| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India
Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Sudha M. Cowsik, Tel.: 91-11-26177359; Fax: 91-11-26165886; E-mail: scowsik{at}yahoo.com.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-helix in this region from residue 4 to 10. An extended highly flexible N-terminus of scyliorhinin I displays some degree of order and a possible turn structure. Observed conformational features have been compared with respect to that of substance P and neurokinin A, which are endogenous agonists of NK-1 and NK-2 receptors, respectively. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In mammals, tachykinins have been shown to elicit a wide array of activities such as powerful vasodilatation, hypertensive action, and stimulation of extravascular smooth muscle and are known to be involved in variety of clinical conditions, including chronic pain, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, depression, rheumatoid arthritis, irritable bowel syndrome and asthma (Khawaja and Rogers, 1996
). This broad spectrum of action of tachykinins is attributed to the lack of selectivity of tachykinins to their receptors. Three distinct G-protein coupled receptor subtypes have been cloned and characterized for tachykinins (Hanley and Jackson, 1987
; Masu et al., 1987
; Nakanishi, 1991
) designated as NK1, NK2, and NK3. All tachykinins interact with all the three receptor subtypes with SP preferring NK1, NKA preferring NK2, and NKB preferring NK3. Considerably more is known about the actions of Scy I in mammalian systems than in their own species. Competitive binding studies have shown that Scy I is a high-affinity agonist for both the mammalian NK1 and NK2 tachykinin receptors and possess 50250 times reduced affinity for NK3 receptor. The binding affinity of Scy I is as high as that of endogenous ligands SP and NKA for NK1 and NK2, respectively (Beaujouan et al., 1988
; Buck and Krstenansky, 1987
). This property of Scy I makes it a valuable tool for further research on tachykinin receptors. Elucidation of the membrane bound conformation of this dual selective agonist is expected to be helpful in understanding the structure-activity relationship and developing efficient drugs.
Bioactive conformation of tachykinin neuropeptides has been extensively investigated using high-resolution NMR, CD, and infrared spectroscopy. Solution structure for SP, NKA, NKB, physalaemin, eledoisin, and various naturally derived or synthetic analogs has been reported in various membrane mimetic solvents (Ananthanarayanan and Orlicky, 1992
; Chandrashekar and Cowsik, 2003
; Chandrashekar et al., 2004
; Convert et al., 1988
, 1991
; Cowsik et al., 1997
; Grace et al., 2001
, 2003
; Horne et al., 1993
; Mantha et al., 2004
; Seelig, 1992
; Whitehead et al., 1998
). Only a few studies have been reported on the structure of Scy I. A solution conformational study for Scy I and its analogs with conformational constraints has been reported in water and DMSO-d6 using a combination of CD, 2D NMR, and theoretical conformational analysis (Klaudel et al., 2000
; Rodziewicz-Motowidlo et al., 2000
). Their results showed that the 3D structure of Scy I was rather flexible, whereas the presence of a local constraint (MePhe7) significantly rigidified the whole molecule. To date, none of the reported data deals with the high-resolution structure of Scy I. Binding of Scy I to its receptor occurs in the membrane environment. Membrane is proposed to induce a specific conformation to the peptide backbone of Scy I before interacting with its receptor, and this conformational alteration should be an essential step for the recognition by the receptor.
In this study, we report the 3D structure of Scy I in DPC, one of the well-characterized model membrane systems (Opella, 1997
), using 2D NMR spectroscopy. CD spectroscopy has been used to explore secondary structural features of Scy-I in different membrane mimetic environments, including 2, 2, 2-TFE, TFE/water mixtures, SDS, DPC micelles, and in the presence of calcium ions. We also discuss the mechanism of interaction of Scy I with membranes and the structural requirements for its function.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CD spectropolarimetry
CD spectra (190250 nm) of the peptide were recorded on a Jasco (Tokyo, Japan) J-720 spectropolarimeter. The instrument had been calibrated previously for wavelength using benzene vapor and for optical rotation using d-10-camphorsulphonic acid. A cell with a path length of 1 mm was used. All the experiments were carried out at room temperature. The parameters used were as follows: bandwidth, 1 nm; step resolution, 0.25 nm; scan speed, 50 nm/min; response time, 0.2 s. Each spectrum was obtained after an average of four scans. The peptide concentration was typically 109 µM in DPC, sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.2, various ratios of TFE/water mixture, and SDS micelles. Ca2+ titrations were carried out using aliquots of CaCl2 in TFE solution so as to get molar ratios (Ca2+: peptide conc.) of 1:1, 5:1, 10:1, 15:1, and 20:1. Before calculation of the final ellipticity, all spectra were corrected by subtraction of respective spectra obtained for peptide-free samples (containing only membrane mimetic solvents). Spectra were then smoothened using fast Fourier transform. CD intensity is expressed in terms of molar ellipticity ([
], expressed in degrees cm2mol1) according to the following equation,
![]() |
mdeg is the measured ellipticity in millidegrees, l is the cell path length in cm; and C is the molar concentration of the protein or peptide.
Analysis of CD data
Quantitative estimations of the secondary structure contents were made using the CDPRO software package, which includes the programs CDSSTR, CONTINLL, and SELCON 3 (http://lamar.colostate.edu/
sreeram/CDPro; Sreerama et al., 1999
; Sreerama and Woody, 1994
). On analysis of the CD spectra with these three programs, CDSSTR gave rise to a best fit with the lowest root mean-square deviation (RMSD) between experimentally derived and calculated points whereas SELCON 3 and CONTINLL gave negative fractions in some calculations. The results tested with a reference set of 42 proteins are reported in Tables 1 and 2. Other reference protein sets, such as 29, 37, 43, and 48 were also tested and gave rise to comparable results.
|
|
0.5 ml of water (90% H2O, 10% D2O, pH 4.5). The experiments in lipid environment were performed with an identical peptide sample to which 40 mg of perdeuterated DPC was added, yielding in solution a lipid concentration of 200 mM, which is well above the critical micellar concentration (1mM). Some preliminary 1D spectra were recorded at different temperatures (290320 K).
The phase sensitive homonuclear 2D DQF-COSY, TOCSY, NOESY, and ROESY experiments at 315 K were performed using a time-proportional phase incrementation method (Marion and Wüthrich, 1983
). For these experiments, 512 transients with 2K complex data points were collected for each of the increments with a relaxation delay of 1.5 s between successive transients, the data along the t1 dimension were zero filled, and the resultant 1K data were subjected to 2D-FT. A TOCSY experiment was performed using 100 ms, MLEV-17 spin-lock mixing pulse. NOESY experiments were performed at mixing times of 100, 150, 200, and 250 ms, and a ROESY experiment at 200 ms mixing time. All NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker (Zurich, Switzerland) DRX-500 spectrometer. The NMR spectra were processed using XWINNMR software on a Silicon Graphics fuel workstation (SGI, Mountain View, CA).
Structure calculation
Distance constraints were extracted from the NOESY spectra with 150 ms mixing time. All the NOE intensities were classified as strong, medium, and weak and were converted to the corresponding upper bound interproton distance restraints of 2.7, 3.5, and 5.0 Å, respectively. A total of 94 NOE constraints (42 intraresidue, 26 i, i + 1, 15 i, i + 2, 8 i, i + 3, and 3 i, i + 4) were originally applied for structure calculation using DYANA (Güntert et al., 1997
). 3JHN
-coupling constants were obtained from high resolution 1D spectra and converted to dihedral angles by applying the Karplus relationship (Pardi et al., 1984
). A total of 50 structures were calculated by DYANA out of which 20 conformers with lowest target function value were consequently subjected to restrained energy minimization.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-helical state.
|
|
|
|
Structure calculations in DPC micelles
A summary of the interresidue sequential and medium-range NOEs is provided in Fig. 5. The presence of several NH-NH connectivities, together with
H-NHi+3 and
H-ßHi+3 connectivities suggests the presence of some helical elements from residue 210. Medium range NOE connectivities, 5 dNN (i, i + 2), 8 d
N (i, i + 2), along with d
N (i, i + 3) support the presence of a 310-helix from residue 410, which is also supported by the negative chemical shift index (Wishart et al., 1992
) and values of coupling constants for these residues. The presence of some population of
-helix is supported by the observation of d
N (i, i + 4) connectivity between residues F3-Y7, K5-L9, and F6-M10, but the relative strengths of the sequential NOEs, particularly near both termini, are not representative of a well-defined
-helix. For the region near the N-terminus, the possibility of a ß-turn seems to be more pronounced, as seen by the absence of d
ß (i, i + 3) crosspeaks. This is further supported by the presence of Asparagine at Position 4, which has the helix breaking tendency. Analysis of NMR data is suggestive of the presence of a 310-helix that is in equilibrium with an
-helix in this region from residue 4 to 10.
|
-coupling constants for Scy I are in the range of 36 Hz, with the exception of L9 and M10 (8 and 9.2 Hz, respectively). Higher values of 3JHN
(>6 Hz) for L9 and M10 can be attributed to the fraying of the helix at the terminus and susceptibility of short, linear peptides to undergo conformational averaging (Dyson and Wright, 1991
H-NHi + 1 and NH-NH NOE intensities using the procedure of Bradley et al. (1990)
Generation of the 3D structure
A 3D structure of Scy I was obtained using a torsion angle dynamics algorithm for NMR applications, DYANA (Güntert et al., 1997
). A total of 91 NOE distance constraints and angle constraints from measured 3JHN
were used as input. Initially 50 structures were generated, out of which 20 conformers with the lowest target function values (i.e., least violations of experimental restraints and van der Waals distances) were chosen for further restrained energy minimization. The resulting structures are shown in Fig. 6, after superimposing the backbone atoms. The backbone pairwise RMSD for all residues is 0.38 Å with standard deviation of 0.19 Å and for all heavy atoms is 1.99 Å with standard deviation of 0.40 Å. The lowest RMS differences are seen for residues 59, where the folded structures determined from the NOE data are best defined.
|
-region of the plot and are within the allowed ranges. The average values of
and
angles for the helix region are 74°(±9°), 27°(±7°) and for the turn are 79°(±6), 22°(±4). The shifted backbone conformation for the C-terminal residue (
,
angles: 90°, 0°) compared to the rest of the helix is a characteristic feature of 310-helices. The deviation can be attributed to the release of electrostatic repulsion between the carbonyl oxygen atoms at the two C-terminal residues and further stabilization (due to a more linear geometry) of an intrahelical hydrogen bond. Measurements of C=Oi, NHi + 3 versus C=Oi, NHi + 4 distances along the stretch of residue 410 were made, and the i, i + 3 distances were <3.0 Å in the majority (>75%) of structures as compared to i, i + 4 distances, suggesting that Scy I has a preference for a 310-helix over a regular helix.
Results from this study indicate that the Scy I prefers to be in a random coil conformation in aqueous solution, whereas part of the N-terminus address domain and the whole of the C-terminal message domain are folded. The NMR data suggest the presence of equilibrium between the 310-helix and the
-helix along the residues 410 of Scy I, preceded by a turn over residues 13 of Scy I. In DPC, the structural equilibrium is biased toward a 310 helix though a small population of regular
-helix cannot be excluded in the solution ensemble. The 310-helix exists as the intermediate between the folding pathway of helices (random coil
nascent helix
310-heilx
-helix; Millhauser, 1995
). A recent study on the analysis of the shortest helices explains the formation of the ß-turn might be correlated to the nucleation step for the formation of both
- and 310-helices (Pal et al., 2003
).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has been reported that the action of tachykinins is dependent on extracellular calcium concentration (O'Riordan et al., 2001
; Pernow, 1983
) and that the calcium bound conformation of tachykinins is required for receptor activation (Ananthanarayanan and Orlicky, 1992
). Ananthanarayanan and co-workers studied conformational determinants for Ca2+ binding by short synthetic peptides in nonpolar solvents (Qi et al., 2000
) and reported that even in the absence of acidic side-chain groups, cation binding to the polar groups in the backbone was a facile process in low dielectric medium. The main conformational requirement appeared to be the ability to adopt a folded structure like a helix or turn in nonpolar medium. Many tachykinins including Scy I fulfill this criterion. Structural studies on Scy I suggested induction of folded conformation in TFE, SDS, and DPC micelles. We have in this study made use of these observations as the basis for examining the structure of Scy I in terms of its interaction with calcium in TFE using CD.
The results of our preliminary study demonstrate a specific interaction of Scy I with calcium in TFE. CD studies on calcium titrations show that the helicity increases with increasing concentrations of calcium and that the calcium bound conformation of Scy I is considerably different from that of a free Scy I. It is of interest to note that a similar situation exists in the case of SP, a tachykinin, and two other peptide hormonesinsulin and glucagons (Ananthanarayanan et al., 1997
; Brimble and Ananthanarayanan, 1992
, 1993
; Qi et al., 2000
). This suggests that specific constraints may be imposed on the Scy I structure on its interaction with calcium at low concentrations, which may play a role in the bioactive conformation of the peptide and its interaction with the receptor. At higher concentrations, calcium seems to be having a nonspecific destabilizing effect on the structure of the peptide. The destabilizing effects of calcium at high ionic strength have also been observed in some studies (Pastrana-Rios et al., 2002
).
Previous studies have indicated that diverse hormones such as glucagons, SP, NPG, Bombesin, and GnRh (Ananthanarayanan et al., 1998
; Qi et al., 2000
) have the ability to bind divalent cation in lipid mimetic solvents and to transport calcium across the synthetic liposomes in aqueous buffers. The ionophoretic ability seems to reside in the C-terminal segment containing the Met-Leu sequence. In light of a proposal on the importance of calcium in dictating the bioactive conformation of the peptide hormones (Ananthanarayanan, 1991
; Ananthanarayanan et al., 1997
, 1998
; Pernow, 1983
), in general we would expect the C-terminal of Scy I to insert into membrane with the bound calcium and interact with the receptor to form a ternary complex between hormone, receptor, and cation. The specificity of binding can be determined only after a detailed study with different analogs has been undertaken. More work is needed before the relevance of these observations to the in vivo action of the peptide is understood.
Summarizing the NMR-derived structure, the amidated C-terminus of Scy-1 in DPC comprises a 310-helix or turn-like elements with some possible fraying of the helix terminus. The "address" segment of Scy I, although undergoing greater conformational averaging than the "message" domain, also retains substantial conformational order in DPC. This order may be interpreted as a loosely defined turn or an unstable continuation of the 310-helix along the message domain. The presence of a turn in the N-terminus preceding the helical core correlates well with the conformational features adopted by NK2 agonists like NKA, NP
, eledoisin, and Kassinin (Chandrashekar and Cowsik, 2003
; Chandrashekar et al., 2004
; Grace et al., 2001
, 2003
). It has been proposed that selective agonists for the NK3 receptor prefer to adopt an
-helical conformation (Mantha et al., 2004
; Wilson et al., 1994
). The presence of a turn preceding the helical core explains the reduced affinity of Scy I toward the NK3 receptor.
The solution conformation of Scy I bound to DPC micelles determined in this study supports various structure-activity and receptor-ligand interaction data available on NK1/NK2 agonists. (Cascieri et al., 1992
; Patacchini et al., 1993a
,b
; Seelig, 1992
; Seelig et al., 1996
; Whitehead et al., 1998
). As seen in Fig. 7, the C-terminus of Scy I presents two different faces to the receptor: a hydrophobic face comprised of Phe 6, Leu 9, Met 10 side chains on one side and a hydrophilic face comprised of Lys 5, Tyr 7, and Gly 8 side chains on the other. This amphipathic nature of the helix at the C-terminus is characteristic of NK-1 receptor agonists (Seelig, 1992
; Seelig and Macdonald, 1989
; Seelig et al., 1996
). Moreover, the presence of an aromatic residue at Position 7 from the N-terminus appears to determine or modify selectivity of the peptide for the NK1 receptor (Severini et al., 2002
). In support of this is the observation that the Tyr residue at Position 7 is important in determining the potency and selectivity of Scy I at the tachykinin receptors, and the introduction of Phe in Scy I provides the molecule with higher selectivity for the NK1 receptor (Patacchini et al., 1993a
,b
). Scy I contains two Lys residues that would result in a more favorable interaction with the anionic fixed-charge compartment of the plasma membrane and greater access to the NK-1 and NK-2 receptors (Schwyzer, 1987
). It can be proposed that the "nonpolar" nature of the Tyr side chain at Position 7 of Scy I confers selectivity for NK2 receptor binding, whereas the aromatic ring of Tyr is important for NK-1 binding. Absence of a Pro residue at Position 4 from the N-terminus (as present in the majority of NK1 receptor agonists), adjacent to the crucial neutral or basic residue occupying Position 3 ("Lys" in SP, NKA, and Scy I), can be considered favorable for the binding of NK2 receptors. Aspartate residue in Scy I, analogous to residue 5 in SP and residue 4 in NKA, may be involved in an ionic interaction, thus contributing to the binding energy as proposed by Cascieri and Buck for NK2 agonists (Buck and Shatzer, 1988
; Cascieri et al., 1992
). We propose that the charged amino acid residues, Lys 2 and Asp 4, of the N-terminus region act as anchoring points, maintaining peptide conformation and positioning the C-terminus within the transmembrane region.
|
| SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Anjali Dike acknowledges the financial support in the form of a Junior Research Fellowship from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India. This work is supported through a grant from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
, neuropeptide gamma; NK1, neurokinin-1; NK2, neurokinin-2; nK3, neurokinin-3; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide. Submitted on September 21, 2004; accepted for publication February 1, 2005.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ananthanarayanan, V. S., M.-P. Belcing, and B. S. Zhorov. 1997. Interaction of oxytocin with Ca2+: II. Proton magnetic resonance and molecular modeling studies of conformations of the hormone and its Ca2+ complex. Biopolymers. 40:445464.[CrossRef]
Ananthanarayanan, V. S., and S. Orlicky. 1992. Interaction of Substance P and its N- and C-terminal fragments with Ca2+: implications for hormone action. Biopolymers. 32:17651773.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ananthanarayanan, V. S., O. Salehian, and K. S. Brimble. 1998. Interaction of gonodotropin releasing hormone and its analogs with Ca2+ in a non polar milieu correlation with biopotencies. J. Pept. Res. 52:185194.[Medline]
Beaujouan, J. C., M. Saffroy, F. Petitet, Y. Torrens, and J. Glowinski. 1988. Neuropeptide K, scyliorhinin I and scyliorhinin II: new tools in the tachykinin receptor field. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 151:353354.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bradley, E. K., J. F. Thomason, F. E. Cohen, P. A. Kosen, and I. D. Kuntz. 1990. Studies of synthetic helical peptides using circular dichroism and nuclear magnetic resonance. J. Mol. Biol. 215:607622.[CrossRef][Medline]
Brimble, K. S., and V. S. Ananthanarayanan. 1992. Induction of Ca2+ transport in liposomes by insulin. Biochim Biophys. Acta. 1105:319327.[Medline]
Brimble, K. S., and V. S. Ananthanarayanan. 1993. Calcium binding and translocation properties of glucagons and its fragments. Biochemistry. 32:16321640.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bruch, M. D., M. M. Dhingra, and L. M. Gierasch. 1991. Side chain-backbone hydrogen bonding contributes to helix stability in peptides derived from an alpha-helical region of carboxypeptidase A. Proteins. 10:130139.[CrossRef][Medline]
Buck, S. H., and J. L. Krstenansky. 1987. The dogfish peptides scyliorhinin I and scyliorhininII bind with differential selectivity to mammalian tachykinin receptors. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 144:109111.[CrossRef][Medline]
Buck, S. H., and S. A. Shatzer. 1988. Agonists and antagonist binding to tachykinin peptide NK-2 receptors. Life Sci. 42:27012708.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cascieri, M. A., R. R. Huang, T. M. Fong, F. M. Cheung, S. Sadowski, E. Ber, and C. D. Strader. 1992. Determination of the amino acid residues of substance P conferring selectivity and specificity for the rat Neurokinin receptors. Mol. Pharmacol. 41:10961099.[Abstract]
Chandrashekar, I. R., and S. M. Cowsik. 2003. Three-dimensional structure of the mammalian tachykinin peptide Neurokinin A bound to lipid micelles. Biophys. J. 85:110.
Chandrashekar, I. R., A. Dike, and S. M. Cowsik. 2004. Membrane induced structure of the mammalian tachykinin neuropeptide gamma. J. Struct. Biol. 148:315325.[CrossRef][Medline]
Conlon, J. M., C. F. Deacon, L. O'Toole, and L. Thim. 1986. Scyliorhinin I and II: two novel tachykinins from dogfish gut. FEBS Lett. 200:111116.[CrossRef][Medline]
Convert, O., H. Duplaa, S. Levielle, and G. Chassaing. 1991. Influence of the replacement of amino acid by its D-enantiomer in the sequence of substance P: conformational analysis by NMR and energy calculations. Neuropeptides. 19:259270.[CrossRef][Medline]
Convert, O., O. Ploux, S. Lavielle, M. Cotrat, and G. Chassaing. 1988. Analysis of tachykinin-binding site interactions using NMR and energy calculation data of potent cyclic analogues of substance P. Biochim. Bhiophys. Acta. 954:287302.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cowsik, S. M., C. Luke, and H. Ruterjans. 1997. Lipid-induced conformation of Substance P. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 15:2736.[Medline]
Dyson, H. J., and P. E. Wright. 1991. Defining solution conformation of small linear peptides. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 20:519538.[CrossRef][Medline]
Grace, C. R., A. M. Lynn, and S. M. Cowsik. 2001. Lipid induced conformation of tachykinin peptide kassinin. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 18:611625.[Medline]
Grace, C. R., I. R. Chandrashekar, and S. M. Cowsik. 2003. Solution structure of the tachykinin peptide eledoisin. Biophys. J. 84:655664.
Güntert, P., C. Mumenthaler, and K. Wüthrich. 1997. Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA. J. Mol. Biol. 273:283298.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hanley, M. R., and T. Jackson. 1987. Substance K receptor: return of magnificent seven. Nature. 329:766767.[CrossRef][Medline]
Horne, J., M. Sadek, and D. J. Craik. 1993. Determination of solution structure of neuropeptide K by high-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 32:74067412.[CrossRef][Medline]
Khawaja, A. M., and D. F. Rogers. 1996. Tachykinins: receptor to effectore. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 28:721738.[CrossRef][Medline]
Klaudel, L., S. Rodziewicz-Motowido, A. Liwo, and K. Rolka. 2000. A comparison of Scyliorhinin I and its analogue with N-Methyl-L-phenylalanine in position 7. Pol. J. Chem. 74:11011114.
Mantha, A. K., I. R. Chandrashekar, N. Z. Baquer, and S. M. Cowsik. 2004. Three-dimensional structure of the mammalian tachykinin peptide Neurokinin B bound to lipid micelles. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 22:137147.[Medline]
Marion, D., and K. Wüthrich. 1983. Application of phase sensitive two-dimensional correlated spectroscopy (COSY) for measurement of 1 H-1 H spin-spin coupling constants in protein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 113:967974.[CrossRef][Medline]
Masu, Y., K. Nakayama, H. Tamaki, M. Harada, Y. Kuno, and S. Nakanishi. 1987. cDNA cloning of bovine substance-K receptor through oocyte expression system. Nature. 329:836838.[CrossRef][Medline]
Millhauser, G. L. 1995. Views of helical peptides: a proposal for the position of 310-helix along the thermodynamic folding pathway. Biochemistry. 34:38733877.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nakanishi, S. 1991. Mammalian tachykinin receptors. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 14:123136.[CrossRef][Medline]
Opella, S. J. 1997. NMR and membrane proteins. Nat. Struct. Biol. 4(Suppl.):845848.[Medline]
O'Riordan, A. M., T. Quinn, J. M. Hyland, D. P. O'Donoghue, and A. W. Baird. 2001. Sources of calcium in Neurokinin A-induced contractions of human colonic smooth muscle in vitro. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 96:31173121.[Medline]
Pal, L., P. Chakrabarti, and G. Basu. 2003. Sequence and structure patterns in proteins from an analysis of the shortest helices: implications for helix nucleation. J. Mol. Biol. 326:273291.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pardi, A., M. Billeter, and K. Wüthrich. 1984. Calibration of the angular dependence of the amide proton-C alpha proton coupling constants, 3JHN alpha, in a globular protein. Use of 3JHN alpha for identification of helical secondary structure. J. Mol. Biol. 180:741751.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pastrana-Rios, B., W. Ocana, M. Rios, G. L. Vargas, G. Ysa, G. Poynter, J. Tapia, and J. L. Salisbury. 2002. Centrin: its secondary structure in the presence and absence of cations. Biochemistry. 41:69116919.[CrossRef][Medline]
Patacchini, R., L. Quartara, P. Rovero, C. Gosos, and C. A. Maggi. 1993a. Role of C-terminal amidation on the biological activity of Neurokinin A derivatives with agonist and antagonist properties. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 264:1721.
Patacchini, R., L. Quartara, K. Rolka, J. Zboinska, G. Kupryszewski, and C. A. Maggi. 1993b. Effect of scyliorhinin I and synthetic scyliorhinin I derivatives at mammalian tachykinin NK1, NK2 and NK3 receptors. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 250:311316.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pernow, B. 1983. Substance P. Pharmacol. Rev. 35:85141.[Medline]
Qi, X.-F., B. S. Zhorov, and V. S. Ananthanarayanan. 2000. CD, 1H NMR and molecular modeling studies of the interaction of Ca2+ with Substance P and Ala7-Substance P in a non-polar solvent. J. Pept. Sci. 6:5783.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rizo, J., F. J. Blanco, B. Kobe, M. D. Bruch, and L. M. Gierasch. 1993. Conformational behavior of Escherichia coli OmpA signal peptides in membrane mimetic environments. Biochemistry. 32:48814894.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rodziewicz-Motowidlo, S., A. Legowska, X. F. Qi, C. Czaplewski, A. Liwo, P. Sowinski, W. Mozga, J. Olczak, J. Zabrocki, and K. Rolka. 2000. Solution conformational study of scyliorhinin I analogues with conformational constraints by two-dimensional NMR and theoretical conformational analysis. J. Pept. Res. 56:132146.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schwyzer, R. 1987. Membrane-assisted molecular mechanism of Neurokinin receptor subtype selection. EMBO J. 6:2255.
Seelig, A. 1992. Interaction of a substance P agonist and of substance P antagonists with lipid membranes: a thermodynamic analysis. Biochemistry. 31:28972904.[CrossRef][Medline]
Seelig, A., T. Alt, S. Lotz, and G. Holzemann. 1996. Binding of substance P agonists to lipid membranes and to the Neurokinin-1 receptor. Biochemistry. 35:43654374.[CrossRef][Medline]
Seelig, A., and P. M. Macdonald. 1989. Binding of a neuropeptide, substance P, to neutral and negatively charged lipids. Biochemistry. 28:24902496.[CrossRef][Medline]
Severini, C., G. Improta, G. F. Erspamer, S. Salvadori, and V. Erspamer. 2002. The tachykinin peptide family. Pharmacol. Rev. 54:285322.
Sreerama, N., and R. W. Woody . 1994. Protein secondary structure from circular dichroism spectroscopy. Combining variable selection principle and cluster analysis with neural network, ridge regression and self-consistent methods. J. Mol. Biol. 242:497507.[Medline]
Sreerama, N., V. S. Yu, and R. W. Woody. 1999. Estimation of the number of
-helical and ß-strand segments in proteins using CD spectroscopy. Protein Sci. 8:370380.[Abstract]
Vigna, S. R. 2001. The N-terminal domain of substance P is required for complete homologous desensitization but not phosphorylation of the rat neurokinin-1 receptor. Neuropeptides. 35:2431.[CrossRef][Medline]
Vigna, S. R. 2003. The role of the amino-terminal domain of tachykinins in Neurokinin-1 receptor signaling and desensitization. Neuropeptides. 37:3035.[CrossRef][Medline]
Whitehead, T. L., S. D. McNair, C. E. Hadden, J. K. Young, and R. P. Hicks. 1998. Membrane-induced secondary structures of neuropeptides: a comparison of solution conformations adopted agonists and antagonists of the mammalian tachykinin NK1 receptor. J. Med. Chem. 41:14971506.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wilson, J. C., K. J. Nielsen, M. J. Mcleish, and D. J. Craik. 1994. A determination of the solution conformation of the nonmammalian tachykinin eledoisin by NMR and CD spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 33:68026811.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wishart, D. S., B. D. Sykes, and F. M. Richards. 1992. The chemical shift index: a fast and simple method for the assignment of protein secondary structure through NMR spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 31:16471651.[CrossRef][Medline]
Woody, R. W. 1992. Circular dichroism and conformation of unordered polypeptides. Adv. Biophys. Chem. 2:3779.
Wüthrich, K. 1986. NMR of Proteins and Nucleic Acids. J. Wiley & Sons, New York.
Zboinska, J., K. Rolka, G. Kupryszewski, K. Golba, P. Imiolek, P. Jana, and Z. S. Herman. 1993. Synthesis and structure-activity relationship of scyliorhinin I analogues modified in position 3, 6, 7, and 8. Collect. Czech. Chem. C. 58:918924.[CrossRef]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |