| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |


* Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria; and
Robert Koch-Institut, 13533 Berlin, Germany
Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Urs Peter Fringeli, Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. Tel.: +43-1-4277-525-30; Fax: +43-1-4277-9525; E-mail: urs.peter.fringeli{at}univie.ac.at.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
z = 0.0054 nm. Using a series connection of capacitors as equivalent circuit of the cell resulted in E = (1.2 ± 0.7) x 107 V/m for the electric field in DMPC. Young's elasticity modulus of DMPC could be calculated to be E
= 2.2 x 106 Pa ± 1.8 x 106 Pa, which is in good agreement with published data obtained by electric field-dependent capacitance measurements. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our approach to the study of electric field-induced conformational changes in model biomembranes is based on the application of the more advanced modulated excitation (ME) technique in the FTIR ATR and transmission mode. ME spectroscopy results in utmost sensitivity and time-resolved information, provided the sample of interest admits a periodic excitation by the modulation of an external parameter, such as the electric field (Fringeli et al., 2000
; Baurecht and Fringeli, 2001
; Baurecht et al., 2002
).
In the present study we report on first results obtained by FTIR ME transmission spectroscopy, using dry oriented DMPC multilayers. Our membrane assembly was similar to that used by Le Saux et al. (2001)
and Hianik (2000)
.
| MATERIAL AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
98%, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was suspended in distilled water (5.96 mg/mL) and exposed to ultrasonic treatment for
10 min. A drop of 10 µL was disposed on the free aperture of one Si/SiO2 window of the transmission cell and dried in a weak stream of air. Such an assembly was estimated to consist of
500 DMPC bilayers on the mean.
Experimental setup
The transmission cell was built up of two cylindrical Si windows (20 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick) separated by a 5-µm polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE (Teflon), Goodfellow, Huntington, England) spacer as shown schematically in Fig. 1.
|
200 nm (Micro-Biolytics GmbH, Freiburg, Germany). Electrical contact to Si was established by means of a silver foil pressed against the windows by the frame of the transmission cell. Temperature control to keep 28.4°C ± 0.2°C was achieved by water circulating from a thermostat through aluminum plates mounted on either outer side of the cell. The temperature was measured by a thermocouple fixed in the cell frame close to the Si window. The transmission cell had a free circular aperture of 7 mm diameter and was mounted on a rotatable shuttle platform, allowing a computer controlled displacement from the infrared (IR) beam to measure background spectra, as well as a change of the angle of incidence of the IR beam within
= 0° and
= 45° by rotation. The rotation axis of the cell was normal to the direction of propagation of the IR beam and normal to the horizontal platform. Electrical stimulation by a rectangular unipolar signal Uapplied (0150 V) of 1.25 Hz, corresponding to a period of 0.8 s, was produced (Fig. 1) by switching a DC voltage source on and off under the control of the computer of the IR spectrometer. Potential generation was performed by a low-voltage DC source (Tabor, Model 8024, Unterschleißheim, Germany) that was amplified by a bipolar amplifier (BOP 500M, Kepco Inc., Flushing, NY) to a high voltage (150 V). In the potential free half-cycle of 0.4 s the cell capacitance was discharged by connecting the two windows via a 30 k
resistor. The steady-state potential profile across the four dielectric layers between the Si windows was calculated by means of Eq. 1, which is derived assuming an equivalent circuit of four capacitors connected in series.
![]() | (1) |
i is the relative permittivity (dielectric constant), and di denotes the thickness of the i dielectric layer. The relevant data are summarized in Table 1 and field profile is shown in Fig. 2.
|
|
with frequencies of the interferogram. In case of slow modulations, i.e., the period of stimulation
is in the range of one second or longer, this problem can be avoided by the application of a new technique, referred to as vector phase sensitive detection (PSD) (Fringeli, 1997During the application of constant potentials up to 150 V no DC current across the cell could be detected by our electrometer (Keithley 6517, Keithley Instruments, Cleveland, Ohio) featuring a sensitivity of 1 pA. Nevertheless considerable attention was made to unambiguously proof that potential-induced spectral changes did not result from periodic sample heating by a current <1 pA. Temperature was controlled to 28.4° ± 0.2°C by circulating water from a thermostat through heat exchanger plates screwed to either side of the transmission cell.
For temperature modulated excitation spectroscopy two thermostats were used, one set to T1 = 28.6°C, the other set to T2 = 28.2°. Modulated excitation was performed by computer-controlled periodic switching of a valve, thus feeding during the first half-period water of temperature T1 to the heat exchangers of the cell, switching to T2 during the second half-period. The difference
T = 0.4°C corresponds to the uncertainty of temperature control during an electric field modulated excitation. The stimulation period of the T-ME measurements was 10.68 min. Compared to the E-ME experiments this longer period was used to ensure complete heat exchange with the sample in the cell. Sixty-four sample-point spectra consisting each of 75 scans were recorded during a stimulation period and the modulation cycles were repeated until at least the same signal to noise ratio as in electric field experiments was maintained (1125 scans per sample-point spectrum at least).
Infrared spectroscopy
The measurements were performed on a Bruker IFS 66 FTIR spectrometer (Bruker Optics, Ettlingen, Germany) equipped with a liquid nitrogen cooled mercury-cadmium-telluride detector and a wire grid polarizer (0.12-µm wide Al strips on a KRS-5 substrate (SPECAC, Orpington, UK). Stationary and ME spectra were measured at two orthogonal polarizer settings. The plane of incidence is defined by the direction of light propagation and by the normal to the windows of the transmission cell in oblique position. i.e.,
> 0°. Thus pp means that the electric vector of the incident transversal wave is in this plane, whereas vp denotes the situation where the vector is orthogonal to this plane (i.e., parallel to the rotation axis of the transmission cell). Measurements were performed with pp and vp incident light and two cell positions, namely at normal incidence
= 0° and at oblique incidence
= 45°. It should be noted, however, that in the latter case refraction at the sample (nsample = 1.45 ± 0.05) resulted in a reduced effective angle of incidence of
eff = 29° ± 3° as shown by Fig. 3.
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, vp) polarized incident light are presented in Fig. 4. Two angles of incidence,
= 0° and
= 45° were used. At normal incidence
= 0°, both polarizations resulted in the same band intensities, thus confirming the expected isotropy of the DMPC layers with respect to the plane parallel to the cell window. Therefore, only the
spectrum is shown in Fig. 4.
|
t with respect to the z-axis, which is the normal to the cell window. According to sample preparation, isotropy of the angle
t, i.e., of t around the z-axis, has to be assumed. Considering now a methylene group in a straight hydrocarbon chain, the HCH plane will be orthogonal to t and its orientation in space is determined by the angle
t. The angles
t,
t, and
t are referred to as Eulerian angles. They are used in this case to establish the relation between the unit vector of a transition moment in the molecule fixed coordinate system (t-system, xt, yt, zt) and the labor-coordinate system (x, y, z). For details see Fringeli et al. (2002)
|
s(CH2) at 2850 cm-1, the corresponding direction of the transition moment may be assumed to be along the bisectrice of the HCH angle. Selecting this direction as xt-axis, the unit vector mt(
s(CH2)) assumes the coordinates mtx(
s(CH2)) = 1, mty(
s(CH2)) = 0, mtz(
s(CH2)) = 0. Because the transition moment of the asymmetric stretching vibration
as(CH2) at 2919 cm-1 is expected to be orthogonal to mt(
s(CH2)), i.e., mtx(
as(CH2)) = 0, mty(
as(CH2)) = 1, mtz(
as(CH2)) = 0.
Because primary experimental data are always related to the labor-coordinate system x, y, z, mt has now to be transformed to m, which is the unit vector of the same transition moment, but related to the labor-coordinate system according to Eq. 2.
![]() | (2) |
t,
t,
t) denotes the corresponding transformation matrix (Eq. 3)
![]() | (3) |
The relative absorbance can now be calculated according to Eqs. 4 and 5.
![]() | (4) |
![]() | (5) |
and
denote the components of the unit vector of the parallel polarized incident electric field.
eff is the effective angle of incidence associated with the nominal tilt angle
of the transmission cell (see Fig. 3). For normal incidence
=
eff = 0. For perpendicular polarized incident light it follows
and
Orientation analysis is generally based on the evaluation of the dichroic ratio R defined by Eq. 6
![]() | (6) |
Equation 6 results in the dichroic ratio for a distinct molecular orientation in space. However, because our system assumes a microcrystalline ultrastructure, numerator and denominator have to be averaged over the angle
t (0
t
2
). Calculated dichroic ratios R for MCU, as a function of the angle
t (rotation of CH2-group about the molecular axis t) and with the tilt angle
t between t and the z-axis as parameter are shown in Fig. 6 A. Experimentally, the dichroic ratio obtained with normally incident light, R(
= 0) = A[
s(CH2)]||,0°/A[
s(CH2)]
,0° = 1.00 ± 0.05 thus confirming isotropic arrangement of microcrystals around the z-axis. At oblique incidence of
= 45°, however, the dichroic ratios obtained from
s(CH2) and
as(CH2) differ significantly from the isotropic value Riso = 1. It resulted R(
s(CH2)) = 0.83 ± 0.07, and R(
as(CH2)) = 0.90 ± 0.07. Assuming that methylene groups of the hydrocarbon chains contribute the major part to the intensities of both bands one may determine both, the mean rotation of a methylene group about the molecular axis t, as well as the tilt angle of this axis with respect to the z-axis (normal to the supporting window). Thus it follows from Fig. 6 A that the rotation of the bisectrice of the HCH angle about the t-axis results in a mean value of
t = 30° ± 5° (see Fig. 5). This is also the mean direction of the transition moment of
s(CH2), whereas the transition moment of
as(CH2) is expected to be orthogonal to the latter, thus corresponding to
t = 120° ± 5°. Because both vibrations are related to the same molecular tilt angle of the hydrocarbon chains with respect to normal to the supporting window, it follows a chain tilt angle of
t = 35° ± 5°. Compared to
t = 12° as reported from an x-ray diffraction study of DMPC (Pearson and Pascher, 1979
) our finding reflects a broad distribution of uniaxial orientations of the microcrystals formed upon evaporation of water, i.e., a significantly reduced overall ordering compared with a single crystal.
|
as(CH3) at 2956 cm-1,
as(CH2) at 2919 cm-1,
s(CH2) at 2850 cm-1,
(C=O) of the two ester groups at 1739 cm-1,
as((N-)CH3), asymmetric bending of the N-methyl groups, as broad shoulder near 1490 cm-1. The sharp peak at 1468 cm-1 results from methylene bending
(CH2) of the hydrocarbon chains with predominantly extended (all-trans) chains. This peak is sitting on a broad shoulder located at
1455 cm-1, resulting from
(CH2) of hydrocarbon chains with gauche defects, and of
as(CH3) of the hydrocarbon chains. There are two further weak but resolved bands to be mentioned, namely at 1416 cm-1 and 1378 cm-1 resulting from
(
-CH2) of the
-methylene groups in the hydrocarbon chains, and from symmetric bending
s(CH3) of the end-standing methyl groups in the hydrocarbon chains, respectively. Unfortunately, the region below 1300 cm-1 is strongly overlapped by vibrations of the thin SiO2 layer. This layer served to protect the Si windows from electrochemical decomposition. As a consequence, in this setup access to typical vibrations of the polar headgroup was significantly hindered. The so-called transverse optic (TO) and longitudinal optic (LO) modes of the asymmetric Si-O stretching vibrations of the SiO2 layer at 1090 cm-1 and 1255 cm-1, respectively, are known to be strongly polarized (Martinet and Devine, 1995
stretching
A further component at 1161 cm-1 is visible at both nominal angles of incidence,
= 0° and 45°, respectively. This band is associated with C-O single bond stretching
(C-O). Finally, the band at 968 cm-1 may be used as a marker for the quaternary ammonium group in the polar headgroup of DMPC. It results from asymmetric stretching of
vibrations. This group should be especially sensitive to electric fields due to its charge, however, overlapping with the spectrum of the SiO2 layer disables again a reliable access. Nearly all spectra are overlapped by broad regular bands (fringes) resulting from interference phenomena of the IR beam in the transmission cell.
Modulation spectra
The interpretation of the stationary spectra of DMPC should help to get a better understanding of the spectral changes obtained under the influence of a strong external electric field. As mentioned earlier, ME technique was applied to achieve optimum sensitivity and background compensation. For details on this less-known technique the reader is referred to Fringeli et al. (2000)
, Baurecht and Fringeli (2001)
, and Baurecht et al. (2002)
. A brief explanation of ME spectroscopy shall be given here for a better understanding of the interpretation of the electric field effects on DMPC. The rectangular potential applied to the sample (see Fig. 1) had a fundamental frequency of fm = 1.25 Hz. In reality, rectangular excitation means multifrequency stimulation of the sample by the frequencies (2n + 1) fm with n = 0, 1, 2, 3, ...., where the relative amplitudes decline by the factor 1/(2n + 1). If a sample responds to such a stimulation, it will do it with these frequencies, and in the case of nonlinear responses also with higher harmonics of each fundamental. It is just this periodicity that renders ME techniques so sensitive, because phase-sensitive detection (PSD) may be used to separate weak periodic signals of known frequency from a huge background, which is not affected by the stimulation. PSD results in utmost signal-to-noise ratios. To understand the spectra presented in Fig. 7, it is necessary to take notice of the fact that PSD leads to output signals that can be described by the following equation:
![]() | (7) |
|
k denotes the phase lag of a response with frequency kfm with respect to the stimulation.
k = 0 means a sample response without any delay. Each delay in a sequence of sample responses results in a contribution
k < 0. A sample may respond to an external stimulation by structural reorientation or chemical reaction. This case is of special interest in ME spectroscopy because it enables access to kinetic data and to the reaction scheme. Finally,
k,PSD denotes an arbitrary angle, to be set by the operator and associated with the frequency kfm. It follows from Eq. 7 that the PSD output signal varies within +Ak0 and -Ak0, with zero crossings at (
k -
k,PSD) = 90° and 270°. Obviously, the operator has the possibility to sense the phase of a signal response by choosing adequate settings of
k,PSD. Modulation spectra obtained at two values of
k,PSD differing by 90°, so-called orthogonal modulation spectra, are required to get time-resolved information about the stimulated process. Finally, it should be mentioned once more, that PSD cancels all parts of the overall spectrum that do not contain periodic absorbance changes with frequencies of kfm.
The spectra shown in Fig. 7 are overlapped by wavelike signals, that result from interferences produced by a periodic change of the distance between the windows as a consequence of the applied high periodic potential. According to Eq. 7 there must exist a phase setting
1,PSD that cancels this perturbation. This is the case at
1,PSD = 90°, however, as shown by Fig. 7, all other signals vanished at this setting, too. Thus one can conclude that there is no phase difference 
1 between the mechanical response of the cell and the field-induced effects in the sample; both react without delay to the external stimulation. Consequently, both contributions reach maxima or minima at
1,PSD = 90° - 90° = 0°, meaning that the disturbance by fringes cannot be traced by setting an adequate
1,PSD. We conclude that the largest relaxation time of our system was still considerably shorter than the period of our stimulation, which was
= 0.8 s (see also Fig. 8 legend). Consequently, ME spectroscopy was reduced in this case to a high-performance difference spectroscopy, which enabled unambiguously the detection of specific parts of the DMPC molecule that responded periodically to the external field stimulation. These group vibrations were:
as(CH3),
as(CH2),
s(CH2),
(C=O),
(CH2),
s(CH3),
(C-O), and
. Quite obviously, the whole molecule was affected by the externally applied electric field. This is contradictory to the finding by Le Saux et al. (2001)
, who reported conformational changes to occur only in the polar headgroup.
|
, and on the polarization. Considering first normal incidence, i.e.,
= 0°, there are negative bands resulting from typical vibrations of the CH2 and CH3 groups of the hydrocarbon chains as assigned earlier, as well as of
Positive bands are resulting from
and
(C-O) of the ester groups. There is also a distinct positive band at 1095 cm-1, which tentatively is assigned to
however, it should be mentioned that in this spectral region there is significant uncertainty due to the proximity to the TO mode of SiO2. On the other hand, the 1095 cm-1 band is also visible as shoulder in both polarizations at
= 45° incidence.
(C=O) exhibits a distinct sigmoidal shape. In the stationary spectra shown in Fig. 4,
(C=O) is located at 1738 cm-1 in all cases. In the modulation spectra, however, we find minima and maxima of the sigmoidal shape depending significantly on the angle of incidence and the polarization as well. For
= 0° they were located at 1761 cm-1 and 1741 cm-1, i.e., significantly above the position in the field-free state. Similar observations are made at oblique incidence
= 45°. For parallel (||) polarized incident light the minimum and maximum are found at 1752 cm-1 and 1730 cm-1, respectively, whereas for perpendicular (
) polarized incident light minimum and maximum are found at 1755 cm-1 and 1733 cm-1, respectively. No definite interpretation can be given at the moment, however, concerning the sign of a band, one can state that a positive sign in the
1,PSD = 0° spectrum means that the average transition dipole moment was deflected by the stimulating electric field toward the incident infrared electric field vector, whereas the opposite deflection would result in a negative band in the modulation spectrum. A more distinct picture of the field induced process in the membrane can be derived from Fig. 6 B where the relative absorbance of
s(CH2) and
as(CH2) were calculated as a function of the angle
t, i.e., the angle of rotation of the molecule fixed coordinate system about the molecular axis t. The molecular tilt angle
t was considered as parameter, varying between 20° and 40° in steps of 2°. If the sample is set to oblique incidence (
= 45° nominal,
eff = 29.3° effective; see Fig. 3), it follows from Fig. 6 B that perpendicular polarized light is significantly stronger absorbed and also stronger dependent on the tilt angle
t. Directing now the unit vector of the transition moment of
s(CH2) along the xt-axis and that of
as(CH2) along the yt-axis, as shown in Fig. 5, it is quite evident from Fig. 6 B that in a general setting of
t,
s(CH2) and
as(CH2) will exhibit a different sensitivity to changes of the tilt angle
t. Only in case of
t = 45° both react in the same way. Taking into account the finding that mean values of rotation and tilting assumed
t = 30° and
t = 35° (see legends for Figs. 4 and 6 A), it follows immediately from Fig. 6 B that the enhancement of the tilt angle will result in negative difference bands for both,
s(CH2) and
as(CH2). Moreover, the effect will be more distinct by a factor of
3, with perpendicular polarized light. Finally, with
t = 30°, the difference band resulting from
as(CH2) is expected to be
34 times more intense than the corresponding difference band associated with
s(CH2). This is exactly what is observed in the E-ME spectra at oblique incidence, Fig. 7, A and B. Therefore, we conclude that the compression of dry DMPC bilayer by a strong electric is accomplished by a reversible enhancement of the tilt angle
t. Thus E-ME modulates this angle about the mean value
t = 35° with an amplitude 
t that must be expected to be very small, because the corresponding absorbance is found to be in the range of 20400 µAU.
Influence of modulated temperature to DMPC
Our experimental setup enabled a temperature control to ±0.2°C. Therefore the question arose whether the detected modulated response of DMPC could not result from a modulated current <1 pA, i.e., smaller than our detection limit, across the sample and thus leading to a periodic heating.
There are two convincing arguments against temperature modulated excitation:
as applied in this case leads to a synchronous stimulation of frequencies (2n + 1)
with n = 0, 1, 2, 3... . According to the Fourier analysis an amplitude damping of 1/(2n + 1) is expected. The PSD of higher harmonics is automatically performed by digital methods (Fringeli, 1997
is shown as an example in Fig. 8. Demodulation with the fundamental frequency
leads to the spectrum already shown in Fig. 7 B. Demodulation by 2
and 4
resulted in flat baselines over the entire spectrum, however, demodulation with 3
and 5
resulted in similar spectra to the 1
-demodulation downscaled by 1/3 and 1/5, respectively. As a consequence, DMPC responded to the rectangular electric field stimulation as linear system. Moreover, no phase lag could be detected in the response to 5
, corresponding to a frequency of 6.25 Hz, meaning that the stimulated process must have relaxation times significantly smaller than 1/5
= 25.5 ms. This observation implies that the sample reacted completely reversible to the external stimulation in a millisecond timescale. Because the transmission cell in use exhibited a time constant in the minute range for heat exchange, it would never be possible to dissipate electrically produced heat in the sample within
25.5 ms, thus disabling 0° phase lag up to 5
as obtained by electric field modulation as shown in Fig. 8.
1,PSD = 0° and
1,PSD = 90° indicating still a significant phase lag of the response with respect to the onset of temperature rise. This phase lag result from two sequential processes, heat transfer and the kinetics of temperature-induced conformational changes, whereas only the latter contributes to the spectral shape.
1,PSD is under the control of the operator and therefore, according to Eq. 7 the variation of
1,PSD between 0 and 2
renders phase-resolved modulation bands that move once through a maximum and a minimum. Zero crossing between them is easiest to be detected experimentally, corresponding to
1,i -
1,PSD = ±90°. Thus the phase lag introduced by the system results in
1,i =
1,PSD ± 90° (zero crossing). Time resolution in modulation spectroscopy means that there are parts in the system resulting in modulation bands with different phase lags. To achieve this situation the stimulation frequency has to be adapted to the relaxation constants of the system in such a way that 0.1 <
x
< 10 where
is a relaxation constant of the system (Fringeli et al., 2000
= 0° (Fig. 9 C) one realizes that the two spectra are not completely similar, i.e., may be converted into each other by a simple factor. In the CH-stretching region a phase difference of 10° ± 2° were evaluated from the determination of the corresponding PSD phase settings to reach zero crossing. As a consequence, the relaxation constant of the temperature-induced conformational changes in the hydrocarbon chain region of dry DMPC multilayers may be estimated to be in the range of
T = 2 min. In the case of E-ME, however, it was found from the 5
-spectrum in Fig. 8 that
E << 25 ms. Thus it can be concluded unambiguously that T-ME and E-ME to dry DMPC resulted in quite different responses. This conclusion is most evidently supported by visual comparison of E-ME (Fig. 7) and T-ME (Fig. 9) spectra.
|
Access to Young's modulus from E-ME data is straightforward and will be summarized as follows. Attention was made to the error propagation, aiming to indicate limits reflecting a statistical confidence of
90%.
First the degree
E of E-ME was determined by calculating the ratio of the absorbances of
as(CH2) in the E-ME spectrum (Fig. 7,
= 0°) and in the stationary spectrum (Fig. 4,
= 0°), resulting in
E = 1.41 x 10-3 ± 1.34 x 10-4. From the calculation of the relative absorbance of
as(CH2) at normal incidence (
= 0°) as depending on the mean values of rotation and tilting
t = 30° and
t = 35°, respectively, it followed that the E-field induced modulated tilt angle resulted in 
t = 0.09° ± 0.015°. This result enables now the calculation of the thickness variation
z under the influence of E-ME. Taking for the length of two extended DMPC molecules in the crystal L = 5.5 nm (Pearson and Pascher, 1979
) with an estimated uncertainty of
L = 5.5 nm ± 0.5 nm and
t = 35° ± 5° for the stationary tilt angle, it follows for the membrane thickness d = 4.5 nm ± 0.5 nm, and for change in membrane thickness
z = -0.0054 ± 0.0017 nm. To calculate the modulated pressure
p exerted by the E-field, one may use Eq. 8, which holds for a plate condenser and thus corresponds to the equivalent circuit used earlier to calculate the electric field in the DMPC layer (see Table 1).
![]() | (8) |
Where
r and E denote relative permittivity and electric field in the DMPC to be introduced from Table 1, and
0 is the permittivity of vacuum
The result is
p = 2.5 x 103 Pa ± 2.0 x 103 Pa. The large error results from the accumulation of preceding uncertainties, especially the electrostatic parameters associated with the DMPC assembly. Nevertheless, these results enable the estimation of the Young's elasticity modulus E
of a dry DMPC bilayer according to Eq. 9
![]() | (9) |
p, and
z denote membrane thickness, E-field induced pressure and pressure induced change of membrane thickness (Hianik and Passechnik, 1995
= 2.2 x 106 Pa ± 1.8 x 106 Pa. Despite the large statistical error, one can conclude that the magnitude is correct (Hianik, 2000| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because interference of temperature effects from periodic Joule heating of the sample by E-ME can unambiguously be excluded, as revealed by T-ME spectra shown in Fig. 9 the E-ME spectra shown in Figs. 7 and 8 reflect pure electric field induced effects. Although T-ME spectra measured in the very narrow temperature range of 28.4° ± 0.2° already show the typical phenomena of chain melting, E-ME spectra look quite different, in a first view even unrealistic, because CH2 stretching vibrations appear in all E-ME spectra as negative bands, indicating a decrease of substance. Moreover, there is no evidence of conformational changes in the hydrocarbon chain region, as observed in the T-ME spectra, where the sigmoidal shapes of the CH2 stretching bands indicate that a small amount of all-trans hydrocarbon chains are reversibly converted into chains containing gauche defects upon temperature increase (Hübner and Mantsch, 1991
). The most probable explanation for the reaction mechanism in case of E-ME is therefore a periodic, reversible increase of the chain tilt angle under the influence of the electric field. This explanation is supported by a semiquantitative analysis of the observed dichroic phenomena. Increasing the tilt angle leads to a thinner membrane and might correspond to what was found by capacitance measurements (Hianik, 2000
; Hianik et al., 2000
). E-ME measurements as described in this paper can be used for an experimental determination of Young's elasticity modulus E
. Despite the relatively large uncertainties of our basic data, the magnitude of E
(E
= 2.2 x 106 Pa ± 1.8 x 106 Pa) was found to be consistent with data published by Hianik (2000)
. This fact can be considered as a verification of the minute changes in the tilt angle (
t = 0.09° ± 0.015°) and membrane thickness (
z = 0.0054 ± 0.0017 nm) as derived from E-ME spectra.
In contrast to T-ME, E-ME results in significant effects in the fatty acid ester region around 1740 cm-1. Here distinct sigmoidal band shapes can be observed indicating probably reversible conformational changes in this region induced by the change of the tilt angle of the hydrocarbon chains. Modeling of the dichroic behavior of C=O stretching band and of other absorption bands of the polar headgroup are in progress.
Moreover, we intend to apply corresponding potentials to oriented monolayers of porin Omp32 on a germanium ATR crystal in aqueous environment (Schwarzott et al., 2003
) to get insight into molecular details of voltage gating. In this case, low voltage potentials (<1 V) must be used, however, high electric fields are expected in the range and under the influence of the Gouy-Chapman layer.
Finally, it should be mentioned that electric fields of the magnitude of 107 V/m are able to induce only very small orientational and conformational changes in supported dry lipid bilayer assemblies. In case of DMPC, as reported in this paper, the use of E-ME technique was a prerequisite to achieve the sensitivity required for the detection of the lipid response.
Submitted on January 21, 2003; accepted for publication September 2, 2003.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Baurecht, D., and U. P. Fringeli. 2001. Quantitative modulated excitation Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 72:37823792.
Fringeli, U. P., D. Baurecht, M. Siam, G. Reiter, M. Schwarzott, T. Bürgi, and P. Brüesch. 2002. ATR spectroscopy of thin films. In Handbook of Thin Films Materials, Vol 2, Chapter 4. H. S. Nalwa, editor. Academic Press: New York. 191229.
Fringeli, U. P., D. Baurecht, and Hs. H. Günthard. 2000. Biophysical infrared modulation spectroscopy. In Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy of Biological Materials. H. U. Gremlich and B. Yan, editors. Marcel Dekker, New York. 143192.
Fringeli, U. P. 1997. Verfahren zur simultanen, digitalen phasenempfindlichen Detektion von zeitaufgelösten, quasi-gleichzeitig erfassten Datenarrays eines periodisch stimulierten Systems. International Patent Publication, PCT, WO 97/08598, Bern, Switzerland.
Fringeli, U. P., and Hs. H. Günthard. 1981. Infrared membrane spectroscopy. In Molecular Biology Biochemistry and Biophysics 31 (Membrane Spectroscopy). E. Grell, editor. Springer Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, New York. 270332.
Robert, C. W. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 19741975, 55th ed. C. W. Robert, editor. CRC Press, Cleveland, Ohio. E58.
Harbecke, B., B. Heinz, and P. Grosse. 1985. Optical properties of thin films and the Berreman effect. Appl. Phys. A. 38:263267.
Hianik, T. 2000. Electrostriction and dynamics of solid supported lipid films. J. Biotechnol. 74:189205.[Medline]
Hianik, T., M. Fajkus, B. Tarus, P. T. Frangopol, V. S. Markin, and D. F. Landers. 2000. The changes in dynamics of solid supported lipid films following hybridization of short sequences DNA. Electroanalysis. 12:495501.
Hianik, T., and V. I. Passechnik. 1995. Bilayer Lipid Membranes: Structure and Mechanical Properties. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London.
Hübner, W., and H. M. Mantsch. 1991. Orientation of specifically 13C=O labelled phosphatidylcholine multilayers from polarized attenuated total reflection FT-IR spectroscopy. Biophys. J. 59:12611272.
Le Saux, A., J.-M. Ruysschaert, and E. Goormaghtigh. 2001. Membrane molecule reorientation in an electric field recorded by attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Biophys. J. 80:324330.
Martinet, C., and R. A. B. Devine. 1995. Analysis of the vibrational mode spectra of amorphous SiO2 films. J. Appl. Phys. 77:43434348.
Miller, I. R. 2002. Effect of electric fields on the structure of phosphatidyl choline in a multibilayer system. Bioelectrochemistry. 57:145148.[Medline]
Pearson, R. H., and I. Pascher. 1979. The molecular structure of lecithin dehydrate. Nature. 281:499501.[Medline]
Sargent, D. F. 2001. Influence of transmembrane voltage on the structure of membrane components. Biophys. J. 81:18231824.
Sargent, D. F. 1975a. Voltage jump/capacitance relaxation studies of bilayer structure and dynamics. J. Membr. Biol. 23:227247.
Sargent, D. F. 1975b. Bilayer dynamics studies using capacitance relaxation. In Molecular Aspects of Membrane Phenomena. H. R. Kaback, H. Neurath, G. K. Radda, R. Schwyzer, and W. R. Wiley, editors. Springer Verlag, Berlin. 104120.
Schwarzott, M., H. Engelhardt, T. Klühspies, D. Baurecht, D. Naumann, and U. P. Fringeli. 2003. In situ FTIR ATR spectroscopy of the preparation of an oriented monomolecular film of porin Omp32 on an internal reflecting element bydialysis. Langmuir. 19:74517459.
Winterthaler, M. 1999. On the defect growth after short electric field pulses in planar lipid bilayers. Colloids Surfaces A. 149:161169.
| ||||||||||