the calcium pump accompanying the dissociation of calcium. Nature. 418:605611.[Medline]
Tsukihara, T., H. Aoyama, E. Yamashita, T. Tomizaki, H. Yamaguchi, K. Shinzawaitoh, R. Nakashima, R. Yaono, and S. Yoshikawa. 1996. The whole structure of the 13-subunit oxidized cytochrome c oxidase at 2.8 angstrom. Science. 272:11361144.[Abstract]
Vonck, J. 2000. Structure of the bacteriorhodopsin mutant F219L N intermediate revealed by electron crystallography. EMBO J. 19:21522160.[Medline]
Xia, D., C. A. Yu, H. Kim, J. Z. Xian, A. M. Kachurin, L. Zhang, L. Yu, and J. Deisenhofer. 1997. Crystal structure of the cytochrome bc(1) complex from bovine heart mitochondria. Science. 277:6066.
Yu, E. W., and D. E. Koshland, Jr. 2001. Propagating conformational changes over long (and short) distances in proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:95179520.
Zhang, Z. L., L. S. Huang, V. M. Shulmeister, Y. I. Chi, K. K. Kim, L. W. Hung, A. R. Crofts, E. A. Berry, and S. H. Kim. 1998. Electron transfer by domain movement in stockbroker bc(1). Nature. 392:677684.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Efremov, V. I. Gordeliy, J. Heberle, and G. Buldt Time-Resolved Microspectroscopy on a Single Crystal of Bacteriorhodopsin Reveals Lattice-Induced Differences in the Photocycle Kinetics Biophys. J., August 15, 2006; 91(4): 1441 - 1451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. S. Baliga, R. Bonneau, M. T. Facciotti, M. Pan, G. Glusman, E. W. Deutsch, P. Shannon, Y. Chiu, R. S. Weng, R. R. Gan, et al. Genome sequence of Haloarcula marismortui: A halophilic archaeon from the Dead Sea Genome Res., November 1, 2004; 14(11): 2221 - 2234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Jang, P. S. Crozier, M. J. Stevens, and T. B. Woolf How Environment Supports a State: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Two States in Bacteriorhodopsin Suggest Lipid and Water Compensation Biophys. J., July 1, 2004; 87(1): 129 - 145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Balint, M. Lakatos, C. Ganea, J. K. Lanyi, and G. Varo The Nitrate Transporting Photochemical Reaction Cycle of the Pharaonis Halorhodopsin Biophys. J., March 1, 2004; 86(3): 1655 - 1663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |