| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



* Laboratoire Physicochimie "Curie", UMR168 Institut Curie/CNRS, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France; and
Laboratoire Compartimentation et Dynamique Cellulaires, UMR144 Institut Curie/CNRS, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France
Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Cécile Sykes, Tel.: 33-1-423-46790; Fax: 33-1-405-10636; E-mail: cecile.sykes{at}curie.fr.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Depolymerization of MTs induces cortical oscillations in cells growing in suspension, like lymphoblasts (9
), as well as during spreading of adherent fibroblastic cells (10
). Since such oscillations are observed only in situations where adhesion is weak, they may reveal a specific regime of actomyosin dynamics that would be unveiled in the absence of adhesion. We thus developed an experimental setup allowing us to observe oscillations with adherent cells in the absence of MTs under conditions where they could not attach to the substrate. In experiments with lymphoblasts, actin and myosin distributions had been visualized by immunolocalization on fixed cells, a procedure that did not allow for real time characterization (9
). Here, the dynamical observation of actin and myosin allowed us to determine that the membrane bulge was first devoid of detectable actin or myosin. This phenomenon was found for entire cells as well as for cell fragments, and the oscillatory behavior was shown to result from actomyosin contractility. Moreover, the ability of cells to oscillate in these conditions correlated positively with their ability to migrate in control conditions. To account for the experimental oscillation phenomenon, we propose a general mechanism based on instability and contraction of the actomyosin gel.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Drug treatments
MTs were disrupted with nocodazole (NZ) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) at 5 µM final concentration. For the lymphoblastic cell lines (KE37 and Jurkat), a treatment at 37°C for 15 min was sufficient. For L929 cells, the NZ treatment was carried out on ice for 1 h; cells were then left to recover at 37°C for 30 min. This treatment depolymerized all the MTs and no reassembly was observed at 37°C (as checked by immunostaining of tubulin).
Myosin II inhibition was achieved using 75 µM blebbistatin (Bb) treatment during 30 min (11
) (gift from T. Mitchison, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA).
Rho-kinase was inhibited by a 2 h treatment with 10 µM Y-27632 (12
) (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA).
To disrupt microfilaments, cells were treated with 2 µg/ml cytochalasin D (CD) (Sigma) or 0.5 µM latrunculin A (LatA).
Local drug delivery
Local drug treatment was carried out using a microinjector (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) mounted on a microscope equipped with a chamber at 37°C. Cells were observed in phase contrast microscopy (Leica, Solms, Germany) using a 40x air objective. The pressure in the micropipette was maintained at 20100 hPa, and the pipette opening was between 1 and 2 µm. The micropipette was filled with the appropriate drug in cell medium ((DMEM and Hepes, see below) and dextran Texas Red (0.2 mg/ml) as a fluorescent marker. Drug concentrations were 5 µg/ml for CD and 0.5 µM for LatA. There was no drug for the control and flow jet experiments. The pressure exerted by the flow jet on the cell edge was estimated as follows: simple hydrodynamics gives that the pressure at the tip of the micropipette (Ps) depends on the pressure inside the pipette (P1), the velocity of the fluid in the tip (v), the diameter (
), and the length (l) of the micropipette tip, and the viscosity
of the fluid,
If the pressure in the fluid far from the pipette is P0 and the distance between the micropipette tip and the cell edge is D, we have also
We thus obtain
Taking 1 µm for D, 100 µm for l, 100 hPa for Pl, and 1 µm for
, we find that the local pressure exerted on the cell edge,
is of the order of 102 Pa.
Polyethyleneglycol (PEG)-coated coverslips
The surface treatment protocol was adapted from (13
). Glass coverslips were cleaned with a piranha solution (H2O2/H2SO4, 30:70 v/v), rinsed twice with ultra-pure water, once with methanol, and incubated overnight in a solution of methanol containing v/v 0.85% of glacial acetic acid, 4.25% of ultra-pure water, and 2.2% of 3-mercaptopropylmethoxysilane (Roth Sochiel, Lauterbourg, France). Coverslips were then rinsed with methanol, dried with argon, heated at 120°C during 5 min, and incubated during 2 h with freshly prepared m-PEG-maleimide, molecular weight 5000 (Nektar/Shearwater, San Carlos, CA) at 2 mg/ml in phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.5. Finally, coverslips were rinsed once with phosphate-buffered saline, twice with ultra-pure water, dried with argon, stocked under vacuum, and used within 10 days.
Cell synchronization
Synchronization of L929 fibroblasts in early G1 phase was accomplished by mitotic shake. Cells were grown to 50% confluence on a collagen-fibronectin coated, 150 cm2 culture flask; 1 h before the mitotic shake itself, the flask was slightly shaken to remove less adherent cells. Mitotic cells were then collected by a strong shake-off, harvested, and replated on a collagen-fibronectin coated, 25 cm2 flask to let them perform cytokinesis. After 3 to 4 h, they were treated with NZ on ice, and then prepared for observation. For G2 synchronization, cells were treated with NZ 16h30 after the shake-off, ensuring at least 50% of the cells in the reduced motility phase <2.5 h before mitosis (14
) (average cell cycle length in our experiments: 17 h).
Preparation of detached L929 cells
Cells were detached with trypsine (GIBCO, Invitrogen), harvested, and resuspended in fresh DMEM with 15 mM Hepes pH 7.2. To keep them in suspension, they were then injected into a chamber made of two PEG coverslips separated by a 165 µm spacer (Gel-Pak, Hayward, CA). This spacer was thin enough to avoid cell dragging by convection flow without constraining the cells. The chamber was sealed with a 1:1:1 w/w mixture of vaseline, lanoline, and solid paraffine.
L929 cell fragments
Cells cultivated on collagen-fibronectin coated plastic plates (Rinzl, Pocketscope.com, Alpharetta, GA) were incubated at 37°C in the presence of 1.5 µg/ml CD for 30 min and of 5 µM NZ for the last 10 min. Cells were then centrifuged at 15,000 x g for 40 min at 37°C in the presence of CD and NZ to pellet nuclei (karyoplasts) and fragments. The pellet was resuspended in fresh DMEM with 5 µM NZ (and no CD). Karyoplasts were separated from fragments by 2 min centrifugation at 120 x g at 37°C. Fragments were then harvested by centrifuging the supernatant at 100,000 x g at 37°C during 20 min. The pellet was resuspended in fresh DMEM with 5 µM NZ and used within a day.
Transfections
The expression plasmid for myosin II regulatory light chain-green fluorescent protein (RLC-GFP) was a gift from Rex Chisholm, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (T.-L. Chew, W. Wolf, and R. Chisholm, unpublished). The expression plasmid for actin-GFP was a gift from Beat Imhof, University of Geneva, Switzerland (15
). L929 cells were transfected by electroporation and seeded on collagen-fibronectin coated plates. Fragments were produced the following day.
Video microscopy
Time-lapse images were taken with a Leica DMIRBE microscope controlled by Metamorph software (Universal Imaging, Downingtown, PA), equipped with a 37°C chamber. The chamber was also controlled at 5% CO2 for observation in open dishes (KE37, Jurkat, and cell fragments). For observation between sealed PEG coverslips, 15 mM Hepes was used instead. Phase contrast images were acquired using a cooled charge-coupled device camera (Micromax, Roper, Evry, France). For the study of transfected fragments, time-lapse z-sequences were collected with a four-dimensional deconvolution microscope controlled by Metamorph 5.7 software. The system is assembled on a bottom port of an inverted microscope (Leica DM IRB2) placed into an incubator for temperature control at 37°C (Life Imaging Services, Reinach, Switzerland). We used a 100x, 1.4 numerical aperture oil immersion objective and a cooled charge-coupled device detector (Roper Coolsnap HQ). Z-positioning was accomplished by a piezo-electric driver (Physik Instrument, Karlsruhe, Germany) mounted underneath the objective lens. The deconvolution process was achieved using the Metamorph point spread function-based iterative constrained modified Gold algorithm (16
), which allows a significant increase in contrast and signal/noise ratio of the data. The sequences were then reconstructed in three dimensions using the maximum intensity projection algorithm. Photobleaching experiments were carried out with a Zeiss (Oberkochen, Germany) confocal microscope controlled by LSM 510 META. We used a 63x, 1.4 numerical aperture oil immersion, Plan-Apochromat objective and an ion argon, 25 mW, laser (488 nm). Image contrast was reprocessed using Metamorph software.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
L929 fibroblasts treated with NZ, and then detached by trypsinization, could be observed for up to 6 h on PEG-grafted coverslips that prevented cells from adhering (see Materials and Methods). Once detached, cells first remained round, and an oscillatory behavior started after 45 min to 3 h. A representative example is displayed in Fig. 1 A: a constriction ring formed and crossed the cell body. Once the ring had reached the opposite side of the cell, a small knob remained, and important membrane activity was displayed by the main cell body. Eventually, the ring moved back across the cell and usually resorbed. Such back and forth movements occurred repeatedly, separated by pauses of variable length. There was no well-defined period, the timescales varying from one cycle to the other.
|
The oscillatory behavior of L929 cells was comparable to the oscillations observed in the absence of MTs in KE37 lymphoblastic cells, which grow in suspension (9
) (Fig. 1 B and Supplementary Movie 1), or in Jurkat cells, another human lymphoblastic cell line (data not shown). However, KE37 displayed a more regular behavior where a semiperiod (time measured between two crossings of the ring at the middle of the cell) could be defined (Fig. 1 C). In both L929 and KE37 cells, once the constriction ring had reached one end of the cell, the other end displayed accentuated membrane activity (white arrowheads in Fig. 1 A at 08:00, and in Fig. 1 B) and lamellipodia formation (Fig. S1). The displacement velocity of the ring during its movement across the cell was
510 µm/min in KE37 as well as in L929.
Depolymerization of MTs thus induces a similar oscillatory behavior in lymphoblasts and detached fibroblasts. This behavior is spontaneous and lasts for at least 6 h, suggesting that it is governed by an intrinsic and general cellular mechanism. We therefore wondered whether it would be conserved in a simplified, nucleus-free system, such as those previously used for migration studies (18
20
).
Cell fragments oscillate
Cell fragments from 0.5 to 10 µm in diameter were obtained as a side product of L929 fibroblast enucleation using a protocol adapted from Prescott et al. (21
) (see Materials and Methods). A great number of cell fragments was produced, possibly by pearling of the membrane tube formed between the cell and the nucleus pulled off by the centrifugation, or due to the fragility of the cell cortex. Fragments from 3 to 10 µm in diameter were observed by video microscopy.
When resuspended in fresh medium supplemented with NZ, fragments remained in suspension, and 7080% displayed an oscillatory behavior that persisted for at least 8 h. A representative sequence is displayed in Fig. 1 D. The constriction ring oscillated very smoothly. A remarkable difference with entire cells was that no membrane protrusion activity was observed (Fig. 1 D, Supplementary Movie 1). This could be related to the small size of the fragments. For a given fragment, a semiperiod was well defined (Fig. 1 E), but varied from one fragment to the other (from 30 to 150 s) with no clear correlation with size, probably due to the inhomogeneity in fragment composition. The velocity of the ring movement was
510 µm/min, comparable to the values observed for entire cells. The oscillatory behavior can thus be generalized to cell fragments.
Oscillations depend on actin polymerization and myosin II activity
We then investigated how actin and myosin II were involved using both L929 cell fragments and KE37 cells. Cytochalasin D (CD) was used to inhibit actin dynamics. In cells and cell fragments first treated with CD for 30 min, the addition of NZ did not result in ring formation. Adding CD to already oscillating NZ-treated KE37 cells or L929 fragments stopped the oscillatory behavior in <5 min. Strikingly, once the oscillation had stopped, the constriction slowly relaxed during 1030 min (data not shown). Treatment of oscillating cells with 0.5 µM latrunculin A (LatA) gave the same result, which suggests that actin is either more concentrated or less dynamic at the constriction. We characterized the effect of low amounts of CD on the well-defined semiperiod of KE37 cells: increasing CD concentration decreased the number of oscillating cells and increased the semiperiod (Fig. 2, A and B).
|
Using an alternative approach to affect myosin II activity through the Rho pathway that enhances contractility, we checked that a Rho-kinase inhibitor, Y-27632 (12
), stopped the oscillation in NZ-treated KE37 cells. No oscillatory behavior was observed when cells were treated with Y-27632 before NZ addition. From these experiments, we conclude that the oscillatory behavior depends on actin polymerization and myosin II activity, which prompted us to investigate their dynamics.
Dynamics of actin and myosin II in oscillating fragments
To obtain a dynamic characterization of the oscillation mechanism, we produced fragments from L929 cells expressing either actin-GFP (15
) or myosin II regulatory light chain (RLC)-GFP, which can be used as a reporter for myosin II (T.-L. Chew, W. Wolf and R. Chisholm, unpublished). The small size of the cell fragments allowed us to acquire time-lapse z-sequences and several oscillations could be recorded without bleaching.
Representative dynamic distributions of actin and myosin II in oscillating fragments are displayed in Fig. 3 and Supplementary Movies 3 and 4 (see Fig. S2 for other examples). Fluorescence profile analysis was performed on deconvolved time-lapse images (Fig. 3, B and D). Actin was essentially located at the membrane throughout the experiment (Fig. 3 B), but its distribution varied significantly during the oscillation cycle. Strikingly, the growing bulge surface was first devoid of detectable actin in comparison with the shrinking part of the fragment (Fig. 3 A at 00:00). Then actin was gradually recruited to the plasma membrane of the bulge (Fig. 3 A, white arrowheads) until the distribution became uniform all over the surface (Fig. 3 A at 01:20). After a delay, a new bulge was expelled through a hole that formed in the actin shell (Fig. 3 A, white asterisks). This hole was rimmed with actin (Fig. S2 C and Supplementary Movie 6). The new bulge was, in turn, initially devoid of detectable actin. In general, the new bulge nucleated next to where the previous bulge had collapsed. Bulge formation was reminiscent of blebbing (22
24
), but here, the bulge size rapidly reached the size of the cell or cell fragment.
|
From these observations, we conclude that 1), hole formation in the actomyosin cortex triggers bulge growth, and 2), the oscillatory behavior is driven by rapid redistributions of cortical actin and myosin II.
Osmotic swelling suppresses the oscillation
To figure out whether or not hole formation could by induced be hydrostatic pressure effect on the cortex (22
), we first investigated the effect of increased internal pressure on the oscillation by performing osmotic swelling experiments. Adding different amounts of water (550% water in the medium) (25
) to already oscillating KE37 cells drastically reduced the number of oscillating cells (Fig. 4 A). Thus, oscillation is not facilitated by increasing the internal pressure, an observation that does not favor the hypothesis of bulging induced by hydrostatic pressure alone.
|
|
More strikingly, the direct effect of tension could be tested by imposing a local mechanical stress. This was achieved by flowing a jet of culture medium on the cell membrane with the pipette tip at a distance of 12 µm from the membrane. The local pressure that was exerted on the cell membrane was then of the order of 102 Pa (see Materials and Methods). This is slightly below the value of the elastic modulus of an actin gel (26
), and also of the critical stress at which symmetry breaks in an actin gel under tension around beads (2
), and corresponds to a force of 0.1 nN on a 1 µm2 surface. Thus this pertubation could be sufficient to induce local rupture of the actin cortex. Notably, although the jet pressed on the membrane, its action did not provoke any invagination, but conversely resulted in the appearance of a membrane bulge in 11 out of 12 cells (1 cell did not form any bulge) (Fig. 5). This experiment favors the idea that a higher local stress can induce cortex breakage.
Photobleaching experiments reveal cortical contraction
Whereas the new bulge grew, the remaining part of the cell or fragment shrank. This could be due to the dynamics of the actomyosin cortex either by actin depolymerization only, or by cortical contraction. To address this issue, we photobleached two spots in the actin cortex of oscillating actin-GFP transfected fragments. We observed reproducibly (10 fragments) that the distance between the two spots decreased, whereas it remained constant in control nonoscillating fragments (Fig. 4, BD). This result provides clear evidence for actomyosin cortical contraction.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mechanism of the actomyosin cortex breakage
Notably, the first step of the oscillation is the formation of a hole in the actomyosin cortex (Fig. 3, Fig. S2, Supplementary Movies 3 and 4), reminiscent of "fenestration" in Walker-carcinoma cells, which has been proposed to result from hydrostatic pressure (22
). However, our experiments favor a contractile effect (see Figs. 4 and 5). We thus propose another mechanism, based on cortical contraction only, inspired by studies on actin gels under tension. Indeed, the actomyosin cortex is a highly dynamic cross-linked gel (27
) organized as a shell of actin associated with the membrane and maintained under tension by the presence of myosin II. A similar actin gel under tension forms around beads that activate actin polymerization. We showed elsewhere that when actin monomers assemble at the surface of these beads, their insertion deforms the existing actin gel, leading to a tension due only to geometry (28
). This state precedes symmetry breaking and movement of beads mimicking Listeria motility (2
,29
,30
). The same analysis applies here: in the stationary regime of oscillating fragments, the shell is locally under a tension, due here to the activity of myosin II. As long as the shell is closed, the tension T, tangential to the cortex (Fig. 6 A, a), keeps a uniform modulus around the shell, given by the formula
![]() |
is the local tangential stress distribution through the gel thickness. The gel thickness
varies locally due to fluctuations, but the tension remains uniform. From the above formula, we see that where the gel is thinner, the local tangential stress is higher, and can provoke gel rupture or depolymerization. Note that the same effect can be produced by any spatial inhomogeneity in the stress like, for example, one caused by a higher local concentration of myosin, as we briefly discuss in the following paragraph. This mechanism is confirmed by the local herniation of the cell membrane at the point where the actin cortex is fragilized either by CD or LatA, or by a mechanical effect (Fig. 5).
|
Physiological relevance of the oscillation phenomenon
The oscillation phenomenon underlines an intrinsic instability of the cortical actomyosin system. Revealed in artificial conditions, where MTs are depolymerized, this mechanism could be involved in the dynamics of the cell shape, although in usual conditions it is controlled partially or totally by the MT system, likely through the Rho pathway. However, there are situations in which the cell will take advantage of this cortical phenomenon. One clear case of cortically driven instability appears to be the onset of fertilization of the Caenorhabditis elegans egg. Indeed, it has been recently observed that the sperm entry triggers a retraction of the cell actomyosin cortex, thus leaving a membrane area free of cortical actin and myosin (34
). In this work, the authors show that the cortical flow relies on myosin-based contraction and is triggered by local, centrosome-mediated, release of contractility. Moreover, the velocity at which the cortex contracts in C. elegans is in the 17 µm/min range, like in our experiments where the cortex shrinks at a velocity of 19 µm/min (Fig. 4 B). Taken together, these experiments support the mechanism of instability leading to global cortical flows we propose in this work. As asymmetrical division then happens, the C. elegans egg must prevent cortical oscillation for proper development, a feature that is possibly achieved by PAR family proteins, which stabilize the asymmetry as suggested by experimental observations (34
). More generally, in mitosis, the orientation of the mitotic spindle is altered in dividing cells where Rho is overexpressed, due to enhanced contractility (7
). The definition of the division axis in such highly contractile cells could result partly from a spontaneous cortex breakage similar to what we observe.
In the case of cell migration, although lamellipodium extension is often studied as a mechanism autonomously defining polarity, there might be a correlation between cortical actomyosin contractility and the sites where membrane extension is nucleated (35
). A possible scenario is that actin and myosin confer active gel properties (36
) to the cell cortex producing physical effects that result in membrane extension.
In keeping with these lines, our mechanism of cortex instability could also explain the formation of a lamellipodium in lymphoblast cells, growing in suspension. The shape of the cell body could be that of an actin shell with a stabilized opening through which the cytoplasm is extruded, allowing actin to repolymerize in the bulge that could then become a lamellipodium (Fig. 6 B). Indeed, polymerization of actin at such membrane bulging zones can, under certain conditions, transform into lamellipodia (23
,37
). The presence of MTs, which reduces the recruitment of myosin II to the cortex, tones down cell contractility (6
,38
40
). The low contractility of the actomyosin shell might then prevent the oscillation dynamics to take place. The stabilized shape would be a round cell body with a constriction at the base of the lamellipodium, as generally observed. Significantly, oscillating NZ-treated cells recovered after Bb addition a shape similar to that of control cells, with a lamellipodium and round cell body (Supplementary Movie 2). Due to Bb treatment, the contractility of the actomyosin shell is reduced, which could explain the stability of the lamellipodium, just like in control cells with MTs.
| CONCLUSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This work has been supported by Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique grants (Action concertée Dynamique et Réactivité des Assemblages Biologiques) and by a grant from the Institut Curie (Programme Incitatif et Coopératif). E. P. is supported by a La Ligue contre le Cancer fellowship.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Submitted on February 2, 2005; accepted for publication April 27, 2005.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Bernheim-Groswasser, A., S. Wiesner, R. M. Golsteyn, M.-F. Carlier, and C. Sykes. 2002. The dynamics of actin-based motility depend on surface parameters. Nature. 417:308311.[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Small, J. V., B. Geiger, I. Kaverina, and A. Bershadsky. 2002. How do microtubules guide migrating cells? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3:957964.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Danowski, B. A. 1989. Fibroblast contractility and actin organization are stimulated by microtubule inhibitors. J. Cell Sci. 93:255266.
5. Pletjushkina, O. J., A. M. Belkin, O. J. Ivanova, T. N. Oliver, J. M. Vasiliev, and K. A. Jacobson. 1998. Maturation of cell-substratum focal adhesions induced by depolymerization of microtubules is mediated by increased cortical tension. Cell Adhes. Commun. 5:121135.[Medline]
6. Rodriguez, O. C., A. W. Schaefer, C. A. Mandato, P. Forscher, W. M. Bement, and C. M. Waterman-Storer. 2003. Conserved microtubule-actin interactions in cell movement and morphogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 5:599609.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Vasiliev, J. M., T. Omelchenko, I. M. Gelfand, H. H. Feder, and E. M. Bonder. 2004. Rho overexpression leads to mitosis-associated detachment of cells from epithelial sheets: a link to the mechanism of cancer dissemination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101:1252612530.
8. Maddox, A. S., and K. Burridge. 2003. RhoA is required for cortical retraction and rigidity during mitotic cell rounding. J. Cell Biol. 160:255265.
9. Bornens, M., M. Paintrand, and C. Celati. 1989. The cortical microfilament system of lymphoblasts displays a periodic oscillatory activity in the absence of microtubules: implications for cell polarity. J. Cell Biol. 109:10711083.
10. Pletjushkina, O. J., Z. Rajfur, P. Pomorski, T. N. Oliver, J. M. Vasiliev, and K. A. Jacobson. 2001. Induction of cortical oscillations in spreading cells by depolymerization of microtubules. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 48:235244.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Straight, A. F., A. Cheung, J. Limouze, I. Chen, N. J. Westwood, J. R. Sellers, and T. J. Mitchison. 2003. Dissecting temporal and spatial control of cytokinesis with a myosin II inhibitor. Science. 299:17431747.
12. Narumiya, S., T. Ishizaki, and M. Uehata. 2000. Use and properties of ROCK-specific inhibitor Y-27632. Methods Enzymol. 325:273284.[Medline]
13. Perret, E., A. Leung, A. Morel, H. Feracci, and P. Nassoy. 2002. Versatile decoration of glass surfaces to probe individual protein-protein interactions and cellular adhesion. Langmuir. 18:846854.[CrossRef]
14. Walmod, P. S., R. Hartmann-Petersen, S. Prag, E. L. Lepekhin, C. Röpke, V. Berezin, and E. Bock. 2004. Cell-cycle-dependent regulation of cell motility and determination of the role of Rac1. Exp. Cell Res. 295:407420.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Ballestrem, C., B. Wehrle-Haller, and B. A. Imhof. 1998. Actin dynamics in living mammalian cells. J. Cell Sci. 111:16491658.[Abstract]
16. Sibarita, J.-B., H. Magnin, and J. R. De Mey. 2002. Ultra-fast 4D microscopy and high throughput distributed deconvolution. IEEE Int. Symp. Biomedical Imaging. 769772.
17. Vasiliev, J. M. 1991. Polarization of pseudopodial activities: cytoskeletal mechanisms. J. Cell Sci. 98:14.
18. Malawista, S. E., and A. de Boisfleury Chevance. 1982. The cytokineplast: purified, stable, and functional motile machinery from human blood polymorphonuclear leukocytes. J. Cell Biol. 95:960973.
19. Euteneuer, U., and M. Schliwa. 1984. Persistent, directional motility of cells and cytoplasmic fragments in the absence of microtubules. Nature. 310:5861.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Verkhovsky, A. B., T. M. Svitkina, and G. G. Borisy. 1999. Self-polarization and directional motility of cytoplasm. Curr. Biol. 9:1120.[CrossRef][Medline]
21. Prescott, D. M., D. Myerson, and J. Wallace. 1972. Enucleation of mammalian cells with cytochalasin B. Exp. Cell Res. 71:480485.[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Keller, H., and P. Eggli. 1998. Protrusive activity, cytoplasmic compartmentalization, and restriction rings in locomoting blebbing Walker carcinosarcoma cells are related to detachment of cortical actin from the plasma membrane. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 41:181193.[CrossRef][Medline]
23. Cunningham, C. C. 1995. Actin polymerization and intracellular solvent flow in cell surface blebbing. J. Cell Biol. 129:15891599.
24. Jungbluth, A., V. von Arnim, E. Biegelmann, B. Humbel, A. Schweiger, and G. Gerisch. 1994. Strong increase in the tyrosine phosphorylation of actin upon inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation: correlation with reversible rearrangements in the actin skeleton of Dictyostelium cells. J. Cell Sci. 107:117125.[Abstract]
25. Raucher, D., and M. P. Sheetz. 2000. Cell spreading and lamellipodial extension rate is regulated by membrane tension. J. Cell Biol. 148:127136.
26. Marcy, Y., J. Prost, M.-F. Carlier, and C. Sykes. 2004. Forces generated during actin-based propulsion: a direct measurement by micromanipulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101:59925997.
27. Bretschneider, T., S. Diez, K. Anderson, J. Heuser, M. Clarke, A. Müller-Taubenberger, J. Köhler, and G. Gerisch. 2004. Dynamic actin patterns and Arp2/3 assembly at the substrate-attached surface of motile cells. Curr. Biol. 14:110.[CrossRef][Medline]
28. Noireaux, V., R. M. Golsteyn, E. Friederich, J. Prost, C. Antony, D. Louvard, and C. Sykes. 2000. Growing an actin gel on spherical surfaces. Biophys. J. 78:16431654.
29. Sekimoto, K., J. Prost, F. Jülicher, H. Boukellal, and A. Bernheim-Groswasser. 2004. Role of tensile stress in actin gels and a symmetry-breaking instability. Eur. Phys. J. E. 13:247259.[CrossRef][Medline]
30. van der Gucht, J., E. Paluch, J. Plastino, and C. Sykes. 2005. Stress release drives symmetry breaking for actin-based movement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 102:78477852.
31. Condeelis, J. S., and D. L. Taylor. 1977. The contractile basis of amoeboid movement V. The control of gelation, solation and contraction in extracts from Dictyostelium discoideum. J. Cell Biol. 74:901927.
32. Conrad, P. A., K. A. Giuliano, G. Fisher, K. Collins, P. T. Matsudaira, and D. L. Taylor. 1993. Relative distribution of actin, myosin I, and myosin II during the wound healing response of fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 120:13811391.
33. Stossel, T. P. 1993. On the crawling of animal cells. Science. 260:10861094.
34. Munro, E., J. Nance, and J. R. Priess. 2004. Cortical flows powered by asymmetrical contraction transport PAR proteins to establish and maintain anterior-posterior polarity in the early C. elegans embryo. Dev. Cell. 7:413424.[CrossRef][Medline]
35. Bray, D., and J. G. White. 1988. Cortical flow in animal cells. Science. 239:883888.
36. Kruse, K., J.-F. Joanny, F. Jülicher, J. Prost, and K. Sekimoto. 2004. Asters, vortices, and rotating spirals in active gels of polar filaments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92:078101.[CrossRef][Medline]
37. Trinkaus, J. P. 1973. Surface activity and locomotion of Fundulus deep cells during blastula and gastrula stages. Dev. Biol. 30:68103.[CrossRef]
38. Kimura, K., M. Ito, M. Amano, K. Chihara, Y. Fukata, M. Nakafuku, B. Yamamori, J. Feng, T. Nakano, K. Okawa, A. Iwamatsu, and K. Kaibuchi. 1996. Regulation of myosin phosphatase by Rho and Rho-associated kinase (Rho-kinase). Science. 273:245248.[Abstract]
39. Krendel, M., F. T. Zenke, and G. M. Bokoch. 2002. Nucleotide exchange factor GEF-H1 mediates cross-talk between microtubules and the actin cytoskeleton. Nat. Cell Biol. 4:294301.[CrossRef][Medline]
40. Rogers, S. L., U. Wiedemann, U. Hacker, C. Turck, and R. D. Vale. 2004. Drosophila RhoGEF2 associates with microtubule plus ends in an EB1-dependent manner. Curr. Biol. 14:18271833.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. S. Rogers, T. A. Waigh, and J. R. Lu Intracellular Microrheology of Motile Amoeba proteus Biophys. J., April 15, 2008; 94(8): 3313 - 3322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Kozlov and A. Mogilner Model of Polarization and Bistability of Cell Fragments Biophys. J., December 1, 2007; 93(11): 3811 - 3819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Paluch, J. van der Gucht, and C. Sykes Cracking up: symmetry breaking in cellular systems J. Cell Biol., December 4, 2006; 175(5): 687 - 692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Wang, Y. Teng, Q. Wang, X. Li, X. Sheng, M. Zheng, J. Samaj, F. Baluska, and J. Lin Imaging of Dynamic Secretory Vesicles in Living Pollen Tubes of Picea meyeri Using Evanescent Wave Microscopy Plant Physiology, August 1, 2006; 141(4): 1591 - 1603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS |