| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-8204
Correspondence: Address reprint requests and inquiries to Alex Smirnov, Tel.: 919-513-4377; Fax: 919-513-7353; E-mail: alex_smirnov{at}ncsu.edu.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
177 nm in diameter results in a more than threefold longer characteristic time of the lipid rearrangement and a decrease in the cooperative unit number, the phase transition temperature is unaffected.
Substrate-supported phospholipid bilayers serve as useful models for studying various properties of biological membranes and as a convenient way to biofunctionalize various inorganic substrates (1
). Typically, substrates employed for such purposes have a planar geometry. Although these structures are convenient for studying with advanced surface-sensitive and imaging techniques, the small amount of lipids per substrate-supported sample poses a problem for other methods such as electron paramagnetic resonance, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Recently, we have described substrate-supported bilayers that are formed by lipid self-assembly inside nanoporous substrates (2
). These structureswhich we call lipid nanotube arrayshave a high density of the nanoporous channels providing at least a 500-fold increase in the bilayer surface area for the same size planar substrate chips. Thus, such arrays could be studied by DSC and other methods. Recent NMR studies of such lipid nanotubes formed from 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-choline (DMPC) and confined to anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) substrate with
200 nm pore diameter indicated some differences in the gel-to-liquid crystal phase transition when compared with unsupported bilayers (3
). Specifically, temperature dependence of the normalized methylene resonance intensity measured in a 1H magic-angle spinning NMR experiment indicated a substantial broadening of the phase transition and
1 K shift of the phase transition to lower temperatures (3
).
To study the thermodynamics and the mechanism of the phase transition in substrate-supported lipid nanotubes we employed DSC as the most direct and convenient method. Multilamellar DMPC vesicles (20% lipid by volume) were prepared as in (2
) and used as a control sample 1. For sample 2, an AAO disk (Whatman, Middlesex, UK; 20 nm pores) was immersed in a buffer and placed inside an ER-3 extruder (Eastern Scientific, Rockville, MD) that was attached to 0.5-ml Hamilton syringes (Hamilton, Reno, NV) on each end. DMPC vesicles were loaded into one of the syringes and pushed back and forth at least 25 times. Subsequently, an excess of lipids was removed by flushing the nanopores with a buffer to ensure that only a single nanotubular bilayer is left on the surface (5
). From examination of this AAO substrate with a JEOL 6400F field Emission scanning electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan), the average pore diameter was 177 ± 25 nm for one side and 28 ± 8 nm for the thin (12 µm) filtration layer on the other side. After depositing the lipids, two AAO disks of 25-mm diameter were broken into a few pieces and placed into a steel high-volume pan. The pan was filled with 2030 µl of buffer, sealed with a lid and an O-ring, and loaded into a Q100 calorimeter (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE). Each sample contained
1 mg of DMPC.
Fig. 1 shows a series of DSC curves for samples 1 and 2 measured at progressively decreasing rates from ß = 1.750.1 K/min (from top to bottom). The scans obtained at ß > 0.5 K/min are visibly distorted. Decreasing ß below 0.1 K/min was impractical because of the low amplitude of the DSC signal. Our minimal rate ß was slower than the 0.5 K/min previously employed in the DSC studies of DMPC bilayers formed on mica chips (4
) but faster than ß = 0.0232 K/min reported for unsupported bilayers (5
).
|
![]() |
![]() |
HvH and
Hcal are the van't Hoff and calorimetric enthalpy, respectively, K(T) is the equilibrium constant, and Tm is the phase transition temperature. These equations represent an idealized model of the bilayer phase transition occurring as a quasiequilibrium non-two-step process composed of many A
B reversible steps.
When the temperature is changing rapidly, the equilibrium for the A
B process is restored as ([A] [A0])
(k1 + k1)t resulting in a proportional time dependence of the heat flow q(t)
(k1 + k1)t = t/
, where k1 and k1 are the rate constants for the forward and the reverse processes, respectively, and
is the effective time constant of the lipid rearrangement. If ß = const, then T is proportional to t and the experimental DSC signal E(T) can be approximated by a convolution integral:
![]() |
We have applied this first-order relaxation model to least-square fit the DSC data using a modification of a convolution-based Levenberg-Marquardt optimization program we developed previously for electron paramagnetic resonance (7
). It was found that this model fits the DSC curves exceptionally well (Fig. 2). The results of least-squares simulations of all the DSC data are plotted in Fig. 3. Two parameters of the phase transition, Tm and
HvH, were found to be rate dependent and therefore were determined by extrapolating to ß = 0 as shown in Fig. 3, A and B. It was found that although for AAO-confined DMPC bilayer Tm = 23.43 ± 0.05°C was essentially the same as for the control sample Tm = 23.50 ± 0.05°C, the van't Hoff enthalpy was lower (
HvH = 8.9 ± 0.2 vs. 18.8 ± 0.2 MJ/mol).
|
|
, for both samples were essentially independent of the temperature rate ß in accord with our model. However,
for the nanopore-confined DMPC bilayer was significantly longer than for the control (
= 70 vs. 21 s). Although the finite time-response of the DSC calorimeter could also contribute to
, we speculate that this contribution is minimal because of the small amount of lipids and very thin samples used for the experiments. Moreover, because of essentially the same lipid amounts in both samples, this contribution is also expected to be the same. Thus, this difference in
indicates that rearrangement of the lipid in the bilayers confined to nanopores during the phase transition is significantly slower than for the control.
Another effect of nanoscale confinement on the mechanism of the phase transition is a decrease of the cooperative unit number N. By taking
Hcal
22.5 KJ/mol for DMPC (8
) we estimate N by dividing
HvH to
Hcal as
400 for the AAO-confined nanotubular bilayer versus
840 for the control sample. It is worthwhile to note here that for AAO-supported nanotubular bilayer the domain size N
400 is about an order of magnitude greater than N = 3545 estimated from atomic force microscopy measurements for planar substrate-supported bilayers (9
). Thus, the main effect of nanopore confinement appears to be in longer time constants associated with lipid rearrangement during the phase transition but not in the thermodynamics as previously thought (3
).
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Submitted on November 17, 2004; accepted for publication December 22, 2004.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 Smirnov, A. I., and O. G. Poluektov. 2003. Substrate-supported lipid nanotube arrays. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125:84348435.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 Gaede, H. C., K. M. Luckett, I. V. Polozov, and K. Gawrisch. 2004. Multinuclear NMR studies of single lipid bilayers supported in cylindrical aluminum oxide nanopores. Langmuir. 20:77117719.[CrossRef][Medline]
4 Yang, J., and J. Appleyard. 2000. The main phase transition of mica-supported phosphatidylcholine membranes. J. Phys. Chem. B. 104:80978100.
5 Albon, N., and J. M. Sturtevant. 1978. Nature of the gel to liquid transition of synthetic phosphatidylcholines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 75:22582260.
6 Sturtevant, J. M. 1987. Biochemical applications of differential scanning calorimetry. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 38:463488.[CrossRef]
7 Smirnov, A. I., and T. I. Smirnova. 2004. Convolution-based algorithm: from analysis of rotational dynamics to EPR oximetry and protein distance measurements. Biol. Magn. Res. 21:277348.
8 Mabrey, S., and J. M. Sturtevant. 1976. Investigation of phase transitions of lipids and lipid mixtures by high sensitivity differential scanning calorimetry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 73:38623866.
9 Xie, A. F., R. Yamada, A. A. Gewirth, and S. Granick. 2002. Materials science of the gel to fluid phase transition in a supported phospholipid bilayer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89:246103.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Y. Chekmenev, P. L. Gor'kov, T. A. Cross, A. M. Alaouie, and A. I. Smirnov Flow-Through Lipid Nanotube Arrays for Structure-Function Studies of Membrane Proteins by Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy Biophys. J., October 15, 2006; 91(8): 3076 - 3084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |