| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Physics, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Karine Guevorkian, E-mail: guevorkian{at}physics.brown.edu.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|

p, of a whole Paramecium:
We show how the measured 
p compares to the anisotropy of the diamagnetic susceptibilities of the components in the cell. We suggest that magnetic fields can be exploited as a novel, noninvasive, quantitative means to manipulate swimming populations of unicellular organisms. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Here, we demonstrate that static magnetic fields exert torques on elongated mobile and immobile cells (paramecia) without eliciting an active response. Because these torques can be calibrated and adjusted, they have potential as a noninvasive tool to measure the "tactic" active responses of cells to other external stimuli. Specifically, we present investigations of the response of Paramecium caudatum to intense, homogeneous, DC magnetic fields (the response of Paramecium to alternating magnetic fields has been studied before (19
,20
)). We show that the trajectories of motile paramecia curve and nonswimming paramecia turn to become aligned with intense static magnetic fields in excess of
3 Tesla (T). We successfully model these phenomena as a passive rotational response to the net torque that the magnetic field exerts on rigid, diamagnetically anisotropic structures in the cell cortex. The magnetic fields do not induce swimming speed changes that one could associate with a physiological response.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Paramecia were immobilized by being suspended in a 0.5-mM solution of NiCl2 for 1015 min (8
). After immobilization, individual cells were transferred with a micropipette into the experimental chamber. Ficoll (Ficoll 400, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) solution with 11% w/v concentration was used to provide a neutrally buoyant solution for the paramecia. The viscosity of Ficoll solution was estimated to be
at (20±2)°C (23
) (the temperature during the experiment).
Apparatus
The experiments were performed using two magnets: a 50-mm bore, 25-T maximum field, resistive magnet at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory and a superconducting solenoid (American Magnetics, Oak Ridge, TN) with an 11-mm room temperature bore and a maximum field of 9 T.
Paramecia were observed through a 6-mm diameter, side view, borescope (Instrument Technology, Westfield, MA). Their motions were recorded using a VCR and a charge-coupled device camera (Sony XC-333). Green light (565 nm, Luxeon V star LED, Lumileds Lighting, LLC, San Jose, CA) along with 3 x 1 mm optical fibers were used for illumination (a similar setup is described elsewhere (24
)). A frame grabber (EPIX, Buffalo Grove, IL) was used to digitize the movies at five frames per second for 3-min intervals. Associated software (XCAP, EPIX, Buffalo Grove, IL) was used to calculate the trajectories of swimming paramecia. Further analysis was done using custom Matlab (The Mathworks, Natick, MA) codes.
The orientation of a Paramecium's trajectory was defined to be the direction of the axis of its helical motion (26
,27
). After a couple of helical periods, this orientation closely coincides with the orientation of the displacement vector of the total trajectory. Only trajectories that extended a couple of periods or more were analyzed. The angles of individual trajectories,
i, were measured relative to the magnetic field direction. Because some paramecia reverse their direction or make abrupt turns due to avoiding reactions, a filtering procedure was used to eliminate those tracks (on average,
15% of the total tracks).
| RESULTS AND ANALYSIS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We characterize the degree of alignment in different magnetic fields by using a two-dimensional, uniaxial order parameter (28
)
The angular brackets denote an average over the track distribution. For a set of tracks that are perfectly aligned parallel or antiparallel with the field,
Perpendicular and random alignments yield
and
respectively. It is important to emphasize that
describes orientation along an axis and, thus, differs from the orientation coefficient employed in gravitaxis studies, which describes orientation along a specific direction (8
). The dependence of
on B in Fig. 1 e shows that the tracks are substantially aligned near 4.5 T and completely aligned at 9 T.
To help determine whether the magnetic field induced alignment is a passive (purely physical) or an active (physiological) response we investigated the effect of magnetic fields on immobilized Paramecium. Fig. 2 a shows a time series of images of an immobilized, neutrally buoyant Paramecium in a Ficoll solution in a 4-T magnetic field. Before being placed in the magnet, this cell was oriented horizontally (perpendicular to the magnetic field) by the use of a thin rod. Once in the magnet it rotated to vertical over the course of
4 min (the viscosity of the Ficoll solution was 6.5 times the viscosity of water). The time dependence of this rotation and those observed at other magnetic field strengths for the same cell are shown in Fig. 2 b. At higher fields the rotation occurs more rapidly and the rate of rotation is largest near 45°. Thus, even nonswimming Paramecium align with a magnetic field in the Tesla range in a manner that depends on field strength. This result suggests that the magnetic alignment of motile paramecia is passive.
|
where 
p is the net anisotropy of the diamagnetic susceptibility of a Paramecium cell (
),
is the angle between its long axis and the magnetic field (see Fig. 2), and µ0 is the magnetic permeability (
). Because the rotations occur at low Reynolds numbers, the orientation rate is linearly proportional to the torque, that is
ß is the drag coefficient for rotation about a minor axis. Integration yields:
![]() | (1) |
We compare the data to this prediction in Fig. 2 c by plotting ln(tan
) versus a rescaled time axis where the scaled time is defined as
For the set of experiments in Fig. 2 b, we chose B0 = 6.4 T as the basis for scaling. With this scaling, the data collapse on a single line, suggesting that the model applies. The slope of the fitted line in Fig. 2 c is used to estimate 
p. The drag coefficient for rotation around the minor axis of a solid ellipsoid of revolution is given by:
(34
) (for Paramecium the semiminor axis, a = 20 x 106 m and semimajor axis, b = 100 x 106 m). The results of trials performed on three different paramecia were (5.9 ± 0.6) x 1023 m3, (7.1 ± 1.4) x 1023 m3 and (6.9 ± 1.5) x 1023 m3, respectively, with the resulting mean value of
In a 4-T magnetic field, this value of diamagnetic anisotropy yields a magnetic potential energy
or 105xkBT indicating that the orientation is completely athermal.
To investigate the origin of the alignment of motile paramecia we analyzed the trajectories of individuals upon their takeoff from the boundary of a chamber. Normally, paramecia take off at random angles and execute straight trajectories. In magnetic fields, however, their trajectories curve toward the axis defined by the magnetic field. This phenomenon is shown in the inset of Fig. 3 a. Notice that the curvature appears for both upward and downward swimmers. Qualitatively, this behavior is expected for a passive response to the magnetic torque described above. The torque superimposes a rotation on the normal translation of the Paramecium. We have tested this effect quantitatively.
|
experiences a total force
where
0 is the density of the liquid, g is the acceleration due to gravity,
is the propulsion force,
is the linear drag coefficient, and v and V are the swimming speed and the volume of the Paramecium, respectively. We presume that Fp is directed along the long axis of the Paramecium. This approximation neglects the torques and resulting angular velocities (26
![]() | (2) |
Integration of the equations gives:
![]() | (3a) |
![]() | (3b) |
= 6
/5(4a + b) for an ellipsoid (36
is the propulsion speed (37
and
0 is the initial angle.
Fig. 3 a shows examples of a set of tracks with similar takeoff angles (symbols) and their respective fits (dashed lines) using the three free parameters, vp,
0, and 
p. Fig. 3 b shows the values obtained for 
p for a number of tracks as a function of magnetic field. The results of averaged values of 
p and vp are summarized in Table 1. Notice that 
p varies little as the field increases from 3 to 10 T (a 10-fold increase in torque). At 17.6 T, however, 
p is significantly lower. This field turns paramecia in less than a helical period, which may render our simplified equations of motion invalid. Excluding the result for 17.6 T, the average 
p for swimming paramecia is (8.3 ± 0.9) x 1023 m3, which is comparable to the values obtained for the immobilized paramecia.
|
c, at which the calculated and measured values of
are comparable (Fig. 4). For the data shown in Fig. 1 e,
c
10 s. This characteristic time corresponds to a characteristic length lc, traveled by the organism that is estimated by
where vp is the
900 µs1. This length is nearly identical to the distance that a Paramecium swims to reach the field of view (center of the chamber) coming from the wall.
|
for the rectangular chamber. The simulation employed the 0-T orientation distributions as the initial distribution and evolved it in time using Eq. 1. Two characteristic times were necessary for fitting the data. We found that for
< 0 (
T), which corresponds to more horizontal than vertical swimmers,
c
6 s provided a good fit (open triangles in Fig. 4). On the other hand, for
which corresponds to more vertical than horizontal swimmers,
c
2 s provided a good fit (open diamonds in Fig. 4). Accordingly, the characteristic length over which the horizontal swimmers can turn in B is lh = 5.4 mm, which is substantially longer than the length over which vertical swimmers can turn lv = 1.8 mm. These two lengths correspond to the halfwidth and halfheight of the experimental chamber (where our field of view was located). This simple approach provides an explanation for the orientation of a distribution based on magnetic torque model and reinforces that the swimming trajectories are oriented through a passive mechanism. | DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3 T. Since immobilized paramecia also align and the time dependence of their alignment is comparable to that of motile paramecia, the latter appears to be a passive response to the magnetic torque. That is, the torque acts on the whole Paramecium and not on some sensing organelle that dictates changes in the direction of swimming. The details of the time dependence of the rotation are consistent with a magnetic torque that is proportional to B2sin2
, where
is the angle between the long axis of the Paramecium and the magnetic field. This dependence intimates that the torque originates in an interaction between the magnetic field and a net anisotropy of the diamagnetic susceptibilities of the constituents of the paramecia.
The result that paramecia respond passively to magnetic fields of the intensity used in our experiments was not predictable. It was at odds with the suggestions made by Rosen and Rosen based on their experiments on Paramecium bursaria in moderate static magnetic fields (0.13 T) (38
). They observed the magnetic field to induce changes in swimming speed and thus, to exert a physiological influence. They speculated that the magnetic fields change the cilia beating pattern by affecting the ion fluxes across the membrane. This alteration could occur if the magnetic field were to distort the membrane shape (39
,40
). Speed changes might also result from magnetic torques exerted directly upon the beating cilia. We saw no clear evidence of speed changes in our substantially larger data set (Table 1) or of altered swimming mechanics. Perhaps, the effect of the high magnetic fields employed in our experiments outweighs these lower field influences considered earlier.
The passive alignment of motile paramecia with magnetic fields differs from that exhibited by magnetotactic bacteria (15
). The bacteria swim parallel to much weaker magnetic fields that are of order 104 T or less. The magnetic torque acts directly on internal chains of permanently magnetic magnetite particles or "magnetosomes" that are rigidly fixed to the bacterium. Also, they only swim toward a specific magnetic pole because the torque on a permanent magnetic dipole has a sin
dependence. By contrast, the induced magnetic moment in paramecia orient them toward both poles because their torque has a sin2
dependence.
In our model of the magnetic reorientation of motile Paramecium, we have been able to neglect the influence of gravitational torques. Gravitational torques can arise because of shape asymmetry (14
) and/or internal density inhomogeneities and tend to orient the Paramecium parallel with the gravity vector. In our experiments, the gravity vector and magnetic field vector are parallel. The gravitational torque is of the general form:
(41
). Mogami et al. (41
) experimentally determined
=0.09 rad s1 for Paramecium caudatum, but point out that this value depends on the age of the cells, which affects their shape and internal density variation. This value for
would give rise to a considerable alignment (order parameter
) at 0 T for the characteristic time
c = 10 s of our experiments. However, our data show a close to random distribution at B = 0 T (Fig. 1 e). We conclude that for our paramecia,
<< 0.09 rad s1 and thus, ignoring gravitational torques is justified.
Given that the alignment appears to be a passive, diamagnetic response, we consider whether the measured anisotropy in the diamagnetic susceptibility, 
p, is reasonable. We start by identifying the structures that are most likely to couple to the magnetic field. Such structures must be rigidly set relative to the Paramecium. Their superposition must possess an axis of symmetry coincident with the long axis of the Paramecium. The structures in the cytoplasm, including the nuclei and contractile vacuoles do not exhibit much symmetry or rigidity and thus, seem unlikely targets. The most obvious candidates are structures associated with the cortex of the Paramecium. The cortex, which envelops the cell, is 4-µm thick, constitutes 40% of the total cell volume and is responsible for its rigidity (42
). The overall structure of the cortex is quite uniform except in the region near the oral groove. Thus, it has the required overall symmetry. Electron micrographs have revealed that the cortex is composed of nearly identical units
1 µm2 in area that are connected to each other in a mosaic pattern in plane with the surface of the Paramecium. Each "cortical unit" includes cilia, trychocysts, plasma membrane, cortical microtubules, and fibrils (43
), all of which have anisotropies in their diamagnetic susceptibilities. It is therefore plausible that a cortical unit has a net anisotropy in its diamagnetic susceptibility, 
cu (assuming the units are cylindrically symmetric). If 
cu < 0, then the superposition of all units produces 
p > 0 so that paramecia align with a magnetic field.
How large is 
cu and is its value reasonable? To address this question, we model the cortex of a Paramecium as a cylindrical tube with a 20-µm outer radius and 200-µm length with hemispherical endcaps (see Fig. 6). The energy difference between parallel and perpendicular alignments with the magnetic field is proportional to 
cuNcu/2, where Ncu is the number of cortical units in the cylinder. Estimating Ncu = 25,000 and equating this to
yields 
cu = 5.4 x 1027 m3 (we have used 
p = 6.7 x 1023 m3). To determine whether this value is realistic, we compare it to the anisotropy of the diamagnetic susceptibility of microtubules. The total anisotropy of the diamagnetic susceptibility of perfectly aligned microtubules filling a volume equivalent to the volume of a cortical unit is
where Nµ is the number of microtubules filling a cortical unit and 
µ is the anisotropy of the diamagnetic susceptibility of a 5-µm-long microtubule (44
). This result suggests that if all the material in the cortical unit has approximately the same anisotropy of the diamagnetic susceptibility as a microtubule then 14% of the total material would have to be aligned to give rise to the observed 
cu. Consequently, we conclude that the measured 
p is reasonable.
|
12 T (45The capability to exert a calibrated, noninvasive torque on a population of swimming organisms has potential as a tool to aid investigations of their responses to other fields or perturbations. For instance, the galvanotactic response of paramecia involves a reorientation, whenever the applied electric field changes direction. This reorientation necessarily requires paramecia to exert a turning torque. The strength of this turning torque can be measured directly by balancing it with a magnetic torque. Thus, an active response can be measured using the passive response to a magnetic torque.
Moreover, magneto-orientation can be used to direct a population of swimming paramecia. This can be extremely helpful in studying the "kinetic" responses of paramecia to other fields such as gravity or chemical gradients, because it can yield a large population of directed swimmers. For example, Paramecium caudatum exhibits a small negative gravikinesis. Upward swimmers propel themselves forward harder than downward swimmers (8
,46
48
). This behavior has received a great deal of attention as it is an example of gravisensitivity at the single cell level (49
51
). It can be difficult to measure, however, because it requires statistical vector analysis of a large number of swimming tracks that are oriented in random directions. To simplify matters, Machemer came up with the elegant idea of applying a second physical field to align the swimming along the gravity vector (8
). He exploited the galvanotactic response of the paramecia to create populations of either upward or downward swimmers. Unfortunately, the active response to the electric fields, which includes speed changes, complicated the analysis of the active gravitational response. By using magneto-orientation in gravikinesis experiments one can enjoy the benefits of Machemer's approach without the complications introduced by the superposition of two active responses.
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|

p, to structures rigidly fixed within the cell cortex. The shape asymmetry of the cell and hence, its cortex and the sign of the anisotropy of each of the cortical units combine so that paramecia experience a net torque aligning their long axis with a magnetic field. We envision using this noninvasive physical field in conjunction with other fields such as chemical gradients or gravity in quantitative studies of the sensitivity of Paramecium to their stimuli. | ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This work was supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration through NAG3-2882. A portion of this work was performed at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, which is supported by National Science Foundation Cooperative Agreement No. DMR-0084173, by the State of Florida, and by the U.S. Department of Energy.
Submitted on July 29, 2005; accepted for publication January 10, 2006.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Dryl, S. 1961. Chemotaxis in Paramecium caudatum as adaptive response of organism to its environment. Acta Biol. Exp. (Warsz). 21:7583.[Medline]
3. Vanhouten, J. 1979. Membrane potential changes during chemokinesis in Paramecium. Science. 204:11001103.
4. Berg, H. C. 2003. E. Coli in Motion. Springer, New York.
5. Hader, D. P. 1987. Polarotaxis, gravitaxis and vertical phototaxis in the green flagellate, Euglena gracilis. Arch. Microbiol. 147:179183.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Colombetti, G., and F. Lenci. 1983. Photoreception and photomovements in microorganisms. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 36:399422.[Medline]
7. Iwatsuki, K., and Y. Naitoh. 1982. Photoresponses in colorless Paramecium. Experientia. 38:14531454.[CrossRef]
8. Machemer, H., S. Machemer-Rohnisch, R. Bräucker, and K. Takahashi. 1991. Gravikinesis in Paramecium: theory and isolation of a physiological-response to the natural gravity vector. J. Comp. Physiol. [A]. 168:112.[CrossRef]
9. Bräucker, R., A. Murakami, K. Ikegaya, K. Yoshimura, K. Takahashi, S. Machemer-Rohnisch, and H. Machemer. 1998. Relaxation and activation of graviresponses in Paramecium caudatum. J. Exp. Biol. 201:21032113.[Abstract]
10. Hemmersbach, R., D. Volkmann, and D. P. Hader. 1999. Graviorientation in protists and plants. J. Plant Physiol. 154:115.[Medline]
11. Machemer-Rohnisch, S., H. Machemer, and R. Bräucker. 1996. Electric-field effects on gravikinesis in Paramecium. J. Comp. Physiol. [A]. 179:213226.
12. Van Hoek, A., V. S. I. Sprakel, T. A. Van Alen, A. P. R. Theuvenet, G. D. Vogels, and J. H. P. Hackstein. 1999. Voltage-dependent reversal of anodic galvanotaxis in Nyctotherus ovalis. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 46:427433.[Medline]
13. Neugebauer, D. C., S. Machemer-Rohnisch, U. Nagel, R. Bräucker, and H. Machemer. 1998. Evidence of central and peripheral gravireception in the ciliate Loxodes striatus. J. Comp. Physiol. [A]. 183:303311.[CrossRef]
14. Roberts, A. M., and F. M. Deacon. 2002. Gravitaxis in motile micro-organisms: the role of fore-aft body asymmetry. J. Fluid Mech. 452:405423.[CrossRef]
15. Frankel, R. B., and R. P. Blakemore. 1980. Navigational compass in magnetic bacteria. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 158:15621564.[CrossRef]
16. Winkleman, A., K. L. Gudiksen, D. Ryan, G. M. Whitesides, D. Greenfield, and M. Prentiss. 2004. A magnetic trap for living cells suspended in a paramagnetic buffer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85:24112413.[CrossRef]
17. Sonek, G. J., Y. Liu, and R. H. Iturriaga. 1995. In situ microparticle analysis of marine-phytoplankton cells with infrared laser-based optical tweezers. Appl. Opt. 34:77317741.
18. Dasgupta, R., S. K. Mohanty, and P. K. Gupta. 2003. Controlled rotation of biological microscopic objects using optical line tweezers. Biotechnol. Lett. 25:16251628.[CrossRef][Medline]
19. Hemmersbach, R., E. Becker, and W. Stockem. 1997. Influence of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on the swimming behavior of ciliates. Bioelectromagnetics. 18:491498.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Nakaoka, Y., K. Shimizu, K. Hasegawa, and T. Yamamoto. 2000. Effect of a 60 Hz magnetic field on the behavior of Paramecium. Bioelectromagnetics. 21:584588.[CrossRef][Medline]
21. Machemer, H., and R. Bräucker. 1992. Gravireception and graviresponses in ciliates. Acta Protozool. 31:185214.[Medline]
22. Nakaoka, Y., R. Takeda, and K. Shimizu. 2002. Orientation of Paramecium swimming in a DC magnetic field. Bioelectromagnetics. 23:607613.[CrossRef][Medline]
23. Chen, X. B., and H. C. Berg. 2000. Torque-speed relationship of the flagellar rotary motor of Escherichia Coli. Biophys. J. 78:10361041.
24. Guevorkian, K., and J. M. Valles. 2005. In Situ imaging of microorganisms in intense magnetic fields. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 76:103706103708.[CrossRef]
25. Reference deleted in proof.
26. Crenshaw, H. C. 1993. Orientation by helical motion. 3. Microorganisms can orient to stimuli by changing the direction of their rotational velocity. Bull. Math. Biol. 55:231255.[CrossRef]
27. Crenshaw, H. C., and L. Edelsteinkeshet. 1993. Orientation by helical motion. 2. Changing the direction of the axis of motion. Bull. Math. Biol. 55:213230.[CrossRef]
28. Chaikin, P. M. T. C. L. 1995. Principles of Condensed Matter Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
29. Torbet, J. 1987. Using magnetic orientation to study structure and assembly. Trends Biochem. Sci. 12:327330.[CrossRef]
30. Maret, G. 1990. Recent biophysical studies in high magnetic-fields. Physica B (Amsterdam). 164:205212.
31. Higashi, T., A. Yamagishi, T. Takeuchi, N. Kawaguchi, S. Sagawa, S. Onishi, and M. Date. 1993. Orientation of erythrocytes in a strong static magnetic-field. Blood. 82:13281334.
32. Hong, F. T. 1995. Magnetic field effects on biomolecules, cells, and living organisms. Biosystems. 36:187229.[CrossRef][Medline]
33. Roberts, A. M. 1970. Motion of Paramecium in static electric and magnetic fields. J. Theor. Biol. 27:97106.[CrossRef][Medline]
34. Berg, H. C. 1993. Random Walks in Biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
35. Naitoh, Y., and K. Sugino. 1984. Ciliary movement and its control in Paramecium. J. Protozool. 31:3140.
36. Happel, J., and H. Brenner. 1973. Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics, with Special Applications to Particulate Media. Noordhoff International Publishing, Leyden, The Netherlands.
37. Fukui, K., and H. Asai. 1985. Negative geotactic behavior of Paramecium caudatum is completely described by the mechanism of buoyancy-oriented upward swimming. Biophys. J. 47:479482.
38. Rosen, M. S., and A. D. Rosen. 1990. Magnetic field influence on Paramecium motility. Life Sci. 46:15091515.[CrossRef][Medline]
39. Rosen, A. D. 1993. A proposed mechanism for the action of strong static magnetic fields on biomembranes. Int. J. Neurosci. 73:115119.[Medline]
40. Rosen, A. D. 2003. Mechanism of action of moderate intensity static magnetic fields on biological systems. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 39:163173.[CrossRef][Medline]
41. Mogami, Y., J. Ishii, and S. A. Baba. 2001. Theoretical and experimental dissection of gravity-dependent mechanical orientation in gravitactic microorganisms. Biol. Bull. 201:2633.
42. Wichterman, R. 1985. The Biology of Parameicum. Plenium Press, New York.
43. Allen, R. D. 1973. Fine structure of the membranous and microfibrillar system in the cortex of Paramecium caudatum. J. Cell Biol. 49:120.[CrossRef]
44. Bras, W., G. P. Diakun, J. F. Diaz, G. Maret, H. Kramer, J. Bordas, and F. J. Medrano. 1998. The susceptibility of pure tubulin to high magnetic fields: a magnetic birefringence and x-ray fiber diffraction study. Biophys. J. 74:15091521.
45. Torbet, J. 2005. Magnetic orientation in biology: virus structure-blood clot assembly-cell guidance. In Material Processing in Magnetic Fields. H. Wanda and H. J. Schneider-Muntau, editors. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore.
46. Hemmersbach, R., R. Voormanns, and D. P. Hader. 1996. Graviresponses in Paramecium biaurelia under different accelerations: studies on the ground and in space. J. Exp. Biol. 199:21992205.
47. Nagel, U., and H. Machemer. 2000. Physical and physiological components of the graviresponses of wild-type and mutant Paramecium tetraurelia. J. Exp. Biol. 203:10591070.[Abstract]
48. Ooya, M., Y. Mogami, A. Izumikurotani, and S. A. Baba. 1992. Gravity induced changes in propulsion of Paramecium caudatum: a possible role of gravireception in protozoan behavior. J. Exp. Biol. 163:153167.
49. Machemer, H. 1998. Mechanisms of graviperception and response in unicellular systems. In Life Sciences: Microgravity Research. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, N.J. 12431251.
50. Hemmersbach, R., R. Voormanns, B. Bromeis, N. Schmidt, H. Rabien, and K. Ivanova. 1998. Comparative studies of the graviresponses of Paramecium and Loxodes. In Life Sciences: Microgravity Research. 12851289.
51. Bräucker, R., A. Cogoli, and R. Hemmersbach. 2002. Graviperception and graviresponse at the cellular level. In Astrobiology: The Quest for the Conditions of Life. G. Horneck and C. Baumstark-Khan, editors. Springer, Berlin. 287296.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |