help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on November 11, 2005.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.105.069963
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.105.069963v1
90/3/993    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yoshikawa, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshikawa, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yoshikawa, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshikawa, K.
Biophysical Journal 90:993-999 (2006)
© 2006 The Biophysical Society

Protective Effect of Vitamin C against Double-Strand Breaks in Reconstituted Chromatin Visualized by Single-Molecule Observation

Yuko Yoshikawa *, Kohji Hizume {dagger}, Yoshiko Oda *, Kunio Takeyasu {dagger}, Sumiko Araki {ddagger} and Kenichi Yoshikawa {ddagger}

* Department of Food and Nutrition, Nagoya Bunri College, Nagoya 451-0077, Japan; {dagger} Laboratory of Plasma Membrane and Nuclear Signaling, Kyoto University Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan; and {ddagger} Department of Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Yuko Yoshikawa, Tel.: 81-52-521-2251; Fax: 81-52-52-2259; E-mail: yuko{at}chem.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTON
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Direct attack to genomic DNA by reactive oxygen species causes various types of lesions, including base modifications and strand breaks. The most significant lesion is considered to be an unrepaired double-strand break that can lead to fatal cell damage. We directly observed double-strand breaks of DNA in reconstituted chromatin stained by a fluorescent cyanine dye, YOYO (quinolinium, 1,1'-[1,3- propanediylbis[(dimethyliminio)-3,1- propanediyl]]bis[4-[(3-methyl-2(3H)-benzoxazolylidene)methyl]]-, tetraiodide), in solution, where YOYO is known to have the ability to photo-cleave DNAs by generating reactive oxygen species. Reconstituted chromatin was assembled from large circular DNA (106 kbp) with core histone proteins. We also investigated the effect of vitamin C (ascorbic acid) on preventing photo-induced double-strand breaks in a quantitative manner. We found that DNA is protected against double-strand breaks by the addition of ascorbic acid, and this protective effect is dose dependent. The effective kinetic constant of the breakage reaction in the presence of 5 mM ascorbic acid is 20 times lower than that in the absence of ascorbic acid. This protective effect of ascorbic acid in reconstituted chromatin is discussed in relation to the highly compacted polynucleosomal structure. The results highlight the fact that single-molecule observation is a useful tool for studying double-strand breaks in giant DNA and chromatin.


   INTRODUCTON
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTON
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
It is widely accepted that oxidative damage to genomic DNA by reactive oxygen species induces various types of DNA lesions, including base and sugar modifications and strand breaks (1Go–3Go). Among these types of damage, a double-strand break is considered to be the most significant lesion in genomic DNA and can lead to chromosomal rearrangements that are lethal to eukaryotes (3Go,4Go). Although a large number of in vitro studies concerning double-strand breaks have been carried out at short DNA molecules or oligomer level (see Box et al. (5Go) for a review), studies on the double-lesion of genomic giant DNA remain at a primitive stage. This may be due to a lack of a suitable methodology for studying lesions of genomic giant DNA. For example, NMR and mass spectroscopies can provide the detailed chemical information on short DNA less than several tens of basepairs (6Go,7Go) but cannot detect a specific change along a giant DNA. We recently performed direct observations of photo-induced double-strand breaks in giant DNAs stained by a cyanine dye, YOYO, under intense illumination ({lambda} = 450–490 nm) in solution (8Go). YOYO is known to have the ability to photo-cleave DNAs by generating reactive oxygen species (9Go). We reported that a quantitative kinetic analysis of the double-strand breakage of giant DNA can be performed by using single-molecule observation and found that the breakage reaction is protected in the presence of a water-soluble flavonoid, glucosyl-hesperidin (8Go).

As the next step, in this study we observed photo-induced double-strand breaks in individual single reconstituted chromatin using fluorescence microscopy. In a eukaryotic nucleus, a long duplex DNA is complexed with histone proteins to form a highly folded chromatin. Therefore, it is important to understand the relationship between the higher-order structure of compacted chromatin and the susceptibility to oxidative damage. A sensitive and reliable technique for studying such lesions would be a useful tool in genotoxicity and antioxidative sensitivity testing. For these studies, we used a polynucleosomal assembly consisting of a large circular DNA (106 kbp) and core histone proteins as reconstituted chromatin.

We also examined the ability of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) to protect against double-strand breaks. Vitamin C is essential for many enzymatic reactions and also acts as a free-radical scavenger. However, the role of vitamin C in protecting against oxidative DNA damage is controversial (10Go–15Go). Numerous studies have demonstrated the antioxidant effects of vitamin C (16Go–22Go). On the other hand, both in vivo and in vitro studies often show that vitamin C acts as a prooxidant (12Go,23Go,24Go). Thus, in this study, we performed a quantitative analysis of breakage reactions in the presence of ascorbic acid through single-molecule observation.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTON
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Purification of histone octamer
Core histones were purified from HeLa cells essentially as described (25Go) with slight modifications (26Go,27Go). The cells were harvested, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and then lysed with L buffer (140 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.5% Triton-X-100). Nuclei were isolated by low-speed centrifugation and washed three times with W buffer (350 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5). The nuclei were then treated with micrococcal nuclease (40 units/mg of DNA) in D-buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 0.25 M sucrose, 0.1 mM phenylmethyl sulfonylfluoride (PMSF)) at 37°C for 15 min. The reaction was stopped by an addition of EGTA to a final concentration of 2 mM, and the nuclei were pelleted by centrifugation at 10,000 g for 5 min. The pellet was resuspended in N buffer (10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 6.8, 5 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM PMSF) and dialyzed against N buffer overnight at 4°C. The sample was centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 min, and the soluble chromatin supernatant was redialyzed against HA-buffer (0.1 M NaPO4, pH 6.7, 0.63 MNaCl) and mixed with hydroxyapatite resin (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). After batch binding at 4°C for 1 h, the resin was packed into a column and washed with five volumes of HA buffer. The core histones were eluted by E buffer (0.1 M NaPO4, pH 6.7, 2 M NaCl). The eluate was applied to a gel-filtration column (Amersham Biosciences (Piscataway, NJ), HiPrep 16/60 S-200) to separate the octamer from the H3/H4 tetramer, H2A/H2B dimer, and other contaminants.

Preparation of DNA template and chromatin reconstitution
DNA (100 kbp) composed of tandem repeats with a 171 bp unit of alphoid DNA was a kind gift from Dr. Ikeno at Fujita Health University. The 100 kbp DNA was subcloned into a bacterial artificial chromosome, pBAC-108L (6 kbp), to obtain a 106 kbp circular DNA as the reconstituted chromatin template.

To reconstitute the chromatin structure, equal amounts (0.5 µg) of the purified DNA template and the histone octamer were first mixed in Hi buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 2 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.05% NP-40, 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol) and then were put into a dialysis tube (total volume, 50 µl). Dialysis was started with 150 ml of Hi buffer with stirring at 4°C. Lo buffer (10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 0.05% NP-40, 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol) was added to the dialysis buffer at 0.46 ml/min, and simultaneously the dialysis buffer was pumped out at the same speed with a peristaltic pump, so that the dialysis buffer contained 50 mM NaCl after 20 h. The sample was collected from the dialysis tube and stored at 4°C.

AFM imaging
Reconstituted chromatin samples were diluted with Di-buffer (10 mM Hepes-NaOH, pH 7.5, 20 mM NaCl). The diluted sample was fixed with 0.3% glutaraldehyde for 30 min at 25°C. For atomic force microscopy (AFM) imaging, the fixed sample was applied to a freshly cleaved mica surface that had been pretreated with 10 mM spermidine unless otherwise stated. After 10 min, the mica was gently washed with water and dried under nitrogen gas. AFM imaging was performed with Nanoscope IIIa (Digital Instruments, Santa Barbara, CA) with a type E scanner under tapping mode in air at room temperature. AFM probes made of a single silicon crystal with a cantilever length of 129 µm and a spring constant of 33–62 N/m (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) were used. Images were collected in the height mode and stored in a 512 x 512 pixel format. The images obtained were then plane fitted and analyzed by the computer programs that accompanied the imaging module.

Fluorescence microscopic observations
For fluorescence microscopic measurements, reconstituted chromatin and naked DNA were dissolved in 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer solution with 0.1 µM YOYO (quinolinium, 1,1'-[1,3- propanediylbis[(dimethyliminio)-3,1- propanediyl]]bis[4-[(3-methyl-2(3H)-benzoxazolylidene)methyl]]-, tetraiodide) (trade name YOYO-1: Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) and 20 mM NaCl at pH 7.4. To diminish intermolecular DNA aggregation, measurements were conducted at a low DNA concentration: 0.3 µM in nucleotide units. In the fluorescence measurement, the intensity of the fluorescent objects provides us the definite information to distinguish DNA aggregates from single DNA molecules. The possible effect of ascorbic acid on the reduction of breakage was evaluated by adding 0.2 mM to 5 mM L-ascorbic acid to the DNA solution. Illumination with 450–490 nm light was performed with an optical excitation filter, and fluorescence was observed at 510 nm. To reduce photocleavage to a level suitable for real-time observation, 4% (v/v) 2-mercaptoethanol was added to samples before optical imaging. Fluorescent DNA images were obtained using a microscope (Axiovert 135 TV, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with a 100x oil-immersion objective lens and a highly sensitive Hamamatsu silicon-intensifier target TV camera, which allowed us to record images on videotapes. The video images were analyzed with an image processor (Argus 20, Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan).


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTON
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Single-molecule observation of double-strand breaks
Fig. 1, a and b, shows a naked circular DNA and a reconstituted chromatin, respectively, observed by AFM. The AFM image in Fig. 1 b clearly shows a beads-on-a-string structure. The reconstituted chromatin was prepared from negatively supercoiled plasmid by the salt-dialysis method. It is noted that the negative superhelicity is absorbed accompanied by the formation of nucleosomes (28Go). The purity of core histones were checked by SDS-PAGE after Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB) staining as in Fig. 1 c, which indicates that the four subunits exist equally and there are not any other bands of contaminated proteins. After micrococcus nuclease treatment, ~150 bp band was detected by agarose gel electrophoresis (Fig. 1 d). This result suggests that ~150 bp of DNA is wrapped around core histones, being essentially the same as in vivo nucleosomes. In this reconstitution system, we have confirmed that the number of nucleosomes formed on the 106 kbp plasmid is 370 on the average (27Go).



View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 1  Representative AFM images. (a) Naked circular DNA (106 kbp). (b) Reconstituted chromatin. The chromatin fiber was reconstituted from the circular DNA and histone octamers by a salt-dialysis method and observed by AFM under tapping mode in air. (c) SDS-PAGE analysis of core histones purified from HeLa cells. The gel was stained with CBB. (d) Micrococcal nuclease digestion assay of reconstituted chromatin fiber. The reconstituted chromatin was digested with 1.0 units/ml micrococcal nuclease at 37°C for 10 min. The DNA was purified and electrophoresed on an 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel in 1 x Tris-Acetate-EDTA.

 
Fig. 2 exemplifies the real-time measurement of the breakage of a naked DNA (Fig. 2 a) and a reconstituted chromatin (Fig. 2 b) in solution by fluorescence microscopy, where the conformations of a DNA and a reconstituted chromatin in the bulk aqueous solution are observed under translational and intrachain Brownian motion. It is to be noted that the two-dimensional images in Fig. 2 include the effect of the three-dimensional conformational fluctuation of the molecular chain, indicating that the brighter emission spot in Fig. 2 is attributed to the depth effect on the three-dimensionally swollen chain. In naked DNA, the double-strand breaks occur in a successive manner, from a circular into a linear conformation (Fig. 2, Step I) and then from a linear conformation into a pair of fragments (Step II). Similar changes in conformation are encountered for the reconstituted chromatin as shown in Fig. 2 b. Thus, fluorescence microscopy makes it possible to monitor the process of double-strand breaks in individual molecules. The actual time of the change from a circular into a linear conformation (Step I) can be recognized only for specimens that show a rather extended conformation during thermal agitation. On the other hand, the time of the second breakage (Step II), i.e., the timing of the fragmentation from a single DNA molecule, can be clearly judged from the video images. For this reason, we measured the time of the second breakage (Step II) on individual specimens. Kinetic analysis was performed based on newly derived equations, as will be explained in the next section. The protective effect of ascorbic acid against photo-induced double-strand breaks is summarized as the time distribution in Fig. 3, where Step II in Fig. 2 is given.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 2  Fluorescence microscopic observations of photo-induced double-strand breaks in (a) naked circular DNA and (b) reconstituted chromatin stained by YOYO. (c) Schematic illustration for double-strand breaks. Individual DNAs undergo structural changes from a circular to a linear conformation (Step I) and then to a pair of fragments (Step II).

 


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 3  Histograms of the breakage time distribution depending on ascorbic acid (AsA) concentration as monitored by fluorescence microscopy. The breakage time is taken at the moment of fragmentation (Step II in Fig. 2). (Left) Naked circular DNA. (Right) Reconstituted chromatin. The solid bins (100<) indicate the percentages of surviving DNA molecules even after 100 s under intense light illumination.

 
Fig. 3 shows a histogram of the breakage time distribution, where the breakage time is taken at the moment of fragmentation (Step II in Fig. 2). For naked DNA, >90% of the DNA molecules are damaged into fragments within 20 s in the absence of ascorbic acid. On the other hand, the addition of ascorbic acid prolongs the breakage time significantly, indicating that ascorbic acid protects against DNA breakage. At 5 mM ascorbic acid, the breakage time becomes >30 s for most of the naked DNA molecules. The breakage time in reconstituted chromatin is apparently greater than that in naked DNA. For reconstituted chromatin, most of the DNA remains without breakage even after 100 s with a higher concentration of ascorbic acid (5 mM).

Fig. 4 shows the time course of the increase in damaged DNA molecules, indicating that breakage in reconstituted chromatin is slower than that in naked DNA, together with the protective effect of ascorbic acid. Besides the significant protective effect of ascorbic acid, the time profile shows a unique characteristic; i.e., the fragmentation starts after a certain induction period.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 4  Time dependence of the percentage of damaged DNA molecules deduced from the summation of the probability in the histograms of Fig. 3. (Left) Naked circular DNA. (Right) Reconstituted chromatin. The lines depicted in the figures are the guide for the eye observation.

 
Kinetic analysis on the double-strand break in the circular DNA
To evaluate the time-dependent change in the relative ratio of double-strand breaks as shown in Fig. 4, we can deduce the kinetic equation by considering the stepwise process of the oxidative damage of circular DNA. Under the experimental conditions for individual DNA observation, the process of breaking from a circular to linear structure, i.e., the first stage of the double-strand break in DNA, is difficult to detect. In contrast, the second step of the double-strand break is easier to detect because this process is observed as the fragmentation of a single fluorescence object. The frequency of single-strand breakage caused by photo-illumination in the presence of YOYO is considered to be proportional to the intensity of light, I. For example, Martens and Clayton (29Go) studied the effect of an intercalator on the single-strand breakage or nick formation under visible light irradiation and found that the number of nicks was proportional to the total light intensity. By denoting the number of nicks per DNA molecule as n, the rate of the increase in nicks can be written as,

(1)
where {alpha} is a constant. For simplicity, we assume that variation in the base composition along the DNA chain has a negligible effect on the possibility of breakage. As the initial condition, we take n = 0 when t = 0. Thus, Eq. 1 is integrated as,

(2)
The first double-strand break on circular DNA induces ring opening into a linear conformation, where the precise distinction between circular and linear DNAs is practically difficult with fluorescence microscopic measurement. Thus, to avoid complexity in the data analysis, we would like to consider the probability of the second double-strand break, by omitting the apparent inclusion of the first double-strand break from the equation. We consider x as the percentage of DNA molecules that survive fragmentation. By introducing a rate constant k, dx/dt is given as,

(3)
After integration of Eq. 3 under the initial condition of x = x0 at t = 0,

(4)
By introducing an effective kinetic constant, A = (1/2)k{alpha}I, Eq. 4 becomes

(5)
Equation 5 implies that the logarithm of the ratio of surviving DNA molecules is proportional to the kinetic constant of double-strand break. The constant A is also linearly correlated to the light intensity and to the kinetic constant of photo-induced single-strand break.

Based on the above theoretical consideration, in Fig. 5, we plotted the square of time with respect to the logarithm of the relative ratio of the surviving DNA, which includes both the circular and linear forms without fragmentation. A linear relationship is seen for all of the experimental data with both naked DNA and reconstituted chromatin, indicating that the method used for the kinetic analysis is adequate. In other words, the unique time-dependent change in Fig. 4 is explained with our theoretical framework. From the relative slope, the apparent kinetic constant of the double-strand break can be deduced.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 5  Linear relationships between t2 and ln x, where x is the percentage of surviving DNA molecules and is calculated as 100% (percentage of damaged DNA).

 
Table 1 shows the kinetic constant A deduced from Eq. 5. In the first column, the relative kinetic constant A1 is given for where the breakage of DNA without histone proteins is adopted as a standard. It is clear that the breakage reaction is largely suppressed with an increase in ascorbic acid concentration. When we compare the breaks between naked DNA and reconstituted chromatin in the absence of ascorbic acid, the breakage rate, i.e., the relative kinetic constant A1 of reconstituted chromatin, is much smaller,~1/4, than that of naked DNA. A similar protective effect for nucleosomal DNA has been found with regard to iron-mediated damage (30Go). It is also obvious that the efficiency of the protection is enhanced with the addition of ascorbic acid in reconstituted chromatin. In the second column of Table 1, the relative kinetic constant A2 of the breakage reaction in reconstituted chromatin is shown, where the rate of reconstituted chromatin without ascorbic acid is taken as unity. The protective effect of ascorbic acid shows a similar trend in naked DNA and reconstituted chromatin, i.e., in naked DNA the relative kinetic constants (A1) are 0.25 and 0.05 for 1 and 5 mM ascorbic acid, respectively, whereas in reconstituted chromatin the relative kinetic constants (A2) are 0.28 and 0.05. This means that the degree of the protective action of ascorbic acid for naked DNA is similar to that for reconstituted chromatin.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1  Relative kinetic constants of the breakage reaction, where A1 and A2 are normalized to be unity in the control experiment on naked circular DNA and reconstituted chromatin, respectively

 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTON
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
In this study, we showed that double-strand breaks can be monitored at the level of individual DNA molecules and that the kinetics of the breakage reaction can be deduced from such single-molecule observation.

We obtained useful information on the protective effects of the chromatin structure compared to naked DNA, together with the effect of ascorbic acid, through individual DNA observation. In relation to our observation, several recent in vivo studies have suggested that the organization of DNA into a highly compacted chromatin structure helps to protect against double-strand breaks (30Go–32Go). Irvine et al. (33Go) reported that poorly compacted abnormal sperm chromatin frequently contains DNA strand breaks. Our results clearly indicate the protective effect of the polynucleosomal structure against oxidative damage. Furthermore, this protection was enhanced by the addition of ascorbic acid.

An additional important implication of our results is that ascorbic acid above millimolar concentrations exhibits a marked protective effect on double-strand breaks. Generally, the protective effect of ascorbic acid can be explained by scavenging reactive oxygen species due to its property as an antioxidant. Another potential explanation for the protective effect is the direct interaction of ascorbic acid with DNA. This hypothesis is associated with the result of our previous study, which indicated that ascorbic acid in millimolar concentrations induces condensation in the higher-order structure of giant DNA (34Go). Thus, it is expected that the change in the higher-order structure of DNA induced by ascorbic acid may be closely associated with its ability to protect against double-strand breaks. It is known that ascorbic acid reaches millimolar concentrations in human circulating immune cells, such as neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes (35Go), which suggests that the ascorbic acid concentration used in this study is of physiological significance. It may be useful to examine such a possible effect of ascorbic acid in the future.

Currently, it is considered that a single double-strand break can be sufficient to kill a cell if it inactivates a key gene (36Go–38Go). However, it has been rather difficult to measure double-strand breaks, especially at very low damage conditions. We have evaluated the kinetics on the fragmentation process of giant DNA and reconstituted chromatin, on the order of one double-strand break per 100 kbp. In addition, our experimental system does not require a large amount of DNA fragments for the detection of DNA damage. Thus, it may be of scientific value to establish a methodology to detect the double-strand break on the level of individual giant DNA.


   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTON
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
 
This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

Submitted on July 7, 2005; accepted for publication October 11, 2005.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTON
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
1. Halliwell, B., and O. I. Aruoma. 1991. DNA damage by oxygen-derived species. Its mechanism and measurement in mammalian systems. FEBS Lett. 281:9–19.[CrossRef][Medline]

2. Dizdaroglu, M. 1992. Oxidative damage to DNA in mammalian chromatin. Mutat. Res. 275:331–342.[CrossRef][Medline]

3. Olive, P. L. 1998. The role of DNA single- and double-strand breaks in cell killing by ionizing radiation. Radiat. Res. 150(Suppl.):S42–S51.[Medline]

4. Morgan, W. F., J. Corcorgan, A. Hartmann, M. I. Kaplan, C. C. L. Limoli, and B. Ponnaiya. 1998. DNA double-strand breaks, chromosomal rearrangements, and genomic instability. Mutat. Res. 404:125–128.[Medline]

5. Box, H. C., J. B. Dawidzik, and E. E. Budzinski. 2001. Free radical-induced double lesions in DNA. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 31:856–868.[CrossRef][Medline]

6. Patrzyc, H. B., J. B. Dawidzik, E. E. Budzinski, H. Iijima, and H. C. Box. 2001. Double lesions are produced in DNA oligomer by ionizing radiation and by metal-catalyzed H2O2 reactions. Radiat. Res. 155:634–636.[CrossRef][Medline]

7. Williams, H. E., M. L. Colgrave, and M. S. Searle. 2002. Drug recognition of a DNA single strand break: nogalamycin intercalation between coaxially stacked hairpins. Eur. J. Biochem. 269:1726–1733.[Medline]

8. Yoshikawa, Y., M. Suzuki, N. Yamada, and K. Yoshikawa. 2004. Double-strand break of giant DNA: protection by glucosyl-hesperidin as evidenced through direct observation on individual DNA molecules. FEBS Lett. 566:39–42.[CrossRef][Medline]

9. Kanony, C., B. Akerman, and E. Tuite. 2001. Photobleaching of asymmetric cyanines used for fluorescence imaging of single DNA molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123:7985–7995.[CrossRef][Medline]

10. Halliwell, B. 1996. Vitamin C: antioxidant or pro-oxidant in vivo? Free Radic. Res. 25:439–454.[Medline]

11. Levine, M., R. C. Daruwala, J. B. Park, S. C. Rumsey, and Y. Wang. 1998. Does vitamin C have a pro-oxidant effect? Nature. 395:231.[Medline]

12. Podmore, I. D., H. R. Griffiths, K. E. Herbert, N. Mistry, P. Mistry, and J. Lunec. 1998. Vitamin C exhibits pro-oxidant properties. Nature. 392:559.[CrossRef][Medline]

13. Poulsen, H. E., A. Weimann, J. T. Salonen, K. Nyyssonen, S. Loft, J. Cadet, T. Douki, and J. L. Ravanat. 1998. Does vitamin C have a pro-oxidant effect? Nature. 395:231–232.[Medline]

14. Carr, A., and B. Frei. 1999. Does vitamin C act as a pro-oxidant under physiological conditions? FASEB J. 13:1007–1024.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Premkumar, K., and C. L. Bowlus. 2004. Ascorbic acid does not increase the oxidative stress induced by dietary iron in C3H mice. J. Nutr. 134:435–438.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Green, M. H., J. E. Lowe, A. P. Waugh, K. E. Aldridge, J. Cole, and C. F. Arlett. 1994. Effect of diet and vitamin C on DNA strand breakage in freshly-isolated human white blood cells. Mutat. Res. 316:91–102.[CrossRef][Medline]

17. Duthie, S. J., A. Ma, M. A. Ross, and A. R. Collins. 1996. Antioxidant supplementation decreases oxidative DNA damage in human lymphocytes. Cancer Res. 56:1291–1295.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Anderson, D., B. J. Phillips, T. W. Yu, A. J. Edwards, R. Ayesh, and K. R. Butterworth. 1997. The effects of vitamin C supplementation on biomarkers of oxygen radical generated damage in human volunteers with "low" or "high" cholesterol levels. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 30:161–174.[CrossRef][Medline]

19. Noroozi, M., W. J. Angerson, and M. E. Lean. 1998. Effects of flavonoids and vitamin C on oxidative DNA damage to human lymphocytes. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 67:1210–1218.[Abstract]

20. Konopacka, M., and J. Rzeszowska-Wolny. 2001. Antioxidant vitamins C, E and beta-carotene reduce DNA damage before as well as after gamma-ray irradiation of human lymphocytes in vitro. Mutat. Res. 491:1–7.[Medline]

21. Lutsenko, E. A., J. M. Carcamo, and D. W. Golde. 2002. Vitamin C prevents DNA mutation induced by oxidative stress. J. Biol. Chem. 277:16895–16899.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Dusinska, M., A. Kazimirova, M. Barancokova, M. Beno, B. Smolkova, A. Horska, K. Raslova, L. Wsolova, and A. R. Collins. 2003. Nutritional supplementation with antioxidants decreases chromosomal damage in humans. Mutagenesis. 18:371–376.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Paolini, M., L. Pozzetti, G. F. Pedulli, E. Marchesi, and G. Cantelli-Forti. 1999. The nature of prooxidant activity of vitamin C. Life Sci. 64:PL273–PL278.[CrossRef]

24. Cai, L., J. Koropatnick, and M. G. Cherian. 2001. Roles of vitamin C in radiation-induced DNA damage in presence and absence of copper. Chem. Biol. Interact. 137:75–88.[CrossRef][Medline]

25. O'Neill, T. E., M. Roberge, and E. M. Bradbury. 1992. Nucleosome arrays inhibit both initiation and elongation of transcripts by bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase. J. Mol. Biol. 223:67–78.[CrossRef][Medline]

26. Hizume, K., S. H. Yoshimura, H. Maruyama, J. Kim, H. Wada, and K. Takeyasu. 2002. Chromatin reconstitution: development of a salt-dialysis method monitored by nano-technology. Arch. Histol. Cytol. 65:405–413.[CrossRef][Medline]

27. Hizume, K., S. H. Yoshimura, and K. Takeyasu. 2004. Atomic force microscopy demonstrates a critical role of DNA superhelicity in nucleosome dynamics. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 40:249–262.[Medline]

28. Germond, J. E., B. Hirt, P. Oudet, M. Gross-Bellard, and P. Chambon. 1975. Folding of the DNA double helix in chromatin-like structures from Simian virus 40. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 72:1843–1847.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Martens, P. A., and D. A. Clayton. 1977. Strand breakage in solutions of DNA and ethidium bromide exposed to visible light. Nucleic Acids Res. 4:1393–1407.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Enright, H. U., W. J. Miller, and R. P. Hebbel. 1992. Nucleosomal histone protein protects DNA from iron-mediated damage. Nucleic Acids Res. 20:3341–3346.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Ljungman, M., and P. C. Hanawalt. 1992. Efficient protection against oxidative DNA damage in chromatin. Mol. Carcinog. 5:264–269.[Medline]

32. Aitken, R. J., and C. Krausz. 2001. Oxidative stress, DNA damage and the Y chromosome. Reproduction. 122:497–506.[Abstract]

33. Irvine, D. S., J. P. Twigg, E. L. Gordon, N. Fulton, R. A. Milne, and R. J. Aitken. 2000. DNA integrity in human spermatozoa: relationships with semen quality. J. Androl. 21:33–44.[Abstract]

34. Yoshikawa, Y., M. Suzuki, N. Chen, A. A. Zinchenko, S. Murata, T. Kanbe, T. Nakai, H. Oana, and K. Yoshikawa. 2003. Ascorbic acid induces a marked conformational change in long duplex DNA. Eur. J. Biochem. 270:3101–3106.[Medline]

35. Rumsey, S. C., and M. Levine. 1998. Absorption, transport, and disposition of ascorbic acid in humans. J. Nutr. Biochem. 9:116–130.[CrossRef]

36. Khanna, K. K., and S. P. Jackson. 2001. DNA double-strand breaks: signaling, repair and the cancer connection. Nat. Genet. 27:247–254.[CrossRef][Medline]

37. Bradbury, J. M., and S. P. Jackson. 2003. The complex matter of DNA double-strand break detection. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 31:40–44.[Medline]

38. Rothkamm, K., and M. Lobrich. 2003. Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low x-ray doses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:5057–5062.[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.105.069963v1
90/3/993    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yoshikawa, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshikawa, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yoshikawa, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshikawa, K.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Biophysical Society.