| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Laboratory for Molecular Biophysics, Physiology and Pharmacology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp Belgium
Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Dirk J. Snyders, MD, PhD, Dept. of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium. Tel.: 32-3-820-23-35; Fax: 32-3-820-23-26; E-mail: Dirk.Snyders{at}ua.ac.be.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The structure of HERG channels is presumably similar to that of other voltage-gated potassium channels: a tetramer of 4
-subunits composed of six transmembrane segments (S1S6), a pore loop (P-loop) and the intracellular amino (N) and carboxyl (C) termini (7
9
). The S1S4 transmembrane segments form the voltage-sensing domain that undergoes conformational changes upon perturbation of the transmembrane potential. The main determinant for the voltage sensitivity is an array of positively charged residues located within the S4 segment (10
). The cytoplasmic activation gate is located at the bottom part of S6 and allows opening and closure of the permeation pathway (11
13
). The N-terminus is composed of a conserved eag or PAS (Per-Arnt-Sim) domain (14
,15
) and a long stretch of
240 amino acids that has been described as a proximal or HERG-specific domain (Fig. 1) (16
).
|
In contrast to the PAS domain, much less is known about the functional role of the proximal domain. Viloria et al. (16
) have shown that a series of deletion mutants in this domain resulted in hyperpolarizing shifts of the midpoint of activation that were dependent on the size of the deletion. It was suggested that the entire proximal domain is involved in the modulation of the gating process, although nearly half of the observed effect could be obtained by deletion of only 19 amino acids at the end of this domain. In addition, Gomez-Varela et al. (27
) reported that deletion of the proximal domain accelerated the forward rate constants during channel opening.
Here, we report that a short cluster of mainly basic residues, which is located in this 19 residue region proximal to the S1 segment, plays a major role in the N-terminal modulation of HERG activation. We propose that the local electric field of this cluster modulates the activation, likely through electrostatic interaction with residues that are located near the channel core.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Electrophysiology
HEK293 cells were cultured in Modified Eagle's Medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 1% nonessential amino acids. The cells were transfected with 1.25 µg of wild-type (WT) or mutant subunits cDNA and 0.5 µg eGFP cDNA, using Hekfectin (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA); and 1224 h after transfection, the cells were trypsinized and used for analysis within 12 h. Cells were kept in culture at 37°C under a 5% CO2 atmosphere.
Current recordings were made with an Axopatch-200B amplifier (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA) in the whole cell configuration of the patch-clamp technique. Experiments were performed at room temperature (2023°C); current recordings were low pass filtered and sampled at 110 kHz with a digidata 1200A data acquisition system (Axon Instruments). Command voltages and data storage were controlled with pCLAMP8 software (Axon Instruments). Patch pipettes were pulled from 1.2-mm Kwik-Fil Borosilicate Glass Capillaries (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL) with a P-2000 puller (Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA). After heat polishing, the resistance of the patch-pipettes was <3 M
in the standard extracellular solution containing (in mM) NaCl 130, KCl 4, CaCl2 1.8, MgCl2 1, HEPES 10, Glucose 10, adjusted to pH 7.35 with NaOH. The pipettes were filled with intracellular solution containing (in mM) KCl 110, K4BAPTA 5, K2ATP 5, MgCl2 1, HEPES 10, and adjusted to pH 7.2 using KOH. Junction potentials were zeroed with the filled pipette in the bath solution. The remaining liquid junction potential was not corrected and was calculated to be 1.7 mV. After achieving a gigaohm seal, the whole cell configuration was obtained by suction. Capacitive transients were elicited by applying a 10 mV voltage step to determine the capacitance, access, and input resistance. The access resistance varied from 1 to 6 M
and was compensated for. Experiments were excluded from analysis if the voltage errors originating from series resistance were >5 mV after compensation.
Data analysis
The holding potential was 80 mV, and the interpulse interval was at least 15 s unless noted otherwise. Details of voltage protocols (voltage range and step duration) were adjusted based upon the different biophysical properties of mutant channels. Time constants of activation, deactivation, onset, and recovery from inactivation were determined by fitting the current recordings with a single or double exponential function. The necessity of a second exponential component was judged both by inspection of difference plots and by F-statistics. Results are expressed as mean ± SE with n the number of cells analyzed. The relative contribution of each deactivation component (%) was calculated based upon the amplitudes of each component and normalized to the total amplitude. The voltage dependence of channel activation was fitted with a Boltzmann equation: y = 1/(1 + exp[(E E1/2)/k]), with E the applied voltage, E1/2 the voltage at which 50% of the channels are activated, and k the slope factor. 1/k corresponds to zF/RT in which z is the equivalent charge and F, R, and T have their usual meanings. The voltage dependence of inactivation was determined as previously described (28
). The Gibbs free energy of activation at 0 mV (
G0) was calculated by
G0 = 0.0002389zFE1/2, with the factor 0.0002389 to express the values in Kcal/mol (29
). The relationship between E1/2 or
G0 values and the local net charge of the KIKER sequence was fitted with a linear function. The time constants of the late phase of activation were fitted with a single exponential function. Their voltage dependence was fit with an exponential function, of which the baseline represents the saturating (asymptotic) value of the activation time constant at strong depolarizations. Goodness-of-fit values r2 and degree of freedom adjusted r2 (DF adj. r2) were calculated to assess the quality of all fitted functions. When needed, a Student's t-test for independent samples was used for statistical significance testing. A Mann Whitney U Rank Sum test was used when unequal variances between the data sets were present. The differences were accepted as significant for the tested p-value below 0.05.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
143372), whereas the remaining sections preceding and following the deletion site were left unchanged (Fig. 1). Compared to WT a large hyperpolarizing shift (
50 mV) of the midpoint of activation was observed (Fig. 2; Table 1).
|
|
171372) was specifically designed to maintain a cluster of basic residues, mimicking the original charge distribution proximal to S1, as the C-end of the remaining sequence preceding the deletion contained several positively charged residues (Fig. 1). Although this subtotal deletion removed
200 of the 240 amino acids of the proximal domain, the midpoint of activation was not significantly different from WT (Fig. 2; Table 1). When this cluster of basic residues was also removed by deletion of an extra 30 amino acids (
143372), a large negative shift was observed in the voltage dependence of activation (Fig. 2). Comparison of the N-terminal sequences in both constructs (i.e.,
171372 and
143372) revealed that the net charge immediately preceding the respective deletion sites was opposite (Fig. 1). Hence, the observed difference in the voltage dependence of activation for both deletions suggests the involvement of the local charge distribution of the proximal domain in modulating the voltage dependence.
To test further whether the shift was not merely caused by the deletion of another 30 amino acids but by the alteration of the local charge distribution, two additional deletion mutations (
143170 and
143361) were created (Fig. 1). The
143170 deletion displayed a mild depolarizing shift (
10 mV) compared to WT, implying that the profound hyperpolarizing shift in voltage dependence of activation of the
143372 deletion compared to the
171372 was not the result of having deleted these extra 30 amino acids (Fig. 2 B). The
143361 deletion, removing almost the entire proximal domain while preserving the charges at the C-terminal part of the proximal domain, revealed a midpoint of activation comparable to that of WT (Fig. 2). Together, these results strongly suggest that the presence of charges in the C-terminal end (362372) of the domain proximal to S1 is required to maintain a WT voltage dependence of activation and that alteration of the local charge distribution modulates the gating properties of HERG.
To investigate this further, we focused on the cluster of basic residues within the region of the terminal 11 residues of the proximal domain. The positively charged residues (K362, K364, R366) of the KIKER sequence were substituted by glutamate resulting in an EIEEE sequence (Fig. 1). In this case the midpoint of activation showed a hyperpolarizing shift of
45 mV, combined with a steepening of the slope factor when compared to WT (Fig. 2, Table 1). The magnitude of the hyperpolarizing shift induced by the EIEEE mutation was similar to the one induced by the near total proximal domain deletion (
143372). Substitution of all charged residues by alanine (i.e., AIAAA) shifted the midpoint of activation by
12 mV (Table 1).
To assess the relative contribution of each charge, the basic residues were each substituted individually by a negatively charged glutamate (Fig. 1). Each substitution consistently displayed a negative shift in the voltage dependence of activation that was intermediate to WT and the triple mutant (EIEEE). The shift of the R366E mutation was more pronounced compared to that of the K362E and K364E mutations (Fig. 2; Table 1). Conversely, changing the glutamate of the KIKER sequence to arginine (E365R) shifted the voltage dependence of activation by
20 mV to more positive potentials (Fig. 2; Table 1).
To evaluate whether the effects on the voltage dependence of activation correlate with the net charge of the KIKER sequence, the midpoint of activation was plotted as a function of the net charges of the different mutants (Fig. 3). A linear function provided a good fit indicating that the E1/2-values correlate well with the local net charge of the KIKER region. When the altered voltage dependence is expressed in terms of Gibbs free energy (30
32
), a similar linear correlation was observed for a local net charge ranging from 4 to +4 (Supplemental Fig. S1). Both approaches indicate that the charges within this segment contribute in an additive manner to the observed effects.
|
C1
C2
O
I) described by Wang et al. (33
C1), necessary to describe the activation behavior of HERG adequately. In this model, the authors described that the initial sigmoidal delay in the activating current largely reflected the early C0
C1 state transition (33
C1 rate constant is obtained by quantifying the sigmoidal delay of activation. Therefore, we determined the time lag between the start of the voltage step and the zero-current time point extrapolated from the exponential rising phase, as illustrated in Fig. 4. It showed that WT, the
171372, and the EIEEE mutations displayed a pronounced delay and sigmoidal phase, whereas the delay was nearly absent in the
143372 mutation. Evaluation of the time lag values confirmed this with values of 53 ± 8 ms and 47 ± 18 ms for WT and the
171372 mutation, respectively. In contrast, the time lag was 8 ± 3 ms for the near total deletion
143372, whereas an intermediate value of 34 ± 6 ms was observed for the charge reversal mutant (EIEEE) (Fig. 4). These data indicate that charge reversal by deletion (
143372) causes faster forward C0
C1 opening rates, whereas the EIEEE only shows a modest tendency toward an accelerated early opening transition.
|
C1 transition, the intermediate C1
C2 opening transition in this model is largely voltage independent and becomes dominant during the late phase of the activation at more positive potentials. This is reflected by the saturation of the rate of activation as the depolarization further increases. Consequently, the C1
C2 rate can be estimated by the saturating value of the activation time constant at strong depolarization (33
143372 and the EIEEE mutations (133 ± 17, 93 ± 5 ms) compared to WT (181 ± 21 ms), indicating that charge reversal at the end of the proximal domain accelerated the voltage-independent C1
C2 transition but with a more pronounced effect for the EIEEE mutation compared to the deletion mutant (Fig. 5).
|
143372 mutation were faster in comparison with WT, whereas the other deletion mutations (
171372,
143170, and
143361) showed activation time constants similar to WT. The deactivation of all deletion mutations was comparable to WT (Fig. 6 A).
|
However, to account for the large shifts of the midpoint of activation described above, the time constants were plotted after correction for the shift in voltage dependence of activation (Fig. 7). The normalized kinetic data showed no significant differences in the activation time constants for most mutations compared to WT except for the EIEEE mutation, which was slightly faster (Fig. 7 A). However, in contrast to the activation kinetics, the deactivation time constants were noticeably faster for the
143372 and EIEEE mutations but remained unaltered for all other mutations compared to WT (Fig. 7). The relative contribution of both fast and slow deactivation components was similar for all mutations analyzed (Fig. 7 D). Thus, when the respective shifts of voltage dependence of activation were taken into account, an acceleration of the deactivation was only observed when the local charge became more negative.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
143372) reported here. These deletions change the charge distribution in the remaining section immediately in front of S1 as the cluster of basic residues (KIKER) is replaced by acidic residues. Deletion of
220 amino acids, preserving a cluster of mainly positively charged residues upstream to S1 (
143361), displayed activation properties that closely resembled WT. These results indicate that a large part of the proximal domain is not essential for a WT HERG activation phenotype.
Substitution of each positive residue of the KIKER sequence by a negative one consistently resulted in a negative shift of the voltage dependence of activation of varying magnitude (R366E > K364E
K362E). When all three basic residues were substituted (EIEEE), the hyperpolarizing shift was similar to that of the near total proximal domain deletion (
143372). In contrast, exchanging the negative charge E365 to an arginine shifted the midpoint of activation to more depolarized potentials. These results indicate that the modulatory effect of the proximal domain can largely be attributed to the charged cluster of the KIKER region. The negative shift of the activation curve with the EIEEE mutation indicates that the closed state is destabilized compared to WT.
The proximal domain influences the rates of the early opening transitions
For HERG a three-closed-state activation model has been proposed with two voltage-sensitive and one intermediate voltage-insensitive transition (33
,34
,36
). In this context it was shown that deletion of the proximal domain primarily accelerated the voltage-sensitive C0
C1 and the intermediate voltage-insensitive C1
C2 transitions (16
).
To evaluate whether both the EIEEE mutation and the
143372 deletion alter the first two opening transitions (C0
C1 and C1
C2) differently, the forward rate constants of both opening transitions were estimated (33
). Based on the sigmoidal delay in activation, the
143372 deletion accelerated the C0
C1 transition almost sevenfold, whereas the EIEEE charge reversal caused only a modest increase in the C0
C1 rates. Since inactivation is fast, changes in inactivation kinetics might alter the sigmoidal delay in activation. The inactivation time constants for the
143372 deletion (at 40 mV) and the EIEEE mutation (at 30 mV) were comparable to WT (at +10 mV). Also, the voltage dependence of inactivation was similar for all constructs. Hence the inactivation process could not explain the fourfold difference of the sigmoidal delay between the
143372 deletion and the EIEEE mutation. We conclude that the observed differences in sigmoidal delay are primarily caused by alterations in the early C0
C1 rates.
The asymptotic values of the activation time constants indicate that the C1
C2 rates are faster for the EIEEE and the
143372 deletion compared to WT, with EIEEE showing the most pronounced effect. Overall, the charge reversal in a full length N-terminus (EIEEE) primarily affected the intermediate voltage-independent C1
C2 transition, whereas deletion of the proximal domain (
143372) induced an additional acceleration of the C0
C1 transition, consistent with previous reports (16
,27
). Simulation of the three-closed-state model largely reproduced the effects on the voltage dependence of activation and were in agreement with the experimental data presented here (Fig. S2). In summary, the charges of the KIKER sequence influence the voltage dependence of activation predominantly by altering the intermediate opening transition C1
C2. The apparent speeding of this voltage-independent C1
C2 transition may account for the observed steepening of the slope factor in conjunction with the negatively shifted E1/2, a correlation that was already described for Shaker-type K channels (37
). Conversely, it is possible that the additional acceleration of the C0
C1 transition (
143372) is reflected in the combination of a shallow slope with a negative shift. These data indicate that although the negative shift in voltage dependence of activation was of a similar magnitude for both mutations (EIEEE and
143372), the mechanisms causing the shifts were not entirely identical. The near total deletion of the proximal domain probably disturbs the conformation of the N-terminus and the way it interacts with other regions of the channel. Hence, it is tempting to speculate that although the net local charge proximal to S1 is comparable for the EIEEE mutation and the
143372 deletion, the interaction with the channel core need not be.
The gating properties are altered through electrostatic interaction but not through alteration of the surface charge
Our data clearly show that the magnitude of the shifts of voltage dependence of activation, expressed as activation midpoint or
G0, was strongly dependent on the net charge of the KIKER mutations (Figs. 3 and S1). Admittedly, the Gibbs free energy analysis is based upon the assumption of a two-state gating model which does not really apply to the three-closed-state gating model of HERG. However, the activation curves could be fitted appropriately with a single Boltzmann function (see also (30
32
)). Furthermore, the
G0 approach takes into account both the midpoint of activation and the slope factor. In this perspective, the additive contribution of each charged residue (ranging from 4 to +4) is indicative of electrostatic interactions. Consequently, the potential interaction site(s) near the channel core are most likely charged clusters, although we cannot fully exclude a multipoint interaction with other charged regions within the N-terminus (25
).
If the KIKER sequence directly affects the local electrical field sensed by the S4 voltage sensor (surface charge effect), then substituting the positively charged cluster by a negative one (EIEEE instead of KIKER) would be expected to induce a shift in the positive direction. However the opposite effect was observed, making a pure surface charge effect on the S4 charges unlikely, indicating that the effect involves interaction with other structures important for gating.
During the process of gate opening, the voltage sensor reorients before the actual gating charges are moved and gating currents can be measured (38
,39
). Because the distal charges of S4 do not seem to participate in the actual voltage sensing, it is possible that the bottom part of the S4 segment may be involved in this early reorientation of the voltage sensor (32
). However, if the charged residues of the KIKER sequence interact with these charges at the bottom of S4, one would expect a stabilizing effect of introducing negative charges, opposite to what was observed (Fig. 2). Alternatively, depending on the position of the KIKER region relative to the bottom of the S4, a more elaborate speculation would be that the native positive charges restrain the early reorientation, in which case introduction of negative charges might remove such electrostatic constraint.
Such an electrostatic restraint does not need to be limited to the bottom part of S4 and may include other regions (i.e., S4-S5 linker, bottom of S6) involved in coupling the process of voltage sensing to gate opening and closure. In this context, Sanguinetti and co-workers have established that electrostatic interactions are an important part of the gating process (40
42
). It is therefore conceivable that charged regions in other parts of the channel, such as the N-terminal KIKER sequence, modify the gating process. Since the interaction of D540 (S4-S5 linker) with R665 (S6) may stabilize the closed state, one could speculate that introducing more negative charges would destabilize this interaction, and hence the closed state (40
).
Activation and deactivation kinetics
The speed at which the activating and deactivating state transitions occur is determined by the rate-limiting steps of the gating process. This is a dynamic event with sequential movement of the voltage sensor that becomes translated into movements of the activation gate, opening or closing the permeation pathway (39
). Hence, it is conceivable that activation and deactivation rates are determined by the underlying structure of the gate and of other regions that constitute the gating machinery rather than the movements of the voltage sensor. As the KIKER sequence predominantly influences the voltage dependence of activation upon charge reversal, the corresponding shifts have to be taken into account when interpreting the activation kinetics. Since the corrected activation rates did not reveal large differences (Fig. 7), likely only minor changes occur at the gating machinery during opening when charges of the KIKER sequence are substituted.
More caution should be exercised when interpreting the deactivation kinetics. Since the mechanism of deactivation is not fully understood, it is an open question to what extent the gate region remains coupled to the voltage sensor movements upon channel closure (43
).
If channel closure is indirectly coupled to the voltage sensor movements, the time constants of deactivation do not have to be corrected for the corresponding shifts in voltage dependence of activation. In that case, the mutations of the KIKER sequence do not influence deactivation (Fig. 6).
On the other hand, if coupling exists during the entire gating process (42
,43
), then the voltage dependence of activation must be taken into account to assess the deactivation rates. Consequently faster closure rates are observed as the charges in the proximal domain become more negative (Fig. 7). This is opposite to what is expected based on a mechanistic coupling between voltage sensor and gate movement. This would imply that the interaction between the proximal domain and the channel core is a dynamic process that may involve multipoint interactions that include other regions important for channel closure.
A prime candidate would be the PAS domain, because similar accelerations of the deactivation kinetics were observed by deletions or mutations of the PAS domain (14
,22
,23
) and of the first 16 N-terminal amino acids (24
26
). It is possible that charges throughout the N-terminus play a role in orienting the PAS domain toward its yet unknown site of interaction. This could explain the similarities of the deactivation kinetics observed between mutations in the PAS domain and mutations elsewhere in the N-terminus. Alternatively, the KIKER sequence may also have a distinct role in the modulation of channel opening since the effects on the voltage dependence of activation shown here were not observed with mutations of other N-terminal regions. These data strengthen the idea that the amino terminus plays an important role in channel gating through dynamic multisite interaction.
In conclusion, our study demonstrates that a small cluster of basic residues within the N-terminus affects the activation process of HERG, whereas almost 220 amino acids of the proximal domain are apparently not essential for a normal activation phenotype. The results suggest that the local electric field of a small section within the proximal domain close to the S1 segment is important for the modulatory effects on channel gating. Although further investigation is needed to elucidate the exact regions of interaction involved, we propose electrostatic interactions on the gating machinery as the main mechanism.
| SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This work was supported by grants from the Flanders Institute for Biotechnology (VIB PRJ05) and the "Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen" (FWO-G0152.06, FWO-1.5.047.05).
Submitted on April 19, 2006; accepted for publication August 30, 2006.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Zhou, Z., Q. Gong, B. Ye, Z. Fan, J. C. Makielski, G. A. Robertson, and C. T. January. 1998. Properties of HERG channels stably expressed in HEK 293 cells studied at physiological temperature. Biophys. J. 74:230241.
3. Spector, P. S., M. E. Curran, A. Zou, M. T. Keating, and M. C. Sanguinetti. 1996. Fast inactivation causes rectification of the IKr channel. J. Gen. Physiol. 107:611619.
4. Sanguinetti, M. C., C. Jiang, M. E. Curran, and M. T. Keating. 1995. A mechanistic link between an inherited and an acquired cardiac arrhythmia: HERG encodes the IKr potassium channel. Cell. 81:299307.[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Curran, M. E., I. Splawski, K. W. Timothy, G. M. Vincent, E. D. Green, and M. T. Keating. 1995. A molecular basis for cardiac arrhythmia: HERG mutations cause long QT syndrome. Cell. 80:795803.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Roden, D. M. 2006. Long QT syndrome: reduced repolarization reserve and the genetic link. J. Intern. Med. 259:5969.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Doyle, D. A., J. M. Cabral, R. A. Pfuetzner, A. Kuo, J. M. Gulbis, S. L. Cohen, B. T. Chait, and R. MacKinnon. 1998. The structure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of K+ conduction and selectivity. Science. 280:6977.
8. Jiang, Y., A. Lee, J. Chen, V. Ruta, M. Cadene, B. T. Chait, and R. MacKinnon. 2003. X-ray structure of a voltage-dependent K+ channel. Nature. 423:3341.[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Long, S. B., E. B. Campbell, and R. MacKinnon. 2005. Crystal structure of a mammalian voltage-dependent Shaker family K+ channel. Science. 309:897903.
10. Bezanilla, F. 2000. The voltage sensor in voltage-dependent ion channels. Physiol. Rev. 80:555592.
11. Long, S. B., E. B. Campbell, and R. MacKinnon. 2005. Voltage sensor of Kv1.2: structural basis of electromechanical coupling. Science. 309:903908.
12. Aggarwal, S. K., and R. MacKinnon. 1996. Contribution of the S4 segment to gating charge in the Shaker K+ channel. Neuron. 16:11691177.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Seoh, S. A., D. Sigg, D. M. Papazian, and F. Bezanilla. 1996. Voltage-sensing residues in the S2 and S4 segments of the Shaker K+ channel. Neuron. 16:11591167.[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Morais Cabral, J. H., A. Lee, S. L. Cohen, B. T. Chait, M. Li, and R. MacKinnon. 1998. Crystal structure and functional analysis of the HERG potassium channel N terminus: a eukaryotic PAS domain. Cell. 95:649655.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Warmke, J. W., and B. Ganetzky. 1994. A family of potassium channel genes related to eag in Drosophila and mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91:34383442.
16. Viloria, C. G., F. Barros, T. Giraldez, D. Gomez-Varela, and P. de la Pena. 2000. Differential effects of amino-terminal distal and proximal domains in the regulation of human erg K(+) channel gating. Biophys. J. 79:231246.
17. Paulussen, A., A. Raes, G. Matthijs, D. J. Snyders, N. Cohen, and J. Aerssens. 2002. A novel mutation (T65P) in the PAS domain of the human potassium channel HERG results in the long QT syndrome by trafficking deficiency. J. Biol. Chem. 277:4861048616.
18. Rossenbacker, T., K. Mubagwa, R. J. Jongbloed, J. Vereecke, K. Devriendt, M. Gewillig, E. Carmeliet, D. Collen, H. Heidbuchel, and P. Carmeliet. 2005. Novel mutation in the Per-Arnt-Sim domain of KCNH2 causes a malignant form of long-QT syndrome. Circulation. 111:961968.
19. Splawski, I., J. Shen, K. W. Timothy, G. M. Vincent, M. H. Lehmann, and M. T. Keating. 1998. Genomic structure of three long QT syndrome genes: KVLQT1, HERG, and KCNE1. Genomics. 51:8697.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. London, B., M. C. Trudeau, K. P. Newton, A. K. Beyer, N. G. Copeland, D. J. Gilbert, N. A. Jenkins, C. A. Satler, and G. A. Robertson. 1997. Two isoforms of the mouse ether-a-go-go-related gene coassemble to form channels with properties similar to the rapidly activating component of the cardiac delayed rectifier K+ current. Circ. Res. 81:870878.
21. Jones, E. M., E. C. Roti Roti, J. Wang, S. A. Delfosse, and G. A. Robertson. 2004. Cardiac IKr channels minimally comprise hERG 1a and 1b subunits. J. Biol. Chem. 279:4469044694.
22. Chen, J., A. Zou, I. Splawski, M. T. Keating, and M. C. Sanguinetti. 1999. Long QT syndrome-associated mutations in the Per-Arnt-Sim (PAS) domain of HERG potassium channels accelerate channel deactivation. J. Biol. Chem. 274:1011310118.
23. Wang, J., M. C. Trudeau, A. M. Zappia, and G. A. Robertson. 1998. Regulation of deactivation by an amino terminal domain in human ether-a-go-go-related gene potassium channels. J. Gen. Physiol. 112:637647.
24. Terlau, H., S. H. Heinemann, W. Stuhmer, O. Pongs, and J. Ludwig. 1997. Amino terminal-dependent gating of the potassium channel rat eag is compensated by a mutation in the s4 segment. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 502:537543.[CrossRef][Medline]
25. Wang, J., C. D. Myers, and G. A. Robertson. 2000. Dynamic control of deactivation gating by a soluble amino-terminal domain in HERG K(+) channels. J. Gen. Physiol. 115:749758.
26. Schonherr, R., and S. H. Heinemann. 1996. Molecular determinants for activation and inactivation of HERG, a human inward rectifier potassium channel. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 493:635642.[Medline]
27. Gomez-Varela, D., P. de la Pena, J. Garcia, T. Giraldez, and F. Barros. 2002. Influence of amino-terminal structures on kinetic transitions between several closed and open states in human erg K+ channels. J. Membr. Biol. 187:117133.[CrossRef][Medline]
28. Paulussen, A. D., A. Raes, R. J. Jongbloed, R. A. Gilissen, A. A. Wilde, D. J. Snyders, H. J. Smeets, and J. Aerssens. 2005. HERG mutation predicts short QT based on channel kinetics but causes long QT by heterotetrameric trafficking deficiency. Cardiovasc. Res. 67:467475.
29. Li-Smerin, Y., D. H. Hackos, and K. J. Swartz. 2000. A localized interaction surface for voltage-sensing domains on the pore domain of a K+ channel. Neuron. 25:411423.[CrossRef][Medline]
30. Subbiah, R. N., C. E. Clarke, D. J. Smith, J. Zhao, T. J. Campbell, and J. I. Vandenberg. 2004. Molecular basis of slow activation of the human ether-a-go-go related gene potassium channel. J. Physiol. 558:417431.
31. Subbiah, R. N., M. Kondo, T. J. Campbell, and J. I. Vandenberg. 2005. Tryptophan scanning mutagenesis of the HERG K+ channel: the S4 domain is loosely packed and likely to be lipid exposed. J. Physiol. 569:367379.
32. Piper, D. R., W. A. Hinz, C. K. Tallurri, M. C. Sanguinetti, and M. Tristani-Firouzi. 2005. Regional specificity of human ether-a'-go-go-related gene channel activation and inactivation gating. J. Biol. Chem. 280:72067217.
33. Wang, S., S. Liu, M. J. Morales, H. C. Strauss, and R. L. Rasmusson. 1997. A quantitative analysis of the activation and inactivation kinetics of HERG expressed in Xenopus oocytes. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 502:4560.[CrossRef][Medline]
34. Johnson, J. P. Jr., F. M. Mullins, and P. B. Bennett. 1999. Human ether-a-go-go-related gene K+ channel gating probed with extracellular CA2+. Evidence for two distinct voltage sensors. J. Gen. Physiol. 113:565580.
35. Liu, S., R. L. Rasmusson, D. L. Campbell, S. Wang, H. C. Strauss, S. G. Liu, and S. M. Wang. 1996. Activation and inactivation kinetics of an E-4031-senstitive current from single ferret atrial myocytes. Biophys. J. 70:27042715.
36. Kiehn, J., A. E. Lacerda, and A. M. Brown. 1999. Pathways of HERG inactivation. Am. J. Physiol. 277:H199H210.[Medline]
37. Yifrach, O., and R. MacKinnon. 2002. Energetics of pore opening in a voltage-gated K(+) channel. Cell. 111:231239.[CrossRef][Medline]
38. Bannister, J. P., B. Chanda, F. Bezanilla, and D. M. Papazian. 2005. Optical detection of rate-determining ion-modulated conformational changes of the ether-a-go-go K+ channel voltage sensor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 102:1871818723.
39. Bezanilla, F. 2005. Voltage-gated ion channels. IEEE Trans. Nanobioscience. 4:3448.[CrossRef][Medline]
40. Tristani-Firouzi, M., J. Chen, and M. C. Sanguinetti. 2002. Interactions between S4S5 linker and S6 transmembrane domain modulate gating of HERG K+ channels. J. Biol. Chem. 277:1899419000.
41. Sanguinetti, M. C., and Q. P. Xu. 1999. Mutations of the S4S5 linker alter activation properties of HERG potassium channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes. J. Physiol. 514:667675.
42. Ferrer, T., J. Rupp, D. R. Piper, and M. Tristani-Firouzi. 2006. The S4S5 linker directly couples voltage sensor movement to the activation gate in the human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG) K+ channel. J. Biol. Chem. 281:1285812864.
43. Ding, S., and R. Horn. 2003. Effect of S6 tail mutations on charge movement in Shaker potassium channels. Biophys. J. 84:295305.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Alonso-Ron, P. de la Pena, P. Miranda, P. Dominguez, and F. Barros Thermodynamic and Kinetic Properties of Amino-Terminal and S4-S5 Loop HERG Channel Mutants under Steady-State Conditions Biophys. J., May 15, 2008; 94(10): 3893 - 3911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |