| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
letter |
University of Arizona Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
School of Biological Sciences Royal Holloway, University of London Egham TW20 0EX, United Kingdom
Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Dr. Joanna Masel, Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, PO Box 210088, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA. Tel.: 303-449-5686; E-mail: masel{at}charles.stanford.edu.
In a recent article, Pöschel et al. (2003)
point out what they believe to be a mistake in our model of prion kinetics (Masel et al., 1999
) and claim to present a corrected version. In fact, it is their version that is in error.
Both articles consider linear polymers breaking into two fragments. Polymer fragments less than a minimum size n convert instantaneously into monomers. Let the concentration of polymers of size i be yi and let the rate of breaking at each of the points along the polymer length be b. Pöschel et al. (2003)
calculate the rate at which monomers are formed through polymer breakage as
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The simulations in Pöschel et al. (2003)
are performed from first principles and so do not reflect this mistake, and the results from the simulation therefore compare to the differential equation model as presented in Masel et al. (1999)
. Their solution of the final steady state is identical to that which can be trivially derived from our system. Their claim that a constant concentration of monomers was "a basic hypothesis" of our theory, in contrast to theirs, is not true, however. We presented a full set of differential equations, including that for the change in the monomer concentration. Based on the vast majority of in vivo kinetic studies, we concentrated the details of our analysis on the initial stages of the kinetics during which monomer concentration is approximately constant and prion growth is exponential. An extension of the detailed analysis to describe later kinetics is not in conflict with our model. Their work represents an interesting extension of ours, without refuting it.
Submitted on January 9, 2004; accepted for publication March 17, 2004.
REFERENCES
Masel, J., V. A. A. Jansen, and M. A. Nowak. 1999. Quantifying the kinetic parameters of prion replication. Biophys. Chem. 77:139152.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pöschel, T., N. V. Brilliantov, and C. Frömmel. 2003. Kinetics of prion growth. Biophys. J. 85:34603474.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Stohr, N. Weinmann, H. Wille, T. Kaimann, L. Nagel-Steger, E. Birkmann, G. Panza, S. B. Prusiner, M. Eigen, and D. Riesner Mechanisms of prion protein assembly into amyloid PNAS, February 19, 2008; 105(7): 2409 - 2414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |