| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||




* Laboratoire de Biophysique Statistique, ITP, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland;
INFM and Istituto dei Sistemi Complessi, 00185 Rome, Italy;
Laboratoire de Physique de la Matière Vivante, IPMC, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; and
Institut Suisse de Recherche Expérimentale sur le Cancer (ISREC), 1066 Epalinges/Lausanne, Switzerland
Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Paolo De Los Rios, E-mail: paolo.delosrios{at}epfl.ch.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-actinin-2 (6
Most PDZ-mediated interactions occur through the recognition of C-terminal peptide motifs (1
,2
), although growing evidence suggests that binding can be specific also for internal regions of the sequence mimicking the structure of a carboxyl terminal. This is the case of the nNOS (neuronal nitritic oxide synthase) and syntrophin complex, where a ß-hairpin "finger" of nNOS docks in the PDZ syntrophin-binding groove (nNOS is itself a PDZ-containing protein, so that this is a PDZ-PDZ complex) (7
). Interestingly, the specificity of PDZ domains for different chemical and topological ligands relies on minor sequence variations, whereas the chemistry of the binding region and the overall domain fold are rather well conserved. Such high versatility of the fold, which with minor modifications allows targeting rather different partners, hints at some very favorable flexibility property of the three-dimensional structure of PDZ domains.
The dynamical characterization of PDZ domains is also beginning to emerge; very recently Fuentes et al. (8
) have argued, on the basis of NMR data, that the dynamics of PDZ domains upon ligand binding should show correlations over the entire protein structure.
Flexibility and internal mobility of proteins have been recognized as fundamental to their biological functions (9
11
), because most of the biological activity occurs close to the native state. A powerful method to study their relation is normal-mode analysis (NMA). NMA had been originally proposed as a method alternative to molecular Dynamics (MD) to explore the dynamics of proteins within their native basin (12
14
). NMA has seen a renaissance in very recent years, after the development of a few simplified methods that have proven to be very effective at describing the global, low-frequency motions of proteins close to the native state (15
26
). Clearly, whenever the protein function is related to some major allosteric transitions of the structure, normal modes, which do not explore conformations far from the native state, might not be appropriate to describe the relevant dynamics, and in such cases all-atom MD remains the best choice. However, in the PDZ case, ligand binding does not induce large conformational changes of the domain structure and normal modes are expected to carry the relevant information for its function. We are furthermore confident that even in the case when larger structure deformations would be involved, normal modes may be the precursors for larger anharmonic motions.
In this work, we have mainly focused on the third PDZ domain of the PSD-95, hereafter referred to as PDZ3, whose structure has been determined by x-ray crystallography both with and without bound peptide (27
). We also dealt with the PDZ domain of ZASP, recently solved by NMR using the x-ray structure of the PDZ3 of PSD-95 as a template (28
). Finally we have analyzed the bound and unbound structures of the second PDZ domain of human protein tyrosine phosphatase 1E (hPTP1E), a soluble protein containing multiple PDZ domains that intervenes in a number of biological processes such as apoptosis, cytokinesis, and signaling. Both structural and dynamic NMR data are available for hPTP1E (29
,30
).
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The vector of amino acid displacements corresponding to the binding deformation has been obtained through standard Kabsch's alignment of the two structures 1bfe and 1be9 (32
). This amounts to finding the best linear transformation that brings one structure onto the other by minimizing the root-mean-square distance (RMSD) between the backbones of the complexed and peptide-free structures.
The NMR data for the ZASP PDZ domain structure (28
) are available as 1rgw from the PDB. The NMR data for the second PDZ domain of hPTP1E are available both in the complexed and peptide-free forms from the PDB (3pdz and 1d5g, respectively) and their difference has again been computed using Kabsch's algorithm. The eight amino acids dynamically linked to the binding site, although not in direct contact with the bound peptide, have been listed by Fuentes et al. (8
).
CHARMM normal-modes calculations
The VIBRAN module of the CHARMM program was used to determine the normal modes and normal-mode frequencies by diagonalization of the force constant matrix. Normal modes were computed for fully minimized structures of the PDZ domain with a distance-dependent dielectric,
= 4r, and a 16-Å cutoff for the nonbonded interactions. The minimization was performed using the steepest-descent algorithm until the root-mean square of the energy gradient reached a value below 101 kcal/mol Å, followed by an adopted basis Newton-Raphson algorithm, until the gradient reached a value of 108 kcal/mol Å. This gradient value has been shown to be satisfactory for calculating normal modes and is expected to yield real frequencies modes (33
). No constraint was applied on the system.
The B-factors, proportional to the thermal fluctuation amplitudes of atoms around their equilibrium positions, were computed according to the standard formula
![]() | (1) |
n the frequency of the n-th mode, and
the displacement of the i-th C
atom in such a mode. The sum runs over nonzero frequency modes, thus discarding the six roto-translations.
Cß anisotropic network model
The anisotropic network model (ANM) (18
) is a coarse-grained model that instead of taking into account the full atomic details of the protein only considers its C
carbons as representatives of the amino acids (it is, therefore, a backbone-centric model). Chemically detailed interactions are simplified to harmonic interactions (springs) between C
carbons closer than a given cutoff Rc. In the original formulation of the model the optimal Rc value is
13 Å. However, the diameter of PDZ domains is not much larger than this cutoff and therefore the ANM would connect almost all amino acids with each other. For this reason we preferred to use a recent version of the ANM, the Cß-ANM (34
). In such a model, also Cß carbons are considered (except for glycine whose side chain is simply a hydrogen) and the complex chemical interactions between residues are described by springs connecting all C
-C
, C
-Cß, and Cß-Cß pairs whose distances, in the native fold, are smaller than Rc = 7.5 Å. The springs have stiffness 

, 
ß, and
ßß, irrespective of distance and chemical species of the residues. Thus, the model is characterized by an energy function
![]() | (2) |
indicates the vector distance between the i-th and j-th C
atoms in the native structure and
is the same distance in a distorted conformation (and similarly for C
-Cß and Cß-Cß pairs). The function
is equal to one if the distance
zero otherwise, and it defines which C
-C
pairs of atoms are in interaction, and analogously for C
-Cß and Cß-Cß pairs. The model eventually depends only on few parameters: Rc, determining the interaction range, and 

, 
ß, and
ßß, the interaction strengths that are chosen so that 

=
(and 

= 2
if the two C
atoms are consecutive along the protein backbone) and 
ß =
ßß =
/2.
The implementation of the Cß-ANM approach involves the diagonalization of the Hessian matrix obtained by the second derivatives of the energy function (3
) with respect to C
and Cß displacements evaluated on the native structure coordinates (in complete analogy with the CHARMM approach). It is worth noticing that the native structure is the minimum of the energy by construction, so that no energy minimization stage is required. The Hessian matrix has 3N x 3N entries where N is the number of C
's (85 in the truncated PDZ that we considered). The Cß atoms coordinates are determined from the C
coordinates with a small residual uncertainty (34
,35
), which is essentially irrelevant using such a simplified energy function as Eq. 2. Therefore, their degrees of freedom do not need to be explicitly taken into consideration, with the considerable advantage of not increasing the size of the Hessian matrix. The value of
is not derived from first principles, but it is adjusted through a least-square fitting of the computed B-factors to the experimental ones. The approximated vibrational spectrum of the protein is obtained from the eigenvalues of the Hessian matrix, and its eigenvectors are the normal modes.
Thermal involvement coefficients
A generic thermal fluctuation
of the N-residues structure around its crystallographic conformation can be expressed in a unique way as a superposition of normal modes,
![]() | (3) |
to the fluctuation; the sum runs over all the 3N 6 non-roto-translational modes, because we assume that
does not contain any roto-translational component.
The normalized vector
of the conformational deformation between complexed and uncomplexed structures of the truncated PDZ3 domain is defined as
![]() | (4) |
The 3N components of the vector
represent each of the displacements along the x,y,z-directions of the C
atoms. The normalization,
preserves the relative displacement amplitudes of different C
atoms.
The overlap between a generic thermal fluctuation and the binding induced deformation is
![]() | (5) |
is the so-called "involvement coefficient" (25
Modes with higher frequencies do not participate significantly to large-scale vibrational motions because their amplitudes decreases as 1/
, a rule of thumb criterion used to focus on the low-frequency part of the vibrational spectrum of proteins in the search for functionally relevant modes (36
). This physically correct but mathematically vague criterion can be cast in a rigorous formulation obtained from thermodynamic considerations. Because the average overlap
vanishes for symmetry reasons, the physically relevant quantity to consider is the average of the square overlap
![]() | (6) |
![]() | (7) |
Each Tn depends on the inverse frequency of the corresponding mode n so that higher frequency modes intrinsically contribute less to the fluctuations. In this way, thermodynamics automatically biases the search for functionally relevant modes to low-frequency ones. At the same time, Eq. 7 dictates that only modes with a sizeable involvement coefficient contribute appreciably to the function; this is the case for the PDZ normal modes in our analysis, where the lowest frequency normal mode (NM) is always almost irrelevant because of a small coefficient In (Figs. 3, 5, and 9).
|
|
|
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-helices (
A, Pro-346Ser-350;
B, His-372Asn-381) and six ß-strands (ßAßF) arranged in a ß-barrel (Fig. 1, left). The same structure in complex with a target peptide is shown in Fig. 1 (right). The peptide sits in a groove between the
B helix and the ßB strand as in the typical binding geometry common to all PDZ domains.
|
B helix and the ßB strand (27
Peptide binding induces a structure deformation involving a concurrent displacement of the loop L1, of the
B helix and, to a lesser extent, of other secondary motifs. An effective representation of the correlations among these structural rearrangements can be obtained through the cross-correlation matrix between C
carbon atoms
![]() | (8) |
is the normalized vector of binding-induced atomic displacements (see Methods), and di
represents the
-th component of the rescaled difference between the positions of the i-th C
atom in the complexed and peptide-free PDZ3 structures (see Eq. 4). The color-code representation of Cij is shown in Fig. 2. A red (blue) entry of Cij indicates (anti)parallel distortions of the i-th and j-th C
atoms.
|
B helix and with large portions of the overall PDZ3 structure. The entries along the diagonal maintain the information about deformation amplitudes thanks to the overall normalization (Eq. 4). They can be used, therefore, to highlight the L1 loop and the
B helix as the regions undergoing the largest deformations upon binding. These results hint at a binding mechanism that opens the hydrophobic pocket, which is located between the
B helix and the ßB strand and covered by the L1 loop.
Normal-modes analysis
The normal modes of a protein structure describe the collective displacements of its atoms around their equilibrium positions (local energy minimum). Each NM is characterized by a frequency of vibration that determines the characteristic relaxation time in the case of overdamped dynamics, and any small deformation of the original structure can be exactly described as a linear superposition of its NMs. Here we apply NMA to describe the collective deformations of various PDZ domains around their equilibrium structures as obtained from x-ray crystallography or solution NMR.
CHARMM force field
We performed the NMA of the PDZ3 domain by means of the corresponding module of the CHARMM package (see Methods). A close examination of the CHARMM results requires a detailed inspection of the eigenvectors (the normal modes) of the Hessian matrix of the CHARMM force field computed at the relaxed native structure (see Methods). To characterize how different NMs are involved in the binding deformation, we computed both their "involvement coefficients" In and their "thermal involvement coefficients" Tn (see Methods) that describe the contribution of each mode to the overlap of the binding deformation with a typical fluctuation of the structure. We found that the binding deformation has maximal thermodynamic overlap with the second and third nontrivial CHARMM NMs (notice that the first six roto-translational eigenvectors of the Hessian matrix have been discarded), hereafter referred to as M2 and M3, respectively. Fig. 3 shows the Tn values, normalized in such a way that
The second and third NMs account together for roughly 47% of the overlap of the binding distortion with the thermal fluctuations of the structure. This means that the distortion is unevenly distributed among the different modes; rather it privileges two low-frequency ones. Furthermore, although the Tn values intrinsically reward low-frequency modes, the exceptionally high contributions of the second and third modes, and modest participation of the first and fourth, indicate that indeed the geometry of the modes plays a very important role.
Correlations of the motions of C
's within modes M2 and M3 are represented by a color-coded matrix in Fig. 4. M2 involves the concerted motion of the
A helix and of the L1 loop, with minor movements of other secondary structures. It does not produce, therefore, a significant rearrangement of the binding region, although the large L1 motion can clearly cap/uncap the binding groove. Mode M3 shows a pattern very similar to the binding deformation (Fig. 2) and it displays remarkable movements of the L1 and L6 loops and of the
B helix. The group
B + L6 moves in an antiparallel way with respect to L1 as can be seen by the boxed blue region in Fig. 4. Specifically, M3 describes the opening/closing of the hydrophobic pocket.
|
Cß-anisotropic network model: focus on PDZ topology
The highly conserved structure of PDZ domains strongly points to a topology well suited for the binding process. To explore the different role of the PDZ topology with respect to its chemistry in determining the binding movements, we have shifted from the CHARMM force field, where both topology and full chemical details are taken into account, to the ANM description in its Cß version, which deals only with the topological features of the domain (see Methods).
We then repeated the analysis of the NMs by computing the geometric and thermodynamic overlap between the binding deformation and the NMs. Results are summarized in Fig. 5, where again the second and third NMs emerge as the best coupled to the PDZ function. Together, they account for roughly 65% of the whole binding deformation. The internal correlations of the second NM (Fig. 6) are remarkably similar to the binding deformation (Fig. 2) and again select an antiparallel motion of the L1 loop and of the
B + L6 group, leading to the "breathing" of the binding groove, just as the CHARMM M3 mode.
|
Dynamic information from experimental data
The agreement between the CHARMM and Cß-ANM NMA extends to the computation of the B-factors, as it can be seen from the bottom panel of Fig. 7. Instead, the B-factors from crystallographic experiments (1bfe) (27
) are significantly different from the theoretical ones (Fig. 7, top panel). We argue that such a discrepancy rests on the possible effects due the crystal. To check this hypothesis we have studied the PDZ domain of the ZASP protein, whose structure has been recently solved by NMR (28
) (see Methods). ZASP-PDZ is a suitable candidate for this check because its reconstruction has been modeled on the PDZ3 template (1bfe). Comparison between theoretical and experimental RMSD is shown in Fig. 8. The atomic RMSDs from NMR are due to experimental uncertainties on the restraints used for the structure refinement, and have various origins among which is the intrinsic dynamic flexibility of the protein. In Fig. 8, we show that the Cß-ANM B-factors are close to the RMSD of the ZASP-PDZ structure, and strongly suggest on the one hand that the RMSDs are likely to be dynamical in nature, and on the other hand that the dynamical information from the x-ray data could indeed be distorted by the crystal context. The relevance of the crystal has been explored previously (39
) showing that vibrational B-factors can change significantly between proteins in solution and in crystals, where, moreover, the total B-factors can be affected by several other contributions such as roto-translations of the whole molecule in the lattice, conformational substates, and crystal disorder.
|
|
|
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Even though NMR experiments often need the x-ray structure as a template, according to our analysis, they compare better with our theoretical predictions and this could be perhaps a hint that NMR provides more reliable information on the dynamics of proteins.
Furthermore our NMA helped to rationalize the recent findings (8
) that peptide binding influences the dynamics of residues that are not in direct contact with the ligand. Our results confirm that peptide binding affects the whole domain structure, because it is strongly coupled to a single normal mode that is intrinsically collective, in agreement with previous speculations (40
).
Submitted on October 26, 2004; accepted for publication March 16, 2005.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Sheng, M., and C. Sala. 2001. PDZ domains and the organization of supramolecular complexes. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24:129.[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Zhang, M., and W. Wang. 2003. Organization of signaling complexes by PDZ-domain scaffold proteins. Acc. Chem. Res. 36:530538.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Pawson, T., and P. Nash. 2003. Assembly of cell regulatory systems through protein interaction domains. Science. 300:445452.
5. Tsunoda, S., and C. S. Zuker. 1999. The organization of INAD-signaling complexes by a multivalent PDZ domain protein in Drosophila photoreceptor cells ensures sensitivity and speed of signaling. Cell Calcium. 26:165171.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Faulkner, G., A. Pallavicini, E. Formentin, A. Comelli, C. Ievolella, S. Trevisan, G. Bortoletto, P. Scannapieco, M. Salamon, V. Mouly, G. Valle, and G. Lanfranchi. 1999. ZASP: a new Z-band alternatively spliced PDZ-motif protein. J. Cell Biol. 146:465475.
7. Hillier, B. J., K. S. Christopherson, K. E. Prehoda, D. S. Bredt, and W. A. Lim. 1999. Unexpected modes of PDZ domain scaffolding revealed by structure of nNOS-syntrophin complex. Science. 284:812815.
8. Fuentes, E. J., C. J. Der, and A. L. Lee. 2004. Ligand-dependent dynamics and intramolecular signaling in a PDZ domain. J. Mol. Biol. 335:11051115.[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Frauenfelder, H., B. H. McMahon, R. H. Austin, K. Chu, and J. T. Groves. 2001. The role of structure, energy landscape, dynamics, and allostery in the enzymatic function of myoglobin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:23702374.
10. Berendsen, H. J., and S. Hayward. 2000. Collective protein dynamics in relation to function. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10:165169.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Kern, D., and E. R. Zuiderweg. 2003. The role of dynamics in allosteric regulation. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 13:748757.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Levitt, M., C. Sander, and P. S. Stern. 1985. Protein normal-mode dynamics: trypsin inhibitor, crambin, ribonuclease and lysozyme. J. Mol. Biol. 181:423447.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Go, N., T. Noguti, and T. Nishikawa. 1983. Dynamics of a small globular protein in terms of low-frequency vibrational modes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 80:36963700.
14. Noguti, T., and N. Go. 1982. Collective variable description of small-amplitude conformational fluctuations in a globular protein. Nature. 296:776778.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Tirion, M. M. 1996. Large amplitude elastic motions in proteins from a single-parameter, atomic analysis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77:19051908.[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Hinsen, K. 1998. Analysis of domain motions by approximate normal mode calculations. Proteins. 33:417429.[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Hinsen, K., A. Thomas, and M. J. Field. 1999. Analysis of domain motions in large proteins. Proteins. 34:369382.[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Atilgan, A. R., S. R. Durell, R. L. Jernigan, M. C. Demirel, O. Keskin, and I. Bahar. 2001. Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. Biophys. J. 80:505515.
19. Bahar, I., A. R. Atilgan, and B. Erman. 1997. Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential. Fold. Des. 2:173181.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Doruker, P., R. L. Jernigan, and I. Bahar. 2002. Dynamics of large proteins through hierarchical levels of coarse-grained structures. J. Comput. Chem. 23:119127.[CrossRef][Medline]
21. Marques, O., and Y. H. Sanejouand. 1995. Hinge-bending motion in citrate synthase arising from normal mode calculations. Proteins. 23:557560.[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Sanejouand, Y. H. 1996. Normal-mode analysis suggests important flexibility between the two N-terminal domains of CD4 and supports the hypothesis of a conformational change in CD4 upon HIV binding. Protein Eng. 9:671677.
23. Suhre, K., and Y. H. Sanejouand. 2004. On the potential of normal-mode analysis for solving difficult molecular-replacement problems. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60:796799.[CrossRef][Medline]
24. Tama, F., F. X. Gadea, O. Marques, and Y. H. Sanejouand. 2000. Building-block approach for determining low-frequency normal modes of macromolecules. Proteins. 41:17.[Medline]
25. Tama, F., and Y. H. Sanejouand. 2001. Conformational change of proteins arising from normal mode calculations. Protein Eng. 14:16.
26. Delarue, M., and Y. H. Sanejouand. 2002. Simplified normal mode analysis of conformational transitions in DNA-dependent polymerases: the elastic network model. J. Mol. Biol. 320:10111024.[CrossRef][Medline]
27. Doyle, D. A., A. Lee, J. Lewis, E. Kim, M. Sheng, and R. MacKinnon. 1996. Crystal structures of a complexed and peptide-free membrane protein-binding domain: molecular basis of peptide recognition by PDZ. Cell. 85:10671076.[CrossRef][Medline]
28. Au, Y., R. A. Atkinson, R. Guerrini, G. Kelly, C. Joseph, S. R. Martin, F. W. Muskett, A. Pallavicini, G. Faulkner, and A. Pastore. 2004. Solution structure of ZASP PDZ domain: implications for sarcomere ultrastructure and enigma family redundancy. Structure (Camb). 12:611622.[Medline]
29. Kozlov, G., D. Banville, K. Gehring, and I. Ekiel. 2002. Solution structure of the PDZ2 domain from cytosolic human phosphatase hPTP1E complexed with a peptide reveals contribution of the beta2-beta3 loop to PDZ domain-ligand interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 320:813820.[CrossRef][Medline]
30. Kozlov, G., K. Gehring, and I. Ekiel. 2000. Solution structure of the PDZ2 domain from human phosphatase hPTP1E and its interactions with C-terminal peptides from the Fas receptor. Biochemistry. 39:25722580.[CrossRef][Medline]
31. Berman, H. M., J. Westbrook, Z. Feng, G. Gilliland, T. N. Bhat, H. Weissig, I. N. Shindyalov, and P. E. Bourne. 2000. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:235242.
32. Kabsch, W. 1976. Solution for best rotation to relate 2 sets of vectors. Acta Crystallogr. A. 32:922923.[CrossRef]
33. Tidor, B., and M. Karplus. 1994. The contribution of vibrational entropy to molecular association. The dimerization of insulin. J. Mol. Biol. 238:405414.[CrossRef][Medline]
34. Micheletti, C., P. Carloni, and A. Maritan. 2004. Accurate and efficient description of protein vibrational dynamics: comparing molecular dynamics and Gaussian models. Proteins. 55:635645.[CrossRef][Medline]
35. Park, B., and M. Levitt. 1996. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near native folds from well-constructed decoys. J. Mol. Biol. 258:367392.[CrossRef][Medline]
36. Ma, J., and M. Karplus. 1997. Molecular switch in signal transduction: reaction paths of the conformational changes in ras p21. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1190511910.
37. Xu, C., D. Tobi, and I. Bahar. 2003. Allosteric changes in protein structure computed by a simple mechanical model: hemoglobin T
R2 transition. J. Mol. Biol. 333:153168.[CrossRef][Medline]
38. Bezprozvanny, I., and A. Maximov. 2002. PDZ domains: evolving classification. FEBS Lett. 512:347349.[CrossRef]
39. Eastman, P., M. Pellegrini, and S. Doniach. 1999. Protein flexibility in solution and in crystals. J. Chem. Phys. 110:1014110152.[CrossRef]
40. Cooper, A., and D. T. Dryden. 1984. Allostery without conformational change. A plausible model. Eur. Biophys. J. 11:103109.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Zen, V. Carnevale, A. M. Lesk, and C. Micheletti Correspondences between low-energy modes in enzymes: Dynamics-based alignment of enzymatic functional families Protein Sci., May 1, 2008; 17(5): 918 - 929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |