| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |


* Department of Chemical Engineering and
Department of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada
Correspondence: Address reprint requests to P. Chen, Fax: 1-519-746-4979; E-mail: p4chen{at}cape.uwaterloo.ca.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
0.1 mg/ml by surface tension measurements. The nanostructures of aggregates were imaged and analyzed by atomic force microscopy. Globular and fibrillar aggregates were observed, and their dimensions were further quantified. To ensure that the aggregates were formed in bulk solution, light scattering (LS) measurements were conducted to monitor the fibril formation with time. The LS profile showed two different rates of aggregation depending on whether the peptide concentration was above or below the CAC. At high concentrations, the LS intensity increased strongly at early times. At low concentrations, the LS intensity increased only slightly. Our study provides information about the nature of the oligopeptide self-assembly, which is important to the understanding of the fibrillogenesis occurring in conformational diseases and to many biomedical engineering applications. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The self-association of oligopeptides into insoluble macroscopic membranes could be considered as a model system for studying insoluble macrostructures, which have been found in many neurological disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease (Zhang et al., 1993
, 1994
; Altman et al., 2000
; Zhang and Rich, 1997
; Zhang and Altman, 1999
). The macroscopic membranes or plaques can interfere with or even prevent cell-to-cell communications, which results in neurological disorders. One well-known self-assembling biomolecule is the amyloid ß-protein (Aß), which has been found to be an important factor in the cause of Alzheimer's disease (Ghanta et al., 1996
). Much research has been done on amyloid aggregation by studying Aß under different conditions (Halverson et al., 1990
; Fraser et al., 1991
; Fraser et al., 1994
; Good and Murphy, 1995
; Shen and Murphy, 1995
; Yang et al., 1999
; Kowalewski and Holtzman, 1999
); however, the self-assembly process of Aß is so complicated that it has not been fully understood. Rather than looking at the complete Aß molecule (a peptide consisting of 4042 amino acids), the study of the self-assembly of simpler oligopeptides may be an alternative. These oligopeptides could be used as model systems that would enable the finding of inhibitors that prevent fibrillogenesis and possibly, provide therapy to neurological disorders.
To understand the self-assembly mechanism of a given oligopeptide, it is necessary to study the conditions under which the oligopeptides aggregate and further develop into macrostructures. Among many conditions, the amino acid sequence and the pH are known to affect the aggregation of peptides (unpublished data) as well as the folding and function of proteins. In fact, the various biological environments in the human body are highly pH specific (i.e., pH 5 in the mouth; pH 1.5 and pH 7.4 in the stomach and blood, respectively) (Campbell, 1993
). Concentration is another parameter which is important to the self-assembly of biomolecules. The concentration dependence of self-assembling oligopeptides is expected to be similar to that of biosurfactants, which have both hydrophobic and hydrophilic parts. By analogy with surfactants, a concentration study may allow one to determine the critical aggregation concentration (CAC). Similar to micellar systems, it is expected that the oligopeptides are in the monomer form below the CAC, while peptide aggregation starts to occur at and above the CAC. Time is also involved in the aggregation process. It provides information on the timescale over which the aggregation takes place. This is important to understand the kinetics of aggregation.
In our research, we chose EAK16, a typical member of the self-assembling oligopeptide family, as the first step to understand the self-assembly mechanism. EAK16 contains three amino acids (Ala, Glu, and Lys) connected into a well-defined sixteen amino acid long sequence. The hydrophobic Ala and hydrophilic Glu and Lys are assembled in a regularly organized sequence, which results in unique amphiphilic properties. EAK16-II is characterized by two negative and positive charges alternating in sequence (--++--++) (Zhang and Altman, 1999
). Its molecular structure is shown in Fig. 1. EAK16-II molecules spontaneously assemble to form an insoluble macroscopic membrane upon addition of salt in aqueous solution (Zhang et al., 1993
). Further investigation led to the proposal that the macroscopic membrane is formed by the stacking of ß-sheets through ionic complements and hydrophobic interactions (Zhang et al., 1994
; Altman et al., 2000
). The ß-sheet structure is stable at temperatures as high as 90°C and over a wide pH range, from pH 1.5 to pH 11 (Zhang and Altman, 1999
).
|
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
) at concentrations ranging from 0.005 mg/ml to 5.0 mg/ml. Very low EAK16-II concentrations (<0.05 mg/ml) were obtained by diluting the stock solution (0.05 mg/ml) using a 10100 µl micropipette. The measurements were performed 1 day after the sample preparation. For the LS measurements, the EAK16-II solutions with concentrations varying from 0.1 mg/ml to 0.2 mg/ml were prepared by diluting from 0.3 mg/ml stock solution. The solutions with concentrations ranging from 0.013 mg/ml to 0.05 mg/ml were diluted from 0.08 mg/ml solution. The samples were divided into sets of four concentrations each for experimental convenience. Each set of samples (four concentrations) required 30 min to prepare. The solutions were stored in 20-ml vials after each test. The time-dependent LS experiments were performed less than 30 min after the solution was prepared. All experiments were conducted at room temperature.
Surface tension measurement
Axisymmetric drop shape analysis-profile was used to study the dynamic surface tension of EAK16-II solutions. For a dynamic process, the surface tension varies as a function of time. For a typical surfactant, the surface tension decreases with time before reaching an equilibrium value. The experimental setup has been described in an earlier publication (Chen et al., 1996
). The EAK16-II solution was released at a speed of 0.04 ml/s for 5 s using a 1-ml motor-driven syringe to form a pendent drop at the tip of the syringe needle (inner diameter, 0.92 mm). The surface tension was measured for 1 h for every sample. The experimental sample chamber was saturated with pure water vapor to keep a consistent humid environment. For each run, images were acquired at 0.5-s intervals for the first 60 s, then at 20-s intervals for the remaining time. Images were magnified by an optical microscope, and then captured by a CCD camera before being transferred to the computer. All images were digitized and analyzed to extract the drop profile. The surface tension was obtained as a fitting parameter when the experimental drop profile was fitted to the theoretical curve governed by the Laplace equation of capillarity (Rotenberg et al., 1983
). The standard deviation of all results is less than 0.2 mJ/m2.
Atomic force microscopy
The nanostructure of the aggregates was investigated by an atomic force microscope (PicoScan, Molecular Imaging, Phoenix, AZ). To prepare the AFM samples, 50 µl EAK16-II solution was put on a mica surface, which was affixed to a multiple use AFM sample plate. The sample was left for 30 min to let the peptide adhere to the mica surface. It was, then, washed twice with 50 µl water. The sample plate was covered by a petri dish to avoid any possible contamination and was left for 12 h to dry out completely. Silicon crystal tips (type NCL-16, Molecular Imaging) with a spring constant of 3171 N/m and a radius of curvature of 10 nm were used for AFM tapping mode (acoustic mode) imaging. The AFM tip resonance frequency for imaging was between 160 and 180 kHz. Images were scanned and collected at 6 x 6 µm2, 3 x 3 µm2, and 1.2 x 1.2 µm2 scales for each sample. To show the details of the nanostructure, only the images at the 1.2 x 1.2 µm2 scale were given in the Results section. Images at the 3 x 3 µm2 scale were used for surface coverage analysis while the dimensions of the nanostructures were measured from those obtained at the 1.2 x 1.2 µm2 scale.
To obtain the surface coverage of the EAK16-II aggregates, an image analysis program (Scion Image, Scion corporation, Frederick, MD) was used. A relatively flat surface was obtained from the AFM images collected at the scale of 3 x 3 µm2. For each topographical image, a reasonable threshold was obtained by comparing the threshold image with the original image to preserve most aggregate features from the background. By analyzing these images, the surface area covered by the EAK16-II aggregates was obtained. Since the images only represent a fraction of the whole sample surface, and the fibrils may not be evenly distributed on the mica surface, the surface coverage can be considered as the fibril density within the fibril networks.
It has been found that the tip size of a cantilever will affect the determination of the real size of objects probed by AFM (Forbes et al., 2001
; Vesenka et al., 1992
; Markiewicz and Goh, 1994
). The height measured by our AFM is relatively accurate as calibrated with a lipid bilayer (egg phosphatidylcholine), but the width is a convolution of the actual size of the objects and that of the tip; That is, the true width is related to the tip size and the shape of the object. To correct the distortion induced by the finite tip size, Vesenka et al. (1992)
derived an equation to predict the diameter by assuming the particle under observation to be spherical. The observed width, W, is approximately equal to
where Rm and Rc are the radius of the particles measured by AFM and the radius of curvature of the tip, respectively.
This equation does not apply to our system because the EAK16-II fibrils are not spherical. In fact, the height of EAK16-II fibrils is 20 times smaller than their width. To correct the fibril width measured by AFM, a new equation has been derived for a sheetlike structure with a height H and a width W* shown in Fig. 2. The actual fibril width W* can be calculated by the equation,
where W is the observed fibril width from AFM. For EAK16-II fibrils (H = 0.55 nm) and silicone crystal tips (Rc = 10 nm) used in the AFM work, the actual fibril width W* is
1530% less than the observed fibril width W. All fibril widths discussed in this article have been corrected by this method.
|
and 2 turns to yield a spectral resolution of 1 nm and 4 nm, respectively. The EAK16-II solution was transferred from the vial into a square cell by a glass pipette for each test. The lamp intensity of the fluorometer was monitored for each sample. Each scattering intensity was divided by the lamp intensity to account for eventual lamp fluctuations. All samples were tested in 1-h intervals initially, and then once a day or once every two days over a period of 3 weeks. The experimental LS data profiles were fitted with two exponential functions. The parameters of these functions were obtained by optimizing the fits with the Marquardt-Levenberg algorithm (Press et al., 1992
The LS intensity is expected to increase with the dimension of particles present in solutions. The sensitivity of LS to particle size was confirmed by monitoring the LS intensity of latex particles with varying diameters. Latex particles (polystyrene carboxylate-modified beads) with diameters of 0.4 µm and 0.9 µm were purchased from Aldrich (Oakville, ON, Canada). Solutions of 0.4 µm and 0.9 µm diameter latex particles were prepared in pure water (Milli-Q, 18.6
) with concentration ranging from 0.002 mg/ml to 0.5 mg/ml. The LS signal was monitored as a function of concentration for both latex particles. For a given concentration in mg/ml, the solution with larger particles always gives the larger LS intensity. Thus, the LS data obtained with the PTI spectrofluorometer yields qualitative information about the size of particles present in solution.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
) is an estimate of the equilibrium surface tension.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Fig. 10, the LS data were normalized by dividing the scattering intensity by the EAK16-II concentration. Since little change in LS intensity was observed at low EAK16-II concentrations, only the data with an EAK16-II concentration at and larger than 0.08 mg/ml are presented in Fig. 10. All data were normalized by concentration. They illustrate that the increase in LS with time is bimodal, being rapid at early times and slower at later times. This effect appears to be induced by the shear which occurs as the peptide solution is forced through the Pasteur pipette into the cell. Pipetting the solutions once per hour or day results in different rates of aggregation leading to the bimodal behavior shown in Fig. 10. Consequently, the scattering profiles were fitted with two exponentials to generate a kinetic model of the aggregation process. The shear-induced association of EAK16-II is not an isolated case since a similar effect has been reported for other proteins (Lougheed et al., 1980
).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The EAK16-II molecule, shown in Fig. 1, contains one hydrophobic side with alanine residues and one hydrophilic side with glutamic acid and lysine residues. It forms stable ß-sheets spontaneously in aqueous solution mainly through hydrogen bonding; both the electrostatic forces of the charged residues and the hydrophobic interactions of the alanines contribute to further aggregation (Zhang et al., 1993
, 1994
; Zhang and Altman, 1999
; Altman et al., 2000
). This unique amphiphilic structure of EAK16-II is quite different from that of a normal surfactant, which contains a hydrophobic tail and a hydrophilic head. This is certainly the reason why EAK16-II aggregates into fibrils rather than forming micelles in solution.
Surface tension measurements lead to the conclusion that EAK16-II has a CAC around 0.1 mg/ml (6.04 x 10-5 M). Although this value is much lower than the CMC of most commercial surfactants (
10-310-2 M) (Reif et al., 2001
; Myers, 1992
), it compares well with the CMC value reported for other biosurfactants, which range from 0.0012 mg/ml (Mulligan and Gibbs, 1993
). For example, both bovine serum albumin (BSA) and human serum albumin (HSA) have been found to have a CAC value around 0.05 mg/ml (
7 x 10-7 M) (Chen et al., 1996
; Makievski et al., 1998
; Fainerman et al., 1998
). Interestingly, Alzheimer's Aß, another self-assembling polypeptide, also has a CAC of
2.5 x 10-5 M (Soreghan et al., 1994
), although a later report shows a CAC of Aß around 1.0 x 10-5 M at low pH (Lomakin et al., 1996
). Therefore, it is possible to have a CAC in the range of 10-5 M for oligopeptides.
The aggregation of EAK16-II is confirmed when aggregates are visualized by AFM on a mica surface. The AFM images show three types of nanostructures, which are the globular aggregates, the fibrils, and the filaments. Fibrils are found when the concentration is above 0.1 mg/ml (Fig. 7, AC). At a concentration of 0.05 mg/ml, isolated globular aggregates and filaments are observed (Fig. 7 D). The existence of aggregates at this concentration appears to be contradictory to the micellization theory. However, two reasons can account for this: The first is the dehydration process. Since the AFM samples are prepared by drying the solutions on the mica surface, the bulk concentration will increase significantly and may exceed the CAC near the end of the drying process, which induces the association. Second, the impurities in the solution may function as seeds, which can initiate the nucleation process for further aggregation (see below).
The LS experiments also show that EAK16-II aggregates at low concentrations (Fig. 9 A). The LS intensity of low concentration samples (0.03 and 0.05 mg/ml) increases slightly with time. After 150 h (
6 days), the LS signal becomes significantly higher than the initial value. This is evidence that aggregation occurs over time at concentrations below the estimated CAC of 0.1 mg/ml.
Although both AFM images and LS data show that aggregation of EAK16-II happens at all concentrations, the aggregation rate depends strongly on the CAC. Fig. 9 C shows that the rate of LS intensity change, which can be related to the aggregation rate, is very different for the concentration below and above the CAC. Fig. 9 D indicates that EAK16-II aggregates much faster at concentrations above the CAC. The two extreme aggregation rates may indicate that EAK16-II associates via two different pathways.
Concentration affects both the size and shape of the nanostructures of EAK16-II. By AFM, three types of nanostructures were observed. They are the globular aggregates, the filaments and the fibrils shown in Fig. 7. When the concentration is below the CAC, both globular aggregates and thin filaments exist (Fig. 7 D). The height and width of the filaments are
0.4 nm and 35 nm, respectively, whereas the height and diameter of the globular aggregates are twice as large (see Table 1). The size of the nanostructures can be related to that of one EAK16-II molecule. According to the structure presented in Fig. 1, the backbone stretches over 6.5 nm and the width ranges from 0.3 to 0.7 nm (estimated by ACD/3D freeware). Comparing the height of EAK16-II aggregates with that of one EAK16-II molecule, the filaments are monolayers of ß-sheets, but the globular aggregates are made of at least 2 layers of ß-sheets.
At the concentration above the CAC, EAK16-II forms fibrils. These fibrils are made of many globular aggregates (protofibrils) lining up and stacking together (Fig. 7 A). The dimensions of the fibrils are
70 nm in width and 3.7 nm in height, which are quite different from the filaments observed at low concentrations. However, it is very interesting that the diameter of the globular aggregates at a concentration of 0.05 mg/ml is comparable to the width of the fibrils at 0.5 mg/ml, although those fibrils are 3.5 x taller than the globular aggregates. From the images, no filaments are observed at high concentrations (≥0.1 mg/ml).
Both fibrils and individual small globular aggregates are found at concentrations around the CAC (Fig. 7 C). The globular aggregates at this concentration (
0.1 mg/ml) are around 1 nm in height and 35 nm in diameter, which is half the diameter at 0.05 mg/ml. Table 1 also shows that the diameter of globular aggregates decreases to the smallest value at 0.1 mg/ml. Therefore, within the concentration range where isolated globular aggregates can be observed, a minimum diameter exists at the concentration close to the CAC.
The observation of the smallest diameter of the globular aggregates at 0.1 mg/ml concentration could be rationalized by a nucleation process, in which the size of the aggregates will depend on the number of nuclei formed. At the low concentration regime (0.05 mg/ml), few nuclei are formed for EAK16-II molecules to associate leading to the formation of fewer but larger globular aggregates. When the concentration reaches the CAC, many nuclei appear immediately, which generates more but smaller globular aggregates as seen in Fig. 7 C. The formation of fibrils by other self-assembling molecules (i.e., Aß) has also been described in terms of a similar nucleation process (Lomakin et al., 1996
).
The nuclei formation is expected to depend on concentration. At concentrations above the CAC, nuclei are generated by the self-association of EAK16-II molecules. Below the CAC, impurities in solution may function as seeds (or nuclei) for the nucleation process. The presence of impurities is confirmed by the small depression observed by the surface tension measurements and shown in Fig. 5. The minute amount of impurities in solution allow EAK16-II molecules to self-assemble at concentrations below the CAC, which agrees with the AFM and LS results.
The aggregation of EAK 16 II behaves differently from the normal surfactant aggregation at concentrations above the CAC because the typical micellization theory cannot explain the increase in aggregate size as a function of concentration. Above the CMC, an increase of the surfactant concentration leads to an increase of the micelle concentration, not its size and shape, which only depend on the packing parameter of the surfactants (Clint, 1992
). Similar results have been reported for the formation of Aß fibrils, where an independent relationship has been established between the fibril width and Aß concentration above the CMC (Lomakin et al., 1996
). Above the CAC, however, an increase of the EAK16-II concentration results in the formation of wider and higher fibrils (Fig. 7 A and Table 1). This shows the unique properties of EAK16-II molecules. Different from surfactants, EAK16-II forms an open structure of aggregates as opposed to an enclosed micelle. Once the nuclei of the aggregates are formed, they keep growing via addition of EAK16-II monomers leading to a continuous increase in the size of protofibrils and fibrils with concentration.
Proposed mechanism for self-assembly
To study the mechanism of self-assembly, Zhang and Altman (1999)
hypothesized a simple model to describe the aggregation process of self-assembling oligopeptides. Initially, the individual peptides arrange themselves into ß-sheets; then the ß-sheets aggregate into filaments and further into membranes. However, no direct evidence supports this proposed model.
Based on our results, an aggregation model of EAK16-II can be proposed. EAK16-II molecules aggregate to form fibrils in two stages. First, EAK16-II monomers self-associate into protofibrils via a nucleation and/or seeding process depending on the solution concentration. Below the CAC, the nuclei are formed only from the seeds (impurities) present in minute amounts in the solution; above the CAC, EAK16-II self-assembles to form nuclei, which initiate further the aggregation of the protofibrils. The protofibrils can adopt two different nanostructures, i.e., the globular aggregates and the filaments. Both structures are composed of ß-sheets, which are held together mainly by hydrogen bonding. The second step involves the interaction of the protofibrils with each other to form fibrils. One hypothetical pathway for fibril formation would have globular aggregates lining up along the filaments. At this stage of our study, it is still unclear why EAK16-II forms either globular aggregates or filaments. Certainly, pH and amino acid sequence will affect the ability of EAK16 to form either globular aggregates or filaments (unpublished data).
The height of the aggregates reported in Table 1 provides some information about the association of protofibrils into fibrils. In the 0.1-mg/ml solution, the fibril height was observed to be
1.6 nm. This value matches the sum of the heights of one globular aggregate and one filament (1 nm and 0.4 nm, respectively), which supports the assumption that the globular aggregates line up along the filaments. It also indicates that the fibril contains three layers of ß-sheets since one ß-sheet layer is
0.5 nm in height. However, at 0.5-mg/ml concentration, the fibril height increases to
3.7 nm, which is 7 times the height of a ß-sheet monolayer. This implies that the globular aggregates can possibly stack one on top of another to form higher fibrils at high concentrations.
Lomakin et al. (1996
, 1997
) proposed a model to describe the aggregation mechanism of Aß in a similar self-assembly system. In their model, the fibrillogenesis starts with the presence of nuclei in solution, which are generated by either seeding or micellization depending upon the concentrations of Aß. The nuclei provide a core for Aß molecules to rearrange themselves into fibrils. The fibril elongation occurs by irreversible binding of Aß monomers to the fibril ends. The derivation of association kinetics is based on whether the bulk concentration of Aß is above or below a critical concentration (CMC).
The Lomakin et al. model was supported by LS measurements. Their data show two different types of LS intensity versus time profiles depending on whether the Aß concentration is above or below the CMC. Above the CMC, all LS intensity profiles can be normalized and fall on a master curve. Below the CMC, the LS intensity increases with time at a rate that decreases with concentration. This behavior observed for Aß is very similar to that of EAK16-II reported in Fig. 10. The similarities exhibited by these two association processes bear the promise that simple oligopeptides like EAK16-II can be used as a model system to study how proteins be responsible for neurological disorders (e.g., Alzheimer's disease) self-assemble.
Kinetics of aggregation
Based on the time-dependent light scattering experiments, the LS data shown in Fig. 10 were fitted with a biexponential function given in Eqs. 1a and 1b, to describe the bimodal profile of LS intensity versus time for EAK16-II concentrations ranging from 0.08 mg/ml to 0.2 mg/ml:
![]() | (1a) |
![]() | (1b) |
The occurrence of the two different rate constants for the aggregation of EAK16-II as shown in Fig. 9 A and Fig. 10 may be the result of the shear effect. The application of shear or agitation has been reported to induce aggregation in blood and latex solutions (Lougheed et al., 1980
; Jen and Mclntire, 1984
; Le Berre et al., 1998
; Serra et al., 1997
). It is because agitating the solutions provides energy, which increases the activity of molecules in a process of aggregation. Moreover, shearing can also align long chain molecules such as polymers, promoting their ability to interact with each other. In each LS measurement, the sample was subject to shear on two occasions, first when it was pipetted out of the stock solution into the cell and a second time during the reverse process. Besides, the solutions were sheared more at the beginning of the experiment (once per hour) than at the end (once per day), which resulted in a rate of increase in I(t)[EAK]0 10 times larger initially.
Our preliminary experiments about shear effect indicate that the amount of shearing applied to the solutions affects the LS intensity versus time profiles. This may explain why the cutoff concentration, above which the LS intensity increases significantly with time, was found to be 0.08 gm/ml in Fig. 9, C and D, and Fig. 10, not the CAC, which was determined to be 0.1 mg/ml by surface tension experiments. However, with the same amount of shear applied to all solutions in this study, the concentration effect on the aggregation process is still significant (Fig. 9, B and C).
Induction time
When the concentration of peptide is sufficiently low, the surface tension does not change within an initial time period, which is referred to as the induction time. This phenomenon exists in most biomolecular systems, and many mechanisms have been proposed to explain it. Miller et al. (2001)
proposed a theory for the kinetics of globular protein adsorption based on a diffusion model. In this theory, the induction time represents the time required for the surface monolayer to attain a certain minimum coverage, above which the surface tension is reduced. Another group explained the existence of an induction time by the phase change theory (Erickson et al., 2000
). The phase transition is a first-order phase change from a surface gaseous to a liquid-expanded state which occurs as the proteins gradually adsorb at the surface. The surface tension remains constant while the surface is in the gaseous state, but decreases when the surface is in the liquid-expanded state, yielding an induction period. Similarly, Ybert and di Meglio (1998)
hypothesized that during the induction time, the protein is adsorbed in a surface gaseous state, so that the surface pressure changes only slightly as the surface coverage increases.
In earlier studies carried out with BSA solutions, MacRitchie and Alexander (1963)
proposed that the induction period represents a diffusion-controlled adsorption time. This period ends when the interface is covered with a certain number of proteins. This adsorbed protein monolayer creates an energy barrier for further adsorption. The surface pressure increases only after this certain coverage is reached. On the other hand, Van der Vegt et al. (1996)
proposed that the proteins do not change the surface pressure until they have changed their conformations, and a mechanism similar to that was suggested by Graham and Phillips (1979)
.
Our surface tension experiments show that the induction time decreases with the increase of EAK16-II concentration, and the induction time disappears only at concentrations above the CAC (Fig. 6). This could be explained by considering both the diffusion-controlled mechanism and the molecular self-rearrangement. For one molecule adsorbing onto the surface, the molecule has to first diffuse from the bulk to the surface then rearrange itself at the surface, which leads to the decrease of surface tension. Based on the diffusion-controlled theory, the bulk concentration is the main driving force for molecules to diffuse onto the surface. Therefore, more EAK16-II molecules adsorb onto the surface as the bulk concentration increases, resulting in an inverse change relationship between the induction time and the bulk concentration shown in Fig. 6. On the other hand, EAK16-II monomers may rearrange themselves at the surface via intermolecular interactions, which could lead to the formation of ß-sheet monolayers. This formation provides a better surface coverage, and hence changes the surface tension significantly. When the concentration is above the CAC, EAK16-II monomers can first self-organize to form ß-sheets in the bulk (nucleation process) then diffuse onto the surface. This mechanism is opposed to the adsorption of individual molecule onto the surface at concentrations below the CAC. The adsorption of ß-sheet monolayers could reduce the time needed for further rearranging molecules to obtain a better coverage of the surface, leading to an immediate effect on the surface tension. This also implies that the molecular self-association occurring in the bulk facilitates the surface adsorption process.
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This research was financially supported by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and the Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI).
Submitted on August 23, 2002; accepted for publication February 10, 2003.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Altman, M., P. Lee, A. Rich, and S. Zhang. 2000. Conformational behavior of ionic self-complementary peptides. Protein Sci. 9:10951105.[Abstract]
Cabrerizo-Vilchez, M. A., Z. Policova, D. Y. Kwok, P. Chen, and A. W. Neumann. 1995. The temperature dependence of the interfacial tension of aqueous human albumin solution/decane. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 5:19.[Medline]
Campbell, N. A. 1993. Biology, 3rd ed. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc., Redwood City.
Chen, P., S. Lahooti, Z. Policova, M. A. Cabrerizo-Vilchez, and A. W. Neumann. 1996. Concentration dependence of the film pressure of human serum albumin at the water/decane interface. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 6:279289.
Clint, J. H. 1992. Surfactant Aggregation. Blackie & Son Ltd., New York.
Erickson, J. S., S. Sundaram, and K. J. Stebe. 2000. Evidence that the induction time in the surface pressure evolution of lysozyme solutions is caused by a surface phase transition. Langmuir. 16:50725078.
Fainerman, V. B., E. H. Lucassen-Reynders, and R. Miller. 1998. Adsorption of surfactants and proteins at fluid interfaces. Colloids Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 143:141165.
Forbes, J. G., A. J. Jin, and K. Wang. 2001. Atomic force microscope study of the effect of the immobilization substrate on the structure and force-extension curves of a multimeric protein. Langmuir. 17:30673075.
Fraser, P. E., D. R. Mclachlan, W. K. Surewicz, C. A. Mizzen, A. D. Snow, J. T. Nguyen, and D. A. Kirschner. 1994. Conformation and fibrillogenesis of Alzheimer A ß peptides with selected substitution of charged residues. J. Mol. Biol. 244:6473.[Medline]
Fraser, P. E., J. T. Nguyen, W. K. Surewicz, and D. A. Kirschner. 1991. pH-dependent structural transitions of Alzheimer amyloid peptides. Biophys. J. 60:11901201.
Ghanta, J., C. Shen, L. L. Kiessling, and R. M. Murphy. 1996. A strategy for designing inhibitors of ß-amyloid toxicity. J. Biol. Chem. 271:2952529528.
Good, T. A., and R. M. Murphy. 1995. Aggregation state-dependent binding of ß-amyloid peptides to protein and lipid components of rat cortical homogenates. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 207:209215.[Medline]
Graham, D. E., and M. C. Phillips. 1979. Proteins at liquid interfaces. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 70:403439.
Halverson, K., P. E. Fraser, D. A. Kirschner, and P. T. Lansbury, Jr. 1990. Molecular determinants of amyloid deposition in Alzheimer's disease: conformational studies of synthetic ß-protein fragments. Biochemistry. 29:26392644.[Medline]
Holmes, T. C., S. de Lacalle, X. Su, G. Liu, A. Rich, and S. Zhang. 2000. Extensive neurite outgrowth and active synapse formation on self-assembling peptide scaffolds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:67286773.
Jen, C. J., and L. V. Mclntire. 1984. Characteristics of shear-induced aggregation in whole blood. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 103:115124.[Medline]
Kowalewski, T., and D. M. Holtzman. 1999. In situ atomic force microscopy study of Alzheimer's ß-amyloid peptide on different substrates: new insights into mechanism of b-sheet formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:36883693.
Lahati, S., O. I. Del Rio, A. W. Neumann, and P. Cheng. 1996. Axisymmetric drop shape analysis (ADSA). In Applied Surface Thermodynamics, A. W. Neumann and J. K. Spelt, editors. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York. 441507.
Le Berre, F., G. Chauveteau, and E. Pefferkorn. 1998. Shear induced aggregation/ fragmentation of hydrated colloids. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 199:1321.
Lomakin, A., D. B. Teplow, D. A. Kirchner, and G. B. Benedek. 1997. Kinetic theory of fibrillogenesis of amyloid ß-protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:79427947.
Lomakin, A., D. S. Chung, G. B. Benedek, and D. A. Kirschner. 1996. On the nucleation and growth of amyloid ß-protein fibrils: detection of nuclei and quantitation of rate constants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:11251129.
Lougheed, W. D., H. Woutfe-Flanagan, J. R. Clement, and A. M. Albisser. 1980. Insulin aggregation in artificial delivery systems. Diabetologia. 19:19.[Medline]
MacRitchie, F., and A. E. Alexander. 1963. Kinetics of adsorption of proteins at interfces. Part I. the role of bulk diffusion in adsorption. J. Colloid Sci. 18:453457.
Makievski, A. V., V. B. Fainerman, R. Miller, M. Bree, L. Liggieri, and F. Ravera. 1997. Determination of equilibrium surface tension values by extrapolation via long time approximations. Colloids Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 122:269273.
Makievski, A. V., V. B. Fainerman, M. Bree, R. Wustneck, J. Kragel, and R. Miller. 1998. Adsorption of proteins at the liquid/air interface. J. Phys. Chem. B. 102:417425.
Markiewicz, P., and M. C. Goh. 1994. Atomic force microscopy probe tip visualization and improvement of images using a simple deconvolution procedure. Langmuir. 10:57.
Miller, R., E. V. Aksenenko, V. B. Fainerman, and U. Pison. 2001. Kinetics of adsorption of globular proteins at liquid/fluid interfaces. Colloids Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 183185:381390.
Mulligan, C. N., and B. F. Gibbs. 1993. Factors influencing the economics of biosurfactants. In Biosurfactants: Production, Properties, and Applications. N. Kosaric, editor. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.
Myers, D. 1992. Surfactant Science and Technology. 2nd ed. VCH Publishers, Inc., New York.
Press, W. H., B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vetterling. 1992. Numerical Recipes. The Art of Scientific Computing (Fortran Version). University Press. Cambridge
Reif, I., M. Mulqueen, and D. Blankschtein. 2001. Molecular-thermodynamic prediction of critical micelle concentrations of commercial surfactants. Langmuir. 17:58015812.
Rotenberg, Y., L. Boruvka, and A. W. Neumann. 1983. Determination of surface tension and contact angle from the shapes of axisymmetric fluid interfaces. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 93:169183.
Serra, T., J. Colomer, and X. Casamitjana. 1997. Aggregation and breakup of particles in a shear flow. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 187:466473.[Medline]
Shen, C., and R. M. Murphy. 1995. Solvent effects on self-assembly of ß-amyloid peptide. Biophys. J. 69:640651.
Soreghan, B., J. Kosmoski, and C. Glabe. 1994. Surfactant properties of Alzheimer's A ß peptides and the mechanism of amyloid aggregation. J. Biol. Chem. 269:2855128554.
Van der Vegt, W., W. Norde, H. C. Van der Mei, and H. J. Busscher. 1996. Kinetics of interfacial tension changes during protein adsorption from sessile droplets on FEP-Teflon. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 179:5765.
Vesenka, J., M. Guthold, C. L. Tang, D. Keller, and E. Delaine. 1992. Substrate preparation for reliable imaging of DAN molecules with the scanning force microscope. Ultramicroscopy. 4244:12431249.
Yang, D., C. M. Yip, T. H. Jackson Huang, A. Chakrabartty, and P. E. Fraser. 1999. Manipulating the amyloid-ß aggregation pathway with chemical chaperones. J. Biol. Chem. 274:3297032974.
Ybert, C., and J. M. di Meglio. 1998. Study of protein adsorption by dynamic surface tension measurements: diffusive regime. Langmuir. 14:471475.
Zhang, S., and A. Rich. 1997. Direct conversion of an oligopeptide from a ß-sheet to an
-helix: a model for amyloid formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:2328.
Zhang, S., and M. Altman. 1999. Peptide self-assembly in functional polymer science and engineering. Reactive and Functional Polymers. 41:91102.
Zhang, S., C. Lockshin, R. Cook, and A. Rich. 1994. Unusually stable ß-sheet formation in an ionic self-complementary oligopeptide. Biopolymers. 34:663672.[Medline]
Zhang, S., T. C. Holmes, C. Lockshin, and A. Rich. 1993. Spontaneous assembly of a self-complementary oligopeptide to form a stable macroscopic membrane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 90:33343338.
Zhang, S., T. C. Holmes, C. M. Dipersio, R. O. Hynes, X. Su, and A. Rich. 1995. Self-complementary oligopeptide matrices support mammalian cell attachment. Biomaterials. 16:13851393.[Medline]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||