| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Chemistry and the NMR Centre, University of Siena, Siena 53100, Italy
Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Gianni Valensin, E-mail: valensin{at}unisi.it.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The conformation of CsA is widely dependent on the environment. In apolar solvents, such as CHCl3, THF, or CH3CN, one main stable conformer dominates, characterized, in CHCl3, by four stable intramolecular H-bonds involving all the amide hydrogens. These H-bonds cause residues 117 to form an antiparallel ß-pleated sheet and residues 34 a type-II' ß-turn. Moreover one cis peptide bond between MeLeu9 and MeLeu10 is present and all hydrophobic carbon chains are exposed to solvent (6
,7
). When the polarity of the solvent increases, such as in acetone, dimethylsulfoxide, or MeOH, hydrogen bonds disappear and the structure loses its peculiar rigidity, leading to the coexistence of various stable conformers (7
9
).
CsA elicits its immunosuppressive action binding to its intracellular receptor, Cyclophilin (Cyp) (10
). In the complex with its target, CsA adopts a different conformation, characterized by a maximal number of intermolecular hydrogen bonds with the environment and by all trans peptide bonds; this feature has been shown to be important for the pharmacological action of the drug (11
14
). The formed CsA-Cyp complex is a specific inhibitor of the enzymatic activity of Calcineurin (CN), a protein responsible for the activation and proliferation of T cells (15
,16
).
Despite its most powerful immunosuppressive action over the majority of natural or synthetic cyclosporins, clinical use of CsA is limited by the many and weighty side effects. In fact CsA can cause nephrotoxicity, hypertension, and diseases of lipid metabolism (17
,18
), and, above all, it can favor the excretion of essential elements, such as calcium and magnesium. The direct connection with magnesium and calcium levels has recently led to the investigation of CsA-metal complexes, revealing a strong association with Ca(II) and Mg(II) (19
21
). Besides this, the mechanism of interconversion of the cis 9-10 peptide bond to the trans conformation, pivotal for the possible binding with Cyp, has been investigated in the case of the CsA-lithium complex (22
). From this point of view, the encounter with metal ions may be expected to favor conformational changes in CsA that might affect the interaction with its target receptor (20
,23
,24
).
With the aim of gaining information on the possible involvement of metal ions in the action mechanism of CsA, this work reports on NMR investigations of its interactions with magnesium(II) and cerium(III) as a paramagnetic probe for calcium. It is in fact well known that cerium and calcium have similar ionic radii and similar coordination modes (25
,26
), such that the lanthanide has been thoroughly exploited to probe calcium binding sites in proteins (27
,28
). NMR and circular dichroism studies on the Ca(II) and Mg(II) complexes with CsA have already been reported (21
). Although the evaluated binding constants were consistent with the possible ionophoric properties of CsA, no structural details were obtained and compared with those of free CsA.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Spin lattice relaxation rates (R1) were measured with inversion recovery (IR) pulse sequences. All rates were calculated by regression analysis of the initial recovery curves of longitudinal magnetization components leading to errors not larger than ±3%. Instead of the simple IR sequence, suitable for well-isolated signals, the IR-TOCSY sequence was applied to overlapping NMR resonances (29
). The T1 values were determined by a three-parameter fit of peak intensities to the following equation:
![]() |
Structure determination and molecular dynamics calculations
The intensities of ROESY crosspeaks for free CsA, the CsA-Mg(II), and the CsA-Ce(III) complexes, referenced to crosspeaks related to proton pairs at fixed distances, were converted into proton-proton distance constraints; these constraints were then used to build a pseudopotential energy for structure determination through a simulated annealing (SA) procedure in torsion angle space with the program DYANA (30
). For the CsA-Ce(III) complex, additional metal-proton distance constraints were obtained from the R1 values (vide infra).
The calculations were performed with 300 random starting structures of CsA and 10,000 steps of SA. Since only one molecule can be given as input in the program, for the complexes we linked the peptide to the metal ion through a long chain of linkers, i.e., residues made by atoms without van der Waals radius. These linkers could freely rotate around their bonds, without causing steric repulsions, allowing us to sample a large number of relative positions of the ligand with respect to the magnesium and cerium ions before the minimization step. CsA contains several nonstandard amino acids, so that the topologies of these residues had to be added to the DYANA library: this was achieved by building these residues with the program MOLMOL 2K 1.0 (31
), starting from the corresponding standard amino acids and adding the necessary atoms, bond distances, angles, and dihedrals in a sequential way. Moreover an upper distance constraint of 1.34 Å with a force constant of 100 was imposed between the carbonyl carbon of residue 11 and the amide nitrogen of residue 1 to cyclize the peptide.
On the best structures obtained with this procedure we performed an energy minimization followed, for the magnesium complex, by a molecular dynamics (MD) simulation using the program GROMACS (32
,33
) with the ffG43a2 force field (34
). In this case the nonstandard amino acids were already present in the chosen force field, and the cyclization of the peptide was explicitly taken into account adding to its topology the necessary bonds, angles, and dihedrals, involving residues 11 and 1, defined as in a standard peptide bond between two consecutive residues. The structure was first minimized in vacuo with the steepest descents method and then with conjugate gradient. Then it was solvated using a parallelepiped box of acetonitrile (35
), with periodic boundary conditions imposing that the minimum distance between any atom of the peptide and the box edge be 1.5 nm. The charge of metal ions was balanced by adding, respectively, two Cl ions for the CsA-Mg(II) complex and three Cl ions in the case of the Ce(III) complex. The resulting systems were again energy minimized and subsequently, in the case of the CsA-Mg(II) complex, brought to the temperature of 298 K through six MD runs in each of which the temperature was raised by 50 K. Then an MD simulation of 100 ps at constant temperature T = 298 K was performed. During these simulations distance constraints of 0.190.26 nm were imposed between the metal and its coordinating oxygens (36
).
The final structure of the CsA-Mg(II) complex (excluding the solvent), obtained by the simulation in acetonitrile, was then solvated in water and brought to the temperature of 298 K with the same procedure and parameters mentioned before for acetonitrile, and finally an MD run of 500 ps at T = 298 K was performed. During this trajectory in water the complex was kept fixed at its initial conformation, since our aim in this case was only to investigate possible interactions between the complex and the residual water present in the sample. In both simulations (in acetonitrile and in water) peptide and solvent separately were weakly coupled to a temperature bath at the chosen temperature and to a pressure bath at 1 atm, with relaxation times
T = 0.1 ps and
P = 0.5 ps, respectively, using Berendsen's weak coupling algorithm (37
); bond lengths were constrained to equilibrium values using the SHAKE procedure (38
), with a geometric tolerance of 104 and the time step set to 2 fs. Nonbonded interactions were treated using a twin range method (39
): within a short-range cutoff of 0.8 nm all interactions were determined at every time step, whereas longer range contributions within a cutoff of 1.4 nm were evaluated each time the pair list was generated.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
NMR studies on the CsA-Mg(II) complex
The addition of 0.5 equivalents of Mg(II) to the CsA sample caused the appearance of additional sets of signals in the one-dimensional (1D) spectra (Fig. 2 A). Moreover, the addition of further 0.5 equivalents of Mg(II) resulted in the complete disappearance of the signals belonging to free CsA and the consequent increase in intensity of the new ones. This is in agreement with the formation of 1:1 CsA-Mg(II) complex in slow exchange with the free form on the NMR timescale, as previously reported for CsA complexes with Mg(II) and Ca(II) (20
).
|
|
|
-protons should be measured. The observed proton relaxation rate variations
R1 (Table 1) of the various residues are instead affected to a different extent, suggesting a structural rearrangement of CsA upon Mg(II) coordination, rather than a global mobility change.
|
-protons of these two residues (Fig. 5 A).
|
|
|
|
The complete 1H and 13C assignments of the cerium(III) complex are shown in Tables S4 and S5. The comparisons of proton and carbon chemical shifts with those of the free form (Fig. 3 B) indicate that the most affected carbonyl signals belong to residues 1, 4, 6, and 11, strongly supporting involvement of the corresponding carbonyl oxygens in Ce(III) binding.
Longitudinal relaxation rates (R1) were measured for the CsA-Ce(III) complex and used to obtain metal-proton distance constraints (Table 3), based on the Solomon and Curie equations in the appropriate form for lanthanides (44
), taking into account the paramagnetic nature of the metal:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
I is the proton magnetogyric ratio,
I and
S are the proton and electron precession frequencies,
r is the rotational correlation time of the protein,
M is the lifetime of the metal-peptide complex,
e is the electronic relaxation time of the metal ion, and r is the proton-metal distance.
|
e = 0.4 ps or 0.1 ps, respectively, and they were used as upper and lower limits for structure determination. The analysis of the ROESY spectrum of the CsA-Ce(III) complex shows that residues 9 and 10 conserve a cis peptide bond and a new cis bond appears between residues 5 and 6 (Fig. 5 B).
Forty-five intraresidue and 17 sequential ROEs obtained from the analysis of 2D ROESY spectra were converted into interproton distance constraints which were used, together with proton-metal distance constraints obtained from the R1 values, to obtain the final structures reported in Fig. 6 C. Additional metal-carbonyl oxygen distance constraints were imposed for the coordinating residues (MeBmt1, MeLeu4, MeLeu6, and MeVal11). The backbone RMSD of the best four structures was 0.03 nm. The ROE violations are reported in Table 4. A comparison between the best structure of free and Ce(III)-bound families is shown in Fig. 6 B. An energy minimization was performed on the obtained CsA-Ce(III) structure, using only the oxygenmetal ion distances already imposed for the structure calculation as restraints (36
).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A comparison of the CsA-Mg(II) complex chemical shifts with those of the free form suggests binding of magnesium to the carbonyl oxygens of residues from 4 to 6. In particular, the downfield shift observed for MeLeu4, Val5, MeLeu6 carbonyl signals in the CsA-Mg(II) complex (Fig. 3 A) indicates a direct metal coordination, whereas the upfield shift of MeBmt1, Sar3, Ala7, and MeLeu10 should be correlated to conformational changes or secondary binding effects (19
). The involvement in metal binding of residues from 4 to 6 is supported also by the effects recorded on their
-carbon and
-proton shifts (Fig. 3 A) and by the strong relaxation rate variations (Table 1). In addition to the above mentioned findings, which are in agreement with those previously reported (20
,21
), the conformation of Mg(II)-complexed CsA has been determined by restrained SA based on the obtained NMR data (Fig. 6 A). Upon Mg(II) complexation, a bending of the polypeptide chain in correspondence with the
-carbons of residues 1 and 6 occurs (Fig. 6 B). Regarding the presence of secondary structure elements, the CsA-Mg(II) complex shows a bend spanning residues 36 and a ß-bridge extending from MeVal11 to Abu2. Metal binding to residues 46 can explain the bend-like structure found in this region and the observed trans-cis isomerization of the Sar3-MeLeu4 peptide bond.
As shown in Fig. 6 A, only the metal position is better arranged after energy minimization and MD simulation of the CsA-Mg(II) complex, as a consequence of consideration of electrostatic contributions arising from atomic charges, whereas the overall peptide conformation is quite conserved, also in the absence of any constraints except those between the Mg(II) ion and its three coordinating oxygens. A remarkable feature of the obtained structures is the position of the carbonyl oxygen of residue 1, whose distance to the metal remains fixed to the binding value of 0.20 nm along all the md1 trajectory, without imposing on it any distance restraint, suggesting its coordination to the metal ion. Such a result is not in agreement with the NMR MeBmt1 carbonyl chemical shift variation shown in Fig. 3. In fact this shift, although large, exhibits an opposite sign compared to those of residues MeLeu4, Val5, and MeLeu6 ruling out, in principle, the involvement in metal coordination. Such behavior could be due to a stronger binding of magnesium to residues 4, 5, and 6 with respect to residue 1, which determines a redistribution of the electronic density, resulting in a deshielding effect on the former three residues and in a shielding effect on residue 1. Since magnesium is known to adopt a octahedral coordination geometry (41
,42
), the involvement of the oxygens of two water molecules to complete the Mg(II) coordination sphere was hypothesized; it is in fact reasonable to think that the peptide cannot provide further donors to the metal, since no other peptide atoms, except carbonyl oxygens of residues 4, 5, 6, and 1, remain within binding distance from magnesium along the MD simulation in acetonitrile (md1). Therefore an MD simulation of the CsA-Mg(II) complex in water (md2) was performed. In all the snapshots reported in Fig. 7, the oxygens of two water molecules (W1590 and W1592) were found within Mg(II) binding distance. The Mg(II)-O(W1590) and Mg(II)-O(W1592) distances have therefore been monitored every picosecond along the whole MD trajectory (Fig. 8), showing that their values remain in the range of 0.180.21 nm, typical of Mg-O binding. These findings strongly suggest that magnesium maintains a pseudo-octahedral binding geometry, where residues MeLeu4, Val5, and MeLeu6 are coordinated more strongly than MeBmt1, and the two water molecules W1590 and W1592 complete the coordination sphere.
|
0.20 nm from OG1 (1
As for the CsA-Ce(III) complex, interpretation of chemical shift variations with respect to the free form takes advantage of Ce(III) being a paramagnetic shift reagent, such that this effect is expected to largely prevail on diamagnetic effects, although no direct correlation can be made in this case between the sign of the chemical shift and metal binding. Indeed the observed variations are in general larger than in the case of magnesium, particularly for carbonyl carbons (Fig. 3 B). These data suggest metal coordination to the carbonyl oxygens of residues MeBmt1, MeLeu4, MeLeu6, and MeVal11. Since CsA slowly exchanges from the cerium complex in the NMR timescale, the measured R1 values can be directly used to obtain information on metal-proton distances through the Solomon and Curie equations (Table 3). The largest R1 values are found for the ß-proton of MeBmt1, the N-methyl and
-protons of MeLeu6, the ß-proton of Ala7, the N-methyl proton of MeVal11. Taking into account the lack of information on the remaining residues, these data are in agreement with the above mentioned coordination mode. Moreover, two cis peptide bonds are found, one between MeLeu9 and MeLeu10 and another between Val5 and MeLeu6. The conformation of Ce(III)-complexed CsA here obtained from ROE and R1 data (Fig. 6 C) shows a bend including residues 46 and a ß-bridge going from MeVal11 to MeBmt1.
Since cerium is known to adopt the same mode of coordination of calcium (25
,26
), these results can be compared with those reported in the literature for the CsA-Ca(II) complex (20
,21
), suggesting that Ca(II) coordination more strongly involves the region including residues 115, and the conservation of the cis bond between residues 9 and 10.
A comparison among free, Mg(II)-complexed, and Ce(III)-complexed CsA conformations highlights a bending of the two metal complexes with respect to free CsA at residues 11/1 and 6, which can be explained by the fact that metal binding occurs in both cases in the region spanning residues 116, leaving almost unaffected the complementary region (including the presence of the MeLeu9-MeLeu10 cis bond), in agreement with previous data (21
).
The two metal complexes show a similar pattern of secondary structural elements but have the second cis peptide bond in different positions, in agreement with the different binding mode displayed by magnesium and cerium.
The findings here ratify the formation of strong 1:1 complexes of CsA with both magnesium(II) and cerium(III) in acetonitrile, in agreement with previous reports (20
,21
). In both cases metal coordination takes place at carbonyl oxygens and yields substantial changes in conformation when compared to the average structure assumed by free CsA. However, the residues involved in metal coordination and the resulting conformational changes are different for the two metals.
The magnesium ion binds to the carbonyl oxygens of MeLeu4, Val5, and MeLeu6 and, more weakly, to the carbonyl oxygen of MeBmt1, and the oxygens of two residual water molecules complete the Mg(II) pseudo-octahedral coordination sphere. Magnesium complexation causes a bending of the peptide in correspondence of residues MeBmt1 and MeLeu6, the trans-cis isomerization of the peptide bond between Sar3 and MeLeu4, and a variation of the global H-bond pattern.
The cerium ion binds to the carbonyl oxygens of residues MeBmt1, MeLeu4, MeLeu6, and MeVal11. This type of coordination is accompanied by a bending of the peptide and by the trans-cis isomerization of the Val5-MeLeu6 peptide bond. The large effect on peptide conformation is in agreement with the fact that Ce(III) binds to atoms placed in different regions of the molecule, which are quite far from one another in free CsA.
Upon binding the two metal ions, the electrostatic potential surface of CsA is modified, as shown in Fig. 9, in a way that increases the hydrophobicity of the molecule.
|
| SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We acknowledge the CIRMMP (Consorzio Interuniversitario Risonanze Magnetiche di Metalloproteine Paramagnetiche) for financial support.
Submitted on September 9, 2005; accepted for publication November 17, 2005.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Wenger, R. M. 1985. Synthesis of cyclosporine and analogues: structural requirements for immunosuppressive activity. Angew. Chem. 24:7785.[CrossRef]
3. Raghavan, S., and M. A. Rasheed. 2004. Modular and stereoselective formal synthesis of MeBmt, an unusual amino acid constituent of cyclosporin A. Tetrahedron. 60:30593065.[CrossRef]
4. Potter, B., R. A. Palmer, R. Withnall, T. C. Jenkins, and B. Z. Chowdhry. 2003. Two new cyclosporin folds observed in the structures of the immunosuppressant cyclosporin G and the formyl peptide receptor antagonist cyclosporin H at ultra-high resolution. Org. Biomol. Chem. 1:14661474.[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Hsu, W., S. L. Heald, M. W. Harding, R. E. Handschumacher, and I. M. Armitage. 1990. Structural elements pertinent to the interaction of cyclosporin A with its specific receptor protein, cyclophilin. Biochem. Pharmacol. 40:131140.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Loosli, H., H. Kessler, H. Oschkinat, H.-P. Weber, T. J. Petcher, and A. Widmer. 1985. Peptide conformations. Part 31. The conformation of cyclosporin A in the crystal and in solution. Helv. Chim. Acta. 68:682703.[CrossRef]
7. Kessler, H., H. R. Loosli, and H. Oschkinat. 1985. Peptide conformations. Part 30. Assignment of the 1H-, 13C-, and 15N-NMR spectra of cyclosporin A in CDCl3 and C6D6 by a combination of homo- and heteronuclear two-dimensional techniques. Helv. Chim. Acta. 68:661681.[CrossRef]
8. Ran, Y., L. Zhao, Q. Xu, and S. H. Yalkowsky. 2001. Solubilization of cyclosporin A. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2:E2.[CrossRef][Medline]
9. El Tayar, N., A. E. Mark, P. Vallat, R. M. Brunne, B. Testa, and W. F. van Gunsteren. 1993. Solvent-dependent conformation and hydrogen-bonding capacity of cyclosporin A: evidence from partition coefficients and molecular dynamics simulations. J. Med. Chem. 36:37573764.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Neri, P., R. Meadows, G. Gemmecker, E. Olejniczak, D. Nettesheim, T. Logan, R. Simmer, R. Helfrich, T. Holzman, J. Severin, and S. Fesik. 1991. 1H, 13C and 15N backbone assignments of cyclophilin when bound to cyclosporin A (CsA) and preliminary structural characterization of the CsA binding site. FEBS Lett. 294:8188.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Weber, C., G. Wider, B. von Freyberg, R. Traber, W. Braun, H. Widmer, and K. Wuthrich. 1991. The NMR structure of cyclosporin A bound to cyclophilin in aqueous solution. Biochemistry. 30:65636574.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Fesik, S. W., R. T. Gampe, T. F. Holzman, D. A. Egan, R. Edalji, J. R. Luly, R. Simmer, R. Helfrich, V. Kishore, and D. H. Rich. 1990. Isotope-edited NMR studies show cyclosporin A has a trans 9,10-amide bond when bound to cyclophilin. Science. 250:14061409.
13. Theriault, Y., T. M. Logan, R. Meadows, L. Yu, E. T. Olejniczak, T. F. Holzman, R. L. Simmer, and S. W. Fesik. 1993. Solution structure of the cyclosporin A/cyclophilin complex by NMR. Nature. 361:8891.[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Wüthrich, K., B. von Freyberg, C. Weber, G. Wider, R. Traber, H. Widmer, and W. Braun. 1991. Receptor-induced conformation change of the immunosuppressant cyclosporin A. Science. 254:953954.
15. Schreiber, S. L., M. W. Albers, and E. J. Brown. 1993. The cell cycle, signal transduction, and immunophilin-ligand complexes. Acc. Chem. Res. 26:412420.[CrossRef]
16. Klee, C. B., H. Ren, and X. Wang. 1998. Regulation of the calmodulin-stimulated protein phospatase, calcineurin. J. Biol. Chem. 273:1336713370.
17. Kahan, B. D. 1989. Cyclosporine. N. Engl. J. Med. 321:17251738.[Medline]
18. Matsuda, S., and S. Koyasu. 2000. Mechanisms of action of cyclosporin. Immunopharmacology. 47:119125.[CrossRef][Medline]
19. Dancer, R. J., A. Jones, and D. P. Fairlie. 1995. Binding of the immunosuppressant peptide cyclosporin A to calcium, zinc and copper. Is cyclosporin A an Ionophore? Aust. J. Chem. 48:18351841.[CrossRef]
20. Carver, J. A., N. H. Rees, D. L. Turner, S. J. Senior, and B. Z. Chowdhry. 1992. NMR studies of the Na+, Mg2+, and Ca2+ complexes of cyclosporin A. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 22:16821684.
21. Cusack, R., L. Grondhal, D. Fairlie, G. Hanson, and L. Gahan. 2003. Studies of the interaction of potassium(I), calcium(II), magnesium(II) and copper(II) with CsA. J. Inorg. Biochem. 97:191198.[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Kofron, J. L., P. Kuzmic, V. Kishore, G. Gemmecker, S. W. Fesik, and D. H. Rich. 1992. Lithium Chloride perturbation of cis-trans peptide bond equilibria: effect on conformational equilibria in cyclosporin A and on time-dependent inhibition of cyclophilin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114:26702675.[CrossRef]
23. Shaw, R., H. H. Mantsch, and B. Z. Chowdhry. 1994. Conformational changes in the cyclic undecapeptide cyclosporin induced by interaction with metal ions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 16:143148.[CrossRef][Medline]
24. Kock, M., D. Seebach, H. Kessler, and A. Thaler. 1992. Novel backbone conformation of CsA: the complex with lithium chloride. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114:26762686.[CrossRef]
25. Shannon, R. D. 1976. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr. A. A32:751767.[CrossRef]
26. Horrocks, W., and D. R. Sudnick. 1981. Lanthanide ion luminescence probes of the structure of biological macromolecules. Acc. Chem. Res. 14:384392.[CrossRef]
27. D'Amelio, N., E. Gaggelli, N. Gaggelli, F. Mancini, E. Molteni, D. Valensin, and G. Valensin. 2003. The structure of the Ce(III)-Angiotensin II complex as obtained from NMR data and molecular dynamics calculations. J. Inorg. Biochem. 95:225229.[CrossRef][Medline]
28. Bertini, I., M. B. Janik, Y. M. Lee, C. Luchinat, and A. Rosato. 2001. Magnetic susceptibility tensor anisotropies for a lanthanide ion series in a fixed protein matrix. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123:41814188.[CrossRef][Medline]
29. Huber, J. G., J. M. Moulis, and J. Gaillard. 1996. Use of 1H longitudinal relaxation times in the solution structure of paramagnetic proteins. application to [4Fe-4S] proteins. Biochemistry. 35:1270512711.[CrossRef][Medline]
30. Güntert, P., C. Mumenthaler, and K. Wüthrich. 1997. Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the program DYANA. J. Mol. Biol. 273:283298.[CrossRef][Medline]
31. Koradi, R., M. Billeter, and K. Wüthrich. 1996. MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Graph. 14:5158.[CrossRef][Medline]
32. Lindahl, E., B. Hess, and D. van der Spoel. 2001. GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J. Mol. Model. (Online). 7:306317.
33. Berendsen, H., D. van der Spoel, and R. van Drunen. 1995. GROMACS: a message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation. Comput. Phys. Comm. 91:4356.[CrossRef]
34. Van Gunsteren, W. F., X. Daura, and A. Mark. 1998. GROMOS force field. Encyclopaedia of Computational Chemistry. 2:12111216.
35. Guàrdia, E., R. Pinzón, J. Casulleras, M. Orozco, and F. J. Luque. 2001. Comparison of different three site interaction potentials for liquid acetonitrile. Mol. Simul. 26:287306.[CrossRef]
36. Torda, E. A., R. M. Scheek, and W. F. van Gunsteren. 1989. Time-dependent distance restraints in molecular dynamics simulations. Chem. Phys. Lett. 157:289294.[CrossRef]
37. Berendsen, H., J. Postma, W. F. van Gunsteren, A. Di Nola, and J. Haak. 1984. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81:36843690.[CrossRef]
38. Ryckaert, J., G. Ciccotti, and H. Berendsen. 1977. Numerical integration of the Cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J. Comput. Phys. 23:327341.[CrossRef]
39. Berendsen, H. 1995. Treatment of long range forces in molecular dynamics. In Molecular Dynamics and Protein Structure. J. Hermans, editor. Polycrystal Book Service, Western Springs, IL. 1822.
40. Baxter, N. J., and M. P. Williamson. 1997. Temperature dependence of 1H chemical shifts in proteins. J. Biomol. NMR. 9:359369.[CrossRef][Medline]
41. Glusker, J., A. Kats, and C. Bock. 1999. Metal ions in biological systems. The Rigaku Journal. 16:816.
42. Bock, C., J. Glusker, and A. Kaufman. 1994. Coordination of water to magnesium cations. Inorg. Chem. 33:419427.[CrossRef]
43. Sillèn, L. G., and A. Martell. 1971. Stability constants. The Chemical Society, London, Special Publication No. 25.
44. Bertini, I., and C. Luchinat. 1996. NMR of paramagnetic substances. Coord. Chem. Rev. 150:1292.[CrossRef]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |