| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||




* Dipartimento di Chimica, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy; and
European Laboratory for Non-linear Spectroscopy, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Riccardo Chelli, Tel.: 39-055-457-3082; Fax: 39-055-457-3077; E-mail: chelli{at}chim.unifi.it.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-helices and a short two-stranded antiparallel ß-sheet (Riek et al., 1996
-helices and a large, multi-stranded antiparallel ß-sheet. A second and alternative model has been proposed by Wille et al. (2002)
PrPSc conversion. The stability of the ß-sheet in PrPC (that is characterized by high dynamical plasticity even at physiological conditions; Riek et al., 1998
In this work, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have been used to reveal conformational changes and/or weaknesses of the prion protein (PrP) fold in structural and thermodynamic conditions that are experimentally known to favor PrP misfolding and aggregation. With this respect, the behavior of the ß-sheet motif in pathogenic condition has been recently claimed in an MD study (Alonso et al., 2001
; DeMarco and Daggett, 2004
) as evidence of the presence of antiparallel ß-sheet in PrPSc. This view, although being consistent with the earlier PrPSc model structure by Huang et al. (1996)
, does not agree with the recent parallel ß-helix model proposed by Wille et al. (2002)
. Here we plan to shed some further light in the stability of the ß-sheet of the PrP fold, hopefully providing a key of interpretation for clarifying and rationalizing the contradictory theoretical and experimental results on the structure of the misfolded PrP.
MD simulations have become a useful and common tool for studying structural and dynamical properties of peptides and proteins. We must stress here that, even if the folding pathways of oligopeptides or small proteins have been determined in some cases by canonical MD simulations (see e.g., Duan and Kollman, 1998
), the conversion between the two prion isoforms, involving a major rearrangement of the tertiary and secondary structure, is a far too slow process to be observed in conventional MD simulations. However, as done recently by other authors (Alonso et al., 2001
; El Bastawissy et al., 2001
; Gsponer et al., 2001
; Gu et al., 2003
; Sekijima et al., 2003
; DeMarco and Daggett, 2004
), we can gain valuable information by performing simulations of PrPC using thermodynamic or structural conditions that are experimentally known to favor the misfolded isoform and by identifying structural readjustments and/or local weaknesses induced in the native fold. In particular, in two recent studies on the Syrian hamster PrP at low pH (Alonso et al., 2001
; DeMarco and Daggett, 2004
) a major conversion involving the build up of antiparallel ß-sheet was observed, pointing to the antiparallel ß-strand addition near helix 1 as the preferential pathway for the conformational conversion to PrPSc. This result, however, is at variance with the data obtained from a previous MD simulation (Sekijima et al., 2003
) done on the same system and in the same thermodynamic conditions, where only a very limited tendency to ß-strand elongation and/or addition was observed. Possibly the results of Alonso et al. (2001)
and those of DeMarco and Daggett (2004)
may be partly flawed due to artifacts induced by their treatment of electrostatics based on the simple and substandard protocol of spherical truncation (Saito, 1994
; Cheatham et al., 1995
; Wolf et al., 1999
; Patra et al., 2003
), and/or by the neutralization scheme (Monticelli and Colombo, 2004
) of the highly charged PrP at low pH.
In this article, we have performed MD simulations of the mouse PrP (mPrPC) adopting the following "perturbing conditions": i), from the thermodynamic standpoint, we choose an apolar environment (solution of CCl4) as PrPSc (and hence PrPSc monomer) is known to be extremely hydrophobic (Prusiner et al., 1981
; Pan et al., 1993
), and ii), from the structural point of view, we choose to introduce the D178N point mutation that is known to be associated with two different strains of inherited TSE (Prusiner, 1996
) and to drastically lessen the thermodynamic stability of PrPC fold (Liemann and Glockshuber, 1999
).
It is generally assumed (Fraunfelder et al., 1988
) that the free energy surface of solvated proteins has many local free energy minima that are often separated by large barriers. In such circumstances, the sampling power of the phase space by a single conventional MD trajectory is very limited. As a consequence, two simulations of a system in the same thermodynamic conditions that start from the same nonequilibrium state and that differ only in, e.g., the thermalization scheme, may yield different results and hence lead to contradictory conclusions. With this respect, the nonergodic behavior of mPrPC and its D178N mutant in standard conditions has been recently pointed out (Gsponer et al., 2001
). In this study, to lessen the impact of the inherent nonergodicity of solvated proteins, we generate a "swarm" of independent and few ns long trajectories for each given protein-solvent system. In fact, the MD approach proposed here is aimed at studying the stability of the structural motifs of the mPrPC in conditions that favor conversion to PrPSc and under the assumption that solvent induced or local structure driven transitions between minima are fast processes, but rare events (Duan and Kollman, 1998
). Under these assumptions and in this nonequilibrium framework, the proposed simulation protocol should allow in principle and in practice (Gsponer et al., 2001
) a better sampling of the phase space with respect to the single long trajectory approach, as the productive part of a single and longer trajectory would probably stay trapped in the same minimum.
The outline of the article is the following: in "Methods", we report the computational details common to all MD simulations (the details about the different thermalization procedures we used are described in "Results"). The analysis of the MD trajectories is reported in "Results". A deep discussion of the results is given in "Discussion". To further support our results, structural analysis of NMR conformers of the human PrP at pH 4.5 and 7.0 is reported and discussed in "Discussion". Conclusions and perspectives are given in "Conclusions".
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
0.9 Å, whereas the Ewald convergence parameter was set to 0.43 Å1. The electroneutrality of the simulation box was achieved by adding a countercharge (2 e for the wild-type PrP and 1 e for the D178N mutant) that was smeared onto all the protein atoms. An r-RESPA multi-step algorithm (Tuckerman et al., 1992| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
100 ps the potential parameters (Lennard-Jones parameters and atomic charges) from the values associated with an aspartic acid to those associated with an asparagine.
|
-carbons from the experimental PrP structure are also reported in Table 1. In all the simulations, the RMSDs, after an increase in few hundreds femtoseconds during the thermalization phase, reach a stable plateau. This behavior is similar to that observed in other MD studies on PrP (Gsponer et al., 2001
in Table 1), clearly indicating that a single trajectory in a nanosecond timescale can explore only a limited region of the phase space around a local free energy minimum. On the contrary, the RMSD standard deviations, computed by averaging over the entire simulation time of the swarm (
in Table 1), are sensibly larger for a-class and m-class simulations. This result indicates that running independent set of simulations effectively enhances the sampling capability of conformational space in PrP, as largely expected and as recently reported by other authors (Gsponer et al., 2001
The importance of the secondary structure stability for identifying local weaknesses and/or early stages for conversion pathways to PrPSc has already been stressed in the introduction. The secondary structure was analyzed by using the DSSP program (Kabsch and Sander, 1983
). Fig. 1 shows the protein secondary structure averaged over all the m-class simulations for each protein-solvent system. In the simulations performed in water, the three
-helices (Fig. 1 a) are preserved and close to the experimental pattern for both WT PrP and D178N mutant. The isosteric replacement of the residue 178 in water is apparently unable to affect the
-helices stability. In fact, the differences between the WT PrP and the D178N mutant behavior are generally within the statistical error. The partial instability of the helical regions 170175 and 218223 and the elongation of the helix 2 on its C-terminal side are features that have been observed also in other MD studies of mPrPC (Guilbert et al., 2000
; Gsponer et al., 2001
).
|
PrPSc conversion. Our data suggests that both a slight ß-sheet elongation and the formation of an additional ß-strand might be a common event, typical of the cellular PrP fold and essentially uncorrelated with pathogenic structural (mutation D178N) or thermodynamic (CCl4 solution) conditions. This natural tendency of mPrPC structure to elongate the ß-structure on the flexible and disordered side could be enhanced for other PrPC fragments (Syrian hamster, human) that are characterized by longer and more flexible N-terminus (Parchment and Essex, 2000
The
-helices were markedly less preserved during the simulations in CCl4 (see Fig. 1 c). The lessened stability of these structural elements is very likely caused by the apolar environment. The CCl4 solvent may in fact interfere with the concurrent interactions among hydrophobic side chains that stabilize the protein core in experimental mPrPC. As previously stated, the RMSD values indicate that the change of polarity is unable to induce major conformational changes in mPrPC. However, Fig. 1 c, when compared to the counterpart in water, shows clearly that, in CCl4, statistically significant local distortions are important even in a nanosecond timescale, affecting seriously the stability of secondary structure elements of the PrP. These distortions are surprisingly more significant for the WT PrP in the helical regions, whereas the ß-sheet appears to be rather stable. The situation is reversed for the mutant where the
-helical regions, especially helix 1 and helix 2, are markedly more stable than those found in the WT PrP, whereas the ß-sheet, despite the occasional elongation or addition, appears appreciably weakened. This split behavior of the stability of ß-structure and helix structure for the mutant and WT PrP in CCl4 is fully confirmed by l (see top panel of Fig. 2) and a-class simulations (data not shown).
|
We want to remark that the stability of the
-helices may have been possibly overestimated due to force field artifacts, both in water and in CCl4. Indeed the force field we used (Cornell et al., 1995
) has been found biased toward
-helical conformation by several authors (Garcia and Sanbonmatsu, 2002
; Duan et al., 2003
; Okur et al., 2003
). Actually all state-of-the-art force fields are subject to such secondary structure artifacts (Mu et al., 2003
; Zaman et al., 2003
). Given this caveat, we have chosen the AMBER force field which is widely used and publicly available for such scrutiny. However our main findings are based on the comparison between fold behavior in different structural/thermodynamic conditions. Hence the focus is on the relative rather than absolute stability of secondary structure elements.
The stability of the ß-sheet in destabilizing and pathogenic conditions, that is the central issue of this study, can be evaluated in a more accurate way by devising a structural time-dependent function that continuously varies with the extension and strength of the stack of concurring H-bonds connecting the two ß-strands. To this end, we therefore define the function
![]() | (1) |
) H-bonds connecting the strands 129131 and 161163,
i and Ri are the O
H-N angle and the O
H distance, respectively, of the ith H-bond and s(Ri) is a switching function defined as follows
![]() | (2) |
In Fig. 3 we report the time record of
where mexp equals the function m (Eq. 1) computed using the NMR experimental structure. The function fß is
1 when the ß-sheet is stable or undergoes an elongation and/or strengthening, and is equal to zero when the two strands are completely detached. The fß values obtained during the m-class runs are shown in Fig. 3. As far as the WT PrP is concerned, during all runs both in water (Fig. 3 c) and CCl4 (Fig. 3 a), the fß values are always slightly >1 showing that this structural element is stable in a nanosecond timescale in both water and apolar environment. For the case of the mutant in CCl4 (Fig. 3 b), the behavior of fß is in close agreement with the results of DSSP analysis. Fig. 3 confirms that the combined effect of the apolar environment and of the D178N mutation weakens the antiparallel ß-sheet leading in some cases to its breakup. A ß-sheet destabilizing effect was observed, to a smaller extent, also for the D178N mutant runs performed in water solution (Fig. 3 d). The fß curves associated with the productive phases of the a-WT-CCl4 and a-D178N-CCl4 simulations are shown in Fig. 4. The trends are in agreement with the results obtained from the m-class simulations analysis, showing clearly the weakening of the ß-sheet when the point mutation is introduced. Regardless of the final values, at the beginning of the productive phase all the mutant runs were characterized by a relevant destabilization of the ß-sheet, even larger than that observed for the m-class runs. This is probably due to the fact that the heating/annealing thermalization scheme allows exploring more effectively local free energy minima for the nonequilibrium runs.
|
|
-helices are in general less stable in CCl4 with respect to water. Whereas helix 3 behaves similarly for both WT and D178N mutant, in CCl4 helix 1 and 2 are found to be significantly more stable for the D178N mutant with respect to WT PrP. The stabilization of helices 1 and 2 of the mutant in CCl4 implies the concurrent breakup of the ß-sheet. | DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-helical regions? In Fig. 2 we report the secondary structure computed for the l-class runs (top panels) along with two representative PrP snapshots (middle panels). As shown in the bottom left panel, Asp-178 in the WT PrP lies in helix 2 and forms two strong electrostatic interactions, a salt bridge with the guanidino group of Arg-164 and an H-bond with the hydroxy group of Tyr-128. Tyr-128 and Arg-164 are adjacent to the ß-strands S1 (129130) and S2 (162163), respectively. In the NMR PrP fold, Asp-178 hence holds the two ß-strands close together and anchors them, along with the bracketed helix 1, to the protein core. When the mutation D178N is introduced, the negative charge on Asp-178 is lost. The mutation may hence induce the breaking of one of the two electrostatic hooks thus easing the breaking of the ß-sheet (as observed in the right top panel of Fig. 2) with consequent destabilization of the native tertiary structure. In the mutant, the loss of the electrostatic hook that stabilizes the PrP WT fold must also help to reduce the hydrophobic structural stresses induced by the apolar solvent on the native structure. This eventually yields a decrease of mechanical constraints on helices 1 and 2 with their consequent enhanced stabilization. The complete absence of ß-structure observed in the l-D178N-CCl4 run (see right top panel of Fig. 2) can be ascribed to the loss of the interaction between Asn-178 and Tyr-128.
There might be other mechanisms for ß-sheet weakening or break-up. For example, in one a-class simulation, the mutation-driven loss of the salt bridge between Asn-178 and Arg-164 provided an alternative route for the ß-sheet loosening or breakup. Also in the l-D178N-CCl4 run, as already noticed in the cumulative averages reported in Fig. 1, we can see an appreciable stabilization of helix 1 and helix 2 when the ß-sheet is broken. We stress here that, irrespective of how the sample was prepared (standard thermalization, thermal annealing or morphing), the ß-sheet weakening or breakup has been observed only when two combining pathogenic conditions, i.e., immersing PrP in CCl4 and introducing the D178N point mutation, are simultaneously applied. In water the weakening of the ß-sheet due to point mutation is also observed but to a less extent (see Fig. 3 d). A significant weakening of ß-structure has been recently observed experimentally in a NMR study of human PrP at low pH (Calzolai and Zahn, 2003
). In fact, like the point mutation D178N, the protonation of Asp-178 at low pH may imply the breakup of either the salt-bridge with Arg-164 or the H-bond with Tyr-128 (this issue will be addressed below in greater detail).
The ß-sheet instability appears therefore to be essentially induced by the D178N point mutation, that in turn implies a weakening of the electrostatic double hook provided by the Asp-178 residue in the WT PrP (Riek et al., 1998
). This mutation induced instability of the ß-sheet motif may lead to its full disintegration, even in a nanosecond timescale, if the process is thermodynamically activated by abruptly immersing the mutant in an apolar environment (i.e., imposing thermodynamic conditions where the misfolded monomeric form is very likely more stable with respect to the native structure). In fact, in CCl4, the instability of the antiparallel ß-sheet motif in the mutant is enhanced and disintegration occurs with higher probability as the hydrophobic residues involved in this structural element experience solvation forces that tend to bring them on the protein surface.
In summary, the stability of the ß-sheet in PrP appears to be related to the H-bond network among the side chains of the residues Tyr-128, Asp-178, and Arg-164. The introduction of the D178N point mutation, mainly since it makes the charged residue 178 electroneutral, weakens the mutual interactions among these three residues. In principle a similar effect could be also achieved lowering the solution pH. In fact, since the Asp-178 residue is exposed to the solvent, a strong acidic environment could enhance the protonation of its carboxylic group, consequently decreasing its average net charge. To get further insight for supporting our results, we have applied the fß algorithm (see Results) to the NMR conformers of human PrP (hPrP) determined at pH 4.5 (Zahn et al., 2000
) (20 conformers in the PDB; code 1QM3) and at pH 7.0 (Calzolai and Zahn, 2003
) (20 conformers in the PDB; code 1HJN). In Fig. 5 a we report the nonnormalized m function (see Eq. 1) instead of the normalized fß to allow a direct quantitative comparison of the ß-sheet stability at pH 7.0 and 4.5. We clearly note that the contents in ß-sheet increase with increasing pH, implying a larger stability of the ß-sheet at pH 7.0. This result is consistent with the conclusions by Calzolai and Zahn (2003)
obtained by evaluating the free energy of exchange of backbone amide atoms of hPrP. To get information on the hypothesized correlation between ß-sheet stability and interactions among Tyr-128, Asp-178, and Arg-164, we have calculated the two atom-atom OD-OH and OD-CZ distances, where OD is the oxygen atom of the Asp-178 side chain closest to the oxygen atom (labeled OH in the PDB) of the Tyr-128 side chain and to the carbon atom (labeled CZ in the PDB) of the Arg-164 side chain, respectively. The data are shown in Fig. 5, b and c, for all NMR conformers at both pH values. In general we can observe that for both types of interactions, Asp-178Arg-164 (OD-CZ distance) and Asp-178Tyr-128 (OD-OH distance), lower pH is correlated to larger interresidue distances, i.e., weaker interaction. In particular it is remarkable that the H-bond between Asp-178 and Tyr-128 is broken at low pH (see Fig. 5 b). The weakening of the interaction between Arg-164 and Asp-178 at low pH (see Fig. 5 c) is not as important as that observed for Asp-178Tyr-128, though well evident in this case too. Although the OD-CZ distance in two conformers at pH 4.5 (conformers 9 and 13 in Fig. 5 c) is very short (lower than 4 Å), in the most representative conformer, indicated by the authors to be the conformer 12 (see header in the 1QM3 PDB file), such distance is predicted to be much larger, i.e.,
10.2 Å. Also the OD-OH distance (Fig. 5 b) in the most representative conformer at pH 4.5 is very large (
6.3 Å). No representative conformer has been indicated for the hPrP at pH 7.0 (see header in the 1HJN PDB file). These results are fully consistent with the main finding of our MD simulation study, thus offering a further experiment-based support to our results.
|
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
52 ns in CCl4. Results indicate that the PrP fold in the nanosecond timescale is stable and does not undergo major conformational changes, irrespective of the solvent polarity and pathogenic point mutation. We have measured the stability of secondary structure elements by means of the DSSP method and by devising an appropriate function based on geometrical considerations for measuring H-bond strength. In general the ß-sheet appears to be less stable in the D178N mutant. More surprisingly, the instability of the ß-sheet is enhanced in CCl4, where intrasolute electrostatic interactions should be in principle favored with the formation of additional secondary structure. The instability of the ß-sheet in the D178N mutant appears to be correlated, in CCl4, to a corresponding stabilization of the
-helices (especially helices 1 and 2). These observations could be rationalized as follows. In the native fold, the electrostatic interactions between Arg-164, Tyr-128, and Asp-178 stabilize both the ß-sheet and, partly, the PrP fold. When Asp-178 is replaced with Asn-178, helix 2 becomes less tightly bound to the antiparallel ß-sheet because of the breakup either of the salt bridge Arg-164Asp-178, or of the H-bond Tyr-128Asp-178. The hydrophobic shock induced by the immersion in CCl4 of the mutant of a fold fit for water and the weakening of the electrostatic hook between helix 2 and the ß-strands, produces mechanical tensions leading to an effective weakening of the short antiparallel ß-sheet. For some runs in CCl4, the ß-sheet breaks down easing the tension on the PrP fold, thus allowing the stabilization of the
-helical motifs. The correlation existing between ß-sheet stability and strength of the interactions among the residues Tyr-128, Asp-178, and Arg-164 is an important issue of our study. To get further support to such observation, we have analyzed several NMR conformers of human PrP experimentally determined at pH 4.5 and 7.0. In particular we have focused on the ß-sheet stability and on the strength of interaction of the residue pairs Arg-164Asp-178 and Tyr-128Asp-178 in terms of atom-atom distances. This analysis, seemingly uncorrelated to our specific aim, has been performed on the basis of the hypothesis that acidic environment acts similarly to the D178N point mutation. In fact, since the Asp-178 side chain is exposed to the solvent, a low pH can certainly enhance the protonated form of Asp-178. As a consequence of this increased protonation we might observe a weakening of the interaction of Asp-178 with both Arg-164 (salt bridge) and Tyr-128 (H-bond) and, at the same time, a decrease of the ß-sheet stability. This is indeed what we have observed for the human PrP.
Moreover, in agreement with other MD studies, we have also observed that the small antiparallel ß-sheet 129130/162163 may occasionally become elongated and/or undergo a ß-strand addition from the flexible N-terminus. However, this phenomenon is observed in both water and CCl4 and for both the native and the mutant PrP. Hence, our results suggest that the tendency to ß-sheet elongation and/or strand addition is a typical feature of the normal monomer PrP fold in the nanosecond or submicrosecond timescale, rather than defining a possible early pathway to PrPC
PrPSc conversion, as claimed elsewhere (DeMarco and Daggett, 2004
).
A statistically significant weakening (and occasionally a breakup) of the antiparallel ß-sheet is observed exclusively when thermodynamic and structural conditions that favor the pathogenic conversion are simultaneously applied. These observations are consistent with the following picture: at some stage during the PrPC
PrPSc conversion, the antiparallel ß-structure of the native fold is dissolved allowing the molecule to partially unfold; ß-structure (whether parallel or antiparallel) could be then reformed in a later step. This picture and the underlying simulation data presented in this study are consistent with NMR studies on H-PrP flanking sequences encompassing helix 1 (Ziegler et al., 2003
) and with the model structure for PrPSc monomer proposed recently by Wille et al. (2002)
, based on parallel ß-helical structure extending from the N-terminus up to the second
-helix. We would further stress here that our results are not actually incompatible with antiparallel ß-sheet composition of PrPSc. However they clearly suggest that, even in the case the PrP conformational transition leads to an effective formation of a multistranded antiparallel ß-sheet, the unfolding mechanism should not involve the growth of the antiparallel ß-sheet of PrPC, as claimed in earlier MD simulation studies (Alonso et al., 2001
; DeMarco and Daggett, 2004
).
Although we believe that our MD approach is statistically more reliable than the standard single trajectory method, we are well aware that some kind of non-Boltzmann sampling methodology must be used to further validate our results. With this respect, we are currently applying the recently proposed history dependent metadynamic method (Laio and Parrinello, 2002
) for computing the potential of mean force of ß-sheet formation/disruption of WT and mutant PrP in various solvents. Results will be presented in a forthcoming article.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Submitted on July 19, 2004; accepted for publication November 10, 2004.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bernstein, F. C., T. F. Koetzle, G. J. B. Williams, E. F. Meyer, M. D. Brice, J. R. Rogers, O. Kennard, T. Shimanouchi, and M. Tasumi. 1977. The Protein Data Bank: a computer based archival file for macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Biol. 112:535542.[Medline]
Calzolai, L., and R. Zahn. 2003. Influence of pH on NMR structure and stability of the human prion protein globular domain. J. Biol. Chem. 278:3559235596.
Caughey, B. W., A. Dong, K. S. Bhat, D. Ernst, S. F. Hayes, and W. S. Caughey. 1991. Secondary structure-analysis of the scrapie-associated protein PrP 2730 in water by infrared-spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 30:76727680.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cheatham, T. E., J. L. Miller, T. Fox, T. A. Darden, and P. A. Kollman. 1995. Molecular-dynamics simulations on solvated biomolecular systemsthe particle mesh Ewald method leads to stable trajectories of DNA, RNA, and proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117:41934194.[CrossRef]
Cornell, W. D., P. Cieplak, C. L. Bayly, L. R. Gould, K. M. Merz, D. M. Ferguson, D. C. Spellmeyer, T. Fox, J. W. Caldwell, and P. A. Kollman. 1995. A 2nd generation force-field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic-acids, and organic-molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117:51795197.[CrossRef]
DeMarco, M. L., and V. Daggett. 2004. From conversion to aggregation: protofibril formation of the prion protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101:22932298.
Duan, Y., and P. A. Kollman. 1998. Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed in a 1-microsecond simulation in aqueous solution. Science. 282:740744.
Duan, Y., C. Wu, S. Chowdhury, M. C. Lee, G. Xiong, W. Zhang, R. Yang, P. Cieplak, R. Luo, T. Lee, J. Caldwell, J. Wang, and P. Kollman. 2003. A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 24:19992012.[CrossRef][Medline]
El Bastawissy, E., M. H. Knaggs, and L. H. Gilbert. 2001. Molecular dynamics simulations of wild-type and point mutation human prion protein at normal and elevated temperature. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 20:145154.[CrossRef][Medline]
Essmann, U., L. Perera, M. L. Berkowitz, T. Darden, H. Lee, and L. G. Pedersen. 1995. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J. Chem. Phys. 103:85778593.[CrossRef]
Fox, T., and P. A. Kollman. 1998. Application of the RESP methodology in the parametrization of organic solvents. J. Phys. Chem. B. 102:80708079.
Fraunfelder, H., F. Parak, and R. D. Young. 1988. Conformational substates in proteins. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 17:451479.[CrossRef][Medline]
Garcia, A. E., and K. Y. Sanbonmatsu. 2002.
-helical stabilization by side chain shielding of backbone hydrogen bonds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:27822787.
Gsponer, J., P. Ferrara, and A. Caflisch. 2001. Flexibility of the murine prion protein and its Asp178Asn mutant investigated by molecular dynamics simulations. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 20:169182.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gu, W., T. Wang, J. Zhu, Y. Shi, and H. Liu. 2003. Molecular dynamics simulation of the unfolding of the human prion protein domain under low pH and high temperature conditions. Biophys. Chem. 104:7994.[CrossRef][Medline]
Guilbert, C., F. Ricard, and J. C. Smith. 2000. Dynamic simulation of the mouse prion protein. Biopolymers. 54:406415.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hornemann, S., and R. Glockshuber. 1998. A scrapie-like unfolding intermediate of the prion protein domain PrP(121231) induced by acidic pH. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:60106014.
Huang, Z., S. B. Prusiner, and F. E. Cohen. 1996. Scrapie prions: a three-dimensional model of an infectious fragment. Fold. Des. 1:1319.[CrossRef][Medline]
James, T. L., H. Liu, N. B. Ulyanov, S. Farr-Jones, H. Zhang, D. Donne, K. Kaneko, D. Groth, L. Mehlhorn, and S. B. Prusiner. 1997. Solution structure of a 142-residue recombinant prion protein corresponding to the infectious fragment of the scrapie isoform. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1008610091.
Jorgensen, W. L., J. Chandrasekhar, J. D. Madura, R. W. Impey, and M. L. Klein. 1983. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79:926935.[CrossRef]
Kabsch, W., and C. Sander. 1983. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers. 22:25772637.[CrossRef][Medline]
Laio, A., and M. Parrinello. 2002. Escaping free-energy minima. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:1256212566.
Liemann, S., and R. Glockshuber. 1999. Influence of amino acid substitutions related to inherited human prion diseases on the thermodynamic stability of the cellular prion protein. Biochemistry. 38:32583267.[CrossRef][Medline]
Liu, H., S. Farr-Jones, N. B. Ulyanov, M. Llinas, S. Marqusee, D. Groth, F. E. Cohen, S. B. Prusiner, and T. L. James. 1999. Solution structure of Syrian hamster prion protein rPrP(90231). Biochemistry. 38:53625377.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lopez Garcia, F., R. Zahn, R. Riek, and K. Wüthrich. 2000. NMR structure of the bovine prion protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:83348339.
Marchi, M., and P. Procacci. 1998. Coordinates scaling and multiple time step algorithms for simulation of solvated proteins in the NPT ensemble. J. Chem. Phys. 109:51945202.[CrossRef]
Monticelli, L., and G. Colombo. 2004. The influence of simulation conditions in molecular dynamics investigations of model ß-sheet peptides. Theor. Chem. Acc. 112:145157.
Mu, Y., D. S. Kosov, and G. Stock. 2003. Conformational dynamics of trialanine in water. 2. Comparison of AMBER, CHARMM, GROMOS, and OPLS force fields to NMR and infrared experiments. J. Phys. Chem. B. 107:50645073.
Nguyen, J. T., H. Inouye, M. A. Baldwin, R. J. Fletterick, F. E. Cohen, S. B. Prusiner, and D. A. Kirschner. 1995. X-ray-diffraction of scrapie prion rods and PrP peptides. J. Mol. Biol. 252:412422.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nosé, S. 1984. A molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble. Molec. Phys. 52:255268.[CrossRef]
Okur, A., B. Strockbine, V. Hornak, and C. Simmerling. 2003. Using PC clusters to evaluate the transferability of molecular mechanics force fields for proteins. J. Comput. Chem. 24:2131.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pan, K., M. Baldwin, J. Nguyen, M. Gasset, A. Serban, D. Groth, L. Mehlhorn, Z. Huang, R. J. Fletterick, F. E. Cohen, and S. B. Prusiner. 1993. Conversion of alpha-helices into beta-sheets features in the formation of the scrapie prion proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 90:1096210966.
Parchment, O. G., and J. W. Essex. 2000. Molecular dynamics of mouse and Syrian hamster PrP: implications for activity. Proteins. 38:327340.[CrossRef][Medline]
Patra, M., M. Karttunen, M. T. Hyvönen, E. Falck, P. Lindqvist, and I. Vattulainen. 2003. Molecular dynamics simulations of lipid bilayers: major artifacts due to truncating electrostatic interactions. Biophys. J. 84:36363645.
Procacci, P., T. Darden, and M. Marchi. 1996. A very fast molecular dynamics method to simulate biomolecular systems with realistic electrostatic interactions. J. Phys. Chem. 100:1046410468.[CrossRef]
Procacci, P., T. A. Darden, E. Paci, and M. Marchi. 1997. ORAC: a molecular dynamics program to simulate complex molecular systems with realistic electrostatic interactions. J. Comput. Chem. 18:18481862.[CrossRef]
Prusiner, S. B. 1982. Novel proteinaceous infectious particles cause scrapie. Science. 216:136144.
Prusiner, S. B. 1996. Molecular biology and pathogenesis of prion diseases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 21:482487.[CrossRef][Medline]
Prusiner, S. B. 1998. Prions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:1336313383.
Prusiner, S. B., M. B. McKinley, K. A. Bowman, D. C. Bolton, P. E. Bendheim, D. F. Groth, and G. G. Glenner. 1983. Scrapie prions aggregate to form amyloid-like birefringent rods. Cell. 35:349358.[CrossRef][Medline]
Prusiner, S. B., M. P. McKinley, D. F. Groth, K. A. Bowman, N. L. Mock, S. P. Cochran, and F. R. Masiarz. 1981. Scrapie agent contains a hydrophobic protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 78:66756679.
Riek, R., S. Hornemann, G. Wider, M. Billeter, R. Glockshuber, and W. Wüthrich. 1996. NMR structure of the mouse prion protein domain PrP(121231). Nature. 382:180182.[CrossRef][Medline]
Riek, R., G. Wider, M. Billeter, S. Hornemann, R. Glockshuber, and K. Wüthrich. 1998. Prion protein NMR structure and familial human spongiform encephalopathies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:1166711672.
Saito, M. 1994. Molecular-dynamics simulations of proteins in solutionartifacts caused by the cutoff approximation. J. Chem. Phys. 101:40554061.[CrossRef]
Sekijima, M., C. Motono, S. Yamasaki, K. Kaneko, and Y. Akiyama. 2003. Molecular dynamics simulation of dimeric and monomeric forms of human prion protein: insight into dynamics and properties. Biophys. J. 85:11761185.
Stahl, N., and S. B. Prusiner. 1991. Prions and prion proteins. FASEB J. 5:27992807.[Abstract]
Swietnicki, W., M. Morillas, S. G. Chen, P. Gambetti, and W. K. Surewicz. 2000. Aggregation and fibrillization of the recombinant human prion protein huPrP90231. Biochemistry. 39:424431.[CrossRef][Medline]
Swietnicki, W., R. Petersen, P. Gambetti, and W. K. Surewicz. 1997. pH-dependent stability and conformation of the recombinant human prion protein PrP(90231). J. Biol. Chem. 272:2751727520.
Tuckerman, M., B. J. Berne, and G. J. Martyna. 1992. Reversibile multiple time scale molecular-dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 97:19902001.[CrossRef]
Turk, E., D. B. Teplow, L. E. Hood, and S. B. Prusiner. 1988. Purification and properties of the cellular and scrapie Hamster prion proteins. Eur. J. Biochem. 176:2130.[Medline]
Wille, H., M. D. Michelitsch, V. Génebaut, S. Supattapone, A. Serban, F. E. Cohen, D. A. Agard, and S. B. Prusiner. 2002. Structural studies of the scrapie prion protein by electron crystallography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:35633568.
Wolf, D., P. Keblinski, S. R. Phillpot, and J. Eggebrecht. 1999. Exact method for the simulation of Coulombic systems by spherically truncated, pairwise r1 summation. J. Chem. Phys. 110:82548282.[CrossRef]
Zahn, R., A. Liu, T. Lührs, R. Riek, C. von Schroetter, F. Lopez Garcia, M. Billeter, L. Calzolai, G. Wider, and K. Wüthrich. 2000. NMR solution structure of the human prion protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:145150.
Zaman, M. H., M.-Y. Shen, R. S. Berry, K. F. Freed, and T. R. Sosnick. 2003. Investigations into sequence and conformational dependence of backbone entropy, inter-basin dynamics and the Flory isolated-pair hypothesis for peptides. J. Mol. Biol. 331:693711.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ziegler, J., H. Sticht, U. C. Marx, W. Müller, P. Rösch, and S. Schwarzinger. 2003. CD and NMR studies of prion protein (PrP) helix 1: novel implications for its role in the PrPC
PrPSC conversion process. J. Biol. Chem. 278:5017550181.
Zou, W. Q., and N. R. Cashman. 2002. Acidic pH and detergents enhance in vitro conversion of human brain PrPC to a PrPSC-like form. J. Biol. Chem. 277:4394243947.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||