| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Laboratory of Chemical Physics, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
Correspondence: Address reprint requests to William A. Eaton, Laboratory of Chemical Physics, Bldg. 5, Rm. 104, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-0520. Tel.: 301-496-6030; Fax: 301-496-0825; E-mail: eaton{at}helix.nih.gov.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
80th power of the protein concentration, compared to
40th power for the concentration dependence of the reciprocal of the delay time that precedes fiber formation. These remarkably high concentration dependences, as well as the exponential distribution of domain volumes, can be explained by the previously proposed double nucleation model in which homogeneous nucleation of a single fiber triggers the formation of an entire domain via heterogeneous nucleation and growth. The enormous sensitivity of the domain formation rate to intracellular hemoglobin S concentration explains the variable cell morphology and why rapid polymerization results in cells that do not appear sickled at all. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Kinetics of polymerization were measured after an
30 s temperature jump from 276 K to final temperatures between 289 K and 308 K by continuously monitoring the birefringence from the intensity of a 458-nm argon ion laser transmitted through the sample placed between crossed Glan-Thompson calcite linear polarizers. The delay time for each progress curve was taken as the time at which the maximal slope of the progress curve intersects with the time axis.
Images of the polymerized sample between crossed linear polarizers at various magnifications between 25x and 400x were recorded with a video camera. Domains were defined as having four lobes of light transmission with a central region of extinction, as observed for the largest domains. A range of magnifications was employed to insure that smaller domains were counted. This method of analysis included more than
75% of the area of the sample. The area of each domain was determined by two, roughly perpendicular diameters. The domain volume was then calculated by approximating the domain as a right circular cylinder with volume
where t is the sample thickness and the radius
is determined from the average of the two measured diameters (Fig. 2).
|
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The distribution of
calculated from all of the normalized data is shown in Fig. 4 B, as well as distributions obtained from subsets of the experiments with largest (long delay times) and smallest (short delay times) domain volumes. The distributions are very similar, exhibiting a peak at small volumes and an exponential decay. The similar shapes of the volume distributions suggests that domains of all sizes have the same structure (i.e., organization of fibers) and form by the same mechanism. The exponential decay in the volume distribution is characteristic of objects that are randomly distributed in space. This probability distribution of points at particle density n was treated by Chandrasekhar (1943)
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Our results can be understood in terms of the double nucleation model for fiber formation (Ferrone et al., 1980
, 1985a
, 2002
; Eaton and Hofrichter, 1990
; Samuel et al., 1990
; Briehl, 1995
; Cao and Ferrone, 1997
; Vaiana et al., 2003
; Galkin and Vekilov, 2004
). According to this model nucleation of a single fiber at random locations in the solution (homogeneous nucleation) triggers the autocatalytic formation of a large number of additional fibers via secondary nucleation on the surface of existing ones (heterogeneous nucleation). Heterogeneous nucleation and growth produce an exponentially increasing amount of polymer with time, and therefore a delay period before a sufficient amount is formed to be detected. Both homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation are highly concentration dependent because a large number of molecules must assemble to form a critical nucleus and because of changes in the effective thermodynamic concentration (activity) arising from molecular crowding in these concentrated protein solutions. The homogeneous nucleation rate has been directly measured from the distribution of delay times observed in repetitive experiments on small sample volumes. The distribution results from stochastic fluctuations in the time at which a single homogeneous nucleus molecule forms (Ferrone et al., 1980
; Hofrichter, 1986
; Szabo, 1988
; Cao and Ferrone, 1996
, 1997
). For long delay times, in which no more than one nucleus is formed in the observation volume, the distribution is exponential and the decay gives the homogeneous nucleation rate directly. Szabo has shown how to extract the nucleation rate in the more complex situation when more than one nucleus is formed in the observation volume (Szabo, 1988
).
A 60 (±10)th power concentration dependence for the homogeneous nucleation rate was determined in a concentration range slightly higher than that employed in the present experiments (Ivanova et al., 2000
). We find a comparable extraordinarily high power for the concentration dependence of the domain formation rate (80 ± 7), with about twice the exponent observed for the delay time (41± 4). (Both the homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation rates depend on concentration to a power that is the size of their critical nuclei, i.e., ci* and cj*, respectively. The inverse delay time depends primarily on the square root of the heterogeneous nucleation rate, i.e., on cj*/2. In the concentration range of our experiments i*
j* (Ferrone et al., 1985a
), explaining the twofold higher concentration dependence of the homogeneous nucleation rate (Cao and Ferrone, 1996
).
These results provide strong evidence that homogeneous nucleation of a single fiber is the rate-limiting process in forming a domain and triggers its growth via heterogeneous nucleation and fiber elongation (Ferrone et al., 1985a
). Moreover, the random location of domains demonstrated by the exponential volume distribution is consistent with the underlying assumption of the double nucleation model that homogeneous nucleation occurs at random positions in the solution.
One possible caveat is that the absolute domain formation rate is more than 10-fold smaller than the homogeneous nucleation rate determined from delay time distributions (Hofrichter, 1986
; Szabo, 1988
; Cao and Ferrone, 1996
, 1997
; Ivanova et al., 2000
). Such a difference is predicted by the double nucleation mechanism. The amount of polymer associated with each nucleation event increases exponentially via heterogeneous nucleation and growth. Since polymers grow linearly with time (Samuel et al., 1990
), and since the maximum dimension of the domain is limited by the length of the longest fiber, the polymer density of the growing domain also increases exponentially. Consequently, the amount of polymerized hemoglobin S associated with nuclei that form late in the delay time is much smaller than that associated with earlier homogeneous nucleation events, with the result that they do not contribute significantly to the birefringence pattern. However, since the structure of gels is independent of domain density, as evidenced by the normalized volume distributions (Fig. 4 B), the fraction of undetected domains should be approximately independent of the delay time, and therefore should not significantly affect the relative domain formation rates.
Our results provide the key to explaining the wide range of shapes observed for red cells containing polymerized hemoglobin S. Sherman (1940)
first showed that the shape of the red cell depends on the rate of deoxygenation (Fig. 5). (Sherman's experiments were influential in attracting Linus Pauling to think about sickle cell disease in the 1940s (Pauling et al., 1949
; Eaton, 2003
).) Since the nucleation rate varies with the supersaturation, which is the ratio of the total protein concentration to the equilibrium solubility (Hofrichter et al., 1976
), the domain formation rate depends on the rate of the solubility decrease resulting from the decreasing oxygen pressure. Rapid deoxygenation corresponds to rapidly attaining a high supersaturation, and is therefore analogous to a high protein concentration in the experiments described above. The optical birefringence micrographs in Fig. 5 show that not only the morphology, but also the birefringence patterns of cells depend on the deoxygenation rate. Slow deoxygenation results in a single fiber domain that initially grows in one general direction (Basak et al., 1988
; Samuel et al., 1990
), with the classic sickled shape resulting from oblique alignment of adjacent fibers through interactions of their helical surfaces (Edelstein and Crepeau, 1979
). In contrast, rapid deoxygenation produces cells that do not appear sickled at all, having a nearly normal biconcave disc shape, even though the cells are filled with multiple domains of polymerized hemoglobin as is evident from the birefringence pattern (Fig. 5 E). When cells are fractionated according to their intracellular hemoglobin concentration and deoxygenated at the same rate, the number of domains observed by linear dichroism increases with increasing concentration, consistent with the above analysis (Corbett et al., 1995
).
|
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Submitted on August 17, 2004; accepted for publication October 29, 2004.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bridges, K. R., G. D. Barabino, C. Brugnara, M. Cho, G. W. Christoph, G. Dover, B. Ewenstein, D. E. Golan, C. R. G. Guttmann, J. Hofrichter, R. V. Mulkern, B. Zhang, and W. A. Eaton. 1996. A multiparameter analysis of sickle erythrocytes in patients undergoing hydroxyurea therapy. Blood. 88:47014711.
Briehl, R. W. 1995. Nucleation, fiber growth and melting, and domain formation and structure in sickle cell hemoglobin gels. J. Mol. Biol. 245:710723.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bunn, H. F. 1997. Mechanisms of diseasepathogenesis and treatment of sickle cell disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 337:762769.
Cao, Z. Q., and F. A. Ferrone. 1996. A 50th order reaction predicted and observed for sickle hemoglobin nucleation. J. Mol. Biol. 256:219222.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cao, Z. Q., and F. A. Ferrone. 1997. Homogeneous nucleation in sickle hemoglobin: Stochastic measurements with a parallel method. Biophys. J. 72:343352.
Chandrasekhar, S. 1943. Stochastic problems in physics and astronomy. Rev. Mod. Phys. 15:189.[CrossRef]
Charache, S., M. L. Perrin, R. D. Morre, G. J. Dover, F. B. Barton, S. V. Eckert, R. P. McMahon, and D. R. Bonds. 1995. Effect of hydroxyurea on the frequency of painful crises in sickle cell anemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 332:13171322.
Corbett, J. D., W. E. Mickols, and M. F. Maestre. 1995. Effect of hemoglobin concentration on nucleation and polymer formation in sickled red blood cells. J. Biol. Chem. 270:27082715.
Cretegny, I., and S. J. Edelstein. 1993. Double strand packing in hemoglobin-S fibers. J. Mol. Biol. 230:733738.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dobson, C. M. 2003. Protein folding and misfolding. Nature. 426:884890.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dykes, G. W., R. H. Crepeau, and S. J. Edelstein. 1978. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the fibres of sickle cell haemoglobin. Nature. 272:506510.[CrossRef][Medline]
Eaton, W. A. 2003. Linus Pauling and sickle cell disease. Biophys. Chem. 100:109116.[CrossRef][Medline]
Eaton, W. A., and J. Hofrichter. 1981. Polarized absorption and linear dichroism spectroscopy of hemoglobin. Methods Enzymol. 76:175261.[Medline]
Eaton, W. A., and J. Hofrichter. 1987. Hemoglobin S gelation and sickle cell disease. Blood. 70:12451266.
Eaton, W. A., and J. Hofrichter. 1990. Sickle cell hemoglobin polymerization. Adv. Protein. Chem. 40:63279.[Medline]
Eaton, W. A., and J. Hofrichter. 1995. The biophysics of sickle cell hydroxyurea therapy. Science. 268:11421143.
Edelstein, S. J., and R. H. Crepeau. 1979. Oblique alignment of hemoglobin-S fibers in sickled cells. J. Mol. Biol. 134:851855.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ferrone, F. A., J. Hofrichter, and W. A. Eaton. 1985a. Kinetics of sickle hemoglobin polymerization II. A double nucleation mechanism. J. Mol. Biol. 183:611631.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ferrone, F. A., J. Hofrichter, and W. A. Eaton. 1985b. Kinetics of sickle hemoglobin polymerization; I. Studies using temperature jump and laser photolysis techniques. J. Mol. Biol. 183:591610.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ferrone, F. A., J. Hofrichter, H. R. Sunshine, and W. A. Eaton. 1980. Kinetic studies on photolysis induced gelation of sickle cell hemoglobin suggest a new mechanism. Biophys. J. 32:361377.
Ferrone, F. A., M. Ivanova, and R. Jasuja. 2002. Heterogeneous nucleation and crowding in sickle hemoglobin: An analytic approach. Biophys. J. 82:399406.
Galkin, O., and P. G. Vekilov. 2004. Mechanisms of homogeneous nucleation of polymers of sickle cell anemia hemoglobin in deoxy state. J. Mol. Biol. 336:4359.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hofrichter, J. 1986. Kinetics of sickle hemoglobin polymerization. III. Nucleation rates determined from stochastic fluctuations in polymerization progress curves. J. Mol. Biol. 189:553571.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hofrichter, J., D. G. Hendricker, and W. A. Eaton. 1973. Structure of hemoglobin S fibers: optical determination of the molecular orientation in sickled red cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 70:36043608.
Hofrichter, J., P. D. Ross, and W. A. Eaton. 1974. Kinetics and mechanism of deoxyhemoglobin S gelation. A new approach to understanding sickle cell disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 71:48644868.
Hofrichter, J., P. D. Ross, and W. A. Eaton. 1976. Supersaturation in sickle cell hemoglobin solutions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 73:30343039.
Ingram, V. M. 1957. Gene mutations in human hemoglobin: the chemical difference between normal and sickle cell hemoglobin. Nature. 180:326328.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ivanova, M., R. Jasuja, S. Kwong, R. W. Briehl, and F. A. Ferrone. 2000. Nonideality and the nucleation of sickle hemoglobin. Biophys. J. 79:10161022.
Mozzarelli, A., J. Hofrichter, and W. A. Eaton. 1987. Delay time of hemoglobin-S polymerization prevents most cells from sickling in vivo. Science. 237:500506.
Pauling, L., H. A. Itano, S. J. Singer, and I. C. Wells. 1949. Sickle cell anemia, a molecular disease. Science. 110:543548.
Samuel, R. E., E. D. Salmon, and R. W. Briehl. 1990. Nucleation and growth of fibres and gel formation in sickle cell hemoglobin. Nature. 345:833835.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sherman, I. J. 1940. The sickling phenomenon, with special reference to the differentiation of sickle cell anemia from sickle cell trait. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hospital. 67:309324.
Sipe, J. D., and A. S. Cohen. 2000. Review: history of the amyloid fibril. J. Struct. Biol. 130:8898.[CrossRef][Medline]
Steinberg, M. H., and C. Brugnara. 2003. Pathophysiological-based approaches to treatment of sickle cell disease. Annu. Rev. Med. 54:89112.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sunshine, H. R., J. Hofrichter, and W. A. Eaton. 1978. Requirements for therapeutic inhibition of sickle hemoglobin gelation. Nature. 275:238240.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sunshine, H. R., J. Hofrichter, and W. A. Eaton. 1979. Gelation of sickle-cell hemoglobin in mixtures with normal adult and fetal hemoglobins. J. Mol. Biol. 133:435467.[CrossRef][Medline]
Szabo, A. 1988. Fluctuations in the polymerization of sickle hemoglobina simple analytic model. J. Mol. Biol. 199:539542.[CrossRef][Medline]
Vaiana, S. M., M. B. Palma-Vittorelli, and M. U. Palma. 2003. Time scale of protein aggregation dictated by liquid-liquid demixing. Proteins. 51:147153.[CrossRef][Medline]
Watowich, S. J., L. J. Gross, and R. Josephs. 1993. Analysis of the intermolecular contacts within sickle hemoglobin fibers - effect of site-specific substitutions, fiber pitch, and double-strand disorder. J. Struct. Biol. 111:161179.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Koldkjaer and M. Berenbrink In vivo red blood cell sickling and mechanism of recovery in whiting, Merlangius merlangus J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2007; 210(19): 3451 - 3460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |