help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Correction for Dickinson et al., Biophys. J. 87 (4) 2838-2854.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Biophysical Journal 88:757b-758 (2005)
© 2005 The Biophysical Society

Correction

Dickinson, R. B., L. Caro, and D. L. Purich. 2004. Force generation by cytoskeletal filament end-tracking proteins. Biophys. J. 87:2838–2854.

A number of items in this article were printed incorrectly. Corrections appear as follows:

Fig. 1 legend: {Delta}Ghydrolysis ~–22 kT.

Table 1: Units of Kp should be in mM. [MD](–)-crit should be defined as "MD addition to minus ends" for both actin and tubulin.

Table 2: For mechanism-B, the equilibrium dissociation constants should be primed, appearing as K'1 K'2/K'3.

Page 2481, left-hand column: Units of should be "pN-nm".

Page 2849: Units of persistent length should be "µm".

Equation in Fig. 4 legend should read: K'2 = K'2,0eFd/2kT.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
 
Word reversal, page 2843, right-hand column: For Mechanism-A, the symbol {rho} should be defined as the probability of the end-tracking unit being bound to the penultimate subunit, is and (1 – {rho}) the probability of it being bound to the terminal subunit. {rho} should be correspondingly defined as such for Mechanism-A in Table 3.

Omissions in legends for Figs. 3 and 4: Dashed lines represent the free-filament elongation model (Eq. 11) with [MT] = 0.3 µM and [MT](+)-crit = 0.1 µM. The value {gamma} = 1 was used for calculations in Fig. 4. The units of K'1 are µM.

Mechanism-B, kinetic Eqs. 12 and 13: Because only one tracking unit was assumed to operate per subfilament, the states represented by probabilities u and {rho} are mutually exclusive; therefore, the factors of (1 – {rho}) appearing in the second-order terms in Eqs. 12 and 13 should not have been included. The corrected equations are:

(12)

(13)

These equations, now allow linear in u and {rho}, yield an analytical solution for the elongation rate, R, which is replotted here as a replacement to Fig. 4 (below). The differences with the original results in Fig. 4 are minor and in no way affect the conclusions of the article.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Biophysical Society.