| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |

* Helsinki Biophysics & Biomembrane Group, Institute of Biomedicine/Biochemistry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; and
MEMPHYS-Center for Biomembrane Physics
Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Paavo K. J. Kinnunen, Helsinki Biophysics & Biomembrane Group, Institute of Biomedicine/Biochemistry, Biomedicum, PO Box 63 (Haartmaninkatu 8), FIN-00014, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. Tel.: 358-9-191-2542; Fax: 358-9-191-2-5444; E-mail: paavo.kinnunen{at}helsinki.fi.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
34 mN/m. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Biomembranes represent the paradigm for spontaneously assembling supramolecular structures, the main driving force being the hydrophobic effect arising from the lack of interactions of hydrocarbons with water and causing reduction in water entropy in the hydrocarbon/water interface. The forces determining the packing of a phospholipid bilayer are compiled in the lateral pressure profile (Seddon and Templer, 1995
; Marsh, 1996
; Cantor, 1997a
). In brief, at equilibrium, steric repulsion between the phospholipid headgroups, and entropic repulsion between the acyl chains, balance the interfacial tension between water and the membrane hydrocarbon phase. Under these conditions there thus remains a significant exposure of hydrophobic surface (Marrink and Berendsen, 1994
), resulting in interfacial tension and representing a direct expression of the hydrophobic effect (Tanford, 1980
; Cevc and Marsh, 1987
). The steric repulsion between the phospholipid headgroups is directly linked to the chemical potential of water. This is due to the fact that the effective size of the headgroup of phospholipids such as phosphatidylcholine involves a significant contribution by the headgroup hydration shell (Lehtonen and Kinnunen, 1994
; 1995
; Kinnunen, 1996b
).
Penetration of water molecules into lipid bilayers is not homogeneous and although lipid headgroups are charged the organization of water molecules in their hydration shell has been proposed to be similar to an idealized clathrate structure of water around apolar solutes (Alper et al., 1993
). Water associated with lipid headgroups and contacting the interfacial region has been postulated to be the main determinant of the dipole potential of lipid membranes (Gawrisch et al., 1992
; Brockman, 1994
). The number of water molecules in the hydration shell further depends on the phase state of lipids, the type of lipid headgroup (McIntosh, 1996
), acyl chain composition, and the presence of cis-double bonds, and the presence of compounds such as sterols, with the headgroup hydration being augmented if the distance between adjacent headgroups is increased by the additives (Jendrasiak and Hasty, 1974
; Jendrasiak and Mendible, 1976
). The hydration of the hydrophilic headgroups plays an important role in the structure and function of phospholipid bilayers (Jendrasiak, 1996
). Dehydration of phospholipid membranes has been shown to induce phase separation (Webb et al., 1993
; Lehtonen and Kinnunen, 1995
) and lamellar-to-hexagonal-II phase transition (Webb et al., 1993
). Dehydration of phospholipid membranes is a prerequisite to the fusion of membranes (Wilschut and Hoekstra, 1986
).
Water activity is lowered by the addition of any nonwater molecule into the system, and any region where water is excluded will be osmotically stressed (Parsegian et al., 2000
; Rand et al., 2000
). The exclusion of water from some regions may result from qualitatively different mechanisms. More specifically, when a solute is too large to enter into a particular region in the system, for example, into a cavity of a protein, the solute is sterically excluded. Preferential hydration means that the interface prefers to interact with water rather than with the solute (Parsegian et al., 2000
; Rand et al., 2000
). On the other hand, a solute may prefer to interact with water more strongly than with the interface. Both mechanisms can lead to the formation around a macromolecule of a depletion layer in which the concentration of the solute is lower than in the bulk phase. The above mechanisms can occur simultaneously in the same system, e.g., in addition to the preferential hydration-created depletion layer, the solute may also be too large to enter into some cavities, resulting in its steric exclusion. Dependence of the osmotic action on the solute size and chemical nature should be distinguished from the osmotic effect (Rand et al., 2000
).
The introduction of different solutes in an aqueous medium also induces structural changes in water, and these compounds have been classified as "structure breakers" (chaotropes), or "structure makers" (kosmotropes), depending on their effect on the hydrogen-bonded networks of liquid water (Luu et al., 1990
, and references therein; Collins, 1997
). As kosmotropes increase the surface free energy, these compounds tend to decrease the interfacial area (increase interfacial tension), whereas chaotropes have the opposite effect, accumulating in the interface and decreasing surface tension. The magnitude of these changes depends on the degree of solute depletion (kosmotropes) or enrichment (chaotropes) at the interfaces, in comparison to the bulk phase (Koynova et al., 1997
). Kosmotropes increase both the pretransition and main transition temperatures and decrease liquid-crystalline
HII phase transition temperature of phospholipids (Koynova et al., 1997
).
Taken together, any osmotically active solute could influence lipid lateral packing in membranes and thus the bilayer lateral pressure profile by two fundamental mechanisms, namely, by depleting osmotically water from the lipid hydration shell or by influencing the interfacial tension. In this study we compared these two mechanisms by using three kosmotropes, betaine, choline chloride, and sucrose. Liposome bilayers were made of the unsaturated 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC) and also incorporated the fluorescent probe Laurdan (molar fraction X = 0.01). The emission spectrum of this fluorophore has been shown to provide sensitive means to assess the hydration (Parasassi et al., 1998
) and intermolecular distance (Bagatolli et al., 1998
) in phospholipid surfaces.
| MATERIAL AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
) was Millipore-filtered (Millipore, Bedford, MA). Lipid stock solutions were made in chloroform. Concentration of POPC was determined gravimetrically using a high precision electrobalance (CAHN 2000, Cahn Instruments, Cerritos, CA). Concentration of Laurdan was determined spectrophotometrically using
= 20,000 M-1 at 364 nm (in CH3OH).
Preparation of liposomes
POPC and Laurdan (X = 0.01) were mixed in chloroform whereafter the solvent was evaporated under a gentle stream of nitrogen. To remove residues of chloroform the lipids were further maintained under reduced pressure for at least 2 h. Notably, in multilamellar vesicles (MLV) the bilayers can be pushed into close proximity, which could influence the membrane dynamics. Also, in MLVs the access of osmolytes into the interlamellar space can be limited, thus causing osmotic gradients. In addition, MLVs in contact with excess solvent can spontaneously deplete small solute molecules from their interior by an entropy-driven mechanism (Diamant, 2002
). To exclude the impact of the above factors large unilamellar vesicles (LUV) were used. MLVs were first obtained by hydrating the lipids with the indicated buffer for 30 min at room temperature. After hydration the MLV dispersions were freeze-thawed five times. These dispersions were subsequently processed to LUVs by extrusion through a Millipore (Bedford, MA) 100-nm-pore-size polycarbonate filters using a Liposofast-Pneumatic (Avestin, Ottawa, Canada), essentially as described by MacDonald et al. (1991)
. Whether the LUVs were freeze-thawed or not did not have any effect (data not shown).
Osmolarity and surface tension measurements
Freezing point depression method (Micro-Osmometer Model 3300, Advanced Instruments, Norwood, MA) was used to obtain osmotic pressure (
) vs. osmolality curve for choline chloride. All measurements were done in duplicate. The difference between these duplicate assays was 016 mosm/kg, with an average difference of 6 mosm/kg. For betaine and sucrose the
vs. osmolality data were retrieved from the homepage of the Laboratory of Physical & Structural Biology at the National Institutes of Health (http://dir.nichd.nih.gov/Lpsb/docs/OsmoticStress.html), measured by the vapor pressure method.
The effect of betaine, sucrose, and choline chloride on the surface tension of water was measured by a multichannel microtensiometer (MultiPi WS1, Kibron, Helsinki, Finland). Sample volume was 50 µl per well. The instrument uses the du Nouy technique with the wire probes attached to the microbalance sensor heads. All measurements were done at ambient temperature (
22°C) and for each solute concentration at least six individual samples were measured. Surface tension recorded for pure water was 72.8 ± 0.1 mN/m, in keeping with the literature (Adamson, 1990
).
Laurdan fluorescence measurements
Laurdan steady-state fluorescence measurements assessing the impact of the indicated solutes were carried out with a PerkinElmer LS50B spectrofluorometer (Perkin Elmer, Boston, MA) equipped with a magnetically stirred cuvette compartment thermostated at 25°C with a circulating waterbath (Haake F6/Haake C25, Karlsruhe, Germany). The data were analyzed by dedicated software from PerkinElmer. The temperature scans of Laurdan fluorescence were performed by a script-controlled Varian Cary Eclipse spectrofluorometer equipped with Peltier temperature control elements and a four-cell cuvette holder. The excitation wavelength was 350 nm and emission was monitored at 440 and 480 nm. The emission generalized polarization (GP) was calculated using the equation
![]() | (1) |
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
) of an aqueous buffer at equal osmotic pressures. These compounds are kosmotropes, which do not partition into the interface and because of the depletion layer increase surface tension (Landau and Lifshitz, 1980
|
max of this probe is insensitive to phospholipid headgroup, charge, and pH, it depends on the phase state of the bilayer. Accordingly,
max is
440 nm in the gel phase and
490 nm in liquid crystalline phase phospholipid bilayers (Parasassi et al., 1998
Differences in GP for Laurdan incorporated in POPC LUVs induced by the three solutes present at concentrations yielding equal osmotic pressures are shown in Fig. 1. In brief, at equal osmotic pressures the GP values increased in the order of sucrose > betaine > choline chloride, and the increments correlated also with the increase in
(Table 1). At 0.5 osm/kg choline chloride, a minor increment in GP was observed without a corresponding increase in surface tension. This is likely to be explained by the better sensitivity of fluorescence spectroscopic measurement. Instead, the change in surface tension at 0.5 osm/kg choline lies at detection limits of surface tension measurement. Importantly, when the values for GP were plotted against the change in 
a significant correlation became evident (Fig. 2).
|
|
by Onsager and Samaris (Landau and Lifshitz, 1980
. This, however, is in disagreement with the experiments. The factors responsible for the failure of the Onsager-Samaris theory for even simple salts remain ambiguous. Boström et al. (2001)
To conclude, if the osmotic pressure would be the dominant factor modulating hydration of the membrane interface, no differences would be expected between these solutes at equal osmotic pressures. However, at equal osmotic pressures different solutes clearly show different effects on GP, whereas GP values fall on single curve when plotted against 
. A possible connection between GP values and 
is likely to be provided by area changes per POPC molecule and consequent changes in bilayer hydration. Accordingly, if the area per POPC decreases, water penetration to the level of Laurdan decreases, and also the freedom of penetrating water molecules to orientate optimally around Laurdan decreases. Water penetration could additionally respond to changes in membrane tension and membrane stiffness, and consequent changes in thermal fluctuations of bilayers. Solutes influence
, which in turn has an impact on water dynamics and structure at the interface, area/lipid, and energetics of area changes due to e.g., thermal fluctuations such as bilayer undulation. Increasing
can be expected to affect bilayer rigidity, leading to diminished membrane fluctuations and attenuated lipid dynamics, evident as an increase in GP.
Surface tension for water decreases with temperature (Weast, 1979
). As an independent test for the correlation between Laurdan GP and
, we measured Laurdan GP values for POPC LUVs in the temperature range from 5 to 50°C in the absence of the kosmotropes. As expected, the values for GP decreased with increasing T. Subsequently, we plotted the Laurdan fluorescence as a function of 
, the latter increasing due to decreasing T and expressed GP values as
GP, representing the difference between GP at 25°C and at the given temperatures (Fig. 3). Measurement of GP is essentially ratiometric and we may therefore expect negligible influence due to thermal deactivation of the excited state of the fluorophore. The observed correlation suggests that the temperature-dependent changes in GP values for fluid, unsaturated POPC LUVs are likely to be explained by the temperature dependence of
. Also shown in Fig. 3 are the data for
GP (difference between GP in the presence and absence of solutes) measured at 25°C and as a function of 
, the latter being increased by increasing concentrations of the three kosmotropes. These two sets of data coincide in keeping with a common mechanistic basis. The only exception is sucrose at 2 osm/kg, which does not overlay with the
GP vs.
-curve (Fig. 3). It should be noted that this concentration sucrose is very viscous (
4.8 mNs/m2), whereas the next highest viscosity is for betaine at 2 osm/kg (
3.4 mNs/m2). Furthermore, sucrose at this high concentration may also directly interact with the phospholipid headgroups (Crowe et al., 1985
; Strauss et al., 1986
; Anchordoguy et al., 1987
).
|
increases, the number of interfacial water molecules is reduced due to augmented lipid lateral packing (i.e., decrease in the mean molecular area per lipid). In keeping with the membrane lateral pressure profile, this has to be compensated with increasing repulsion at headgroup and/or acyl chain level.
Based on changes in free energy as a function of the area of exposure of hydrocarbon to water (Tanford, 1979
; 1980
) we get an estimate of the involved energies. The interfacial free energy is G =
A. For small area changes the
can be approximated to be independent of area, though in reality it will depend on the area per molecule becoming smaller as area per molecule decreases. From this approximation it follows
. Furthermore, when the changes are small, we can also approximate
. From our measurements with Laurdan we can calculate the intermolecular distance (ID) values for the different solutions and thus also obtain estimates for the mean molecular areas (Table 2). More specifically, Bagatolli et al. (1998)
reported a linear correlation between ID and GP, the former defined as the distance between two neighboring acyl chain residues of adjacent phospholipids. ID was calculated by subtracting the diameters associated with the surface area circumscribed by the rotation of the lipid molecule (Bagatolli et al., 1998
). Comparison of the Laurdan GP value for POPC LUVs at 25°C in the absence of kosmotropes to the data by Bagatolli et al. (1998)
yields an intermolecular distance of
2.5 Å. Following this line of analysis we may further estimate the decrease in ID due to increasing
, which reveals a linear reciprocal correlation (Fig. 4).
|
|
and height R, giving A = 2 x
x R2 (Fig. 5). The derived value of 65.3 Å2 for POPC in buffer agrees very well with the value 62 ± 1 Å2 (at 50°C, 2030% by weight in distilled water) obtained by x-ray scattering (Pabst et al., 2000
|
A and water-hexadecane interfacial tension (
water/hexadecane = 52.5 mN/m, Lee et al., 2001b
G = 0, and therefore 
A = -A
. This also includes the assumption that factors such as trans
gauche isomerization have only minor contribution to the surface free energy. We may now calculate the changes in
needed to balance the area changes. The values obtained using
water/hexadecane = 52.5 mN/m for initial surface tension for the lipid-water interface are clearly too large (Table 2). However, assuming that the changes in surface tension are additive, i.e., 
lipid/water = 
air/water, we can obtain an estimate for the initial surface tension at the lipid/water interface. Rearranging A
lipid/water = -
lipid/water
A yields
![]() |
lipid/water we minimize the sum
![]() |
air/water the error in measured
air/water. Due to the large deviation in GP values (and therefore
A values) for the 2 osm/kg sucrose solution, it was left out from the minimization procedure. The minimum for the weighed sum of squares is achieved with the value
lipid/water = 18.5 mN/m, which gives us the values for 
shown in Table 3. Subtracting the estimated
lipid/water = 18.5 mN/m from the
water/hexadecane = 52.5 mN/m results in
=
water/hexadecane -
lipid/water = 34.0 mN/m for the equilibrium lateral pressure in the bilayers, in excellent agreement with previous estimates (Marsh, 1996
|
Although the depletion layers for air/water and bilayer/water interface could be considered to be similar it has been pointed out that comparison between these interfaces is not straightforward because the water structure associated with the phospholipids is different from bulk water (Feng et al., 1994
), and also different from water structure at the air/water interface. Another example emphasizing the fundamental difference between the air/water and bilayer/water interfaces is provided by poly(ethylene-glycol) (PEG), which is excluded from phospholipid surfaces (Arnold et al., 1990
). Yet, PEG as such is surface-active, accumulating at the air-water interface (Winterhalter et al., 1995
). This comparison readily demonstrates the importance of steric exclusion for the former surface.
Exclusion of certain solutes (so-called compatible, or kosmotropic, solutes) from protein surface and resulting in increment in surface tension has been previously demonstrated to cause augmented molecular packing (Timasheff, 1993
). The denaturation temperature of soluble proteins increases as
is increased (Kaushik and Bhat, 1998
). We have previously studied the effects of betaine on the structural dynamics of a soluble protein, Humicola lanuginosa lipase (Söderlund et al., 2002
). In brief, betaine decreased the mean hydrodynamic volume of this protein and enhanced its molecular packing. On the basis of the results of our current study, we can conclude that for the three studied osmolytes (betaine, choline chloride, and sucrose), the main factor affecting the interfacial dynamics, water penetration into the phospholipid bilayers, and lateral packing of lipids is surface tension, whereas osmotic pressure had less effect. The impact of the increase in
by betaine on the protein-water interface is thus essentially analogous to the augmented packing and decreased hydration of the lipid bilayer reported here. Changes in the lateral pressure profile have been proposed as a mechanism for membrane-mediated modulation of integral membrane proteins (Cantor, 1997a
; 1997b
). By necessity alterations in bilayer/water interfacial tension due to solutes must also influence the bilayer lateral pressure profile. As pointed out by Cantor (1997a)
, the magnitude of the lateral pressures prevailing in membranes is considerable, corresponding to bulk pressures of hundreds of atm. This is in keeping with the increment of the main transition temperature (Tm) of dimyristoylphosphocholine (DMPC) by betaine. More specifically, Tm for DMPC was increased progressively by this solute, reaching 5° at 5 M betaine (Söderlund et al., unpublished results). Similar increment in Tm for DMPC is observed at a hydrostatic pressure of
200 atm (Reyes Mateo et al., 1993
).
Importantly, cells can and do control the concentration of these type of solutes. The effect of kosmotropes described here for lipid bilayers would thus provide a powerful means for the cell to modulate the physical state and functions of membranes (the activities of membrane proteins) via changes in water structure. However, this effect would not be limited to bilayer-mediated impact on integral membrane proteins only but would also apply to soluble proteins. To this end, it is of interest that the structurally closely related solute phosphorylcholine appears to be required for mitogenic signaling by growth factors and oncogenes (Cuadrado et al., 1993
).
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The authors acknowledge grants from Cultor (T.S.) and Helsinki Biomedical Graduate School (J.-M.I.A). Memphys is supported by the Danish National Research Foundation, and Helsinki Biophysics & Biomembrane Group by the Academy of Finland and TEKES.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Submitted on December 11, 2002; accepted for publication June 6, 2003.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Alper, H. E., D. Bassolino-Klimas, and T. R. Stouch. 1993. The limiting behavior of water hydrating a phospholipid monolayer: a computer simulation study. J. Chem. Phys. 99:55475559.
Anchordoguy, T. J., A. S. Rudolph, J. F. Carpenter, and J. H. Crowe. 1987. Modes of interaction of cryoprotectants with membrane phospholipids during freezing. Cryobiology. 24:324331.[Medline]
Arnold, K., O. Zschoernig, D. Barthel, and W. Herold. 1990. Exclusion of poly(ethylene glycol) from liposome surface. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1022:303310.[Medline]
Asturias, F. J., D. Pascolini, and J. K. Blasie. 1990. Evidence that lipid lateral phase separation induces functionally significant structural changes in the Ca+2ATPase of the sarcoplasmic reticulum. Biophys. J. 58:205217.
Bagatolli, L. A., E. Gratton, and D. Fidelio. 1998. Water dynamics in glycosphingolipid aggregates studied by Laurdan fluorescence. Biophys. J. 75:331341.
Boström, M., D. R. M. Williams, and B. W. Ninham. 2001. Surface tension of electrolytes: specific ion effects explained by dispersion forces. Langmuir. 17:44754478.
Brockman, H. L. 1994. Dipole potential of lipid membranes. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 73:5779.[Medline]
Burack, W. R., and R. L. Biltonen. 1994. Lipid bilayer heterogeneities and modulation of phospholipase A2 activity. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 73:209222.[Medline]
Cantor, R. S. 1997a. The lateral pressure profile in membranes: a physical mechanism of general anesthesia. Biochemistry. 36:23392344.[Medline]
Cantor, R. S. 1997b. Lateral pressures in cell membranes: a mechanism for modulation of protein function. J. Phys. Chem. B. 101:17231725.
Cevc, G., and D. Marsh. 1987. Phospholipid Bilayers: Physical Principles and Models. Wiley-Interscience Publications, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Collins, K. D. 1997. Charge density-dependent strength of hydration and biological structure. Biophys. J. 72:6576.
Crowe, L. M., J. H. Crowe, and D. Chapman. 1985. Interaction of carbohydrates with dry dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholines. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 236:289296.[Medline]
Cuadrado, A., A. Carnero, F. Dolfi, B. Jimenez, and J. C. Lacal. 1993. Phosphorylcholine: a novel second messenger essential for mitogenic activity of growth factors. Oncogene. 8:29592968.[Medline]
Diamant, H. 2002. Tension and solute depletion in multilamellar vesicles. Phys. Rev. E. 65:14.
Feng, S., H. L. Brockman, and R. C. MacDonald. 1994. On osmotic-type equations of state for liquid-expanded monolayers of lipids at the air-water interface. Langmuir. 10:31883194.
Gawrisch, K., D. Ruston, J. Zimmerberg, V. A. Parsegian, R. P. Rand, and N. Fuller. 1992. Membrane dipole potentials, hydration forces, and the ordering of water at membrane surfaces. Biophys. J. 61:12131223.
Goni, F. M., and A. Alonso. 1999. Structure and functional properties of diacylglycerols in membranes. Prog. Lipid Res. 38:148.[Medline]
Janmey, P. A., and C. Chaponnier. 1995. Medical aspects of the actin cytoskeleton. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7:111117.[Medline]
Jendrasiak, G. L., and J. H. Hasty. 1974. The hydration of phospholipids. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 337:7991.[Medline]
Jendrasiak, G. L., and J. C. Mendible. 1976. The phospholipid head-group orientation: effect on hydration and electrical conductivity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 424:149158.[Medline]
Jendrasiak, G. L. 1996. The hydration of phospholipid and its biological significance. J. Nutr. Biochem. 7:599609.
Kaushik, J. K., and R. Bhat. 1998. Thermal stability of proteins in aqueous polyol solutions: role of the surface tension of water in the stabilizing effect of polyols. J. Phys. Chem. B. 102:70587066.
Kinnunen, P. K. J. 1991. On the principles of functional ordering in biological membranes. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 57:375399.[Medline]
Kinnunen, P. K. J. 1996a. On the molecular-level mechanisms of peripheral protein-membrane interactions induced by lipids forming inverted non-lamellar phases. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 81:151166.
Kinnunen, P. K. J. 1996b. On the mechanisms of the lamellar
hexagonal HII phase transition and the biological significance of the HII propensity. In Nonmedical Applications of Liposomes, Vol. 1. D. D. Lasic, and Y. Arenholz, editors. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 153171.
Kita, Y., T. Arakawa, T. Y. Lin, and S. N. Timasheff. 1994. Contribution of the surface free energy perturbation to protein-solvent interactions. Biochemistry. 33:1517815189.[Medline]
Koynova, R., J. Brankov, and B. Tenchov. 1997. Modulation of lipid phase behavior by kosmotropic and chaotropic solutes. Experiment and thermodynamic theory. Eur. Biophys. J. 25:261274.
Landau, L. D., and E. M. Lifshitz. 1980. Course of theoretical physics. In Statistical Physics, Vol. 5, 3rd Ed. Pergamon Press Ltd., Oxford, England. 517527.
Lee, J. C. M., R. J. Law, and D. E. Discher. 2001a. Bending contributions to hydration of phospholipid and block copolymer membranes: unifying correlations between probe fluorescence and vesicle thermoelasticity. Langmuir. 17:35923597.
Lee, S., D. H. Kim, and D. Needham. 2001b. Equilibrium and dynamic interfacial tension measurements at microscopic interfaces using a micropipet technique. 1. A new method for determination of interfacial tension. Langmuir. 17:55375543.
Lehtonen, J. Y. A., and P. K. J. Kinnunen. 1994. Changes in the lipid dynamics of liposomal membranes induced by poly(ethylene glycol). Free volume alterations revealed by inter- and intramolecular excimer forming phospholipid analogs. Biophys. J. 66:19811990.
Lehtonen, J. Y. A., and P. K. J. Kinnunen. 1995. Poly(ethylene glycol)-induced and temperature-dependent phase separation in fluid binary phospholipid membranes. Biophys. J. 68:525535.
Luu, D. V., L. Cambon, and M. Mathlouthi. 1990. Perturbation of liquid-water structure by ionic substances. J. Mol. Struct. 237:411419.
Luzardo, M. C., F. Amalfa, A. M. Nuñez, S. Diaz, A. C. Biondi de Lopez, and E. A. Disalvo. 2000. Effect of trehalose and sucrose on the hydration and dipole potential of lipid bilayers. Biophys. J. 78:24522458.
MacDonald, R. C., R. I. MacDonald, P. Menco, K. Takeshita, N. K. Subbarao, and L. Hu. 1991. Small volume extrusion apparatus for preparation of large, unilamellar vesicles. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1061:297303.[Medline]
Marrink, S. J., and H. J. C. Berendsen. 1994. Simulation of water transport through a lipid membrane. J. Phys. Chem. 98:41554168.
Marsh, D. 1996. Lateral pressures in membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1286:183223.[Medline]
McIntosh, T. J. 1996. Hydration properties of lamellar and non-lamellar phases of phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 81:117131.[Medline]
Mouritsen, O. G., and P. K. J. Kinnunen. 1996. Role of lipid organization and dynamics for membrane functionality. In Biological Membranes. K. Merz, Jr., and B. Roux, editors. Birkhäuser, Boston. MA. 463502.
Mustonen, P., J. A. Virtanen, P. J. Somerharju, and P. K. J. Kinnunen. 1987. Binding of cytochrome c to liposomes as revealed by the quenching of fluorescence from pyrene-labelled phospholipids. Biochemistry. 26:29912997.[Medline]
Pabst, G., M. Rappolt, H. Amenitsch, and P. Laggner. 2000. Structural information from multilamellar liposomes at full hydration: full q-range fitting with high quality x-ray data. Phys. Rev. E. 62:40004009.
Parasassi, T., G. De Stasio, G. Ravagnan, R. M. Rusch, and E. Gratton. 1991. Quantitation of lipid phases in phospholipid vesicles by the generalized polarization of Laurdan fluorescence. Biophys. J. 60:179189.
Parasassi, T., M. Loiero, M. Raimondi, G. Ravagnan, and E. Gratton. 1993. Absence of lipid gel-phase domains in seven mammalian cell lines and in four primary cell types. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1153:143154.[Medline]
Parasassi, T., A. M. Giusti, E. Gratton, E. Monaco, M. Raimondi, G. Ravagnan, and O. Sapora. 1994. Evidence for an increase in water concentration in bilayers after oxidative damage of phospholipids by ionizing radiation. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 65:329334.[Medline]
Parasassi, T., E. K. Krasnowska, L. Bagatolli, and E. Gratton. 1998. Laurdan and Prodan as polarity-sensitive fluorescent membrane probes. J. Fluorescence. 8:365373.
Parsegian, V. A., and R. P. Rand. 1995. Interaction in membrane assemblies. In Handbook of Biological Physics, Vol. 1. R. Lipowsky, and E. Sackmann, editors. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 643690.
Parsegian, V. A., R. P. Rand, and D. C. Rau. 2000. Osmotic stress, crowding, preferential hydration, and binding: a comparison of perspectives. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:39873992.
Rand, R. P., V. A. Parsegian, and D. C. Rau. 2000. Intracellular osmotic action. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 57:10181032.[Medline]
Reyes Mateo, C., P. Tauc, and J. C. Brochon. 1993. Pressure effects on the physical properties of lipid bilayers detected by trans-parinaric acid fluorescence decay. Biophys. J. 65:22482260.
Seddon, J. J., and R. H. Templer. 1995. Polymorphism of lipid-water systems. In Handbook of Biological Physics, Vol. 1. R. Lipowsky, and E. Sackmann, editors. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 97160.
Strauss, G., P. Schurtenberger, and H. Hauser. 1986. The interaction of saccharides with lipid bilayer vesicles: stabilization during freeze-thawing and freeze-drying. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 858:169180.[Medline]
Söderlund, T., K. Zhu, A. Jutila, and P. K. J. Kinnunen. 2002. Effects of betaine on the structural dynamics of Thermomyces (humicola) lanuginosa lipase. Coll. Surf. B Biointer. 26:7583.
Tanford, C. 1979. Interfacial free energy and the hydrophobic effect. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 76:41754176.
Tanford, C. 1980. The Hydrophobic Effect: Formation of Micelles and Biological Membranes. Wiley Interscience, New York.
Timasheff, S. N. 1993. The control of protein stability and association by weak interactions with water: how do solvents affect these processes? Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 22:6797.[Medline]
Timasheff, S. N. 2002. Protein hydration, thermodynamic binding, and preferential hydration. Biochemistry. 41:1347313482.[Medline]
Weast, R. C. 1979. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 59th Ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Webb, M. S., S. W. Hui, and P. L. Steponkus. 1993. Dehydration-induced lamellar-to-hexagonal-II phase transitions in DOPE/DOPC mixtures. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1145:93104.[Medline]
Weber, G., and F. J. Farris. 1979. Synthesis and spectral properties of a hydrophobic fluorescent probe: 6-propionyl-2-(dimethylamino)napthalene. Biochemistry. 18:30753078.[Medline]
Wilschut, J., and D. Hoekstra. 1986. Membrane fusion: lipid vesicles as a model system. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 40:145166.[Medline]
Winterhalter, M., H. Bürner, S. Marzinka, R. Benz, and J. J. Kasianowicz. 1995. Interactions of poly(ethylene-glycols) with air-water interfaces and lipid monolayers: investigations on surface pressure and surface potential. Biophys. J. 69:13721381.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. B. M. Koehorst, R. B. Spruijt, and M. A. Hemminga Site-Directed Fluorescence Labeling of a Membrane Protein with BADAN: Probing Protein Topology and Local Environment Biophys. J., May 15, 2008; 94(10): 3945 - 3955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. B. daCosta, D. E. E. Kaiser, and J. E. Baenziger Role of Glycosylation and Membrane Environment in Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Stability Biophys. J., March 1, 2005; 88(3): 1755 - 1764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |