help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on September 23, 2005.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.105.067116
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.105.067116v1
89/6/3976    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by García, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Sánchez, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by García, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Sánchez, J. A.
Biophysical Journal 89:3976-3984 (2005)
© 2005 The Biophysical Society

Short-Term Regulation of Excitation-Contraction Coupling by the ß1a Subunit in Adult Mouse Skeletal Muscle

María C. García *, Elba Carrillo *, José M. Galindo *, Ascensión Hernández *, Julio A. Copello {dagger}, Michael Fill {ddagger} and Jorge A. Sánchez *

* Departmento de Farmacología, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del I.P.N., Mexico, D.F. 07360, Mexico; {dagger} Department of Pharmacology, Southern Illinois University, Springfield, Illinois; and {ddagger} Department of Physiology, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Dr. Jorge A. Sánchez, Dept. of Pharmacology, Cinvestav Apartado Postal 14-740, Mexico, D.F. 07360. Tel.: 52-55-5061-3301; Fax: 52-55-5577-7090; E-mail: jsanchez{at}cinvestav.mx.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The ß1a subunit of the skeletal muscle voltage-gated Ca2+ channel plays a fundamental role in the targeting of the channel to the tubular system as well as in channel function. To determine whether this cytosolic auxiliary subunit is also a regulatory protein of Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum in vivo, we pressure-injected the ß1a subunit into intact adult mouse muscle fibers and recorded, with Fluo-3 AM, the intracellular Ca2+ signal induced by the action potential. We found that the ß1a subunit significantly increased, within minutes, the amplitude of Ca2+ release without major changes in its time course. ß1a subunits with the carboxy-terminus region deleted did not show an effect on Ca2+ release. The possibility that potentiation of Ca2+ release is due to a direct interaction between the ß1a subunit and the ryanodine receptor was ruled out by bilayer experiments of RyR1 single-channel currents and also by Ca2+ flux experiments. Our data suggest that the ß1a subunit is capable of regulating E-C coupling in the short term and that the integrity of the carboxy-terminus region is essential for its modulatory effect.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Dihydropyridine receptors (DHP) play an essential role as the voltage sensors that link excitation with contraction in skeletal muscle (for reviews, see Ríos and Pizarro and others 1–4). In addition to their role as voltage sensors, these receptors are also permeant to Ca2+, generating a very slowly activated L-type Ca2+ current ((5Go) for a review, see Melzer et al. (4Go)). DHP receptors are composed of the main subunit {alpha}1s, and the auxiliary subunits, {alpha}2-{delta}, ß1, and {gamma}-subunits. The {alpha}1s subunit (now referred to as the CaV1.1 channel (6Go)) contains the pore (7Go), the voltage sensor of excitation-contraction coupling, and the DHP binding sites (for reviews, see Ríos and Pizarro and others (1Go,8Go–10Go)).

The ß1a subunit is the main isoform among the ß1 subunits present in skeletal muscle (11Go) and its role has been explored by inactivating the ß1 gene using gene targeting techniques. This approach has revealed that this subunit plays an essential role in the assembly of DHP receptors in their correct position. ß-null cells have undetectable levels of the {alpha}1s subunit in the cell membrane and show greatly reduced L-type Ca2+ currents and charge movement (12Go,13Go), an effect that can be reversed by the introduction of the cDNA of the ß1a subunit (14Go). However, much less is known about the potential role of this auxiliary subunit as a modulatory protein of E-C coupling, regulating Ca2+ release in the short term. In this regard, we have recently described that the addition of the ß1a subunit to a cell-free preparation enhances the amplitude of L-type current within minutes, consistent with a short-term modulatory role on CaV1.1 channels (15Go). The aim of this study was to examine whether the ß1a subunit also has a short-term effect on Ca2+ release induced by action potentials in adult skeletal muscle fibers.

Preliminary results have been published (16Go).


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Fiber preparation
BALB/c mice (aged ~9 weeks) were used. These were killed by cervical dislocation, after which the flexor digitorum brevis muscles (FDB) of the hindlimbs were isolated and incubated at 34°C for 60 min in a Ca2+-Mg2+-free Tyrode solution plus 10% fetal calf serum (Gibco-Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and collagenase (0.5 mg/ml, type lV, Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The muscles were then rinsed and dissociated by gently triturating the enzyme-treated muscles through a fire-polished Pasteur pipette with collagenase-free Tyrode solution containing (mM): NaCl, 146; KCl, 5; CaCl2, 2; MgCl2, 1; glucose, 11; HEPES, 10; at pH = 7.4. The experiments were performed according to the guidelines of the local animal care committee.

Molecular biology techniques
Production of the ß1a subunit in COS-1 cells
We have described the expression and detailed purification procedure of the ß1a subunit in COS-1 cells elsewhere (15Go). In brief, COS-1 cells were transiently transfected with a plasmid containing the cDNA of the ß1a subunit (pSG5-Mß1a) under the control of the SV-40 promoter. Membrane fraction samples of homogeneized COS-1 cells were loaded onto polyacrylamide gels and stained with Coomassie blue. The gel band that contained the ß1a subunit was identified by Western blots, cut, and purified by electroelution methods according to Smith (17Go). After the electroelution procedure, electrodialysis techniques were used to remove all traces of sodium dodecyl sulfate, as described by García et al. (15Go). The dried protein was stored at –20°C until used.

Bacterial production and purification of the ß1a subunit
The coding fragment of the ß1a subunit was liberated from the pSG5 expression vector mentioned above. To this end, pSG5-ß1a was cleaved with NheI (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA). NheI sites are present in both ends of the ß1a fragment. The sticky ends of the fragment were filled with Klenow polymerase and ligated at the SmaI site of the multiple cloning site of the pQE-31 vector (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). This strategy generates an in-frame cloning of the ß1a protein. Escherichia coli DH5-{alpha} cells were transformed with this construct and clones with the correct orientation of the insert were selected to achieve transcription of the product with the T5 promoter present in the vector. The deletion of the last 40 amino acids in the carboxy-terminus region of the ß1a subunit was achieved by cleavage of pSG5-ß1a plasmid with NotI. The plasmid contains a single recognition site located downstream from the open reading frame. After that, DNA was treated with Bal-31 exonuclease (New England Biolabs) for 15 min. To estimate the size of the deleted products, we used NcoI and HincII to liberate the 3' end of the ß1a subunit and the products were subsequently sequenced. The fragment containing the truncated ß1a was liberated from the pSG5 vector by NheI and HincII (New England Biolabs). It was then filled with Klenow polymerase and subcloned in the same way as the nontruncated ß1a subunit. Both clones were sequenced to confirm the integrity of the open reading frame with Sequenase kit (version 2.0, USB) and specific oligonucleotides for pQE vectors. Deletion of 40 amino acids in the C-terminus region of the ß-subunit is not expected to alter the folding of the protein. In fact, Bogdanov et al. (18Go) produced chimeras of ß-subunits lacking more amino acids in their C-terminus region than in this study and suggested that no disruption in protein folding takes place. In addition, molecular models of ß-subunits have identified several domains that allow intramolecular interactions, namely, SH3 domain, PDZ domain, and the GK domain (19Go,20Go). None of these domains is located in the C-terminus region of the ß-protein and the domain organization of D2 and D4 domains is not altered by a similar C-terminus deletion (21Go).

E. coli BL21({lambda}DE3) (Novagen, San Diego, CA) cells were transformed with the above constructs and used for mass production of the ß1a subunit protein and its truncated form. The cells were cultured in 100 ml of LB medium in the presence of 100 µg/ml ampicillin and grown at 32°C until an A600 of 0.6 was reached. The production of the protein was induced by 1.0 mM isopropyl ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside for 6 h at 32°C. The cells were pelleted and resuspended in 10 ml of NETN buffer (NaCl = 120 mM, Tris-HCl = 20 mM, EDTA = 1 mM, PSMF = 1 mM, and 0.5% NP-40 at pH = 8.0). Cell lysis was achieved with the aid of a French press (Thermo Spectronic, Shelton, CT) at a pressure of 600 psi, applied twice. The lysate was centrifuged at 15,000 x g resulting in a pellet and in a clear supernatant fraction. The ß1a subunit protein was found in the pellet fraction and was solubilized with 5 M urea. The truncated form of the ß1a subunit was found in the supernatant. The protein fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie blue. The ß1a subunit was identified by Western blot as described elsewhere (15Go). The products were obtained by electroelution techniques and the eluted protein products were precipitated with acetone. Thereafter, the samples were dialyzed with water to remove the salt content.

Pressure injection techniques
To introduce the ß1a subunit into muscle fibers, we used an intracellular micropipette to which pressure was applied. The micropipettes were pulled in a Brown-Flaming horizontal puller (Sutter Instruments, San Francisco, CA) from Kwik-fill glass capillaries (WPI, New Haven, CT) and had an average resistance of 25 M{Omega} when filled with 3 M KCl. They were mounted in a plastic holder and driven by a hydraulic micromanipulator (Narishige MO-150, Tokyo, Japan). Pipettes were filled with a solution containing (mM): KCl, 140; MgCl2, 1; EGTA, 1; and HEPES, 10, at pH = 7.1. Fibers were impaled at a point located 125 µm from the position where light was detected with the photodiode. The ß1a subunit, purified either from COS-1 cells or from bacteria, was used at a concentration of 0.35 µg/µl. Most experiments were performed with ß1a subunits purified from COS-1 cells. Experiments that were performed with ß1a subunits from bacteria are clearly indicated in the text. Control experiments involved pressure injection of a heat-inactivated ß1a subunit added at the same concentration or pressure injection of the micropipette saline solution. In both cases, these control injections gave similar results and are considered together in the Results section. Two trains of pulses separated by a 30-s interval were delivered. Each train consisted of five consecutive 150 kPa pressure pulses, each lasting 600 ms. We estimate that this procedure allowed the injection of 40–50 pl of solution. Action potentials were elicited by passing rectangular current pulses between two platinum plate electrodes placed symmetrically on either side of the muscle chamber.

The microinjected ß1a subunit is expected to diffuse away from the point of injection along the axis of the muscle fiber. To estimate the diffusion of the ß1a subunit in our experiments, we used Fick's second law (Eq. 1). This equation was used by Papadopoulos et al. (22Go) to account for the axial spread of microinjected proteins in muscle. In Eq. 1, D is the diffusion coefficient and C is the concentration of the injected protein in the sarcoplasm that changes as a function of time (t) and as a function of the distance from the point of injection (x). Equation 1 describes the proportionality between the change of C along the diffusion pathway {partial}C/{partial}x and the change in concentration with time {partial}C/{partial}T. This equation assumes a one-dimensional diffusion process with an infinite extension of the diffusion path.

(1)

The diffusion coefficient (D) in Eq. 1 was measured experimentally in the myoplasm of muscle fibers by Papadopoulos et al. (22Go) for proteins of different masses. In our estimations we used D = 6.2 x 10–8 cm2 s–1. This value corresponds to the diffusion coefficient measured for hemoglobin (22Go), a protein that has a similar mass (64.5 kDa) to that of the ß1a subunit (55 kDa (10Go)). The analytical solution of Eq. 1 can be achieved using a Dirac delta function applied at t = 0. The solution is Eq. 2 where A is an amplitude factor.

(2)

Optical techniques
We used Fluo-3 AM (1–10 µM) (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) to monitor the levels of intracellular Ca2+. This dye undergoes large fluorescence changes upon Ca2+ binding, it has a large dynamic range, low compartmentalization (23Go), and it has been used extensively in muscle (24Go–26Go). Fibers were mounted in a chamber placed on the stage of an Optiphot microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). The fluorescence emitted by a preselected region of a stained muscle fiber, illuminated episcopically with monochromatic light at a wavelength of 485 nm, was filtered with a high-pass barrier filter (cut-on wavelength 535 nm), and detected with a low noise photodiode connected in a photovoltaic configuration. The basal fluorescence (F) from the same region of the muscle fiber was recorded continuously on video tape. Its mean value during 300 ms before electrical stimulation, was used to scale Ca2+ signals as {Delta}F/F. This procedure minimizes the possible effects of changes in the concentration of the dye on fluorescence signals and it has been used extensively by others (24Go,27Go). No attempts were made to calculate the actual myoplasmic Ca2+ concentration. To prevent mechanical artifacts, intact single fibers were suspended in 0.35% agar gel, following a procedure similar to that described in (28Go) except that we used a lower agar concentration and that our experiments were performed at a lower temperature (20–22°C).

Ca2+ leak measurements
Skeletal muscle heavy sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) microsomes were obtained following procedures by Saito et al. (29Go). The net rate of Ca2+ leak from these microsomes was measured at room temperature (20–24°C) with a spectrophotometer (Cory 50, Varian, Palo Alto, CA) using the Ca2+-sensitive dye antipyrylazo III (APIII). Changes in Ca2+ concentration over time were measured as the absorbance difference between 710 and 790 nm as described in (30Go). Briefly, microsomes (50 µg protein) were incubated with 1 ml of assay solution containing 100 mM potassium phosphate, 0.2 mM APIII, 4 mM MgCl2, and 2 mM ATP (pH 7). Microsomes were actively preloaded with Ca2+ (via the SR Ca2+ ATPase) by adding 3 aliquots of 40 nM CaCl2 while stirring. The microsomes were then incubated for 5 min with standard buffer (control) or buffer containing ruthenium red (5 µM), normal ß1a subunit, or the truncated ß1a subunit. After this incubation period, 25 µM cyclopiazonic acid (CPZ) was added to inhibit the SR Ca2+ ATPase and then Ca2+ leak from the microsomes was monitored. When caffeine (2.5 mM) was applied, it was applied simultaneously with CPZ. Ca2+ leak rate in each experimental condition was measured from the slope of the APIII Ca2+ signal.

Electrophysiological methods
Dissociated FDB muscle fibers were used in voltage clamp experiments. To minimize mechanical artifacts during measurements of membrane currents, fibers were not embedded in agar as in optical experiments. Instead, movement artifacts were greatly suppressed by a previous incubation for 3 h in the cell permeant calcium buffer BAPTA AM (10 mM) (Molecular Probes).

The whole-cell patch-clamp technique was used to record CaV1.1 currents (31Go). Pipettes (1–1.2 M{Omega}) were double-pulled from hard glass (KIMAX-51; Kimble Glass, Toledo, OH) and were filled with 5 µl of the internal solution. CaV1.1 currents were measured 10 min after achieving the whole cell configuration. The ß1a subunit was tested by adding 0.30–0.35 µg µl–1 of the ß1a subunit to the pipette solution. Currents were recorded with an Axopatch 200A (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA) amplifier; 60–80% of the series resistance was electronically compensated.

To measure charge movement, command pulses of 60-ms duration and variable amplitude were delivered. The pulse sequence was bracketed by 16 consecutive hyperpolarizing control pulses, –20 mV from the holding potential (Eh) that was set at –100 mV. The currents generated during these pulses were used to subtract linear membrane components, to calculate the linear membrane capacitance, and to measure the leakage current during the experiment.

The voltage dependence of activation of nonlinear charge movement was fitted to the Boltzmann function:

(3)
where Qmax is the maximum value of charge, Vm is the membrane potential, V is the potential where Q = 0.5 Qmax, and k is a measure of the steepness of the curve.

To measure Ca2+ currents (ICa) the same pulse protocol was used except that the duration of the pulses was 750 ms and Eh = –80 mV. The interval between pulses was 4 s. The peak Ca2+ current values were fitted to Eq. 4, which is similar to that used by Wang et al. (32Go) to describe the current-voltage relationship of L-type Ca2+ currents in muscle fibers.

(4)

In Eq. 4, Gmax is the maximum conductance and Vrev is the reversal potential. The other parameters have the same meaning as in Eq. 3.

Single channel measurements of skeletal RyR1 channels were recorded by fusing SR microsomes into artificial planar lipid bilayers as previously described by Copello et al. (33Go). Briefly, planar bilayers were formed by painting a mixture (5:4:1) of phosphatydilethanolamine, phosphatydilserine, and phosphatydilcholine (50 mg/ml decane) across a 100-µm hole separating two ~1-ml solutions. One solution (trans) contained 250 mM HEPES/50 mM Ca(OH)2 (pH 7.4) and was clamped to 0 mV using an Axopatch 200B patch-clamp amplifier (Axon Instruments). The other solution (cis) was held at virtual ground and contained 1 mM CsCl, 250 mM HEPES/Tris (pH 7.4), and 1 mM CaCl2. The SR microsomes (5 µg protein) were added to the cis solution while stirring. In this situation, the RyR1 channels incorporate with their cytosolic surface facing the cis solution. Channels were identified by their high conductance, Ca2+ selectivity, and gating characteristics. After RyR1 incorporation, the cis solution was perfused with 30 vol of 250 mM HEPES/Tris (pH 7.4) and the free Ca2+ level was adjusted to ~2 µM (1.4 mM CaCl2, 1 mM BAPTA, and 1 mM DiBromoBAPTA). The cis solution also contained 7 mM ATP and 5.5 mM Mg2+. Single-channel recordings were made before and after addition of ß1a subunit (1–4 µM; stirring for 2 min) to the cis solution. Recordings were filtered at 1000 Hz and digitized at 20 KHz with a Digidata 1360 acquisition system (Axon Instruments). Data were analyzed using pClamp9 (Axon Instruments). Open probability (Po) was determined from at least 8 min of recording.

Electrophysiological and optical experiments were carried out at room temperature (20–22°C).

Solutions
The external solution employed to record ICa contained (mM): 10 Ca2+, 140 TEACH3SO3 (tetraethylamonium methanesulphonate), and 2 MgCl2. The pipette solution contained (mM): 140 Cs-aspartate, 5 MgCl2, and 10 EGTA. The composition of the external solution used to record charge movement was similar, except that the concentration of external Ca2+ was reduced to 1 mM. The presence of Ca2+ was required to maintain the stability of our recordings because fibers do not generally tolerate the absence of Ca2+ well. We did not use Ca2+ channel blockers because they alter the voltage dependence of charge movement and may have deleterious effects on leakage currents (34Go). Due to the contamination of "off" charge by tail Ca2+ currents, we restricted our measurements to "on" charge only. Contamination of "on" charge by ICa is likely to be minor because charge moves at more negative potentials than ICa and the time course of activation of ICa is very slow compared to that of "on" charge (32Go). In fact, it has been shown that integration of "on" charge provides an accurate measure of charge movement in Ca2+-contaning solutions, even without Ca2+ channel blockers (35Go).

Extracellular and intracellular solutions were buffered with HEPES (10 mM) at pH 7.2 and 7.1, respectively. Chemicals were obtained from either Sigma Chemical or Aldrich Chemical (St. Louis, MO).

The fitting of numerical formulas to experimental data employed a nonlinear, least squares algorithm. Parameter values given in the text are expressed as mean ± SE. Student's t-test was used at the level p < 0.05 to calculate statistical significance of the data.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Actions of the ß1a subunit on intracellular Ca2+ signals
Fig. 1 A shows Ca2+ transients from a control experiment recorded from a single FDB skeletal muscle fiber. The recorded region was located ~125 µm from the point of injection. Illustrated are Ca2+ signals recorded before and after the injection of a control solution (at t = 0). The change in fluorescence of the dye is expressed as a {Delta}F/F ratio. The transient increase in Fluo-3 fluorescence induced by an action potential rapidly reaches a peak and decays quickly initially and then, more slowly to prestimulus levels. The fiber was stimulated extracellularly at the times indicated (in minutes) by the numbers above each trace. The Ca2+ transients were quite similar before and after pressure injection indicating that the injection, by itself, had only minor effects on Ca2+ release. A very different result was observed when the ß1a subunit was injected. The ß1a subunit had remarkable effects on Ca2+ signals generated by action potentials (Fig. 1 B). The amplitude of the Ca2+ transients increased and this potentiation was evident a few minutes after the ß1a subunit was pressure injected. The potentiation reached a peak ~20 min after the injection and then slowly declined to preinjection values. The time course of ß1a subunit action is summarized in Fig. 2. To compare data from different experiments, the ratio between the peak amplitude of the Ca2+ signal, at any given time, relative to its mean value before pressure injection, was computed for every experiment. Their average values are shown in Fig. 2. Each symbol represents mean values (± SE). Open symbols represent results from fibers that were pressure injected with a control solution. Solid circles represent results from fibers that were pressure injected with the ß1a subunit. The smooth curve is the solution of Eq. 2 with the parameters indicated in the legend. It describes rather well the time course of the effect of the ß1a subunit on peak {Delta}F/F signals. The most significant effect of the ß1a subunit was to increase the peak amplitude of the Ca2+ transient. There were only minor changes in their time course that were not statistically significant. Before pressure injection of the ß1a subunit, the half-time and decay-time constant of the Ca2+ transients averaged 42.8 ± 4.9 (n = 13) ms and 40.9 ± 4.5 (n = 13) ms, respectively. After the injection of the ß1a subunit, these parameters were 46.1 ± 4.8 (n = 13) ms and 38.6 ± 4.3 (n = 13) ms, respectively.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1  The action of the ß1a subunit upon Ca signals. (A) The records show Fluo-3 Ca2+ signals associated with action potentials from a muscle fiber that was pressure injected with a control solution. (B) Ca2+ signals from a separate fiber to which the ß1a subunit was pressure injected. The numbers below each trace indicate time in minutes computed since microinjection was done.

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2  The time course of action of the ß1a subunit. Circles represent mean values (± SE) of peak Ca2+ signals as a function of time. Values were normalized for every experiment as: Peak j / Peak a, where j is every individual peak Ca2+ signal value and a is the average peak value of signals recorded before pressure injection; ({circ}) represents values of normalized records obtained from pressure-injected fibers with the control solution; (•) represents values from pressure-injected fibers with the ß1a subunit. The arrow indicates time of microinjection. Unless otherwise indicated by the number in parentheses, each symbol represents the mean value of at least five to seven separate experiments. The smooth curve is the graph of Eq. 2 at x = 125 µm and D = 6.2 x 10–8 cm2 s–1.

 
Actions of the ß1a subunit on charge movement of muscle fibers
The ß1a subunit regulates the amplitude of L-type currents that flow through {alpha}1s, the principal subunit of the Ca2+ channel in muscle. Because the {alpha}1s subunit also generates the charge movement associated with Ca2+ release, it is important to determine if the increase in the amplitude of the Ca transient, described above, is associated with similar changes in charge movement.

To measure charge movement, voltage clamp experiments were carried out in FDB muscle fibers. We chose this preparation because of the small fiber size that favors diffusion of the ß1a subunit and provides better space clamp than large fibers. The mean fiber length and diameter were 565 ± 26 µm (n = 12) and 29 ± 2 µm (n = 12), respectively. The mean capacitance was 899 ± 72 pF (n = 12). The expected capacitance, assuming a value of 1 µF cm–2, was 508 ± 26 pF (n = 12).

Fig. 3 A illustrates the relationship between the amount of mobilized charge and membrane potential from control experiments. Each symbol represents average values ± SE. The smooth curve is the best fit of Eq. 3 with the parameters indicated in the legend. The Boltzmann parameters in Fig. 3 A are similar to those found by Collet et al. (36Go) in FDB muscle fibers. The inset shows nonlinear currents from a representative experiment at the potential indicated (in mV) with the numbers beside each trace. Fig. 3 B summarizes results from experiments in which the pipette contained the ß1a subunit. The maximum charge values and the voltage dependence of charge movement were very similar to those of the control experiments. This indicates that, in the short term, the ß1a subunit has no effect on charge movement.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3  The action of the ß1a subunit on charge movement. (A) ({circ}) Represents mean values (± SE) of charge movement as a function of membrane potential from control experiments (n = 16). The smooth curve is the best fit of Eq. 3 to the data points with Qmax = 31.3 nC/µF, V = –36.6 mV, and k = 15.0 mV. (B) (•) Represents mean values (± SE) of charge movement as a function of membrane potential in the presence of the ß1a subunit (n = 16). Eh = –100 mV. The smooth curve is the Boltzmann fit with Qmax = 30.2 nC/µF, V = –36.0 mV, and k = 13.9 mV. The insets in panels A and B show records of nonlinear currents from representative experiments. The amplitude and timescale in panel A also applies to panel B.

 
Actions of the ß1a subunit on Ca2+ currents
The absence of ß1a subunit action on charge movement (demonstrated above) is not due to poor diffusion of the ß1a subunit through the patch pipette and into the fiber. This is shown here by demonstrating a clear action of this auxiliary subunit on L-type Ca2+ current in voltage clamp experiments performed in muscle fibers. We found that the ß1a subunit increased the amplitude of ICa (Fig. 4, AD). Fig. 4 A illustrates control currents at the potentials indicated (in mV). The amplitude and time course of ICa depended on the membrane depolarization level. ICa was not sustained, but declined during the pulse by a voltage-dependent inactivation process. Fig. 4 B illustrates records from a similar experiment except for the presence of the ß1a subunit. The amplitude of ICa was distinctly larger at all potentials although their time course was not substantially changed. For example, the time to peak of ICa at +30 mV was 262 ms in panel A, and 270 ms in panel B. Likewise, the time to peak of ICa at large depolarizations averaged 247.2 ± 12.9 ms (n = 21) in control experiments and it averaged 233.0 ± 11.2 ms (n = 16) in the presence of the ß1a subunit.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4  The action of the ß1a subunit on L-type currents. (A) The records show nonlinear currents from a control experiment at the potentials indicated with the numbers (in mV) between traces. (B) Records of membrane currents at the same potentials from a separate experiment performed in the presence of the ß1a subunit. Currents were normalized per unit capacitance. (C) The current-voltage relationship of Ca2+ currents. Symbols represent mean values (± SE) of peak Ca2+ currents from control experiments ({circ}) (n = 21) and from experiments performed in the presence of the ß1a subunit (•) (n = 16). Eh = –80 mV. The smooth curve is the best fit of Eq. 4 to the data points with Gmax = 122.5 µS/µF, V = 3.4 mV, k = 4.2 mV, and Vrev = 70.2 mV ({circ}) and Gmax = 163.6 µS/µF, V = 7.0 mV, k = 3.1 mV, and Vrev = 81.7 mV (•). (D) The voltage dependence of the normalized conductance. Mean current density values from panel C were divided by Gmax x (VmVrev). Smooth curves are best fits of a Boltzmann function with V = 3.4 mV and k = 4.1 mV ({circ}) and V = 7.0 mV and k = 3.0 mV (•).

 
Fig. 4 C shows the average current-voltage relationship derived from several experiments as that illustrated in Fig. 4, A and B. Open symbols represent the control experiment and solid symbols experiments in the presence of the ß1a subunit. Compared to currents recorded under control conditions, currents recorded in the presence of the ß1a subunit were significantly larger (p < 0.05) at positive potentials. The smooth curves through the data points in Fig. 4 C represent the best fit of Eq. 4 with the parameters indicated in the legend. The most significant effect of the ß1a subunit on the I-V curve was to increase the values of Gmax. There were only minor shifts along the voltage axis, as illustrated in Fig. 4 D, which represents the relationship between the normalized conductance and membrane potential in both experimental conditions.

Role of the carboxy-terminus on potentiation of Ca2+ signals
The carboxy-terminus region of the ß1a subunit is essential for the restoration of E-C coupling in ß-null myotubes to levels similar to those of control cells (37Go). Therefore, the role of this region in the potentiation of Ca2+ transients induced by action potentials was examined. Fig. 5 A shows representative Ca2+ signals from a fiber that was pressure injected with the ß1a subunit purified from bacteria. Consistent with the data illustrated in Fig. 1 B, there was a gradual increase in the amplitude of the signals that reached a peak value 16 min after injection. After that, there was a slow return to control values. In contrast, when a truncated ß1a subunit (lacking 40 amino acids in the carboxy-terminus region) was pressure-injected, the amplitude of the Ca2+ signals remained unchanged. Similar results were observed in 15 other experiments. The peak {Delta}F/F values averaged 4.1 ± 0.2 (n = 16) before pressure injection and 3.9 ± 0.2 (n = 16), 20 min after the truncated form of the ß1a subunit was pressure injected. Likewise, electrophysiological experiments revealed that the truncated form of the ß1a subunit had no effect on L-type currents or on charge movement.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5  The involvement of the carboxy-terminus region of the ß1a subunit on Ca2+ signal potentiation. (A) The records show Fluo-3 Ca2+ signals associated with action potentials from a muscle fiber that was pressure injected with the full-length ß1a subunit purified from bacteria. (B) Ca2+ signals from a separate fiber to which a truncated form of the ß1a subunit, lacking 40 amino acids in the carboxy-terminus region, was pressure injected. The numbers below each trace indicate time in minutes computed since microinjection was carried out. The dotted lines indicate resting fluorescence and peak {Delta}F/F before pressure injection.

 
Peak ICa values were –6.2 ± 0.7 µA/µF (n = 5) in control experiments and 5.9 ± 0.7 µA/µF (n = 6) in the presence of truncated ß-subunits. The Boltzmann parameters from charge movement experiments were: Qmax = 33.5 ± 2.3 nC/µF, V = –40.1 ± 2.0 mV, and k = 14.6 ± 2.1 mV (n = 5) for control experiments and Qmax = 32.1 ± 3.8 nC/µF, V = –39.2 ± 1.9 mV, and k = 15.1 ± 2.7 mV (n = 7) from experiments performed with the truncated ß1a protein.

Action of the ß1a subunit on SR Ca2+ release channels
The possibility that the ß1a subunit protein is acting directly on SR Ca2+ release channels was tested by performing SR Ca2+ leak and bilayer experiments. Fig. 6 A shows the action of the ß1a subunit on RyR-mediated Ca2+ leak from a population of heavy SR membrane microsomes. The SR microsome population was actively Ca2+ loaded using the ATP driven SERCA pump. The pump was then blocked with CPZ and the rate of Ca2+ leak from the microsomes measured in five different experimental conditions (control, caffeine, ruthenium red, ß1a, and truncated ß1a). Open diamonds and squares show leak rates in the presence of ruthenium red and caffeine, respectively. Ruthenium red slowed leak rate whereas caffeine accelerated the leak. The average leak rate (nM Ca mg protein–1min–1) was 17.7 ± 2.4 (n = 6) in ruthenium red and 489 ± 55 (n = 6) in caffeine. Open and solid circles show leak rates in the presence of the ß1a subunit and truncated ß1a subunit, respectively. The average leak rate was 64.9 ± 7.7 (n = 6) with the ß1a subunit added and 62.8 ± 8.8 (n = 6) when the truncated ß1a subunit was added. The leak rates with the normal and truncated subunits were virtually identical and overlap control leak data (i.e., leak after CPZ application without another added reagent; data not shown). This result suggests that the ß1a subunit does not activate RyR-mediated Ca2+ release from SR microsomes.



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6  The action of the ß1a subunit on Ca2+ leak from SR microsomes and on single RyR1 channel function. (A) The Ca2+ leak rate of Ca2+ loaded skeletal muscle SR microsomes (50 µg) was recorded after SERCA pump blockade by 25 µM cyclopiazonic acid (CPZ). Leak was measured in different experimental conditions ({square}, 2.5 mM caffeine; {diamond}, 5 µM ruthenium red; •, ß1a subunit; {circ}, truncated ß1a subunit). (B) Single RyR1 channel activity in planar lipid bilayers was monitored in the absence (control) and presence of the ß1a subunit. The charge carrier was Ca2+ and holding potential was 0 mV. The solution in the cytosolic chamber had 2 µM free Ca2+, 5.5 mM total Mg2+, and 7.0 mM total ATP.

 
Fig. 6 B shows the action of the ß1a subunit on single RyR1 channel function. The SR microsomes used above were fused into planar lipid bilayers and RyR1 channel activity recorded. Open events are shown as upward deflections from the zero current level (marked). In most cases, multiple RyR1 channels were incorporated into the bilayers. The ß1a subunit was added to the cytosolic chamber in six different experiments. Representative channel recordings are shown. Addition of the ß1a subunit did not induce a detectable change in unit Ca2+ current or open probability. The average open probability (nPo) was 0.16 ± 0.04 (n = 6) in control and 0.23 ± 0.05 (n = 6) after the ß1a subunit was added. This result suggests that the ß1a subunit does not affect the RyR1 channel when it was directly applied to the isolated channel in a bilayer. The SR Ca2+ leak and single channel data (Fig. 6) combined imply that the ß1a subunit potentiation of the action potential induced Ca2+ transient in muscle fibers is not likely due to a direct action of the ß1a subunit on the RyR1 channel.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Role of the ß-subunit on Ca2+ release
The major finding of this study is that the acute application of ß1a subunits increases the amount of Ca2+ that is released by an action potential. Although the underlying mechanism of the potentiation of Ca2+ signals by ß1a subunits is unknown, the fact that no changes in charge movement were observed suggests that the ß1a subunit improves the efficiency of the coupling mechanism, where the same number of voltage sensors would open more Ca2+ release channels. Alternatively, the ß1a subunit may improve the effectiveness of the Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release mechanism that is known to operate in skeletal muscle, although Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release is a minor component in mammalian skeletal muscle (38Go) and no direct action of the ß1a subunit on the RyR1 channel was detected in our studies.

An alternative explanation would involve binding of the ß1a subunit to intracellular factors that regulate Ca2+ release. The SR Ca release process is regulated by numerous factors in cells. The presence of some of these factors (e.g., sorcin) may chronically inhibit the SR Ca2+ release process. If these chronically inhibitory factors also interact with the ß1a subunit, the application of excess ß1a subunits could alter the way this factor regulates release. The addition of excess ß1a protein could hypothetically result in larger Ca2+ release simply by interacting with this factor. Based on the current absence of data supporting this alternative interpretation, we believe an increase in coupling efficiency is more likely the underlying mechanism involved.

From a structural point of view, potentiation of Ca2+ signals could be explained in two ways. The first possibility is that not all {alpha}1s subunits in the transverse tubular system (TTS) membranes are associated with ß1a subunits. In this scenario, the exogenously added ß1a subunit would bind to free {alpha}1s subunits to exert their action. However, this is very unlikely because the ß1a subunit is essential for the targeting of the channel (12Go) and thus all correctly targeted {alpha}1s subunits should have associated ß1a subunits. As discussed by Dolphin (39Go), however, it is possible that the affinity of {alpha}1s subunits for ß1a subunits is reduced once the channel has reached the TTS membranes. The second possibility is that there are multiple binding sites between {alpha}1s and ß1a subunits (40Go). In this scenario, additional ß1a subunits would bind to a single {alpha}1s subunit modulating the interaction between the {alpha}1s subunit and the RyR1 channel. In either case, the ß1a subunit would modulate the signal transduction process involved in EC coupling.

Role of the C-terminus region
Our data further indicate that the carboxy-terminus region of the ß1a subunit is essential for potentiation of Ca2+ transients. Previous work has established that this region is required for restoration of normal E-C coupling in ß-null cells (37Go,41Go) and it is different from the high affinity site in ß (the BID region), a 30-amino-acid N-terminal region of its second conserved domain (42Go), that interacts with a high-affinity site in the {alpha}-subunit (the AID region) (43Go,44Go). It is thus possible that higher order regulatory complexes are formed where the ß1a subunit binds to the {alpha}1s subunit in different regions. The high-affinity binding site would provide the structural basis for the strong interaction between {alpha}1s and ß1a subunits allowing the trafficking and expression of {alpha}1s in TTS. The regulatory effects of the ß1a subunit on Ca2+ release that we report here, might result from the interaction of {alpha}1sß1a complexes with a second ß1a subunit, possibly mediated by low-affinity sites. This last possibility is fully compatible with these findings, since the time course of the effect of the ß1a subunit on Ca2+ signals could be described by a purely diffusional process. The additional interaction of a ß1a subunit with the CaV1.1 channel would not necessarily lead to the formation of a stable complex as it has been described for the ß-modulation of the {alpha}1c channel (45Go). Also, low-affinity sites in the {alpha}1 subunit of Ca2+ channels have been described in regions distant from the AID region (46Go,44Go,47Go,48Go), and based on the effects of increasing concentrations of ß3 on {alpha}1A subunit, it has been suggested that there are two distinct binding processes for ß-subunits (49Go). A low-affinity interaction between {alpha}1s and ß1a subunits would be more easily switched "on" and "off" as expected from a regulatory process.

Is the {alpha}1s subunit function limited by the ß-subunit?
These results suggest a different role of ß-subunits from the classical action on trafficking of the channels to the plasma membrane. The capability of the ß1a subunit to potentiate Ca2+ transients in the short term, suggests that this auxiliary subunit is a limiting factor regulating the amount of Ca2+ that is released by the SR. Therefore, the {alpha}1 subunits of skeletal muscle are not normally saturated with ß, raising the possibility that Ca release may be regulated by ß-subunits under physiological conditions. In this regard, there are several previous observations suggesting that the function of {alpha}1 subunits is limited by the amount of ß-subunits available. Thus, when CaV1.1 channels in a cell-free preparation are exposed to additional ß1a subunits, a potentiation of L-type Ca2+ channel currents is observed (15Go). Also, overexpression of ß-subunits in adult heart cells increases whole-cell, L-type Ca2+ currents, and maximal gating charge (48Go), whereas overexpression of {alpha}1c in a transgenic mouse model does not lead to increases in Ca2+ channel current density values (50Go). The observations of Yamaguchi et al. (51Go) are also consistent with the idea that the concentration of ß-subunits is limiting: the injection of ß3 subunit protein increases CaV1.2 currents in Xenopus oocytes and it has acute effects on the biophysical properties of the channel.

A physiological modulation of Ca release by ß-subunits would not be expected to involve a very high concentration of these proteins. In this regard, we used in these experiments an amount of ß-protein that is distinctly lower (at least five times) than the one used in the experiments of Yamaguchi et al. (51Go) and Opatowsky et al. (52Go). A physiological role of the ß-subunits on Ca release in muscle would require the presence of an intracellular pool of ß-proteins that could be shuttled to the membrane where they would bind to {alpha}1 subunits leading to changes in the interaction between {alpha}1 subunits and RyR1. The presence of ß-subunits in skeletal muscle, not associated with {alpha}1 subunits, has indeed been described in tissue homogenates (53Go).


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
We thank Dr. Roberto Coronado and Dr. Zurisaddai Hernández for relevant discussions and advice, Dr. Patricia Powers for the ß1a cDNA, and Dr. Julio Vergara for providing the pressure injection system. We thank Rodrigo Sanchez for data analysis. We also thank Oscar Ramírez, Rubén García, Maura Porta, and Dr. Paula Diaz-Sylvester for technical assistance and Ms. Susana Zamudio for secretarial work.

This work was supported by CONACyT grants, 41180-N and 37356-N, and by National Institutes of Health grants R01 HL63903 and HL57832, MDA3699.

Submitted on May 23, 2005; accepted for publication September 13, 2005.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
1. Ríos, E., and G. Pizarro. 1991. Voltage sensor of excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal muscle. Physiol. Rev. 71:849–908.[Free Full Text]

2. Lamb, G. D. 1992. DHP receptors and excitation-contraction coupling. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 13:394–405.[CrossRef][Medline]

3. Huang, C. L. H. 1993. Intramembrane Charge Movements in Striated Muscle. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.

4. Melzer, W., A. Herrmann-Frank, and H. C. Luttgau. 1995. The role of Ca2+ ions in excitation-contraction coupling of skeletal muscle fibres. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1241:59–116.[Medline]

5. Sánchez, J. A., and E. Stefani. 1983. Kinetic properties of calcium channels of twitch muscle fibres of the frog. J. Physiol. 337:1–17.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Ertel, E. A., K. P. Campbell, M. M. Harpold, F. Hofmann, Y. Mori, E. Perez-Reyes, A. Schwartz, T. P. Snutch, T. Tanabe, L. Birnbaumer, R. W. Tsien, and W. A. Catterall. 2000. Nomenclature of voltage-gated calcium channels. Neuron. 25:533–535.[CrossRef][Medline]

7. Perez-Reyes, E., H. S. Klim, A. Lacerda, W. Horne, X. Wei, D. Rampe, K. P. Campbell, A. M. Brown, and L. Birnbaumer. 1989. Induction of calcium currents by the expression of the ß1-subunit of the dihydropyridine receptor from skeletal muscle. Nature. 340:233–236.[CrossRef][Medline]

8. Hofmann, F., M. Biel, and V. Flockerzi. 1994. Molecular basis for Ca2+ channel diversity. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 17:399–418.[CrossRef][Medline]

9. Isom, L. L., J. S. De Jongh, and W. Catterall. 1994. Auxiliary subunits of voltage gated ion channels. Neuron. 12:1183–1194.[CrossRef][Medline]

10. Catterall, W. A. 2000. Structure and regulation of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 16:521–555.[CrossRef][Medline]

11. Ren, D., and L. M. Hall. 1997. Functional expression and characterization of skeletal muscle dihydropyridine receptors in Xenopus oocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 272:22393–22396.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Gregg, R. G., A. Messing, C. Strube, M. Beurg, R. Moss, M. Behan, M. Sukhareva, S. Haynes, J. A. Powell, R. Coronado, and P. A. Powers. 1996. Absence of the ß subunit (cchb1) of the skeletal muscle dihydropyridine receptor alters expression of the {alpha}1 subunit and eliminates excitation-contraction coupling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:13961–13966.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Beurg, M., M. Sukhareva, C. A. Ahern, M. W. Conklin, E. Perez-Reyes, P. A. Powers, R. G. Gregg, and R. Coronado. 1999. Differential regulation of skeletal muscle L-type Ca2+ current and excitation-contraction coupling by the dihydropyridine receptor ß1 subunit. Biophys. J. 76:1744–1756.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Beurg, M., M. Sukhareva, C. Strube, P. A. Powers, R. G. Gregg, and R. Coronado. 1997. Recovery of Ca2+ current, charge movements, and Ca2+ transients in myotubes deficient in dihydropyridine receptor ß1 subunit transfected with ß1 cDNA. Biophys. J. 73:807–818.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. García, R., E. Carrillo, S. Rebolledo, M. C. García, and J. A. Sánchez. 2002. The ß1a subunit regulates the functional properties of adult frog and mouse L-type Ca2+ channels of skeletal muscle. J. Physiol. 545:407–419.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. García, M. C., R. García, E. Carrillo, and J. A. Sánchez. 2004. The ß1a subunit enhances the amplitude of L-type Ca2+ currents and Ca2+ signals of adult mouse skeletal muscle fibers. Biophys. J. 86:63A (Abstr.).

17. Smith, A. J. 1992. Electrophoretic separation of proteins. In Short Protocols in Molecular Biology. F. M. Ausubel, editor. John Wiley & Sons, NY. 1023–1026.

18. Bogdanov, Y., N. L. Brice, C. Canti, K. M. Page, M. Li, S. G. Volsen, and A. C. Dolphin. 2000. Acidic motif responsible for plasma membrane association of the voltage-dependent calcium channel ß1b subunit. Eur. J. Neurosci. 12:894–902.[CrossRef][Medline]

19. Hanlon, M. R., N. S. Berrow, A. C. Dolphin, and B. A. Wallace. 1999. Modelling of a voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel ß subunit as a basis for understanding its functional properties. FEBS Lett. 445:366–370.[CrossRef][Medline]

20. Richards, M. W., A. J. Butcher, and A. C. Dolphin. 2004. Ca2+ channel ß-subunits: structural insights AID our understanding. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 25:626–632.[CrossRef][Medline]

21. Sheridan, D. C., W. Cheng, L. Carbonneau, C. A. Ahern, and R. Coronado. 2004. Involvement of a heptad repeat in the carboxyl terminus of the dihydropiridine receptor ß1a subunit in the mechanism of excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal muscle. Biophys. J. 87:929–942.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Papadopoulos, S., K. D. Jurgens, and G. Gros. 2000. Protein diffusion in living skeletal muscle fibers: dependence on protein size, fiber type, and contraction. Biophys. J. 79:2084–2094.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Thomas, D., S. C. Tovey, T. J. Collins, M. D. Bootman, M. J. Berridge, and P. Lipp. 2000. A comparison of fluorescent Ca2+ indicator properties and their use in measuring elementary and global Ca2+ signals. Cell Calcium. 28:213–233.[CrossRef][Medline]

24. Vergara, J., M. Difranco, D. Compagnon, and B. Suárez-Isla. 1991. Imaging of calcium transients in skeletal muscle fibers. Biophys. J. 59:12–24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Caputo, C., and P. Bolaños. 1994. Fluo-3 signals associated with potassium contractures in single amphibian muscle fibres. J. Physiol. 481:119–128.[Medline]

26. Lacampagne, A., M. G. Klein, C. W. Ward, and M. F. Schneider. 2000. Two mechanisms for termination of individual Ca2+ sparks in skeletal muscle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:7823–7828.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Shirokova, N., J. García, and E. Rios. 1998. Local calcium release in mammalian skeletal muscle. J. Physiol. 512:377–384.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Carroll, S. L., M. G. Klein, and M. F. Schneider. 1995. Calcium transients in intact rat skeletal muscle fibers in agarose gel. Am. J. Physiol. 269:C28–C34.[Medline]

29. Saito, A., S. Seiler, A. Chu, and S. Fleischer. 1984. Preparation and morphology of sarcoplasmic reticulum terminal cisternae from rabbit skeletal muscle. J. Cell Biol. 99:875–885.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Copello, J. A., Y. Qi, L. H. Jeyakumar, E. Ogunbunmi, and S. Fleischer. 2001. Lack of effect of cADP-ribose and NAADP on the activity of skeletal muscle and heart ryanodine receptors. Cell Calcium. 30:269–284.[CrossRef][Medline]

31. Hamill, O. P., A. Marty, E. Neher, B. Sakmann, and F. J. Sigworth. 1981. Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Arch. 391:85–100.[CrossRef][Medline]

32. Wang, Z., M. L. Messie, and O. Delbono. 1999. Patch-clamp recording of charge movement, Ca2+ current, and Ca2+ transients in adult skeletal muscle fibers. Biophys. J. 77:2709–2716.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Copello, J. A., S. Barg, A. Sonnleitner, M. Porta, P. Diaz-Sylvester, M. Fill, H. Schindler, and S. Fleischer. 2002. Differential activation by Ca2+, ATP and caffeine of cardiac and skeletal muscle ryanodine receptors after block by Mg2+. J. Membr. Biol. 187:51–64.[CrossRef][Medline]

34. Francini, F., C. Bencini, C. Piperio, and R. Squecco. 2001. Separation of charge movement components in mammalian skeletal muscle fibres. J. Physiol. 537:45–56.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Horowicz, P., and M. F. Schneider. 1981. Membrane charge movement in contracting and non-contracting skeletal muscle fibres. J. Physiol. 314:565–593.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Collet, C., L. Csernoch, and V. Jacquemond. 2003. Intramembrane charge movement and L-type calcium current in skeletal muscle fibers isolated from control and mdx mice. Biophys. J. 84:251–265.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Beurg, M., C. A. Ahern, P. Vallejo, M. W. Conklin, P. A. Powers, R. G. Gregg, and R. Coronado. 1999. Involvement of the carboxy-terminus region of the dihydropyridine receptor ß1a subunit in excitation-contraction coupling of skeletal muscle. Biophys. J. 77:2953–2967.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Murayama, T., and Y. Ogawa. 2002. Roles of two ryanodine receptor isoforms coexisting in skeletal muscle. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 12:305–311.[CrossRef][Medline]

39. Dolphin, A. C. 2003. ß subunits of voltage-gated calcium channels. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 35:599–619.[CrossRef][Medline]

40. Jones, S. W. 2002. Calcium channels: when is a subunit not a subunit? J. Physiol. 545:334.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. Sheridan, D. C., W. Cheng, C. A. Ahern, L. Mortenson, D. Alsammarae, P. Vallejo, and R. Coronado. 2003. Truncation of the carboxyl terminus of the dihydropyridine receptor ß1a subunit promotes Ca2+ dependent excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal myotubes. Biophys. J. 84:220–237.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. De Waard, M., M. Pragnell, and K. P. Campbell. 1994. Ca2+ channel regulation by a conserved beta subunit domain. Neuron. 13:495–503.[CrossRef][Medline]

43. Pragnell, M., M. De Waard, Y. Mori, T. Tanabe, T. P. Snutch, and K. P. Campbell. 1994. Calcium channel ß subunit binds to a conserved motif in the I–II cytoplasmic linker of the {alpha}1-subunit. Nature. 368:67–70.[CrossRef][Medline]

44. Walker, D., and M. De Waard. 1998. Subunit interaction sites in voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels: role in channel function. Trends Neurosci. 21:148–154.[CrossRef][Medline]

45. Gerster, U., B. Neuhuber, K. Groschner, J. Striessnig, and B. E. Flucher. 1999. Current modulation and membrane targeting of the calcium channel {alpha}1C subunit are independent functions of the ß subunit. J. Physiol. 517:353–368.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

46. Qin, N., D. Platano, R. Olcese, E. Stefani, and L. Birnbaumer. 1997. Direct interaction of Gß{gamma} with a C-terminal Gß{gamma}-binding domain of the Ca2+ channel {alpha}1 subunit is responsible for channel inhibition by G protein-coupled receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:8866–8871.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

47. Walker, D., D. Bichet, S. Geib, E. Mori, V. Cornet, T. P. Snutch, Y. Mori, and M. De Waard. 1999. A new ß subtype-specific interaction in {alpha}1A subunit controls P/Q-type Ca2+ channel activation. J. Biol. Chem. 274:12383–12390.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

48. Colecraft, H. M., B. Alseikhan, S. X. Takahashi, D. Chaudhuri, S. Mittman, V. Yegnasubramanian, R. S. Alvania, D. C. Johns, E. Marban, and D. T. Yue. 2002. Novel functional properties of Ca2+ channel beta subunits revealed by their expression in adult rat heart cells. J. Physiol. 541:435–452.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

49. Canti, C., A. Davies, N. S. Berrow, A. J. Butcher, K. M. Page, and A. C. Dolphin. 2001. Evidence for two concentration-dependent processes for ß-subunit effects on {alpha}lB calcium channels. Biophys. J. 81:1439–1451.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

50. Muth, J. N., H. Yamaguchi, G. Mikala, I. L. Grupp, W. Lewis, H. Cheng, L. S. Song, E. G. Lakatta, G. Varadi, and A. Schwartz. 1999. Cardiac-specific overexpression of the {alpha}1 subunit of the L-type voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel in transgenic mice. Loss of isoproterenol-induced contraction. J. Biol. Chem. 274:21503–21506.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

51. Yamaguchi, H., M. Hara, M. Strobeck, K. Fukasawa, A. Schwartz, and G. Varadi. 1998. Multiple modulation pathways of calcium channel activity by a ß subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 273:19348–19356.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

52. Optatowsky, Y., O. Chomsky-Hecht, K. Myoung-Goo, K. P. Campbell, and J. A. Hirsch. 2003. The voltage-dependent calcium channel ß subunit contains two stable interacting domains. J. Biol. Chem. 278:52323–52332.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

53. Witcher, D. R., M. De Waard, H. Liu, M. Pragnell, and K. P. Campbell. 1995. Association of native Ca2+ channel ß subunits with the {alpha}1 subunit interaction domain. J. Biol. Chem. 270:18088–18093.[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.105.067116v1
89/6/3976    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal