| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

* Department of Chemistry, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015; and
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Steven L. Regen, Dept. of Chemistry, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015. Tel.: 610-758-4842; Fax: 610-758-6560; E-mail: slr0{at}lehigh.edu.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ho = 2.06 ± 0.14 kcal/mol of phospholipid and
S° = 4.48 ± 0.44 cal/K mol of phospholipid. From 60 to 65°C, the mixing of these lipids was found to be insensitive to temperature, and sterol-phospholipid association was now entropy driven; that is,
Ho = 0.23 ± 0.38 kcal/mol of phospholipid and
S° = +1.68 ± 1.12 cal/K mol of phospholipid. In the liquid-disordered/liquid-ordered coexistence region, changes in lipid mixing reflect changes in the phase composition of the membrane. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A unique approach for studying cholesterol-phospholipid interactions that has recently evolved is based on the use of the nearest-neighbor recognition (NNR) method (7
11
). In essence, this method takes molecular-level snapshots of bilayer organization by detecting and quantifying the thermodynamic tendency of exchangeable monomers to become nearest neighbors of one another. Typically, two lipids of interest (A and B) are converted into exchangeable dimers (AA, AB, and BB), which are then allowed to undergo monomer interchange via thiolate-disulfide interchange. These equilibria are then defined by a constant, K, which governs the monomer interchange among AA, BB, and AB (Eqs. 1 and 2). When monomers A and B mix ideally, this is reflected by an equilibrium constant that equals 4.0. When homoassociations are favored, the equilibrium constant is <4.0; favored heteroassociations are indicated by a value that is >4.0.
![]() |
![]() | (1) |
![]() | (2) |
Using the NNR method, we have previously shown that the mixing of 1 with 2 (Scheme 1) in host bilayers derived from 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC) and cholesterol is controlled by the cholesterol content in the membrane (11
). Thus, at low sterol concentrations (<14 mol %), the mixing of these lipids is close to ideal at 60°C. When the sterol concentration is increased from 14 to
30 mol %, a strong preference of sterol-phospholipid association emerges. Beyond
30 mol %, this preference levels off. We have also noted that this behavior closely matches the transition from the liquid-disordered state (ld,
014 mol % sterol) where the phospholipids are "coiled" to the liquid-disordered/liquid-ordered coexistence region (ld/lo,
1430 mol % sterol) and finally to the liquid-ordered phase (lo,
>30 mol % sterol) where the phospholipids become stretched, according to the phase diagram that has been reported for DPPC/cholesterol mixtures (12
).
|
So for cholesterol-phospholipid interactions. Second, we wanted to examine, in a more rigorous way, whether our NNR measurements are in agreement with the phase diagram that has been proposed for DPPC/cholesterol mixtures by varying both the temperature and the sterol content. | MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nearest-neighbor recognition measurements
In a typical liposome preparation, thin films of DPPC, cholesterol and {1,2} heterodimer or DPPC, cholesterol, {1,1} and {2,2} homodimers were prepared using 17.4 µmol of DPPC, 5.4 µmol of cholesterol, and 0.6 µmol {1,2} heterodimer or 17.4 µmol of DPPC, 5.4 µmol of cholesterol, 0.3 µmol of {1,1}, and 0.3 µmol of {2,2} in chloroform. After drying overnight under reduced pressure, 2.0 ml of 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM NaN3, 1 mM EDTA, pH = 7.4) were added to the dried film. The mixture was then vortex mixed for 1 min and incubated for 5 min at 60°C, followed by another 1 min of vortex mixing and another 20 min of incubation. The dispersion was then subjected to five freeze/thaw cycles (liquid nitrogen/60°C water bath), followed by sequential extrusion through 400- and 200-nm membranes (10 times for each membrane and a total extrusion time of 10 min). The extrusion pressures that were used for the 400-and 200-nm Nuclepore membranes were <50 and 200 psi, respectively. After extrusion, the dispersion was incubated for
30 min at the desired temperature before initiating the thiolate disulfide exchange reaction. Large unilamellar vesicles formed under these conditions were typically 200 nm in diameter (dynamic light scattering). Thiolate-disulfide interchange reactions were initiated after the dispersions were equilibrated at 60°C by injecting 25.5 µL of a Tris-buffer solution of 37.65 mM threo-dithiothreitol (0.96 µmol) and 24 µL of a Tris-buffer solution that was 8.4 µM in monensin (0.204 µmol), with brief vortex mixing, and finally increasing the pH to 8.5 via addition of
10 µL of 1.0 M NaOH. All dispersions were maintained under an argon atmosphere throughout the course of the interchange reactions. Aliquots (0.30 mL) were withdrawn as a function of time and quenched by addition to a 5.0-mL test tube containing 85 µL of 30 mM HCl (final pH 5.0), brief (10 s) vortex mixing, and immediate cooling to 20°C. The frozen samples were then lyophilized and the lipid portion dissolved in 2 mL of chloroform with vortex mixing for 30 s, followed by centrifugation (20 min) using a clinical centrifuge. The clear chloroform solution was poured into another test tube, and chloroform was evaporated under reduced pressure [40 min, 0.4 Torr, 23°C]. The resulting clear film was dissolved in a solution made from 10 µL of chloroform plus 90 µL of the mobile phase that was used for high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. Product mixtures were analyzed using a C18 reverse phase HPLC column with a mobile phase that was composed of 10 mM tetrabutylammonium acetate in denatured ethanol/water/hexane (76/13/10, v/v/v) with flow rate of 0.9 mL/min. The column was maintained at 31°C and the components were monitored at 205 nm by a Waters 996-photodiode-array ultraviolet detector (Milford, MA).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
H°/R (1/T) +
S°/R] are expected to yield
Ho and
So values that are relevant not only to the mixing between 1 and 2, but also to the mixing between DPPC and cholesterol (15
|
The temperature dependences of K for the four phospholipid/cholesterol compositions that were examined are shown as van 't Hoff plots in Fig. 2. A summary of these data is also shown in Table 1. In the ld phase, where the mixing of 1 with 2 is close to ideal, no significant temperature dependence was detected. In contrast, in the ld/lo coexistence region, the apparent values of K were found to steadily increase with decreasing temperatures. Unexpectedly, bilayers in the lo phase containing 35 or 40 mol % sterol showed more complex behavior. From 60 to 65°C, no significant temperature dependence of K was observed. In contrast, from 45 to 60°C, a significant temperature dependence was found. If one treats these data as two separate regions, the former is characterized by
Ho = 0.23 ± 0.38 kcal/mol of phospholipid and
S° = +1.68 ± 1.12 cal/K mol of phospholipid; the latter corresponds to
Ho = 2.06 ± 0.14 kcal/mol of phospholipid and
S° = 4.48 ± 0.44 cal/K mol of phospholipid. It should be noted that these entropy values include a statistical component, R x ln 4 or 2.75 cal/K mol of lipid dimer, which is due to the fact that the heterodimer is statistically favored over each homodimer by a factor of two.
|
|
5.5. This value is, essentially, the same as that found at 60°C (Table 1 and Fig. 2).
Nearest-neighbor recognition in undiluted bilayers
To confirm that the mixing properties of 1 and 2 closely match those of DPPC and cholesterol, we examined the temperature dependence of the mixing of 1 and 2 in bilayers made exclusively from these two exchangeable lipids using 25% of 2 (Fig. 3). As expected, the apparent enthalpy and entropy values (
Ho = 1.30 ± 0.30 kcal/mol of phospholipid and
S° = 2.29 ± 0.92 cal/K mol of phospholipid) were found to be indistinguishable from those measured in DPPC/cholesterol host membranes that contained 25 mol % sterol (
Ho = 1.27 ± 0.18 kcal/mol of phospholipid and
S° = 2.23 ± 0.54 cal/K mol of phospholipid). Thus, these results imply that, at a given temperature, the diluted and undiluted membranes have similar proportions of the ld and lo phase and that the averaged microenvironment surrounding 1 and 2 is also similar.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3.8, which is close to the value for random mixing (K = 4) and is independent of temperature. This confirms that the mixing between 1 and 2, and therefore the mixing between DPPC and cholesterol, is close to ideal in the ld phase. The change in K as a function of temperature in the ld/lo coexistence region (25 mol % sterol) is due to the effect of temperature on the fractions of the lo and ld phases of the membrane. Phase fractions calculated from our data are in close agreement with those obtained from the phase diagram. Thus, the thermodynamic parameters in this two-phase region are only apparent values. In the lo phase (35 and 40 mol % sterol), at temperatures that lie between 45 and 60°C, a van 't Hoff plot indicates that sterol-phospholipid association is weakly driven by enthalpy with a heat of association that corresponds to
2 kcal/mol of phospholipid. This value compares well with the proposed enthalpy of phospholipid-cholesterol complex formation (14The fact that K was found to be constant, on going from 60 to 65°C in the lo phase, was unexpected. That this segment of this van 't Hoff plot is not due to "drifting" into the ld/lo coexistence region is evident from the fact that the K values level off at high temperatures. If contributions were being made from the ld phase, then K would be expected to decrease more rapidly with increasing temperatures, which is clearly not the case.
This finding suggests that the phospholipid-cholesterol association, although remaining favorable, has changed from enthalpy driven to entropy driven at
60°C. The physical basis for this apparent entropy-enthalpy compensation is not obvious, but we can suggest two possible interpretations. One is that 60°C is close to the critical temperature of the ld-lo coexistence region and that critical fluctuations are dominating the DPPC/cholesterol association that is measured by NNR in the 6065°C temperature range. Another explanation, based on the concept of condensed complexes, is that 60°C corresponds to thermal dissociation of the complexes. Above this temperature, DPPC/cholesterol is still favored as nearest neighbors, but they no longer form condensed complexes (3
,16
20
). Although the correctness of these hypotheses remains to be established, these results define the thermodynamic parameters of the molecular interactions between DPPC and cholesterol, with which any realistic model must be consistent.
Finally, to place the driving force for sterol-phospholipid association in the lo phase into clear view, we have calculated the molecular Gibbs free energy of interaction (
G°i) between 1 and 2 at various temperatures by subtracting contributions made from the statistical entropy (RT ln4). This free energy corresponds to the difference between an AB interaction and the average of AA and BB interactions; that is,
. As shown in Table 2,
varies from 104 to 189 cal/mol of phospholipid. These values clearly indicate that the interactions between the phosphocholine and cholesterol are favorable in the lo phase, in contrast to what is observed in the ld phase, where they are neutral (random mixing), and in the gel phase, where they are unfavorable (9
).
|
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ho = 2.06 ± 0.14 kcal/mol of phospholipid and
S° = 4.48 ± 0.44 cal/K mol of phospholipid. Above 60°C, sterol-phospholipid association is converted into an entropy-driven process, where
Ho = 0.23 ± 0.38 kcal/mol of phospholipid and
S° = +1.68 ± 1.12 cal/K mol of phospholipid. Subtraction of contributions made from statistical entropy yield molecular Gibbs free energies of interaction (
) between 1 and 2 in the lo phase, which vary from 104 cal/mol of phospholipid at 65°C to 189 cal/mol of phospholipid at 45°C. In a broader context, these findings lend further support for the general features of the phase diagram that has been proposed for DPPC/cholesterol mixtures; they also reveal a region of the lo phase in which a change in the organizational state appears to occur.
| SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Submitted on March 2, 2006; accepted for publication May 19, 2006.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Simons, K., and W. L. C. Vaz. 2004. Model systems, lipid rafts, and cell membranes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 33:269295.[CrossRef][Medline]
3. McConnell, H. M., and A. Radhakrishnan. 2003. Condensed complexes of cholesterol and phospholipids. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1610:159173.[Medline]
4. Feingold, L. 1993. Cholesterol in Membrane Models. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
5. Vist, M. R., and J. H. Davis. 1990. Phase equilibria of cholesterol/dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine mixtures: deuterium nuclear magnetic resonance and differential scanning calorimetry. Biochemistry. 29:451464.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Veatch, S. L., and S. L. Keller. 2002. Organization in lipid membranes containing cholesterol. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89:268101/1268101/4.
7. Sugahara, M., M. Uragami, X. Yan, and S. L. Regen. 2001. The structural role of cholesterol in biological membranes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123:79397940.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Sugahara, M., M. Uragami, and S. L. Regen. 2002. Selective sterol-phospholipid associations in fluid bilayers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124:42534256.[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Sugahara, M., M. Uragami, and S. L. Regen. 2003. Selective association of cholesterol with long-chain phospholipids in liquid-ordered bilayers: support for the existence of lipid rafts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125:1304013041.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Cao, H., N. Tokutake, and S. L. Regen. 2003. Unraveling the mystery surrounding cholesterol's condensing effect. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125:1618216183.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Cao, H., J. Zhang, B. Jing, and S. L. Regen. 2005. A chemical sensor for the liquid-ordered phase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127:88138816.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Sankaram, M. B., and T. E. Thompson. 1991. Cholesterol-induced fluid-phase immiscibility in membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 88:86868690.
13. Radhakrishnan, A., and H. M. McConnell. 2002. Thermal dissociation of condensed complexes of cholesterol and phospholipid. J. Phys. Chem. B. 106:47554762.
14. Anderson, T. G., and H. M. McConnell. 2001. Condensed complexes and the calorimetry of cholesterol-phospholipid bilayers. Biophys. J. 81:27742785.
15. Zhang, J., H. Cao, B. Jing, and S. L. Regen. 2006. Ethanol-induced reorganization of the liquid-ordered phase: enhancement of cholesterol-phospholipid association. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128:265269.[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Finean, J. B. 1953. Phospholipid-cholesterol complex in the structure of myelin. Experientia. 9:1719.[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Hinz, H. J., and J. M. Sturtevant. 1972. Calorimetric investigation of the influence of cholesterol on the transition properties of bilayers formed from synthetic L- -lecithins in aqueous suspension. J. Biol. Chem. 247:36973700.
18. Gershfeld, N. L. 1978. Equilibrium studies of lecithin-cholesterol interactions. I. Stoichiometry of lecithin-cholesterol complexes in bulk systems. Biophys. J. 22:469488.
19. Needham, D., T. J. McIntosh, and E. Evans. 1988. Thermomechanical and transition properties of dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine/cholesterol bilayers. Biochemistry. 27:46684673.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Ipsen, J. H., G. Karlstrom, O. G. Mouritsen, H. Wennerstrom, and M. J. Zuckermann. 1987. Phase equilibria in the phosphatidylcholine-cholesterol system. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 905:162172.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Zhang, T. Hadlock, A. Gent, and G. R. Strichartz Tetracaine-Membrane Interactions: Effects of Lipid Composition and Phase on Drug Partitioning, Location, and Ionization Biophys. J., June 1, 2007; 92(11): 3988 - 4001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Frazier, J. R. Wright, A. Pokorny, and P. F. F. Almeida Investigation of Domain Formation in Sphingomyelin/Cholesterol/POPC Mixtures by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer and Monte Carlo Simulations Biophys. J., April 1, 2007; 92(7): 2422 - 2433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |