| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
* Department of Physics and Astronomy, and Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Nancy L. Thompson, Tel.: 919-962-0328; Fax: 919-966-3675; E-mail: nlt@unc.edu.
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONTHEORETICAL BACKGROUNDMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
RII, which was purified and reconstituted into substrate-supported planar membranes. Data were obtained as a function of the IgG solution concentration, the Fc receptor surface density, the observation area size, and the incident intensity. Best fits of the autocorrelation functions to appropriate theoretical forms gave measures of the average surface density of bound IgG, the local solution concentration of IgG, the kinetic rate constant for surface dissociation, and the rate of diffusion through the depth of the evanescent field. The average number of observed fluorescent molecules, both in solution and bound to the surface, scaled with the solution concentration of IgG, observation area size, and Fc receptor surface density as expected. The dissociation rate constant and rate of diffusion through the evanescent field agree with previous results, and all measured parameters were independent of the incident intensity. |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONTHEORETICAL BACKGROUNDMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
; Rabinowitz et al., 1996); regulation of signaling complex formation by the dissociation kinetics of IgE (Hlavacek et al., 2001) and tumor necrosis factor (Krippner-Heidenreich et al., 2002) from their receptors; the efficacy of ligands interacting with G-protein coupled receptors (Shea et al., 2000); and effects on synaptic transmission mediated by nicotinic acetylcholine receptors at the neuromuscular junction (Wenningmann and Dilger, 2001). To dissect the mechanisms governing the sensitivity, specificity, and regulation of the initiation of cell signaling, it is necessary to be able to accurately characterize the kinetics of ligand-receptor interactions. In this work, the usefulness of total internal reflection illumination combined with fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (TIR-FCS) for measuring ligand-receptor kinetic rate constants is demonstrated. In this technique, fluorescent ligands reversibly associate with receptors on a planar transparent surface. A laser beam is internally reflected at the surface/solution interface and a small sample volume is defined by the depth of the evanescent field and a confocal pinhole. The fluorescence fluctuations from the sample volume are monitored and autocorrelated. The autocorrelation function yields information about the ligand-receptor interaction, including the kinetic dissociation rate constant and the average surface density of bound ligand.
Although both evanescent excitation in fluorescence microscopy (Thompson et al., 1993; Thompson and Lagerholm, 1997; Axelrod, 2001) and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (Rigler and Elson, 2001; Thompson et al., 2002; Haustein and Schwille, 2003) are fairly well-developed methods, the combination of these two techniques has thus far been limited to only a handful of theoretical works (Thompson et al., 1981; Thompson, 1982; Starr and Thompson, 2001) and experimental applications. TIR-FCS has been used previously to examine the nonspecific binding of tetramethylrhodamine-labeled immunoglobulin and insulin to serum albumin-coated fused silica (Thompson and Axelrod, 1983), the reversible adsorption kinetics of rhodamine 6G to C-18-modified silica surfaces (Hansen and Harris, 1998a,b), and the local diffusion coefficients and concentrations of fluorescently labeled, monoclonal IgG in solution very close to substrate-supported phospholipid bilayers (Starr and Thompson, 2002).
In this work, we develop TIR-FCS as a method for examining the specific interaction kinetics between a fluorescently labeled, monoclonal IgG in solution and a cell-surface Fc receptor incorporated into substrate-supported phospholipid bilayers. Average populations of fluorescently labeled IgG molecules, both in solution and bound to the surface within the detection volume, are determined as a function of the IgG solution concentration, the Fc receptor surface density, and the size of the observation area over a range of excitation intensities. The measured dissociation rate constant of the interaction agrees well with results from other methods. This work describes the first application of TIR-FCS to the study of specific ligand-receptor kinetics.
|
THEORETICAL BACKGROUND |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONTHEORETICAL BACKGROUNDMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
= Af/At.
|
 | (1) |
0 is the vacuum wavelength of the laser beam, and n1 and n2 are the refractive indices of the substrate and solution, respectively. The beam is incident on the interface, from the higher refractive index region, at an angle 
which is greater than the critical angle, c = sin-1(n2/n1). In this work, 0 = 488.0 nm, n1 = 1.467, n2 = 1.334, = 70°, and d = 112 nm. The evanescent field selectively excites fluorescent molecules that are bound to, or near, the surface/solution interface. The properties of evanescent fields have been discussed previously in detail (Agudin and Platzeck, 1978; Thompson et al., 1993; Knoll, 1998; Girard et al., 2000).
Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (TIR-FM)
To determine the equilibrium dissociation constant for the ligand-receptor interaction, steady-state total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (TIR-FM) is used to measure the evanescently excited fluorescence from a relatively large elliptical area (1/e2 radii 
30 and 100 µm) as a function of the ligand concentration in solution (e.g., Lagerholm et al., 2000). Assuming that the relative fluorescence intensities collected from molecules in solution and bound to the surface are equal, the fluorescence is proportional to the average number of fluorescent molecules in solution, NAf, plus the average number of fluorescent molecules bound to the surface, NCf. In the simplest case, for a given value of , NCf increases to saturation with At according to the shape of a standard binding isotherm and NAf increases linearly with At. The average fluorescence intensities as a function of the solution concentration for samples containing (+) or not containing (-) surface binding sites are
 | (2) |
F+
-F- as a function of the solution concentration At gives a measure of the equilibrium dissociation constant Kd and the product QS. Fitting matched negative control data F- to a line gives a measure of the constant Qd. This quantity, along with the known value of d, can then be used to determine the absolute density of surface binding sites S.
TIR-FCS: General considerations
Information about the kinetics of the ligand-receptor interaction is obtained by using TIR-FCS. A small observation volume is defined by the depth of the evanescent field d, and a circular aperture placed at an intermediate image plane of the microscope that defines an area of radius h 1.2 µm in the sample plane (Fig. 1 b). As individual molecules diffuse through the observation volume, and bind to or dissociate from sites on the surface, the fluorescence intensity fluctuates with time. These fluctuations are monitored and autocorrelated to obtain information about the concentration, diffusion, and binding characteristics of the molecules. The fluorescence fluctuation autocorrelation function is defined as
 | (3) |
F(t) = F(t) - F is the difference between the instantaneous fluorescence intensity at time t and the average intensity, the brackets denote a time average, and 
is the lag time or correlation time. G() decreases monotonically with the correlation time to zero at = 
. Of interest in this work is the manner in which G() depends on the basic kinetic and transport properties of the system. In particular, a theoretical expression describing the autocorrelation data is necessary to extract parameters such as the dissociation rate constant, kd, and the diffusion coefficient, D.
TIR-FCS: Case of no nonfluorescent molecules
The theoretical form of G() for the case in which fluorescence fluctuations, resulting both from diffusion through the evanescent field and from reversible binding to specific surface sites, contribute to the autocorrelation function has recently been described in detail for = 1 (Starr and Thompson, 2001). The general expression has four terms and four characteristic rates:
 | (4) |
 | (5) |
) and GAA() are derived from autocorrelations of fluctuations in the densities of surface-bound fluorescent molecules and in the concentrations of fluorescent molecules in solution, respectively. GCA() and GAC() result from cross-correlations in the concentration fluctuations of these species. Rr is the relaxation rate for the surface association/dissociation process, Rt describes transport in solution and is related to surface rebinding (Lagerholm and Thompson, 1998), Rh is the rate of diffusion in solution parallel to the surface through the observation area, and Re is the rate of diffusion in solution through the depth of the evanescent field. For the IgG-FcRII system described here, At 1 µM, Kd 2.5 µM, ka 0.4 µM-1 s-1, kd 1 s-1, D 5 x 10-7 cm2 s-1, and S 500 molecules µm-2 (Poglitsch et al., 1991; Hsieh et al., 1992; Hsieh and Thompson, 1995). Thus, approximate values of the characteristic rates are Rr = 1.4 s-1, Rh = 35 s-1, Rt = 890 s-1, and Re = 4000 s-1; and Rr << Rh << Rt << Re.
The relative values of the surface reaction rate Rr and the solution transport rates Rt and Rh determine the nature of GCC(). The faster of the two transport rates determines the rate at which molecules in solution are made available for surface binding. However, it is the slower of the reaction rate and the defining solution transport rate that dominates GCC() (Thompson et al., 1981; Pearce et al., 1992). Therefore, when Rr << Rh << Rt, diffusion in solution does not play a significant role in GCC(); the shape of this term is a simple exponential that decays with rate Rr. Furthermore, when Rr << Rh << Rt << Re, the cross-correlation terms are of negligible magnitude. This condition also implies that GAA() has a simple form depending only on Re, although it is not exponential (see below). For this case, with = 1 (Starr and Thompson, 2001),
 | (6) |
 | (7) |
 | (8) |
h2dAf is the average number of fluorescent molecules in solution within the observed volume and NCf = h2Cf is the average number of fluorescent molecules bound to the surface in the observed area. The fraction of surface binding sites remaining unoccupied at equilibrium, ß, is defined above.
TIR-FCS: Case of a mixture of fluorescent and nonfluorescent molecules
From Eqs. 7 and 8 one sees that the magnitude of the autocorrelation function increases as the number of observed fluorescent molecules decreases. Therefore, low concentrations of fluorescent molecules are necessary for the fluorescence fluctuations, and thus the magnitude of the autocorrelation function, to be significant. However, to avoid working far below the mid-range of the binding isotherm where rare, tight, nonspecific binding sites might be occupied and dominate the system, a much higher solution concentration of unlabeled ligand was added. The low proportion of fluorescent molecules then acts as a reporter for the whole system (Thompson, 1982).
We have recently generalized our previous theory describing TIR-FCS when both surface kinetics and diffusion in solution contribute to the measured autocorrelation function (Starr and Thompson, 2001) to include the situation in which fluorescent and nonfluorescent molecules compete for the surface binding sites (Lieto and Thompson, unpublished data). In this case, when the kinetic association and dissociation rate constants, as well as the diffusion coefficients in solution, are equivalent for fluorescent and nonfluorescent molecules, the form for G() is similar to but nonetheless more complex than that shown in Eqs. 6–8. The limit for kd << Rh, Rt, and Re is given by Eqs. 6, 7, and
 | (9) |
is the fraction of ligand that is fluorescently labeled as defined above. This equation agrees with the previously published expression for the case in which fluorescent and nonfluorescent ligands compete for surface binding sites, the kinetic rates for the two species are equivalent, and NAf << NCf (Thompson, 1982). For the experimental conditions used in the work described here, ß 
and << 1. Under these conditions, G() is given by Eqs. 6, 7, and the limit of Eq. 9 for << 1:
 | (10) |
) (Eq. 10).
Autocorrelation function characteristics
Theoretical autocorrelation functions for samples with (pos) and without (neg) binding sites are shown in Fig. 2 a. Gneg(), for samples without surface binding sites, is predicted by Eq. 7 with NCf = 0. Gpos(), for samples with surface binding sites, under the experimental conditions used in this work, is predicted by Eqs. 6, 7, and 10. The shapes of G() for these two situations are readily distinguishable as the surface binding term GCC() contributes a long-time component. Also shown is the ratio of the magnitudes of the autocorrelation functions for these two cases, Gpos(0)/Gneg(0), as a function of NCf/NAf (Fig. 2 b). The magnitude of Gpos() for samples with binding sites will always be lower than the magnitude of Gneg() for corresponding samples without binding sites. This result follows from the fact that there are more fluorescent molecules observed on average in the samples with surface binding.
|
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONTHEORETICAL BACKGROUNDMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
). Hybridomas were maintained in DMEM/F12 medium supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 100 units ml-1 penicillin G, 100 µg ml-1 streptomycin (GPPS), and 5% fetal calf serum that had been heat-inactivated (30 min, 56°C). 1B7.11 IgG was purified from cell supernatants by affinity chromatography with DNP-conjugated human serum albumin. The IgG was eluted with DNP-glycine, which was later removed by extensive dialysis followed by ion exchange chromatography with Dowex 1X8-200 in a low-pH phosphate buffer (0.01 M sodium phosphate, 0.1 M NaCl, and 0.01% NaN3, at pH 5.7) (Lagerholm et al., 2000; Schweitzer-Stenner et al., 1992). Each liter of supernatant yielded 15–20 mg of antibody as determined spectrophotometrically by assuming that the molar absorptivity at 280 nm was 1.4 ml mg-1 cm-1. Previous work in similar systems has shown that a high percentage of IgG prepared in this manner retains the ability to bind FcRII (Gesty-Palmer and Thompson, 1997). 1B7.11 IgG was fluorescently labeled (A-) using the Alexa Fluor 488 Protein Labeling Kit (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). The solution concentration of A-IgG and the molar ratio of Alexa Fluor 488 to IgG (0.2–0.6 dyes/protein) were estimated spectrophotometrically according to the manufacturer's protocol. To prepare mixtures of labeled and unlabeled IgG, it was assumed that no antibodies were labeled with more than one dye molecule. All antibody solutions were passed through 0.02-µm filters immediately before use.
Monoclonal anti-moFcRII antibodies were obtained from the rat-mouse hybridoma 2.4G2 (American Type Culture Collection) (Unkeless, 1979). Hybridomas were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with GPPS and 5% fetal calf serum (see above). 2.4G2 antibodies were purified from cell supernatants by affinity chromatography with anti-(rat IgG 
light chain) antibodies (Poglitsch et al., 1991). 2.4G2 antibodies were passed through a 0.1-µm filter immediately before use.
Chicken egg albumin (ovalbumin; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was used to assist with blocking nonspecific binding sites. To reduce background fluorescence levels, ovalbumin dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 0.05 M sodium phosphate, 0.15 M NaCl, and 0.01% NaN3, at pH 7.4) was passed down a Sephadex G-75 column. Immediately before use, the ovalbumin was passed through a 0.1-µm filter.
Fc receptors
J774A.1, a macrophage-like cell line expressing the cell surface Fc receptor mouse FcRII, was obtained from the University of North Carolina Tissue Culture Facility. Cells were maintained in DMEM/F12 medium supplemented with GPPS and 5% fetal calf serum (see above). FcRII was purified from homogenized J774A.1 cells by 2.4G2 Fab affinity chromatography with modifications to a previously developed procedure (Poglitsch et al., 1991). Approximately 109 cells were homogenized in PBS with 0.5% Igepal CA-630 containing Complete Protease Inhibitor Tablets (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). The homogenate was clarified at 1600 g for 5 min and then twice at 27,000 g for 60 min. The supernatant was carefully removed to minimize contamination by floating lipids and was applied to a 2.4G2 Fab affinity column equilibrated with wash buffer (PBS with 0.5% Igepal CA-630). The column was rinsed with 500 ml of wash buffer and then eluted with 0.1 M sodium acetate, and 0.5 M NaCl, at pH 4.0, containing 20 mM n-octyl ß-D-glucopyranoside (octylglucoside). The eluate was immediately neutralized with 2 M Tris at pH 7.4 and dialyzed against two 250-ml volumes of buffer A (0.05 M NaCl, 0.165 M sucrose, 10 mM HEPES, and 0.01% NaN3, at pH 7.4) containing 20 mM octylglucoside. All procedures were carried out at 4°C, and the purity of the product was estimated with SDS-PAGE and silver staining. A bicinchoninic acid assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL) with bovine serum albumin as the standard was used to determine the yield (typically 75–300 µg from 2–5 x 109 cells).
Liposomes
Purified FcRII was reconstituted into phospholipid liposomes by detergent dialysis (Poglitsch et al., 1991). Egg phosphatidylcholine and cholesterol (Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL) were mixed in a ratio of 6:1 (w:w) in chloroform/methanol (2:1, v:v), dried under vacuum for 4–5 h, and solubilized with 25 µg ml-1 FcRII in buffer A with octylglucoside at a protein:lipid ratio of 1:6 (w:w). After treatment in a water-bath sonicator for 2 min on ice, samples were dialyzed against 4 1-L volumes of buffer A. Liposomes were also prepared similarly without FcRII. Liposome suspensions were clarified by spinning twice for 5 min at 13,600 g immediately before use.
Sample preparation
Supported phospholipid bilayers were formed on planar fused silica surfaces by vesicle adsorption and fusion (Poglitsch et al., 1991). For TIR-FCS measurements, the sample chamber was created between a glass coverslip (24 x 60 mm, No. 0) (Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ) supported on an aluminum mount and a fused silica substrate (SiO2; 0.75 in x 1 in x 1 mm) (Quartz Scientific, Fairport Harbor, OH) with double-coated tape (100-µm thickness) as a spacer. For TIR-FM measurements, the glass coverslip and aluminum mount were replaced by a glass microscope slide (3 in x 1 in x 1 mm). Fused silica and glass substrates were cleaned by boiling in detergent (ICN, Aurora, OH), bath-sonicating, rinsing extensively with deionized water, and drying at 160°C. Immediately before use, substrates were cleaned in an argon ion plasma cleaner (PDC-3XG, Harrick Scientific, Ossining, NY) for 15 min at 25°C. Planar bilayers were formed by applying 45 µl of a liposome suspension to a fused silica substrate (1 h, 25°C), and then rinsing with 3 ml of 0.1-µm filtered PBS. Samples were then treated with 200 µl of 10 mg ml-1 ovalbumin in PBS (30 min, 25°C). Finally, 200 µl of solutions containing various concentrations of unlabeled 1B7.11 and A-1B7.11 with 10 mg ml-1 ovalbumin in PBS, sometimes with 0.25 µM 2.4G2 as a negative control, were applied. Samples were also prepared with approximately one-half the typical receptor surface density by mixing equal volumes of liposomes with and without incorporated FcRII before application to the substrate. Background samples had unlabeled 1B7.11 in solution adjacent to a planar lipid bilayer (without FcRII) treated with ovalbumin.
Fluorescence microscopy
All measurements were carried out on an instrument consisting of an argon ion laser (Innova 90-3, Coherent, Palo Alto, CA), an inverted microscope (Zeiss Axiovert 35, Carl Zeiss Microimaging, Thornwood, NY), and a single-photon counting photomultiplier (RCA C31034A, Lancaster, PA). Experiments were carried out at 25°C using the 488-nm laser line. The laser power was typically set at 0.25 W and neutral density filters were inserted in its path giving an incident intensity 0.03–1.08 µW µm-2. For TIR-FCS, a pinhole with a radius of 50 µm (or 100 µm) placed at an internal image place of the microscope defined an area with a radius of h 1.2 µm (or 2.4 µm) when projected onto the sample plane. On each area of the sample examined, nonspecific, tightly-bound fluorescent molecules were first prebleached with a high power bleach pulse (typically 1 s). The fluorescence arising from the volume defined by the evanescent wave and the pinhole was collected through a 60x, 1.4-NA oil immersion objective (PlanApo, Nikon Instruments, Augusta, GA). The fluorescence signal was autocorrelated by a PC-based correlator board (ALV 5000/E) with collection times ranging from 1 to 10 min. The average fluorescence intensity was approximately constant over the period of each measurement. For TIR-FM, the fluorescence excited by the whole evanescent wave was collected through a much larger image plane aperture and a 40x, 0.75-NA water immersion objective (AchroPlan, Zeiss).
TIR-FCS data analysis
TIR-FCS autocorrelation data measured from negative control samples (no surface binding sites) were fit to Eq. 7 plus an arbitrary constant G, withNCf = 0. The free parameters were Re, NAf, and G. Autocorrelation data measured from positive samples were fit to the combination of Eqs. 6, 7, and 10, plus an arbitrary constant G. For these fits, Re was fixed as the average from corresponding negative control samples, and NAf, NCf, kd, and G were free parameters. Before fitting, all data were background-corrected by multiplying each data point by the factor S2/F2, where F = S - Bg is the average measured fluorescence calculated by subtracting the average measured background signal Bg from the average measured sample signal S (Thompson, 1991). Nonlinear least-squares fits were determined by the Levenberg-Marquardt method using Mathematica 4.1 (Wolfram Research, Champaign, IL). The magnitude of G was typically 
0.005.
Consideration was given to calculation of the standard deviation of the autocorrelation function G(), at different lag time points . Knowledge of the standard deviation is necessary to calculate a value for chi-squared related to the least-squares data fit as well as for weighted data fitting. When considered, an approximate value for the standard deviation is often calculated according to an expression derived for the case of an exponential correlation function, assuming a large number of fluorescent particles in the observation volume, negligible background fluorescence, and sampling times much smaller than the correlation time expected for the process under investigation (Koppel, 1974). This analytical expression has recently been compared to other protocols for determining a measure of the uncertainty in G() (Wohland et al., 2001). The technique thought to yield the most accurate measure of the uncertainty, though also the most time-consuming in terms of data collection, is to collect multiple data sets on a given spot, and then average the correlation data points at each lag time . The uncertainty in the correlation is then given by the standard deviation of the data. Thus, the average correlation and the corresponding uncertainty were determined from 4 to 6 measurements per spot for a portion of the data collected, and the uncertainty was used to compare weighted and unweighted data fits. The average correlation data sets were less noisy than the individual sets, but the weighted data fitting did not significantly alter the values of the fit parameters. There was more variation from spot-to-spot on a given sample than between unweighted and weighted data fits; therefore, the fit parameters presented here were determined by unweighted data fitting.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONTHEORETICAL BACKGROUNDMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
RII was confirmed by using steady-state TIR-FM (Hsieh et al., 1992). The evanescently excited fluorescence intensity was measured for a series of samples with increasing IgG concentration (and 1) in solution adjacent to supported phospholipid bilayers containing FcRII (Fig. 3 a). Negative control measurements were made for samples either without FcRII or with saturating amounts of the monoclonal antibody 2.4G2, which binds specifically and tightly to FcRII and blocks its interaction with the Fc portion of IgG (Unkeless, 1979). The difference data were fit to the theoretical form for a bimolecular reaction occurring at a surface; i.e., the difference of Eq. 2 (Fig. 3 b). The equilibrium dissociation constant Kd was determined to be 2.4 ± 0.4 µM and the FcRII surface density was estimated to be S 800 molecules µm-2. These values are consistent with those previously measured (Hsieh et al., 1992; Hsieh and Thompson, 1995).
|
Representative fluorescence fluctuation autocorrelation functions are shown in Fig. 4. As shown, although the magnitudes of G() were similar for the two sample types, the decay rates were significantly different. In particular, a much more slowly decaying component, consistent with visual observations, was apparent for samples containing FcRII (Fig. 4 a). The shapes and timescales of the experimental data agree with the theoretically predicted autocorrelation functions (see Fig. 2 a). The values of G(0) are expected to be similar when NCf is less than NAf, and Gpos(0) is always expected to be less than Gneg(0) for the same concentration of fluorescent ligand in solution (see Fig. 2 b) which is seen here.
|
RII surface densities, and two pinhole sizes. Positive samples were composed of A-IgG and unlabeled IgG in solution adjacent to supported bilayers containing FcRII. Negative control samples contained a similar range of solution concentrations of A-IgG and unlabeled IgG, but either did not contain FcRII in their bilayers, or also contained 2.4G2 in solution to block the binding of IgG to FcRII.
Negative control data were fit to Eq. 7 plus a constant G, with NCf = 0, and values for NAf and Re were determined (Table 1). As expected, NAf increased approximately linearly with the solution concentration of A-IgG for a constant solution concentration of IgG; and NAf remained approximately constant as the total solution concentration of IgG was varied while the solution concentration of A-IgG remained the same. NAf also increased with the radius of the observation area h. Re agreed with previous measurements (Starr and Thompson, 2002) and remained approximately constant under all conditions. NAf and Re remained constant, within experimental uncertainty, over a range of excitation intensities (0.22–1.08 µW µm-2) (data not shown).
|
, with Re fixed as the average from corresponding negative control data. Values for NAf, NCf, and kd were obtained from the fits (Table 2). The values of these parameters did not change, within experimental uncertainty, for a range of excitation intensities (0.03–0.22 µW µm-2) (data not shown). In addition, the best-fit values of NAf agreed roughly with values obtained from corresponding negative control samples (Table 1).
|
RII surface density is decreased, NCf should decrease whereas NAf should be unaffected if the solution concentrations of A-IgG and total IgG remain constant.
The measured value of the dissociation rate constant kd remained approximately constant under all conditions, and agrees with previous measurements of this parameter made for IgG and FcRII by using total internal reflection illumination with fluorescence photobleaching recovery (Hsieh and Thompson, 1995). As described above, transport in solution via rates Rt and Rh is predicted to affect the shape of GCC() only if the larger of these rates is smaller than or approximately equal to kd. Thus, because Rt >> kd, changing the observation area size should not change the measured decay rate. This prediction is confirmed since kd remains approximately constant for both observation area sizes (Table 2).
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONTHEORETICAL BACKGROUNDMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
As shown in this work, combining total internal reflection illumination with fluorescence correlation spectroscopy can be used to measure ligand-receptor kinetic dissociation rate constants. A comprehensive set of fluorescence fluctuation autocorrelation functions were obtained for a fluorescently labeled IgG reversibly associating with the mouse receptor FcRII in substrate-supported planar membranes, and both theoretical and data analysis methods were developed for extracting the kinetic dissociation rate for this interaction from the measured G(). The measured dissociation rate was consistent with that measured previously by combining internal reflection illumination and fluorescence photobleaching recovery.
TIR-FCS is an attractive method for measuring ligand-receptor kinetics because of the small volumes and required amounts of material. In addition, the planar geometry opens the possibility of using this method in combination with microarrays for high throughput screening based on kinetic dissociation rates. Finally, as shown in an accompanying article (Lieto and Thompson, unpublished data), when fluorescent and nonfluorescent molecules compete for the surface binding sites, TIR-FCS autocorrelation functions contain, in general, information about the kinetic rates for both fluorescent and nonfluorescent molecules. Thus, it may be possible to use a single fluorescent ligand to monitor the kinetics of a variety of competitive or potentially competitive nonfluorescent species.
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONTHEORETICAL BACKGROUNDMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
This work was supported by National Science Foundation grant MCB-0130589, National Institutes of Health grant GM-41402, ACS-PRF grant 35376-AC5-7, North Carolina Biotechnology Center grant 2000-ARG-0026, and Glaxo-Smith-Kline.
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Submitted on April 3, 2003; accepted for publication May 19, 2003.
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONTHEORETICAL BACKGROUNDMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
Axelrod, D. 2001. Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy in cell biology. Traffic. 2:764–774.[Medline]
Gesty-Palmer, D., and N. L. Thompson. 1997. Binding of the soluble, truncated form of an Fc receptor (mouse FcRII) to membrane-bound IgG as measured by total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. J. Mol. Recog. 10:63–72.
Girard, C., C. Joachim, and S. Gauthier. 2000. The physics of the near-field. Rep. Prog. Phys. 63:893–938.
Hansen, R. L., and J. M. Harris. 1998a. Total internal reflection fluorescence correlation spectroscopy for counting molecules at solid/liquid interfaces. Anal. Chem. 70:2565–2575.
Hansen, R. L., and J. M. Harris. 1998b. Measuring reversible adsorption kinetics of small molecules at solid/liquid interfaces by total internal reflection fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 70:4247–4256.
Haustein, E., and P. Schwille. 2003. Ultrasensitive investigations of biological systems by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Methods. 29:153–166.[Medline]
Hlavacek, W. S., A. Redondo, H. Metzger, C. Wofsy, and B. Goldstein. 2001. Kinetic proofreading models for cell signaling predict ways to escape kinetic proofreading. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:7295–7300.
Hsieh, H. V., C. L. Poglitsch, and N. L. Thompson. 1992. Direct measurement of the weak interactions between a mouse Fc receptor (FcRII) and IgG1 in the absence and presence of hapten: a total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy study. Biochemistry. 31:11562–11566.[Medline]
Hsieh, H. V., and N. L. Thompson. 1995. Dissociation kinetics between a mouse Fc receptor (FcRII) and IgG: measurement by total internal reflection with fluorescence photobleaching recovery. Biochemistry. 34:12481–12488.[Medline]
Knoll, W. 1998. Interfaces and thin films as seen by bound electromagnetic waves. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 49:569–638.[Medline]
Koppel, D. E. 1974. Statistical accuracy in fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. A. 10:1938–1945.
Krippner-Heidenreich, A., F. Tübing, S. Bryde, S. Willi, G. Zimmermann, and P. Scheurich. 2002. Control of receptor-induced signaling complex formation by the kinetics of ligand/receptor interaction. J. Biol. Chem. 277:44155–44163.
Lagerholm, B. C., and N. L. Thompson. 1998. Theory for ligand rebinding at cell membrane surfaces. Biophys. J. 74:1215–1228.
Lagerholm, B. C., T. E. Starr, Z. N. Volovyk, and N. L. Thompson. 2000. Rebinding of IgE Fabs at haptenated planar membranes: measurement by total internal reflection with fluorescence photobleaching recovery. Biochemistry. 39:2042–2051.[Medline]
McKeithan, T. W. 1995. Kinetic proofreading in T-cell receptor signal transduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 92:5042–5046.
Pearce, K. H., R. G. Hiskey, and N. L. Thompson. 1992. Surface binding kinetics of prothrombin fragment 1 on planar membranes measured by total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. Biochemistry. 31:5983–5995.[Medline]
Poglitsch, C. L., M. T. Sumner, and N. L. Thompson. 1991. Binding of IgG to moFcRII purified and reconstituted into supported planar membranes as measured by total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. Biochemistry. 30:6662–6671.[Medline]
Rabinowitz, J. D., C. Beeson, D. S. Lyons, M. M. Davis, and H. M. McConnell. 1996. Kinetic discrimination in T-cell activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1401–1405.
Rigler, R., and E. L. Elson. 2001. Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy: Theory and Applications. Springer, Berlin.
Schweitzer-Stenner, R., A. Licht, and I. Pecht. 1992. Dimerization kinetics of the IgE-class antibodies by divalent haptens. I. The Fab-hapten interactions. Biophys. J. 63:551–562.
Shea, L. D., R. R. Neubig, and J. J. Linderman. 2000. Timing is everything: the role of kinetics in G protein activation. Life Sci. 68:647–658.[Medline]
Starr, T. E., and N. L. Thompson. 2001. Total internal reflection with fluorescence correlation spectroscopy: combined surface reaction and solution diffusion. Biophys. J. 80:1575–1584.
Starr, T. E., and N. L. Thompson. 2002. Local diffusion and concentration of IgG near planar membranes: measurement by total internal reflection with fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B. 106:2365–2371.
Thompson, N. L. 1982. Surface binding rates of nonfluorescent molecules may be obtained by total internal reflection with fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Biophys. J. 38:327–329.
Thompson, N. L. 1991. Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy, In Topics in Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Vol. 1: Techniques. J. R. Lakowicz, editor. Plenum Press, New York. 337–378.
Thompson, N. L., and D. Axelrod. 1983. Immunoglobulin surface-binding kinetics studied by total internal reflection with fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Biophys. J. 43:103–114.
Thompson, N. L., T. P. Burghardt, and D. Axelrod. 1981. Measuring surface dynamics of biomolecules by total internal reflection fluorescence with photobleaching recovery or correlation spectroscopy. Biophys. J. 33:435–454.
Thompson, N. L., and B. C. Lagerholm. 1997. Total internal reflection fluorescence: applications in cellular biophysics. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 8:58–64.[Medline]
Thompson, N. L., A. M. Lieto, and N. W. Allen. 2002. Recent advances in fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12:634–641.[Medline]
Thompson, N. L., K. H. Pearce, and H. V. Hsieh. 1993. Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy: application to substrate-supported planar membranes. Eur. Biophys. J. 22:367–378.[Medline]
Unkeless, J. C. 1979. Characterization of a monoclonal antibody directed against mouse macrophage and lymphocyte Fc receptors. J. Exp. Med. 150:580–596.
Wenningmann, I., and J. P. Dilger. 2001. The kinetics of inhibition of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors by (+)-tubocurarine and pancuronium. Molec. Pharm. 60:790–796.[Medline]
Wohland, T., R. Rigler, and H. Vogel. 2001. The standard deviation in fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Biophys. J. 80:2987–2999.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  J. Ries, E. P. Petrov, and P. Schwille Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy: Effects of Lateral Diffusion and Surface-Generated Fluorescence Biophys. J., July 1, 2008; 95(1): 390 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Ries, T. Ruckstuhl, D. Verdes, and P. Schwille Supercritical Angle Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy Biophys. J., January 1, 2008; 94(1): 221 - 229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Li, G. J. Augustine, and K. Weninger Kinetics of Complexin Binding to the SNARE Complex: Correcting Single Molecule FRET Measurements for Hidden Events Biophys. J., September 15, 2007; 93(6): 2178 - 2187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Karymov, A. V. Krasnoslobodtsev, and Y. L. Lyubchenko Dynamics of Synaptic SfiI-DNA Complex: Single-Molecule Fluorescence Analysis Biophys. J., May 1, 2007; 92(9): 3241 - 3250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Ohsugi, K. Saito, M. Tamura, and M. Kinjo Lateral Mobility of Membrane-Binding Proteins in Living Cells Measured by Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy Biophys. J., November 1, 2006; 91(9): 3456 - 3464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. C. Lagerholm, L. Averett, G. E. Weinreb, K. Jacobson, and N. L. Thompson Analysis Method for Measuring Submicroscopic Distances with Blinking Quantum Dots Biophys. J., October 15, 2006; 91(8): 3050 - 3060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y.-l. Wang, K. M. Hahn, R. F. Murphy, and A. F. Horwitz From imaging to understanding: Frontiers in Live Cell Imaging, Bethesda, MD, April 19-21, 2006 J. Cell Biol., August 14, 2006; 174(4): 481 - 484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. P. Burghardt, J. E. Charlesworth, M. F. Halstead, J. E. Tarara, and K. Ajtai In Situ Fluorescent Protein Imaging with Metal Film-Enhanced Total Internal Reflection Microscopy Biophys. J., June 15, 2006; 90(12): 4662 - 4671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. Moran-Mirabal, J. B. Edel, G. D. Meyer, D. Throckmorton, A. K. Singh, and H. G. Craighead Micrometer-Sized Supported Lipid Bilayer Arrays for Bacterial Toxin Binding Studies through Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Microscopy Biophys. J., July 1, 2005; 89(1): 296 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
