help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on December 2, 2005.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.105.072942
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.105.072942v1
90/5/1607    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holmgren, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rakowski, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holmgren, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rakowski, R. F.
Biophysical Journal 90:1607-1616 (2006)
© 2006 The Biophysical Society

Charge Translocation by the Na+/K+ Pump under Na+/Na+ Exchange Conditions: Intracellular Na+ Dependence

Miguel Holmgren * and Robert F. Rakowski {dagger}

* National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, Maryland; and {dagger} Department of Biological Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to R. F. Rakowski, Tel.: 740-593-2330; Fax: 740-593-0300; E-mail: rakowski{at}ohio.edu.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The effect of intracellular (i) and extracellular (o) Na+ on pre-steady-state transient current associated with Na+/Na+ exchange by the Na+/K+ pump was investigated in the vegetal pole of Xenopus oocytes. Current records in response to 40-ms voltage pulses from –180 to +100 mV in the absence of external Na+ were subtracted from current records obtained under Na+/Na+ exchange conditions. Na+-sensitive transient current and dihydroouabain-sensitive current were equivalent. The quantity of charge moved (Q) and the relaxation rate coefficient (ktot) of the slow component of the Formula-sensitive transient current were measured for steps to various voltages (V). The data were analyzed using a four-state kinetic model describing the Na+ binding, occlusion, conformational change, and release steps of the transport cycle. The apparent valence of the Q vs. V relationship was near 1.0 for all experimental conditions. When extracellular Na+ was halved, the midpoint voltage of the charge distribution (Vq) shifted –25.3 ± 0.4 mV, which can be accounted for by the presence of an extracellular ion-well having a dielectric distance {delta} = 0.69 ± 0.01. The effect of changes of Formula on Formula-sensitive transient current was investigated. The midpoint voltage (Vq) of the charge distribution curve was not affected over the Formula concentration range 3.13–50 mM. As Formula was decreased, the amount of charge measured and its relaxation rate coefficient decreased with an apparent Km of 3.2 ± 0.2 mM. The effects of lowering Formula on pre-steady-state transient current can be accounted for by decreasing the charge available to participate in the fast extracellular Na+ release steps, by a slowly equilibrating (phosphorylation/occlusion) step intervening between intracellular Na+ binding and extracellular Na+ release.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Studies of transient current associated with the Na+/K+ pump
Nakao and Gadsby (1Go) were the first to report pre-steady-state transient current associated with the Na+/K+ pump in the absence of K+ in cardiac myocytes. The strophanthidin-sensitive difference current elicited by voltage jumps requires the presence of intracellular ATP and Na+, and is blocked by oligomycin B. The amount of charge translocated (measured as the integral of the transient current) has a sigmoid voltage-dependence that can be described by a Boltzmann distribution with an apparent valence (z) of 1.0 appropriate for a single positive charge moved through the entire membrane field. The voltage-dependence of transient current has also been studied in intact (2Go) and cut-open Xenopus oocytes (3Go). Dihydroouabain- (DHO) and Formula-sensitive transient currents measured in K+-free internal and external solutions were shown to be similar in their voltage-dependence and kinetic properties. The transient current is dependent on the presence of intracellular Na+ and nucleotides, and is diminished by activation of forward Na+/K+ pumping, by addition of extracellular K+ or by addition of 10 µg ml–1 oligomycin B. The voltage-dependence of the steady-state charge distribution and the relaxation rate coefficient of the transient current can be described by a simple two-state model in which only the reverse rate coefficient is voltage-dependent. Time-resolution of current obtained with the two-microelectrode and cut-open oocyte techniques is limited by the rise time of the voltage steps that can be achieved. Rettinger et al. (4Go) obtained improved temporal resolution using the patch-clamp technique and Hilgemann (5Go) was able to separate the transient current recorded from cardiac myocytes into two components using the giant patch technique. The highest temporal resolution of the transient current has been obtained in squid giant axons in which it was possible to demonstrate the existence of three current components that are thought to correspond to the sequential release of three Na+ ions to the extracellular solution (6Go).

Lack of data on the effects of intracellular Na+ on charge movement in cellular preparations
A relatively large number of studies have been published that were restricted to the examination of deocclusion and extracellular Na+ release steps by limiting the availability of ADP and by operating at saturating Formula in Xenopus oocytes, squid giant axons, and cardiac myocytes (2Go,6Go,7Go). No previous work in a cellular preparation has been published that examines the effect of changes in Formula on transient current by the Na/K pump. On the other hand, intracellular effects on charge translocation have been extensively studied in noncellular systems. Intracellular Na+ binding has been studied in proteoliposomes (8Go,9Go) and in Na+,K+-ATPase-containing membrane fragments adsorbed onto lipid bilayers (10Go,11Go). These studies have led to the hypothesis that intracellular Na+ binding to the Na+/K+ pump has a dielectric coefficient of ~0.25. The first two Na+ ions are thought to bind to two negatively charged sites, and to do so in an electroneutral fashion. All of the charge movement associated with intracellular Na+ binding has been ascribed to the binding of the third ion to an Na+-selective site in a shallow internal ion-well (12Go,13Go).

Postulated effect of intracellular Na+ on transient current
In this report, we examine the effect of extracellular and intracellular Na+ on pre-steady-state charge translocation mediated by the Na+/K+ pump in oocytes in which the internal solution composition was controlled by direct perfusion or by equilibration across a region of membrane permeabilized with saponin. Rather than restricting the partial reactions of the pump cycle to only those associated with deocclusion and release of Na+ at its external face, we wished to examine the ability of Formula to increase the amount of charge deoccluded and released from the external face of the enzyme. The experiments described here were performed in the presence of 5 mM internal ATP and ADP. This promotes electroneutral Na+/Na+ exchange by permitting the slow reverse reaction step, resulting in phosphorylation of ADP to ATP. In these conditions, both the forward and reverse steps that are associated with binding and occlusion of Na+ at the internal side of the enzyme can occur. This should allow equilibration of internal Na+ with its occlusion sites and thus make additional Na+ available for release in response to a depolarizing voltage pulse. The experiments described below are designed to test this postulated effect of Formula on pre-steady-state current.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Preparation and incubation of oocytes
Oocyte-positive, adult female African clawed frogs (Xenopus laevis) were obtained from Xenopus I (Ann Arbor, MI) and were maintained on a high protein diet in freshwater tanks. The methods of dissection, enzymatic treatment, and incubation of oocytes have been described previously (13Go,14Go). Oocytes were stored at 17°C in Barth's solution with 50 µg ml–1 streptomycin and 50 units ml–1 penicillin. The Barth's solution had the following composition: 88 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 2.4 mM NaHCO3, 0.82 mM MgSO4, 0.33 mM Ca(NO3)2, 0.41 mM CaCl2, and 5 mM Tris HEPES (pH = 7.1).

Experimental solutions
100 Na, 0 K external solution had the following composition: 100 mM Na sulfamate, 20 mM tetraethylammonium (TEA) sulfamate, 3 Mg sulfamate, 5 mM Ba(NO3)2, 2 mM Ni(NO3)2, 0.01 mM Gd(NO3)3, 0.3 mM niflumic acid, and 10 mM Tris HEPES (pH = 7.6). The 0 Na 0 K external solution was obtained by equimolar substitution of tetramethylammonium for Na+. Intermediate extracellular Na+ concentrations were obtained by mixing 100 Na 0 K and 0 Na 0 K solutions. The composition of the internal solution was 50 mM Na sulfamate, 20 mM TEA sulfamate, 10 mM MgSO4, 5 mM MgATP, 5 mM TrisADP, 5 mM 1,2-bis(2-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid, 30 mM N-methyl D-glucamine (NMDG) sulfamate, and 10 mM Tris HEPES (pH = 7.3). Na+-free internal solution was prepared by equimolar substitution of NMDG for Na+. Intermediate intracellular Na+ concentrations were obtained by mixing internal solutions containing 50 and 0 mM Na+. Note that both ATP and ADP were present in the intracellular solution to promote electroneutral Na+/Na+ exchange (15Go,16Go). The solutions were designed to minimize non-pump-mediated current. Extracellular TEA+ (20 mM) was present to block passive K+ conductance (3Go,17Go). NMDG was used as an internal Na+ substitute in the expectation that it would be less likely to compete for Na+ binding sites than smaller cations. The solutions were nominally chloride-free and were also Ca2+-free to prevent activation of Ca2+-dependent anionic current. Ni2+ and Gd3+ were present to block Na+/Ca2+ exchange (18Go) and stretch-activated cation channels (19Go), respectively.

Electrophysiological measurements
Two modifications (internal perfusion and saponin permeabilization) of the open-oocyte, guarded-seal technique (20Go) were used to study the effect of intracellular and extracellular Na+ on transient current mediated by the Na+/K+ pump. The effect of changes in Formula was studied in internally perfused oocytes as described previously (3Go,21Go). Internal perfusion was performed through a glass micropipette (internal diameter of 0.58 mm and length of ~1 cm) that injected solution at a rate of 50–60 µl h–1. On the other hand, because longer duration experiments could be performed, the effect of changes in Formula was also studied in permeabilized oocytes. After the cell was mounted with its (dark) animal pole oriented toward the intracellular compartment of the experimental chamber, it was permeabilized by adding 0.1% saponin to the intracellular compartment. Permeabilization resulted in a decrease in access resistance and large increase in total capacitance that resulted in an increase in the time constant of small amplitude (10–20 mV) test voltage-clamp pulses. Permeabilization required from 3 to 10 min, after which the solution was replaced by the experimental intracellular solution and allowed to equilibrate for an additional period of time (10–30 min) until there was no change in steady-state or transient current magnitude. Permeabilization with saponin permitted stable electrical recording for more than 2 h. Internally perfused oocytes were not as stable as permeabilized oocytes, but allowed changes of internal solution to be made whereas equilibration at various Formula was too slow to be practical in permeabilized oocytes. Since both the charge relaxation rate coefficients and the total charge moved (Qtot) obtained with perfused oocytes were in agreement with those obtained after saponin treatment, we conclude that saponin treatment has no effect on the transient currents measured in this study.

The voltage-clamp system was obtained from DAGAN (Model CA-1 High Performance Oocyte Clamp; Minneapolis, MN). The holding potential was –40 mV. Voltage pulses from 30 to 40 ms in duration were made from the holding potential to command potentials over the range –180 to +100 mV in increments of 20 mV. Pulses were applied every 500 ms. The current records were obtained by averaging 12–20 repetitions of the pulse protocol. Data were acquired using an analog-to-digital converter system and software (TL-1 DMA interface, 100 KHz, PCLAMP version 6; Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) running on an IBM-compatible computer system (Dell Computer, Austin, TX). The analog signal was filtered at 2–5 KHz before being digitized, and was sampled every 66 µs.

Difference current was calculated by subtraction of the current records obtained after halting Na+/Na+ exchange by addition of 20 µM DHO or removal of Formula from records acquired just before stopping the exchange (3Go). Despite the presence of the various channel blocking agents, a steady-state (leakage) current was still observed. Part of the leakage current may arise owing to imperfect electrical isolation by the guard compartment. In some experiments, a time-dependent increase in steady-state leakage current also required subtraction. The rate of increase of the leakage current was sufficiently slow, however, that it could be treated as time-independent during the voltage pulses. The integral and relaxation rate coefficient of the transient current were determined using CLAMPFIT software modules of PCLAMP 6.0. The Formula- or DHO-sensitive transient current was preceded by a fast component with a time course close to that of the voltage step (relaxation rate >2000 s–1). Therefore, the transient current was fit with the sum of two-exponential relaxation rate coefficients, but only the relaxation rate coefficient of the slow component was analyzed further. The integral of the slow component was determined by direct numerical integration of the subtracted current records over a 35-ms time period starting 400–800 µs after the start of the voltage step. The integral of the fast component was not calculated. Further analysis, least-squares curve fitting, and preparation of figures were done with SIGMAPLOT software (Systat Software, Richmond, CA). Curve fit parameters are reported means ± SE of the value obtained from the least-squares fitting procedure. Experiments were performed at room temperature (~22°C).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Kinetic model for internal Na+ occlusion and extracellular Na+ release
A pseudo-three-state kinetic model of reaction steps that are presumed to occur between the Na+-occluded, ADP-bound form of the enzyme ((Na3)E1P·ADP) and the release of 3 Na+ to the extracellular space from the E2P form of the enzyme (Reaction Scheme 1) has been described in detail by Peluffo (22Go):

Formula
The first-order rate constant k1 describes the Formula and voltage-independent release of ADP from the left-most intermediate. The parameter {kappa}–1 is a pseudo-first-order rate coefficient describing the rebinding of ADP, defined by the following equation: {kappa}–1 = k–1[ADP], where k–1 is a second-order rate coefficient and [ADP] is the intracellular ADP concentration. The value of k–1 measured by Peluffo (22Go) was 6.89 x 104 s–1 M–1. Since all of the experiments described here were done at 5 mM [ADP], a value of {kappa}–1 of 345 s–1 is used in all of the least-squares curve-fitting calculations described below in which this rate coefficient is explicit rather than lumped with others. The rate coefficient {kappa}–2 is a voltage- and Formula-dependent rate coefficient that describes extracellular Formula rebinding and occlusion. Its relationship to other parameters can be written as

Formula 1(1)
where k–2 is a voltage-independent rate coefficient that combines extracellular Na+ rebinding and occlusion as well as the conformational change E2P to E1P. The expression Formula 1 exp(–zFVm/RT) accounts for Na+ ion rebinding within an extracellular access channel. The parameter n in this equation is the apparent molecularity of the charge-moving process, as described below. The rate coefficient k2 describes the E1P–E2P conformational change accompanied by Na+ deocclusion followed by rapid release of 3 Na+ to the extracellular space. In principle, the release steps should also be voltage-dependent, since they are postulated to occur within the same extracellular ion-well as the Na+-rebinding steps described by Eq. 1. However, for the sake of simplicity, it is assumed that the voltage-dependence of Na+ release can be ignored, since those steps occur after the relatively slow E1P–E2P conformational change with which they have been lumped. This simplification was found to be acceptable in previous work (2Go,22Go), and is likely to hold true, except at very negative membrane potentials, which would slow the extracellular Na+ release steps so they are comparable in rate to the deocclusion step. Attempts to include the voltage-dependence of extracellular Na+ release in Scheme 1 showed that a shallow minimum would be produced in the ktot vs. V relationship. This behavior has been observed in preliminary experiments at very low Formula 1 but has not been investigated in detail.

Effect of extracellular Na+ on the pre-steady-state Q vs. V relationship
Fig. 1 A shows Formula 1-sensitive difference current records from an oocyte bathed in 100 mM Na+. The records are the subtracted average of 20 current transients elicited by voltage-clamp pulses measured before and after removal of Formula 1. Additional data were recorded from this oocyte at 50, 25, and 12.5 mM Formula 1. At the end of the experiment the extracellular solution was changed back to 100 mM Na+ and DHO-sensitive current transients were measured that were comparable to those shown in Fig. 1 A (open triangles in Fig. 1, B and E). A similar comparison of Formula 1- and DHO-sensitive difference current at 100 mM Formula 1 has been made previously (3Go).


Figure 1
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1  Extracellular Na+-sensitive current transients from a permeabilized oocyte equilibrated with 50 mM intracellular Na+. (A) Averaged current records are shown for Formula 1 = 100 mM. Voltage-clamp pulses, 40-ms in duration, were done in increments of 20 mV from –180 to +100 mV from a holding potential of –40 mV. The Formula 1-sensitive difference current for each voltage was determined by subtraction of 20 records obtained after removal of Na+ from 20 in its presence. For clarity, only the five difference current records elicited by voltage-clamp pulses to –180, –120, –60, 0, and +60 mV are shown. The sequence of changes to nonzero values of Formula 1 in experiments of this kind was performed in random order. In this experiment, the sequence was 100, 0, 50, 0, 12.5, 0, 25, 0, and then again 100 mM Formula 1, followed by addition of 20 µM DHO. (B) Voltage-dependence of the normalized charge moved during the on (Qon). Open circles and triangles correspond to data from the beginning and end of the experiment, respectively, at an Formula 1 of 100 mM. Other data measured at 50 mM (solid circles), 25 mM (open squares), and 12.5 mM (solid squares). The solid lines are least-square fits of Eq. 2 to Qon for the data at various Formula 1 values. The data were normalized by subtraction of Qmin and dividing by the total charge (Qtot) determined at 100 mM Formula 1 from a preliminary fit to a nonnormalized version of Eq. 2. (C) The least-squares values of z, mean ± SE, from the fits obtained in B are plotted as a function of Formula 1 (solid circles). The data in B were also fit simultaneously to Eq. 4. The best-fit values were z = 0.99 ± 0.03, n = 1.56 ± 0.06, and A = 18.2 ± 2.7 M–1. The solid and dashed lines in C represent the least-squares value of z, mean ± SE, respectively, from this simultaneous fit. (D) The least-squares values of Vq determined from the individual fits in B are plotted at each Formula 1 (solid circles). The mean ± SE is smaller than the diameter of the symbols. The solid line is calculated according to Eq. 5 with the best-fit values of z, n, and A determined in B. (E) Voltage-dependence of the slow charge relaxation rate coefficient (ktot). Open and solid symbols as in B. For each concentration, the value shown at –40 mV was obtained by averaging the data from the off-transients. The mean ± SE for the data at –40 mV is smaller than radius of the symbols. The solid lines are the least-squares fit of Eqs. 1 and 6, with the value of {kappa}–1 set to 345 s–1, and Km(0) set to 3.2 mM. The parameter values obtained from the fit were k1 = 597 ± 22 s–1, k2 = 287 ± 14 s–1, and k–2 = 221 ± 14 s–1 M–1. The data shown in A–E were obtained from the same oocyte.

 
The difference current records in Fig. 1 A have two components—a fast component (truncated at this gain) that has a time course similar to the rise-time of the voltage step (400–600 µs), and a slow component whose relaxation rate coefficient is voltage-dependent. Holmgren et al. (6Go) have been able to further separate the fast component in experiments on squid giant axons and have shown that there are three distinct sequential steps in the release of Na+ that are postulated to correspond to the deocclusion and release of each of the three translocated Na+ ions. The temporal resolution of the present experiments, however, was insufficient to resolve the fast components. We, therefore, restrict our analysis to the slow component. The integral of the slow component during the on (Qon) for the records in Fig. 1 A and similar records obtained at various Formula 1 was normalized by dividing by its respective value of Qtot. The resulting data are plotted in Fig. 1 B.

Alternative Q vs. V relationships for Scheme 1
The normalized pre-steady-state charge distribution (Q(V) Qmin)/Qtot for Scheme 1 can be written in several forms. The traditional (Boltzmann) form of the charge distribution is given by Eq. 2,

Formula 2(2)
where Qtot is the total available amount of moveable charge, Qmin is the minimum value of charge approached at extreme negative voltages, z is the apparent valence of the charge, Vq is the midpoint voltage of the charge distribution, V is the membrane potential during the test voltage step, and F, R, and T have their usual meanings. The solid lines in Fig. 1 B are the best fits of Eq. 2 to the data at each Formula 2. Equation 2 can be written in an alternative form that accounts for the effect of changes in Formula 2, as follows. For Scheme 1, the midpoint voltage Vq is defined by Eq. A10 of Peluffo (22Go) and is given here slightly modified as Eq. 3:

Formula 3(3)
Substitution of Eq. 3 in Eq. 2 gives the expression for the Q vs. V relationship of

Formula 4(4)
where Formula 4. Rearranging Eq. 3, we obtain the following expression for Vq:

Formula 5(5)

The apparent valence (z) is independent of Nao+
The solid circles in Fig. 1 C (mean ± SE) are the values of the apparent valence (z) determined by the least-squares fit of Eq. 2 to the data at each Formula 5 in B. The value of z obtained from the simultaneous fit of all of the data in Fig. 1 B to Eq. 4 is shown as the solid line (mean ± SE, dashed lines) in Fig. 1 C. There is no obvious dependence of z on Formula 5 and its value is close to 1.0. In this study, curve fits that included the parameter z were performed initially with z as a free parameter. Since the mean value of z was found to be not-significantly-different from 1.0, it was simply set equal to 1.0 for subsequent fits. Previous measurements of pre-steady-state transient current in intact oocytes (2Go) or oocytes internally perfused with ADP (3Go,22Go) are also consistent with a value of z = 1.0.

Extracellular Na+ dependence of the midpoint voltage (Vq)
The values of Vq determined from the least-squares fit of Eq. 2 to the data in B at each Formula 5 are plotted in Fig. 1 D. The solid line is drawn according to Eq. 5, using the parameters determined from the simultaneous fit of Eq. 4 to the entire data set in B. The parameters z and n in Eqs. 35 are related by the expression: z = nq{delta} (23Go), where q is the charge of the translocated species (+1.0 for Na+) and {delta} is the fractional distance that it moves through the membrane field. The two alternative methods of fitting the Q vs. V data in B (Eqs. 2 and 4) gave identical values of z = 0.99 ± 0.03 for both methods and n = 1.56 ± 0.06 from Eq. 4. From these values, we calculate a value of {delta} = 0.63 ± 0.05. This is consistent with various estimates of the dielectric coefficient for extracellular Na+ release (e.g., 0.65) (11Go). An additional calculation based on a summary of all such data in this study is given in Fig. 2 below.


Figure 2
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2  Effect of Formula 5 on the voltage-dependence of extracellular Na+-sensitive charge and current relaxation rate coefficient in permeabilized oocytes equilibrated with solutions containing 50 mM Formula 5. The data were obtained from seven oocytes in which the extracellular Na+-sensitive Qon was determined at 100 mM Formula 5 and at least at one other concentration. (A) Voltage-dependence of the normalized charge at 100 mM Formula 5 (open circles, N = 9, where N is the number of measurements made at this concentration), 50 mM (solid circles, N = 5), 25 mM (open squares, N = 3), and 12.5 mM (solid squares, N = 3). Solid lines are calculated from a least-squares fit of Eq. 4 to the data. The best-fit values for the parameters were z = 1.01 ± 0.01, n = 1.47 ± 0.03, and A = 11.8 ± 0.9. The data from each oocyte at each Formula 5 were normalized by subtraction of Qmin and dividing by the value of total charge (Qtot) determined by a preliminary fit of Q(V) from Eq. 2 to the data at each Formula 5. (Inset) Solid circles are the values of Vq obtained from fits of Eq. 2 to the data at each Formula 5. The solid line is calculated according to Eq. 5 with the best-fit values of z, n, and A given above. (B) Voltage-dependence of the charge relaxation rate coefficient (ktot) of Formula 5-sensitive current at various Formula 5. Symbols correspond to those in A. The solid lines are least-squares fits of Eqs. 1 and 6 to the data with the value of {kappa}–1 set to 345 s–1. The best-fit parameters were k1 = 852 ± 31 s–1, k2 = 252 ± 13 s–1, and k–2 = 113 ± 6 s–1 M–1. (Inset) Solid circles are the values of z mean ± SE determined from the fit of Eq. 2 to the Q(V) data in A. The least-squares value of z, mean ± SE, from the fit of the data in A to Eq. 4 is shown as the solid and dashed lines, respectively. For the entire figure, the mean ± SE is smaller than the size of the symbol if no error bar is visible.

 
Voltage-dependence of the relaxation rate coefficient for Scheme 1
Scheme 1 does not attempt to separate the kinetics of extracellular Na+ rebinding into individual components for each Na+ ion or to consider the voltage-dependence of the extracellular Na+ release steps. The rate coefficient {kappa}–2 in Scheme 1 describes a lumped extracellular Na+ rebinding process and includes the E2P–E1P conformational change. Three eigenvalues are expected to describe the transient behavior of Scheme 1. One eigenvalue is zero. The other two are obtained from the two real roots of a quadratic expression. The eigenvalue of interest is the one associated with the negative root since the requirement that the rate coefficients be positive means that the negative root will be the smaller of the two, and therefore will govern the slow rate coefficient of charge relaxation. The voltage-dependence of the rate coefficient for slow-charge relaxation (ktot) is shown for various Formula 5 in Fig. 1 E. The relaxation-rate coefficient of the slow component is given by Eq. 6, which is the negative root of the quadratic expression obtained for Scheme 1 (see (22Go)):

Formula 6(6)

Summary of the effect of changes in extracellular Na+ in oocytes equilibrated with 50 mM intracellular Na+
Fig. 2 is a summary of the data obtained from seven oocytes in which Formula 6-sensitive transient current was initially measured in 100 mM Formula 6 and subsequently in at least one other Formula 6. The oocytes were permeabilized with saponin and exposed to 50 mM Formula 6. The least-squares fit of Eq. 4 to the data in A gave values of z = 1.01 ± 0.01 and n = 1.47 ± 0.03. This corresponds to a value of {delta} of 0.69 ± 0.02 corresponding to a shift of the midpoint voltage of –25.3 ± 0.4 mV for each halving of Formula 6, values that are consistent with previous measurements in oocytes and squid giant axon (24Go,25Go). The inset in Fig. 2 A shows Vq determined from individual fits of Eq. 2 (solid circles). The solid line is a plot of Vq calculated from Eq. 5 using the parameters from the simultaneous fit of the data in A to Eq. 4. The mean values of the relaxation rate coefficient of slow charge (ktot) measured in these seven oocytes at various Formula 6 are plotted in Fig. 2 B. The solid lines are calculated from the least-squares fit of Eqs. 1 and 6 to the data using the parameters given in the figure legend. The solid circles in the inset are the values of z (mean ± SE) from the individual fits to Eq. 2 to the data in Fig. 2 A. The solid and dashed lines show the value of z (mean ± SE) obtained from the fit of Eq. 4 to the data in A.

Effect of intracellular Na+ on the availability of pre-steady-state charge
The following kinetic model can be written to describe equilibrium binding of intracellular Na+ ions to the E1ATP conformation of the enzyme. The electrogenic binding of Na+ within a shallow internal ion-well is expected to occur very rapidly compared to a subsequent slow occlusion reaction (13Go). We assume that these steps can be lumped as a single reaction step governed by a holding-potential dependent equilibrium coefficient (Km(Vh)). See Scheme 2, below:

Formula 6
This model extends Scheme 1 by preceding the ADP release step with a slow binding and occlusion step that equilibrates at the holding potential. Apell and Diller (26Go) have presented evidence that the proton-binding affinity of the E1 conformation of the pump is significantly greater than the E2P form and that the first two intracellular binding sites for Na+ are occupied either by H+ or Na+, thereby resulting in no net charge translocation for the exchange of intracellular Na+ and H+ at the first two sites to be occupied before Na+ occlusion. Since the intracellular binding site for the third Na+ ion is located within a shallow internal access channel having a dielectric coefficient ({delta}i) of ~0.25 (12Go), Km(Vh) is given by

Formula 7(7)
where Km(0) is the dissociation coefficient for binding of the third intracellular Na+ in the absence of a membrane potential. Scheme 2 also assumes that the charge movements associated with ADP release are small and can be neglected. Since the charge available to participate in the E1–E2 conformational change and the charge translocation associated with extracellular Na+ rebinding are limited by the slow intracellular Na+ equilibration step, we may write the following expression for Q(V) for Scheme 2:

Formula 8(8)
Note the distinction in Eq. 8 between V, the membrane potential during the test step, and Vh, the holding potential. The assumption of equilibrium binding at intracellular Na+ sites is supported by the measurements of Heyse et al. (9Go), who found a forward rate constant of 1.5 x 107 s–1 M–1 and reverse rate constant of 1.64 s–1 for the intracellular Na+ binding step to the unphosphorylated enzyme. We may also write an expression for Q(V) in the traditional form that is convenient for curve-fitting data at a fixed Formula 8 and has one fewer free parameter:

Formula 9(9)
Since intracellular Na+ binding that is below saturation limits the forward rate k1(Na3)E1P·ADP, we may write an expression for an effective forward rate coefficient (kf) that gives its relationship to the rate coefficient k1 that was defined for Scheme 1,

Formula 10(10)
The parameter kf may be substituted for k1 in Eq. 6, to give the following expression for the relaxation rate coefficient for Scheme 2,

Formula 11(11)

Effect of intracellular Na+ on the amount of charge moved and its relaxation kinetics
The effect of Formula 11 on Formula 11-sensitive transient current was investigated at 50 mM extracellular Na+. This concentration was selected because the midpoint voltage of the steady-state charge distribution is near the holding potential (–40 mV) at saturating Formula 11 (50 mM, see Fig. 2 A). This is advantageous, since equal-magnitude voltage pulses in either the positive or the negative direction will result in approximately equal-magnitude charge transients. Examples of the effect of changes in Formula 11 on internally perfused oocytes are shown in Fig. 3. Fig. 3, A and B, show data from an oocyte perfused with 50 mM (open circles) and 25 mM (solid circles) Formula 11. There is a reduction both in the magnitude of the charge moved (Fig. 3 A) and its relaxation rate coefficient (Fig. 3 B) as Formula 11 is reduced. This is made more evident in Fig. 3, C and D, obtained from a different oocyte initially perfused with 50 mM Formula 11, followed by perfusion with 3.13 mM Formula 11. The effect of Formula 11 on the measurable slow-charge movement is summarized in Fig. 3 E, which shows averaged data from 12 experiments like those in Fig. 3, A and C. For each oocyte, the available charge measured at a particular Formula 11 (Q(Nai)) was normalized with respect to the total charge measured at 50 mM Formula 11 (Qtot) in that oocyte. The solid line in Fig. 3 E is a one-site equilibrium occupancy (Michaelis-Menten) curve for intracellular Na+ binding (Q(Nai)/Qtot = [Na]i /([Na]i + Km(0)), having a least-squares value of Km(0) of 3.2 ± 0.4 mM. The interpretation is that binding of the third Na+ to its intracellular occlusion site (26Go) equilibrates at a given holding potential and increases the occupancy of the phosphorylated 3 Na+ ion-occluded state ((Na3)E1P·ADP), thereby increasing the amount of charge available to be moved through the ADP release, conformational change, and extracellular Na+ release steps. In contrast to the effect of Formula 11 on the amount of charge measured, Fig. 3 F shows the lack of effect of Formula 11 on Qtot over the concentration range 12.5–100 mM.


Figure 3
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3  Effect of intracellular and extracellular Na+ on Formula 11-sensitive transient current in internally perfused oocytes. Voltage-dependence of Formula 11-sensitive charge (A) and its relaxation rate coefficient (B) from an oocyte perfused with 50 mM (open circles) and 25 mM (solid circles) Formula 11. Formula 11-sensitive charge (C) and its relaxation rate coefficient (D) from a second oocyte perfused with 50 mM (open circles) and 3.13 mM (solid circles) Formula 11. The Formula 11-sensitive transient current at the two different Formula 11 values in each oocyte were obtained after allowing 20 min for the perfusing solution to equilibrate at the new concentration. The data points in A and C are the mean ± SE of the on- and off-charge for each voltage pulse. The relaxation rate coefficients in B and D were measured from the on-current transient except the point at the holding potential of –40 mV, which is the mean value of the off-relaxation rate coefficient. The solid lines through the charge data represent the best fit of Eq. 8 to the data with z set equal to 1.0. The best-fit parameter values are Qtot = 153 ± 11 pC, Qmin = –67 ± 5 pC, Vq = –32 ± 2 mV, and Km(–40) = 11 ± 3 mM for the data in A; and Qtot = 95.6 ± 1.1 pC, Qmin = –42.3 ± 0.7 pC, Vq = –33 ± 1 mV, and Km(–40) = 3.23 ± 0.16 mM for the data in C at 50 mM Formula 11. The solid lines in B and D are the best fit of Eqs. 1, 7, 10, and 11 to the data. The parameter z was set equal to 1.0, n equal to 1.47, {kappa}–1 = 345 s–1, Km(0) = 3.2 mM, and{delta}i. = 0.25 The best-fit parameters are k1 = 880 ± 80 s–1, k2 = 250 ± 30 s–1, and k–2 = 200 ± 30 s–1 M–1 for the data in B; and k1 = 770 ± 80 s–1, k2 = 180 ± 30 s–1, and k–2 = 180 ± 20 s–1 M–1 for the data in D. (E) The maximum values of Q measured in 12 oocytes at the indicated Formula 11 (Q(Nai)) were normalized to the value obtained at 50 mM Formula 11 (Qtot). The solid line is the best fit of Q(Nai)/Qtot = 1/(1 + (Km(0)/[Na]i)) to the data. The best-fit value for Km(0) was 3.2 ± 0.4 mM. (F) Formula 11-dependence of Qtot. Open circles are the average Qtot at each Formula 11 for all of the data summarized in Fig. 2 A. Solid circles are values of Qtot for the data from the single oocyte in Fig. 1 B. The solid line is the average Qtot from all Q vs. V measurements over the concentration range 12.5–100 mM external Na+ (20 measurements from seven oocytes). Dashed lines are mean ± 3 SE. Intracellular Na+ was 50 mM in all of the experiments in F.

 
Effect of intracellular Na+ on the extracellular Na+-sensitive transient current
Fig. 4 A shows the mean values of the normalized charge measured at four different Formula 11 (50>, 25Go, 6Go.25, and 3.13 mM) from 10 experiments like (and including) those shown in Fig. 3, A and C, in which it was possible to make measurements at 50 mM Formula 11 and at least one other concentration. In contrast to the finding that reduction of Formula 11 produces a leftward shift of the Q vs. V curve (Figs. 1 B and 2 A) the position of the Q vs. V curve is unchanged when Formula 11 is lowered. We interpret this to be a consequence of the fact that the transient charge movement being measured includes only extracellular Na+-sensitive current. Scheme 2 assumes that the charge transients that are expected to result from electrogenic Na+ binding of the third Na+ within an internal ion-well (12Go,26Go) are not observed, because this binding step is followed by a subsequent slow occlusion step that equilibrates at the holding potential but which, in effect, isolates the intracellular binding steps from the more rapid extracellular Na+ release steps. The least-squares fit of Eq. 2 to the normalized data with z set equal to 1.0 gives a value for the single free-parameter of Vq = –36 ± 1 mV. Fig. 4 B shows the mean values of the charge relaxation rate coefficients measured at these four Formula 11. The least-squares fit to the data gave a Km(0) of 3.2 ± 0.02 mM and the additional parameters listed in the figure legend.


Figure 4
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4  Effect of intracellular Na+ on the voltage-dependence of extracellular Na+-sensitive current transients. The extracellular solution contained 50 mM Na+. (A) Normalized charge at an intracellular Na+ of 50 mM (open circles, n = 10), 25 mM (solid circles, n = 3), 6.25 mM (open squares, n = 6), and 3.13 mM (solid squares, n = 5). The solid line is the best fit to Eq. 2 and gave Vq = –36 ± 1 mV and z = 0.93 ± 0.03. (B) Voltage-dependence of ktot at various Formula 11. Symbols correspond to those in A. Solid lines in B are the best fit of Eqs. 1, 7, 10, and 11 to the data. The parameter z was set equal to 1.0, n = 1.47, and {kappa}–1 = 345 s–1. The best-fit parameters were k1 = 650 ± 60 s–1, k2 = 219 ± 18 s–1, k–2 = 310 ± 30 s–1 M–1, {delta}i = 0.22 ± 0.12, and Km(0) = 3.2 ± 0.2 mM.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Measurements of the dielectric coefficient for extracellular Na+ release
The data in Fig. 2 A give a calculated value of {delta} = 0.69 ± 0.02 from the least-squares values of z and n. The equality of the shift in the midpoint voltage of the Q vs. V and ktot vs. V curves with each doubling of Formula 11 is strong evidence for the existence of an extracellular ion well. This value of {delta} (elsewhere also called {lambda}o) agrees with previous charge-relaxation measurements in intact Xenopus oocytes (2Go) using a two-microelectrode voltage-clamp technique (calculated to be 0.70 ± 0.04 from the observed shift of –24.8 ± 1.7 mV per doubling of Formula 11). Gadsby et al. (25Go) reported a value of 0.69 ± 0.04 studying 22Na+ unidirectional efflux mediated by electroneutral Na+/Na+ exchange in squid giant axon. De Weer et al. (27Go) measured a value of {delta} = 0.61 ± 0.03 in squid axon under backward-pumping conditions, and Holmgren et al. (6Go) measured a value of 0.71 ± 0.04 for the slow component of charge relaxation in squid giant axon. The agreement of these values is remarkably close, despite the fact that they were determined under different experimental conditions and in two different species. The fact that the external ion-well depth ({delta}) is a robust parameter, independent of the intracellular [ATP] and [ADP], supports the hypothesis that it is determined only by structural considerations and represents the fractional electrical distance at which Na+ ions are deoccluded and released to the extracellular face of the enzyme. It will be of considerable interest to determine if mutations in the vicinity of the postulated extracellular Na+ ion egress sites (28Go) produce structural changes that have an effect on the profile of the electric field in this region and thereby change the value of {delta}.

Lack of effect of extracellular Na+ on the magnitude of Qtot
Rakowski (2Go) reported that increases in Formula 11 produce an increase in the value of Qtot. This effect was not predicted by the pseudo-three-state model proposed in that study. It was suggested that extracellular Na+ is able to recruit more enzyme to participate in the slow electrogenic reactions from a nonparticipating pool. In apparent contradiction with this previous study, the data in Fig. 3 F show that, under Na+/Na+ exchange conditions (both saturating ATP and ADP present), there is no effect of Formula 11on the magnitude of Qtot. We suggest that the postulated nonparticipating pool has been fully recruited by the presence of both ADP and ATP (29Go), whereas, in the intact oocytes in the previous study, the intracellular [ADP] was likely to be too low to fully activate Na+/Na+ exchange owing to active metabolic production of ATP from ADP.

Lack of effect of changes in intracellular Na+ on the midpoint voltage of the Q vs. V curve
A surprising finding of these studies is the lack of effect of changes in Formula 11 on the midpoint voltage (Vq) of the steady-state Q vs. V relationship (Fig. 4). Based on the results of others that support the presence of a shallow internal-facing ion-well having a dielectric coefficient of ~0.25 (9Go,11Go), we expected to observe a shift of the midpoint voltage of the Q vs. V curve to the right. That this effect of Formula 11 on the Q vs. V curve was not seen can be explained by the isolation of intracellular binding steps from extracellular release steps by a relatively slow occlusion reaction, as described for Scheme 2. On the other hand, the kinetics of slow-charge relaxation were affected by changes in Formula 11, as predicted by Eqs. 10 and 11 for Scheme 2.

The apparent valence of charge translocation (z) under Na+/Na+ exchange conditions
All of the data in this study are consistent with a value of z = 1.0. Initially we performed fits to the data that allowed z to be a free parameter. The mean value of z determined from these initial fits was not statistically significantly different from 1.0 (p < 0.01, N = 26). The absence of K+ in both the internal and external solutions prevents the operation of the complete cycle of the Na+/K+ pump in either its forward or reverse mode. In this study, the presence of 5 mM ADP and ATP in the internal solution, and the presence of intra- and extracellular Na+, strongly favor the operation of the Na+/K+ pump in its electroneutral Na+/Na+ exchange mode without net hydrolysis of ATP (15Go,16Go). Previous work in oocytes in the presence or absence of ADP (22Go) also gave values of z near 1.0. The observation that z is near 1.0 in the absence of ADP (which restricts the pump to extracellular Na+ deocclusion and release steps) is consistent with the assumption of Scheme 2 that the slow intracellular ion occlusion step, in effect, isolates charge movement associated with intracellular Na+ binding from the extracellular Na+-sensitive deocclusion and release steps. This isolation provides an explanation of why neither the midpoint voltage (Vq) nor exponential steepness (z) of the transient charge are affected by changes in Formula 11. The present study does not provide an answer to the question of whether electroneutral Na+/Na+ exchange is 3:3 or 1:1. Either stoichiometry could be consistent with an apparent valence (z) of 1.0.

Effect of intracellular Na+ on the magnitude of the Q(V) relationship and the kinetics of charge relaxation
The effect of Formula 11 on the magnitude of the Q(V) relationship (Fig. 3 E) can be accounted for by a simple one-site binding model with a Km(0) of 3.2 ± 0.4 mM (Eqs. 79). The effect of Formula 11 on the relaxation rate coefficient of pre-steady-state charge (Fig. 4 B) provides a second estimate (Eqs. 10 and 11) for Km(0) of 3.2 ± 0.2 mM. These values are comparable to the value of 3.6 ± 0.5 mM obtained for the highest affinity of three intracellular Na+ sites by measurement of the activation of ATP-dependent Na+/Na+ exchange by cytoplasmic Na+ in liposomes containing reconstituted shark Na+,K+-ATPase (30Go) and the value of 3 mM measured by titration by Grell et al. (31Go). However, as discussed by Grell et al. (31Go), the value of Km(0) is strongly affected by pH and the presence of other cations that effectively compete with Na+ at its negatively charged intracellular binding sites. The close agreement may, therefore, simply be coincidental. We assume that the increase in the Q(V) curves, as [Na+]i is raised, results from production of additional 3 Na+-occluded enzyme and the increase in the slow-charge relaxation rate coefficient results from Formula 11 increasing the effective forward occlusion rate coefficient kf as described by Eq. 10. The data in Figs. 2 B and 4 B do not provide strong support for the predicted saturation of the ktot vs. V relationship. Greater temporal resolution of fast, medium, and slow components of charge movement will be required to examine whether the predicted saturation of the slow component can be clearly demonstrated.

Comparison of the values of the rate coefficients k1, k2, and k–2 with previous work
All of the curve-fits that require a value for the pseudo-first-order rate coefficient {kappa}–1 use a value of 345 s–1 based on the measurement of k–1 of 6.89 x 104 s–1 M–1 by Peluffo (22Go) and the assumption that the intracellular [ADP] has a value close to that of the intracellular experimental solution (5 mM). The rate coefficient k1 determined here (650 ± 60 s–1) falls between that of Peluffo (22Go) (404 s–1) and that reported by Campos and Beaugé (32Go) (1067 s–1). It is in good agreement with the value of 600 s–1 reported by Heyse et al. (10Go). Estimates of the rate coefficient k2 vary widely, but the value determined here of 219 ± 18 s–1 is within the range of values measured by others (20–300 s–1) in a variety of preparation using various methods. The value of k2 reported by Peluffo (22Go) (130 s–1) is somewhat lower. The value of the rate coefficient k–2 of 310 ± 30 s–1 M–1 reported here is more rapid than those found by Rakowski (2Go) (150 s–1 M–1) and by Peluffo (22Go) (162 s–1 M–1). The reason for this twofold discrepancy is not clear. However, the ratio k2/k–2 found here (0.7 M) is close to that of Peluffo (22Go) (0.8 M), as expected for low affinity extracellular binding. It should be noted that these rate coefficients are thought to reflect the conformational changes associated with rate-limiting enzymatic steps involving individual Na+ ion deocclusion/reocclusion. The diffusional translocation of ions within the postulated internal and external ion wells is faster than the temporal resolution of our measurements.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Supported by National Institutes of Health grant No. NS-22979.

Submitted on August 22, 2005; accepted for publication November 14, 2005.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
1. Nakao, M., and D. C. Gadsby. 1986. Voltage-dependence of Na translocation by the Na+/K+ pump. Nature. 323:628–630.[CrossRef][Medline]

2. Rakowski, R. F. 1993. Charge movement by the Na+/K+ pump in Xenopus oocytes. J. Gen. Physiol. 101:117–144.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Holmgren, M., and R. F. Rakowski. 1994. Pre-steady-state transient currents mediated by the Na+/K+ pump in internally perfused Xenopus oocytes. Biophys. J. 66:912–922.[Medline]

4. Rettinger, J., L. A. Vasilets, S. Elsner, and W. Schwarz. 1994. Analyzing the Na+/K+-pump in outside-out giant membrane patches of Xenopus oocytes. In The Sodium Pump: Structure, Mechanism, Hormonal Control and Its Role in Disease. E. Bamberg and W. Schoner, editors. Steinkopff Verlag, Darmstadt, Germany. 553–556.

5. Hilgemann, D. W. 1994. Channel-like function of the Na,K pump probed at microsecond resolution in giant membrane patches. Science. 263:1429–1432.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Holmgren, M., J. Wagg, F. Bezanilla, R. F. Rakowski, P. De Weer, and D. C. Gadsby. 2000. Three distinct and sequential steps in the release of sodium ions by the Na+/K+-ATPase. Nature. 403:898–901.[CrossRef][Medline]

7. Gadsby, D. C., M. Nakao, A. Bahinski, G. Nagel, and M. Suenson. 1992. Charge movements via the cardiac Na, K-ATPase. Acta Physiol. Scand. Suppl. 146:11–23.

8. Goldshleger, R., S. J. D. Karlish, A. Rephaeli, and W. D. Stein. 1987. The effect of membrane potential on the mammalian sodium-potassium pump reconstituted into phospholipids vesicles. J. Physiol. 387:331–355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Or, E., R. Goldshleger, and S. J. D. Karlish. 1996. An effect of voltage on binding of Na+ at the cytoplasmic surface of the Na+-K+ pump. J. Biol. Chem. 271:2470–2477.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Heyse, S., I. Wuddel, H.-J. Apell, and W. Stürmer. 1994. Partial reactions of the Na,K-ATPase: determination of rate constants. J. Gen. Physiol. 104:197–240.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Wuddel, I., and H.-J. Apell. 1995. Electrogenicity of the sodium transport pathway probed by charge pulse experiments. Biophys. J. 69:909–921.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Domaszewicz, W., and H.-J. Apell. 1999. Binding of the third Na+ ion to the cytoplasmic side of the Na, K-ATPase is electrogenic. FEBS Lett. 458:241–246.[CrossRef][Medline]

13. Apell, H.-J. 2004. How do P-type ATPases transport ions? Bioelectrochemistry. 63:149–156.[CrossRef][Medline]

14. Smith, L. D., W. Xu, and R. L. Varnold. 1991. Oogenesis and oocyte isolation. In Methods in Cell Biology. Xenopus laevis: Practical Uses in Cell and Molecular Biology. B.K. Kay and H.B. Pengs, editors. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. 45–60.

15. De Weer, P. 1970. Effects of intracellular 5' ADP and orthophosphate on the sensitivity of sodium efflux from squid giant axon to external sodium and potassium. J. Gen. Physiol. 56:583–620.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Glynn, I. M., and J. Hoffmann. 1971. Nucleotide requirements for sodium-sodium exchange catalyzed by the sodium pump in human red cells. J. Physiol. 218:239–256.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Rakowski, R. F., L. A. Vasilets, J. La Tona, and W. Schwarz. 1991. A negative slope in the current-voltage relationship of the Na+/K+ pump in Xenopus oocytes produced by reduction of external. J. Membr. Biol. 121:177–187 [K+].[CrossRef][Medline]

18. Kimura, J., S. Miyamae, and A. Noma. 1987. Identification of sodium-calcium exchange current in single ventricular cells of guinea-pig. J. Physiol. 384:199–222.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Yang, X. C., and F. Sachs. 1989. Block of stretch-activated ion channels in Xenopus oocytes by gadolinium and calcium ions. Science. 243:1068–1071.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Taglialatela, M., L. Toro, and E. Stefani. 1992. Novel voltage-clamp to record small, fast currents from ion channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Biophys. J. 61:78–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Rakowski, R. F., A. Sagar, and M. Holmgren. 1994. Access channel model for Na+ and K+ translocation by the Na+/K+-pump. In The Sodium Pump: Structure, Mechanism, Hormonal Control and Its Role in Disease. E. Bamberg and W. Schoner, editors. Steinkopff Verlag, Darmstadt, Germany. 545–548.

22. Peluffo, R. D. 2004. Effect of ADP on Na+-Na+ exchange reaction kinetics of Na, K-ATPase. Biophys. J. 87:883–898.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Läuger, P. 1991. Electrogenic Ion Pumps. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.

24. Sagar, A., and R. F. Rakowski. 1994. Access channel model for the voltage-dependence of the forward-running Na+/K+ pump. J. Gen. Physiol. 103:869–893.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Gadsby, D. C., R. F. Rakowski, and P. De Weer. 1993. Extracellular access to the Na,K pump: pathway similar to ion channel. Science. 260:100–103.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Apell, H.-J., and A. Diller. 2002. Do H+ ions obscure electrogenic Na+ and K+ binding in the E1 state of the Na,K-ATPase? FEBS Lett. 532:198–202.[CrossRef][Medline]

27. De Weer, P., D. C. Gadsby, and R. F. Rakowski. 2001. Voltage-dependence of the apparent affinity for external Na+ of the backward-running sodium pump. J. Gen. Physiol. 117:315–328.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Sagar, S., and R. F. Rakowski. 2003. Found: Na+ and K+ binding sites of the sodium pump. News Physiol. Sci. 18:164–168.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Kennedy, B. G., G. Lunn, and J. F. Hoffmann. 1986. Effects of altering the ATP/ADP ratio on pump-mediated Na/K and Na/Na exchanges in resealed human red blood cell ghosts. J. Gen. Physiol. 87:47–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Cornelius, F., and J. C. Skou. 1988. Non-equivalent cytoplasmic Na+ sites and their susceptibility to transmembrane interaction from extracellular Na+. In The Na+, K+-Pump, Part A: Molecular Aspects. J.C. Skou, J.G. Nørby, A.B. Maunsbach, and M. Esmann, editors. Alan R. Liss, New York. 485–492.

31. Grell, E., R. Warmuth, E. Lewitzki, and H. Ruf. 1991. Precision titrations to determine affinity of alkali, alkaline earth, and buffer binding to Na, K-ATPase. In The Sodium Pump. Recent Developments. J.H. Kaplan and P. De Weer, editors. Rockefeller University Press, New York. 441–445.

32. Campos, M. A., and L. A. Beaugé. 1997. ATP-ADP exchange reaction catalyzed by Na+, K+-ATPase: dephosphorylation by ADP of the E1P enzyme form. Biochemistry. 36:14228–14237.[CrossRef][Medline]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.105.072942v1
90/5/1607    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal