help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on March 31, 2006.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.081539
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.081539v1
90/12/4337    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pereira, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hünenberger, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pereira, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hünenberger, P. H.
Biophysical Journal 90:4337-4344 (2006)
© 2006 The Biophysical Society

Conformational and Dynamical Properties of Disaccharides in Water: a Molecular Dynamics Study

Cristina S. Pereira, David Kony, Riccardo Baron, Martin Müller, Wilfred F. van Gunsteren and Philippe H. Hünenberger

Laboratory of Physical Chemistry, ETH-Hönggerberg, Zürich, Switzerland

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to P. H. Hünenberger, Laboratory of Physical Chemistry, ETH-Hönggerberg, HCI G233, CH 8093 Zürich, Switzerland. Tel.: 41-1-632-5503; Fax: 41-1-632-1039; E-mail: phil{at}igc.phys.chem.ethz.ch.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Explicit-solvent molecular dynamics simulations (50 ns, 300 K) of the eight reducing glucose disaccharides (kojibiose, sophorose, nigerose, laminarabiose, maltose, cellobiose, isomaltose, and gentiobiose) have been carried out using the GROMOS 45A4 force field (including a recently reoptimized carbohydrate parameter set), to investigate and compare their conformational preferences, intramolecular hydrogen-bonding patterns, torsional dynamics, and configurational entropies. The calculated average values of the glycosidic torsional angles agree well with available experimental data, providing validation for the force field and simulation methodology employed in this study. These simulations show in particular that: 1) (1->6)-linked disaccharides are characterized by an increased flexibility, the absence of any persistent intramolecular hydrogen bond and a significantly higher configurational entropy (compared to the other disaccharides); 2) cellobiose presents a highly persistent interresidue hydrogen bond and a significantly lower configurational entropy (compared to the other disaccharides); 3) persistent hydrogen bonds are observed for all disaccharides (except (1->6)-linked) and typically involve a hydrogen donor in the reducing residue and an acceptor in the nonreducing one; 4) the probability distributions associated with the glycosidic dihedral angles {phi} and {psi} are essentially unimodal for all disaccharides, and full rotation around these angles occurs at most once or twice for {phi} (never for {psi}) on the 50-ns timescale; and 5) the timescales associated with torsional transitions (except around {phi} and {psi}) range from ~30 ps (rotation of hydroxyl groups) to the nanosecond range (rotation of the lactol and hydroxymethyl groups, and around the {omega}-glycosidic dihedral angle in (1->6)-linked disaccharides).


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Carbohydrates play a key role in the molecular logic of life. Present in nearly all biological systems on earth, this class of molecules accounts for most of the organic matter in the biosphere, predominantly in the form of cellulose. The complex functions of carbohydrates in biology may be related to the high density of functional (predominantly hydroxyl) groups present in these compounds, in a virtually infinite variety of possible stereoisomers (1Go). Due to the ability to encode complex stereochemical information, saccharides are considered key elements in a biochemical alphabet that plays a fundamental (yet not completely understood) role in intra- and intercellular recognition processes (2Go).

Disaccharides are the simplest molecules presenting all the rotational degrees of freedom determining the conformation and flexibility of more complex oligo- and polysaccharides. For this reason, the investigation of the conformational preferences of disaccharides is not only interesting on its own, but also an important first step toward the understanding of the conformation and dynamics of polysaccharides. From the point of view of computer simulation, they also represent the simplest test systems to validate force fields that ultimately aim at the simulation of more complex saccharides.

In the present work, explicit-solvent molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are used to investigate the behavior of disaccharides of D-glucopyranose (Glc) in water. The eight reducing disaccharides (ß-anomeric configuration in the reducing residue) presenting all possible glycosidic linkages considered are (Fig. 1): kojibiose (K), sophorose (S), nigerose (N), laminarabiose (L), maltose (M), cellobiose (C), isomaltose (I), and gentiobiose (G).


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1  The eight reducing disaccharides (ß anomeric configuration in the reducing residue) formed by the linkage of two D-Glc units: kojibiose (K; Glc{alpha}(1->2)Glcß), sophorose (S; Glcß(1->2)Glcß), nigerose (N; Glc{alpha}(1->3)Glcß), laminarabiose (L; Glcß(1->3)Glcß), maltose (M; Glc{alpha}(1->4)Glcß), cellobiose (C; Glcß(1->4)Glcß), isomaltose (I; Glc{alpha}(1->6)Glcß), and gentiobiose (G; Glcß(1->6)Glcß). The conformations around the glycosidic linkage are arbitrary. The standard atom labeling is illustrated for K. The definitions of the dihedral angles {phi} (O5-C1-O1-Cn'), {psi} (C1-O1-Cn'-Cn–1'), Formula(O5-C5-C6-O6), and Formula' (O5'-C5'-C6'-O6', where O6' = O1 for a (1->6)-linkage), are illustrated for I. The H-bonds listed in Table 2 are also indicated along with their occurences during the corresponding simulations.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2  Occurrences of intramolecular H-bonds evaluated from the present simulations

 
All of these disaccharides are found in honey (3Go) and most of them have been the scope of numerous experimental studies. Those constituting the building blocks of naturally abundant polysaccharides like amylose (M) or cellulose (C) have received most attention in the literature (4Go–21Go), while those carrying a less common glycosidic linkage (e.g., 1->2) have received more limited consideration (4Go,5Go,22Go,23Go). Most of these disaccharides have been characterized experimentally using x-ray crystallography (24Go) or nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy (7Go,8Go,14Go,15Go,23Go) and investigated theoretically using MD simulations (9Go–17Go,23Go,27Go), molecular mechanics (MM) calculations (4Go–6Go,22Go,28Go,29Go) (typically MM3 (30Go,31Go)) or quantum mechanics calculations (18Go–21Go).

The conformation of disaccharides is mainly determined by the populations of rotamers around the glycosidic linkage. Although the pyranose ring exhibits a certain degree of flexibility, the effect of this flexibility on the overall conformation of oligo- and polysaccharides is limited. Therefore, studies on the conformation of disaccharides mainly focus on the glycosidic torsional angles {phi} (O5-C1-O1-Cn') and {psi} (C1-O1-Cn'-Cn–1') around a (1->n)-linkage (24Go) (with n = 2, 3, 4, 6), in addition to the torsional angle Formula (O5'-C5'-C6'-O6', where O6' = O1) in the case of a (1->6)-linkage (see Fig. 1). The conformation of unsubstituted hydroxymethyl groups in either of the two residues is described similarly through the dihedral angles Formula (O5'-C5'-C6'-O6') and Formula (O5-C5-C6-O6).

This work focuses on the study of the flexibility and dynamics of disaccharides in water by: 1) analyzing the distribution of glycosidic torsional angles; 2) analyzing the occurrence of intramolecular hydrogen bonds; 3) evaluating the dynamics of the various torsional angles; and 4) estimating the configurational entropies of the saccharides. These analyses are based on long (50 ns) MD simulations of the eight disaccharides in explicit water based on the most recent version (45A4) of the GROMOS carbohydrate force field (32Go). The results contribute to the validation of the force field and provide valuable insight into (thermodynamical and dynamical) properties not directly accessible from experimental measurements.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
All MD simulations were performed using the GROMOS96 program (33Go) together with the GROMOS 45A4 force field (including a parameter set recently developed for carbohydrates (32Go)), and the SPC water model (34Go). Newton's equations of motion were integrated using the leap-frog algorithm (35Go) with a 2-fs timestep. The SHAKE algorithm (36Go) was applied to constrain all bond lengths with a relative geometric tolerance of 10–4. The simulations were carried out in the isothermal-isobaric ensemble (at a temperature of 300 K and a pressure of 1 atm), by separately coupling the temperature of solute and solvent degrees of freedom to a heat bath (37Go) (relaxation time 0.1 ps) and by coupling the system pressure to a pressure bath via isotropic coordinate scaling (37Go) (relaxation time 0.5 ps; isothermal compressibility 0.46 x 10–3 · kJ–1 · mol · nm3). Nonbonded interactions were truncated at a distance of 1.4 nm, reevaluated every timestep in the range 0.0–0.8 nm, and evaluated every five timesteps in the range 0.8–1.4 nm (twin-range cutoff scheme (38Go)). A reaction-field correction (39Go) was applied to account for the mean effect of neglected interactions beyond 1.4 nm, using a relative dielectric permittivity of 66 for the SPC water model. All simulated systems were composed of one disaccharide molecule surrounded by ~1000 water molecules (K: 1012; S: 988; N: 972; L: 1109; M: 1002; C: 1048; I: 924; G: 1070) in a truncated-octahedron box simulated under periodic boundary conditions. The initial configurations for the disaccharides S, L, M, C, and G, were taken from the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) (this database is available from Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/products/csd/. For the disaccharides K, N, and I, crystallographic structures were not directly available in the CSD and the structures of similar compounds (methyl-2-O-{alpha}-D-mannopyranosyl-ß-D-glucopyranoside, methyl-3-O-D-glucopyranosyl-{alpha}-D-glucopyranoside and 6-O-{alpha}-D-galactopyranosyl-{alpha}-D-glucopyranoside, respectively) were used as a basis to model the corresponding disaccharide (using the modeling program XCHemEdit (40Go)). The CSD reference codes of the structures used in this study are: RESMOR (K), SOPHROS (S), MOGLPR (N), LAMBIO (L), MALTOS (M), CELLOB (C), MELIBM (I), and GENTBS (G)). All simulations were carried out for 50 ns after an equilibration period of 0.1 ns. Atomic coordinates were saved every 0.5 ps for analysis.

Solute (absolute) configurational entropies were estimated for all simulations based on a quasi-harmonic analysis ((41Go), R. Baron, W. F. van Gunsteren, and P. H. Hünenberger, to be submitted), by calculating the solute all-atom mass-weighted covariance matrix in Cartesian coordinates, after least-square fit superposition (42Go) of the successive trajectory configurations onto the corresponding initial structure (so as to eliminate overall translational and rotational motions (43Go)). The quasi-harmonic entropy estimate (Formula) was then evaluated as the entropy of a multidimensional quantum-mechanical harmonic oscillator with the same mass-weighted covariance matrix. The six (nearly zero) eigenvalues corresponding to the suppressed rigid-body motion were left out of the analysis. The convergence of the estimated entropies with time was assessed by repeating the analysis for increasingly long time-periods along the simulations (differing in length by 0.5 ns). Entropy corrections for anharmonicities in the quasi-harmonic modes (Formula) and for (supralinear) pairwise correlations among the modes (Formula) were evaluated at the classical level as detailed elsewhere (R. Baron, W. F. van Gunsteren, and P. H. Hünenberger, to be submitted). The anharmonicity correction Formula was calculated by summing the corresponding per-mode contributions up to eigenvector 50 (i.e., in the domain of validity of the classical approximation and for the modes where anharmonicity effects are significant. The pairwise (supralinear) correlation correction Formula was calculated by summing the corresponding contributions over all (unique) pairs of modes. Additional information on the underlying theory, assumptions, approximations and practical implementation can be found (R. Baron, W. F. van Gunsteren, and P. H. Hünenberger, to be submitted).


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The average values of the {phi}- and {psi}-dihedral angles, together with the conformer populations around the Formula-dihedral angle of the reducing residue (i.e., the free hydroxymethyl group in K, S, N, L, M, and C, or the third glycosidic dihedral angle in I and G), are reported in Table 1 for all disaccharides considered. The simulation results are presented along with available experimental (solution NMR (14Go,23Go,26Go) and solid-state x-ray (24Go)) and theoretical (MM (4Go,5Go,28Go) and MD (10Go,11Go,13Go–15Go,27Go)) data from the literature. The corresponding normalized probability distributions for the glycosidic dihedral angles {phi}, {psi}, and Formula (reducing residue) are also displayed in Fig. 2. In general, the simulation results of this work are in good qualitative agreement with experimental and theoretical data from the literature (Table 1). The best agreement is met for the average values of the {phi}-glycosidic dihedral angle, the preferences around which are largely dictated by the exo-anomeric effect that causes polar substituents to be oriented away from the ring (24Go). For {alpha}-linked disaccharides (K, N, M, I) this average angle is in the range [70°; 100°] for all entries of Table 1, while for ß-linked disaccharides (S, L, C, G) it is typically in the range [–60°; –90°] (except L with MD (27Go), –58.6°; G with x-ray (24Go), –58.3°). The corresponding probability distributions from the present simulations (Fig. 2 a) for the ß-linked disaccharides and (to a lesser extent) the {alpha}-linked disaccharides are indeed very similar for all linkages considered. The variability is more important for the average values of the {psi}-dihedral angle (Table 1). Considering all entries of Table 1, disaccharides with a R configuration at Cn' (K, S, M, C) present values in the range [90°; 120°] (except K with MM (5Go), 78.8°; S with x-ray (31Go), 128.5°; C with MM (4Go), 73.8). Disaccharides with an S configuration at Cn' (N, L) present values in the range [–150°; –110°] (except N with MM (5Go), –72.6°; L with x-ray (24Go), –109.1°, MM (4Go), –162.3° and MD, –94.5°), and (1->6)-linked disaccharides (I, G) values in the range [160°; 180°] (except G with NMR (14Go), –129.0° and x-ray (24Go), –156.3°). These differences are clearly reflected in the corresponding probability distributions from the simulations (Fig. 2 b). The corresponding maxima are found at ~110° (K, S), –120° (N, L), 100° (M, C), and 180° (I, G). Note also the significantly broader distribution in the case of (1->6)-linked disaccharides (I, G). Finally, the conformational distributions around the dihedral angle Formula of the reducing residue (Table 1 and Fig. 2 c) show comparable populations for the gt (Formula = –60°) and gg (Formula = 60°) conformers (the latter being marginally more populated for free hydroxymethyl groups, the opposite being true for hydroxymethyl groups within a (1->6)-linkage), whereas the tg (Formula = 180°) conformer is never significantly populated. The analysis of the corresponding distributions for the free hydroxymethyl group in the nonreducing ring of all disaccharides reveals nearly identical features (data not shown). The rotamer populations from the present simulations are in reasonable qualitative agreement with data from NMR measurements (23Go,26Go) and other MD simulations (10Go,11Go,13Go,15Go,27Go) whenever available (the largest deviations being observed for C). Two-dimensional {phi}-{psi} maps of probability distributions were also generated from the present simulations and found to present very good agreement with corresponding MM3 adiabatic maps for the eight disaccharides (4Go–6Go,22Go,28Go,29Go) (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1  Average values of the {phi}- and {psi}-glycosidic dihedral angles (first line of each entry) and population around the Formula dihedral angle of the reducing residue (second line of each entry), calculated from the simulations and compared with available experimental (NMR (14Go,23Go,26Go), x-ray (24Go)), and theoretical (MM (4Go,5Go,28Go), MD (10Go,11Go,13Go–15Go,27Go)) results

 

Figure 2
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2  Normalized probability distributions of the glycosidic dihedral angles {phi} (a), {psi} (b), and Formula (c, reducing residue) for the eight disaccharides considered, either {alpha}-linked, (K, N, M, I; left panels), or ß-linked (S, L, C, G; right panels). The codes used for the disaccharides refer to Fig. 1.

 
The data reported in Table 1 represent an extensive validation of the new carbohydrate parameter set recently developed for the GROMOS (45A4) force field (32Go) and tested up to now only for a limited set of compounds (32Go,44Go,45Go).

The occurrences of intramolecular hydrogen bonds (H-bonds) during the simulations are reported in Table 2 (only H-bonds with occurrences larger than 5% are indicated) and Fig. 1. Significantly-populated intramolecular H-bonds are observed in all simulations, except for the two (1->6)-linked disaccharides (I, G), and all of them are interresidue H-bonds. The complete absence of intraresidue H-bonds is probably related to the rather restrictive geometrical criterion used here to define the presence of an H-bond, namely a hydrogen-acceptor distance shorter than 0.25 nm and donor-hydrogen-acceptor angle larger than 135°. MD simulations of ß-D-glucose in solution show that when the angle criterion is relaxed (135° -> 100°), intraresidue H-bonds become observable (data not shown). Interestingly, all but one of the nine persistent H-bonds observed involve a hydrogen donor from the reducing ring and an acceptor from the nonreducing one. The absence of H-bonds in I and G is probably due to the larger spacing between the rings and the increased flexibility caused by an additional bond within the glycosidic linkage. The absence of intramolecular H-bonds in I and the presence of interresidue H-bonds between the hydroxyl groups at positions 2 and 3' in M were previously suggested by a combined NMR/MD study (15Go). The H-bonds present in K and S were also observed in the corresponding global minima found in MM3 calculations (22Go). Finally, the H-bond observed for C was reported in a number of previous experimental and theoretical studies (6Go,10Go,11Go,20Go,21Go,46Go). In these simulations, this specific H-bond is the one with the highest occurrence (nearly 70%). It is known to persist in the polysaccharide chains (cellulose) formed by this disaccharide in the crystalline state (47Go,48Go), and to be an important determinant of the physico-chemical and mechanical properties of this material (stability, rigidity, and insolubility in water (49Go)).

The timescales associated with dihedral-angle transitions occurring around Formula (nonreducing residue), Formula (reducing residue), and the different {chi}n (n = 2,3,4,6; nonreducing residue) and {chi}n' (n = 1,2,3,4,6; reducing residue) dihedral angles defining the orientation of the hydroxyl groups in the two rings (defined as Cn–1-Cn-On-HOn and Cn–1'-Cn'-On'-HOn', respectively) are reported in Table 3. These timescales were evaluated by considering transitions between the three dihedral-angle wells centered at staggered conformations. The probability distributions associated with the glycosidic dihedral angles {phi} and {psi} (Fig. 2, a and b) are essentially unimodal for all disaccharides considered (except for minor peaks at {phi} = 60° in the case of S, C, and G). During the 50-ns simulations, full rotation around these angles occurs at most once or twice for {phi} (in S, C, and G only) and never for {psi}. The timescale associated with the rotation of free hydroxymethyl groups and with transitions around Formula in (1->6)-linked disaccharides is in the range 0.5–1.5 ns. The typical timescales associated with the rotation of hydroxyl groups are 30–40 ps ({chi}2, {chi}2', {chi}3, {chi}3', {chi}6, {chi}6'), 80–100 ps ({chi}4, {chi}4'), and 0.5–1.2 ns ({chi}1', with a dominant trans conformation). However, deviations to larger timescales are observed for specific hydroxyl groups in the reducing residue, typically for those involved in interresidue H-bonds (e.g., {chi}3' in C, {chi}4' in N and L, and {chi}1' in S).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3  Timescale (in nanoseconds) associated with transitions occurring around the dihedral angles Formula Formula and the different {chi}n and {chi}n'

 
The convergence properties of the estimated configurational (quasi-harmonic) entropy Formula as a function of the sampling time are illustrated in Fig. 3 a for the eight disaccharides. These entropy values are directly comparable because all molecules contain an identical number of atoms (31Go atoms). The curves show a stepwise buildup in the first 15–20 ns of the simulations, which suggests that simulations of at least this length are required for a disaccharide in water to sample a significant fraction of its accessible configurational space. After this time-period, the curves are characterized by long plateaus and convergence appears to be essentially reached after ~30–40 ns. The numerical error on the final Formula estimates (evaluated based on block averaging of five 10-ns subensembles of structures) is ~7 J x K–1 x mol–1 (average value over all disaccharides, with a maximum of 16 J x K–1 x mol–1 for I). The contributions Formula of the successive quasi-harmonic modes to the total configurational entropy Formula (evaluated from the full 50-ns simulations) are displayed in Fig. 3 b as a function of the eigenvector index m (arranged in order of increasing frequency) for all disaccharides considered. For all systems, the single-mode contribution from the first eigenvector (which dominantly accounts for the relative rotation of the two rings) is markedly higher than that from all the following eigenvectors. The single-mode contributions also show a noticeable decrease after eigenvector 20. The corresponding cumulative estimates of the entropy upon summing the successive per-mode contributions are also displayed in Fig. 3 b. A significant number of low-frequency modes must be included to obtain an accurate estimate of the total quasi-harmonic entropy, in agreement with previous observations in the context of the reversible-folding of ß-peptides in methanol (R. Baron, W. F. van Gunsteren, and P. H. Hünenberger, to be submitted). In the present case, the inclusion of ~60 or 80 modes is required to account for 90 or 99% of the total entropy, respectively.


Figure 3
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3  Build-up curves of the quasi-harmonic entropy Formula for the eight disaccharides considered as a function of the sampling time (a, the inset focuses on the last 20 ns of the main graph), and corresponding entropy contributions Formula per mode (based on the full 50-ns simulations) displayed as a function of the eigenvector index m (b, left scale and decreasing curves) together with the corresponding cumulative sum (b, right scale and increasing curves). The last six eigenvectors with (nearly) vanishing eigenvalues are omitted from the analysis. The codes used for the disaccharides refer to Fig. 1.

 
The quasi-harmonic entropies Formula for all disaccharides considered (calculated based on the full 50-ns simulations and including the contributions from all quasi-harmonic modes), together with the associated corrections Formula for anharmonicity in the individual modes and Formula for (supralinear) pairwise correlations among the different modes, are reported in Table 4. The corrections Formula for anharmonicity are negative and relatively small (at most 1.7% of Formula), which agrees with previous results in the context of small solute molecules (50Go,51Go) (R. Baron, W. F. van Gunsteren, and P. H. Hünenberger, to be submitted) but does not necessarily apply to larger macromolecules. These corrections are of similar magnitudes for all compounds. The corrections Formula for pairwise (supralinear) correlations are also negative, but of significantly larger magnitudes (19–26% of Formula), which also agrees with previous results in the context of the reversible folding of ß-peptides in methanol (R. Baron, W. F. van Gunsteren, and P. H. Hünenberger, unpublished). This correction is far from negligible, and omitting it would lead to a significant overestimation of the configurational entropy. Higher-order (beyond pairwise) correlations are expected to further decrease the entropy, but are increasingly difficult to estimate (requirement for more extensive sampling, large computational and memory costs involved in their evaluation). Both anharmonicity and correlation effects are likely to become even more important when considering longer polysaccharide chains.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4  Estimated configurational entropies and corresponding correction terms for the eight disaccharides considered

 
The corrected entropy values Formula for the (1->6)-linked disaccharides (I, G) are significantly larger than the corresponding values for the other disaccharides. This observation is intuitively justified by the presence of an additional dihedral angle within the glycosidic linkage, and agrees with the results of a chromatographic study comparing estimated conformational entropies for M, C, I, and G in aqueous solution (52Go). The disaccharide C has a significantly lower entropy compared to all other disaccharides (in large part due to a more negative correlation correction term Formula). This observation is probably related to the presence of a highly-persistent HO3'–O5 H-bond in this sugar (Table 2). This peculiarity of the disaccharide building block of cellulose in terms of conformational entropy may also play a role in determining the specific physico-chemical properties of this polysaccharide. The corrected entropy values for all other disaccharides (K, S, N, L, and M) fall in a narrower range of ~50 J x K–1 x mol–1. All ß-linked disaccharides have a higher entropy than the corresponding {alpha}-linked disaccharides, with the exception of the M/C pair. This observation is in qualitative agreement with analyses of the relative flexibilities of disaccharides based on QM and MM potential energy maps (4Go–11Go,14Go,18Go–23Go,28Go,29Go). These studies suggest that di-equatorial linkages (as found in the ß-linked disaccharides) are intrinsically more flexible then axial-equatorial ones (as found in {alpha}-linked disaccharides) (4Go–6Go,18Go–22Go,28Go,29Go). The above-mentioned chromatographic study of M, C, I, and G (52Go) also supports this conclusion. The trends in configurational entropies suggested by the present simulation study are G>>I>>L>S>K>N>M>>C (Table 4).


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The present article reports a comparative study of the eight reducing glucose-based disaccharides using explicit-solvent MD simulations. The properties of all possible glycosidic linkages, i.e., {alpha}(1->2), ß(1->2), {alpha}(1->3), ß(1->3), {alpha}(1->4), ß(1->4), {alpha}(1->6), and ß(1->6) have thus been investigated in the context of the disaccharides K, S, N, L, M, C, I, and G, respectively (with the ß-anomer at the reducing residue). The conformational preferences associated with the glycosidic dihedral angles {phi}, {psi}, and Formula (the latter for I and G) are found to agree well with available experimental and theoretical data. This agreement provides additional validation for the new GROMOS 45A4 force-field parameter set recently developed for carbohydrates (32Go). The H-bond analysis reveals the presence of significantly populated interresidue H-bonds (nearly always involving a hydrogen donor in the reducing residue) in all disaccharides except I and G. The characteristic timescales associated with transitions in the various dihedral angles (except {phi} and {psi}) range from ~30 ps (rotation of hydroxyl groups) to the nanosecond range (rotation of the lactol and hydroxymethyl groups, and around the {omega}-glycosidic dihedral angle in (1->6)-linked disaccharides). The probability distributions associated with the {phi}- and {psi}-glycosidic dihedral angles are essentially unimodal, and full rotation around theses angles is observed at most once or twice for {phi} (never for {psi}) on the 50-ns timescale. Finally, a quasi-harmonic entropy analysis shows that simulations of at least 30–40 ns are required to adequately sample the conformational space accessible to solvated disaccharides. The corresponding final entropy estimates (after corrections for anharmonicities and pairwise mode correlation) evidence a significantly higher entropy for (1->6)-linked disaccharides (I and G) and a significantly lower entropy for C compared to the five other disaccharides investigated. In addition, for a given linkage, the entropy is generally higher for the ß-form compared to the {alpha}-form (except for the M/C pair).


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The authors thank Roberto D. Lins for insightful discussions.

Financial support by the Swiss National Foundation grant No. 21-105397 is gratefully acknowledged. R.B. is grateful for financial support from the National Center of Competence in Research, Structural Biology, of the Swiss National Foundation.

Submitted on January 17, 2006; accepted for publication March 15, 2006.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
1. Lehmann, J. 1998. Carbohydrates Structure and Biology. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany.

2. Gabius, H. J., H. C. Siebert, S. Andre, J. J. Barbero, and H. Rüdiger. 2004. Chemical biology of the sugar code. ChemBioChem. 5:740–764.[CrossRef][Medline]

3. Sanz, M. L., J. Sanz, and I. Martinez-Castro. 2004. Gas chromatographic mass spectrometric method for the qualitative and quantitative determination of disaccharides and trisaccharides in honey. J. Chromatogr. A. 1059:143–148.[CrossRef][Medline]

4. Dowd, M. K., A. D. French, and P. J. Reilly. 1992. Conformational analysis of the anomeric forms of sophorose, laminarabiose, and cellobiose using MM3. Carbohydr. Res. 233:15–34.[CrossRef][Medline]

5. Dowd, M. K., J. Zeng, A. D. French, and P. J. Reilly. 1992. Conformational analysis of the anomeric forms of kojibiose, nigerose, and maltose using MM3. Carbohydr. Res. 230:223–244.[CrossRef][Medline]

6. Stortz, C. A., and A. S. Cerezo. 2003. Depicting the MM3 potential energy surfaces of trisaccharides by single contour maps: application to ß-cellotriose and {alpha}-maltotriose. Carbohydr. Res. 338:95–107.[CrossRef][Medline]

7. Lipkind, G. M., A. S. Shashkov, and N. K. Kochetkov. 1985. Nuclear Overhauser effect and conformational states of cellobiose in aqueous solution. Carbohydr. Res. 141:191–197.[CrossRef]

8. Shashkov, A. S., G. M. Lipkind, and N. K. Kochetkov. 1986. Nuclear Overhauser effects for methyl ß-maltoside and the conformational states of maltose in aqueous solution. Carbohydr. Res. 147:175–182.[CrossRef]

9. Ha, S. N., L. J. Madsen, and J. W. Brady. 1988. Conformational analysis and molecular dynamics simulations of maltose. Biopolymers. 27:1927–1952.[CrossRef][Medline]

10. Hardy, B. J., and A. Sarko. 1993. Conformational analysis and molecular dynamics simulation of cellobiose and larger cello-oligomers. J. Comput. Chem. 14:831–847.[CrossRef]

11. Hardy, B. J., and A. Sarko. 1993. Molecular-dynamics simulation of cellobiose in water. J. Comput. Chem. 14:848–857.[CrossRef]

12. Brady, J. W., and R. K. Schmidt. 1993. The role of hydrogen-bonding in carbohydrates—molecular dynamics simulations of maltose in aqueous solution. J. Phys. Chem. 97:958–966.[CrossRef]

13. Ott, K. H., and B. Meyer. 1996. Molecular dynamics simulations of maltose in water. Carbohydr. Res. 281:11–34.[CrossRef]

14. Cheetham, N. W. H., P. Dasgupta, and G. E. Ball. 2003. NMR and modelling studies of disaccharide conformation. Carbohydr. Res. 338:955–962.[CrossRef][Medline]

15. Best, R. B., G. E. Jackson, and K. J. Naidoo. 2001. Molecular dynamics and NMR study of the {alpha}(1 -> 4) and {alpha}(1 -> 6) glycosidic linkages: maltose and isomaltose. J. Phys. Chem. B. 105:4742–4751.

16. Umemura, M., S. Hayashi, T. Nakagawa, S. Yamanaka, H. Urakawa, and K. Kajiwara. 2003. Structure of water molecules in aqueous maltose and cellobiose solutions using molecular dynamics simulation. I. Statics. J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM. 624:129–144.[CrossRef]

17. Umemura, M., S. Hayashi, T. Nakagawa, H. Urakawa, and K. Kajiwara. 2003. Structure of water molecules in aqueous maltose and cellobiose solutions using molecular dynamics simulation. II. Dynamics. J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM. 636:215–228.[CrossRef]

18. French, A. D., A. M. Kelterer, G. P. Johnson, and M. K. Dowd. 2000. B3LYP/6–31G*, RHF/6–31G* and MM3 heats of formation of disaccharide analogs. J. Mol. Struct. 556:303–313.[CrossRef]

19. French, A. D., A. M. Kelterer, G. P. Johnson, M. K. Dowd, and C. J. Cramer. 2001. HF/6–31G*energy surfaces for disaccharide analogs. J. Comput. Chem. 22:65–78.[CrossRef]

20. Strati, G. L., J. L. Willett, and F. A. Momany. 2002. Ab initio computational study of P-cellobiose conformers using B3LYP/6–311++G. Carbohydr. Res. 337:1833–1849.[CrossRef][Medline]

21. Strati, G. L., J. L. Willett, and F. A. Momany. 2002. A DFT/ab initio study of hydrogen bonding and conformational preference in model cellobiose analogs using B3LYP/6–311++G. Carbohydr. Res. 337:1851–1859.[CrossRef][Medline]

22. Stortz, C. A., and A. S. Cerezo. 2003. MM3 potential energy surfaces of the two linked glucosyl trisaccharides {alpha}-kojitriose and ß-sophorotriose. Carbohydr. Res. 338:1679–1689.[CrossRef][Medline]

23. Andre, I., K. Mazeau, F. R. Taravel, and I. Tvaroska. 1995. NMR and molecular modeling of sophorose and sophorotriose in solution. New J. Chem. 19:331–339.

24. Rao, V. S. R., P. K. Qasba, P. V. Balaji, and R. Chandrasekaran. 1998. Conformation of Carbohydrates. Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 93–102.

25. Lipkind, G. M., A. S. Shashkov, S. S. Mamyan, and N. K. Kochetkov. 1988. The nuclear Overhauser effect and structural factors determining the conformations of disaccharide glycosides. Carbohydr. Res. 181:1–12.[CrossRef]

26. Poppe, L. 1993. Modeling carbohydrate conformations from NMR data—maximum-entropy rotameric distribution about the C5–C6 bond in gentiobiose. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115:8421–8426.[CrossRef]

27. Kony, D., W. Damm, S. Stoll, and P. H. Hünenberger. 2004. Explicit-solvent molecular dynamics simulations of the ß (1->3)- and ß (1->6)-linked disaccharides ß-laminarabiose and ß-gentiobiose in water. J. Phys. Chem. B. 108:5815–5826.

28. Dowd, M. K., A. D. French, and P. J. Reilly. 1994. Relaxed-residue conformational mapping of the three linkage bonds of isomaltose and gentiobiose with MM3 (92). Biopolymers. 34:625–638.[CrossRef][Medline]

29. Stortz, C. A., and A. S. Cerezo. 2002. Potential energy surfaces of {alpha}-(1->3)-linked disaccharides calculated with the MM3 force field. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 21:355–371.[CrossRef]

30. Allinger, N. L., Y. H. Yuh, and J.-H. Lii. 1989. Molecular mechanics—the MM3 force-field for hydrocarbons. 1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111:8551–8566.[CrossRef]

31. Allinger, N. L., M. Rahman, and J.-H. Lii. 1990. A molecular mechanics force field (MM3) for alcohols and ethers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112:8293–8307.[CrossRef]

32. Lins, R. D., and P. H. Hünenberger. 2005. A new GROMOS force field for hexopyranose-based carbohydrates. J. Comput. Chem. 26:1400–1412.[CrossRef][Medline]

33. van Gunsteren, W. F., S. R. Billeter, A. A. Eising, P. H. Hünenberger, and P. Krüger. 1996. Biomolecular Simulation: The GROMOS96 Manual and User Guide. A. E. Mark, W. R. P. Scott, and I. G. Tironi, editors. Hochschulverlag an der ETH Zürich/BIOMOS, Zürich/Groningen, Switzerland.

34. Berendsen, H. J. C., J. P. M. Postma, W. F. van Gunsteren, and J. Hermans. 1981. Intermolecular Forces. B. Pullman, editor. Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 331–342.

35. Hockney, R. W. 1970. The potential calculation and some applications. Methods Comput. Phys. 9:136–211.

36. Ryckaert, J. P., G. Ciccotti, and H. J. C. Berendsen. 1977. Numerical integration of Cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints—molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J. Comp. Phys. 23:327–341.[CrossRef]

37. Berendsen, H. J. C., J. P. M. Postma, W. F. van Gunsteren, A. DiNola, and J. R. Haak. 1984. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81:3684–3690.[CrossRef]

38. van Gunsteren, W. F., and H. J. C. Berendsen. 1990. Computer simulation of molecular dynamics—methodology, applications, and perspectives in chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 29:992–1023.[CrossRef]

39. Tironi, I. G., R. Sperb, P. E. Smith, and W. F. van Gunsteren. 1995. A generalized reaction field method for molecular dynamics simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 102:5451–5459.[CrossRef]

40. XchemEdit, Version 0.93. Http://www.cemcomco.com/ChemEdit_Distribution1074.html.

41. Karplus, M., and J. Kushick. 1981. Method for estimating the configurational entropy of macromolecules. Macromolecules. 14:325–332.[CrossRef]

42. McLachlan, A. D. 1979. Gene duplications in the structural evolution of chymotrypsin. J. Mol. Biol. 128:49–79.[CrossRef][Medline]

43. Schäfer, H., A. E. Mark, and W. F. van Gunsteren. 2000. Absolute entropies from molecular dynamics simulation trajectories. J. Chem. Phys. 113:7809–7817.[CrossRef]

44. Yu, H., M. Amann, T. Hansson, J. Kohler, G. Wich, and W. F. van Gunsteren. 2004. Effect of methylation on the stability and solvation free energy of amylose and cellulose fragments: a molecular dynamics study. Carbohydr. Res. 339:1697–1709.[CrossRef][Medline]

45. Pereira, C. S., R. D. Lins, I. Chandrasekar, L. C. G. Freitas, and P. H. Hünenberger. 2004. Interaction of the disaccharide trehalose with a phospholipid bilayer: a molecular dynamics study. Biophys. J. 86:2273–2285.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

46. Leeflang, B. R., J. F. G. Vliegenthart, L. M. J. Kroonbatenburg, B. P. Vaneijck, and J. Kroon. 1992. A H-1-NMR and MD study of intramolecular hydrogen-bonds in methyl ß-cellobioside. Carbohydr. Res. 230:41–61.[CrossRef][Medline]

47. Gardner, K. H., and J. Blackwell. 1974. Structure of native cellulose. Biopolymers. 13:1975–2001.[CrossRef]

48. Kolpak, F. J., and J. Blackwell. 1976. Determination of structure of cellulose II. Macromolecules. 9:273–278.[CrossRef][Medline]

49. Kadla, J. F., and R. D. Gilbert. 2000. Cellulose structure: a review. Cellulose Chem. Technol. 34:197–216.

50. Ichiye, T., and M. Karplus. 1987. Anisotropy and anharmonicity of atomic fluctuations in proteins—analysis of a molecular dynamics simulation. Proteins. 2:236–259.[CrossRef][Medline]

51. Perahia, D., R. M. Levy, and M. Karplus. 1990. Motions of an {alpha}-helical polypeptide—comparison of molecular and harmonic dynamics. Biopolymers. 29:645–677.[CrossRef]

52. Striegel, A. M. 2003. Anomeric configuration, glycosidic linkage, and the solution conformational entropy of O-linked disaccharides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125:4146–4148.[CrossRef][Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
A. A. Gorfe, R. Baron, and J. A. McCammon
Water-Membrane Partition Thermodynamics of an Amphiphilic Lipopeptide: An Enthalpy-Driven Hydrophobic Effect
Biophys. J., October 1, 2008; 95(7): 3269 - 3277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GlycobiologyHome page
M. L DeMarco and R. J Woods
Structural glycobiology: A game of snakes and ladders
Glycobiology, June 1, 2008; 18(6): 426 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.081539v1
90/12/4337    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pereira, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hünenberger, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pereira, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hünenberger, P. H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Biophysical Society.