| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

* Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Colaba, Mumbai, India; and
Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
Correspondence: Address reprint requests and inquiries to Sudipta Maiti, Tel.: 091-222-278-2716; Fax: 091-222-280-4610; E-mail: maiti{at}tifr.res.in.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recent studies suggest that the soluble aggregates of amyloid-β peptide (Aβ), rather than the amyloid deposits, are the main pathogenic species in Alzheimer's disease (AD) (1
–4
). Similar species are also thought to be responsible for many other aggregation-related diseases, such as Huntington's and Parkinson's (2
,5
). Hence, many of the current clinical strategies target these aggregates to prevent neuronal loss in AD (6
,7
). Unfortunately, presymptomatic diagnosis of the disease has achieved limited success (8
). An effective strategy for diagnosis would be to detect the soluble aggregates, which appear early and are potently toxic, in vivo. Monitoring the effectiveness of a candidate drug or a treatment routine, say in a model animal, also requires monitoring of these aggregates inside the brain over time.
In vitro, such aggregates can be detected using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) (9
–11
). FCS measurements have helped uncover chemical agents that can lower the population of these aggregates (11
). Unfortunately, FCS uses bulky optics, and at present it is not possible to use it inside the brain. Here we explore the possibility of measuring protein aggregation in a minimally invasive manner, extending a recently demonstrated scheme that uses a single mode fiber for obtaining FCS data from fluorescent beads (12
). Comparatively lower sensitivity, higher background fluorescence, and higher photobleaching make this technique inappropriate for detecting single fluorescent molecules. However, an aggregated protein particle, where a fraction of the monomers is labeled with a fluorophore, can present a target much brighter than a single molecule, and may possibly be amenable to the fiber technique. Here we monitor an aggregating Aβ solution in vitro with fiber-based FCS, and compare the results with conventional FCS.
We first calibrate the fiber FCS instrument with a solution of fluorescent beads of 13 nm radius. The fiber optic arrangement is similar to that reported earlier (12
). In this setup, a single mode optical fiber (mode field radius = 1.7 µm) is used both for delivering the excitation light (543 nm) and also for collecting the fluorescence from the sample. This setup is automatically confocal and can be used for FCS measurements (12
,13
). We fit the FCS data using the MEMFCS routine (14
), which analyzes the data in terms of a quasicontinuous distribution of diffusion constants. Such analysis is required for characterizing highly heterogeneous aggregating protein solutions (10
,11
). The size distribution obtained from the bead solution using the fiber FCS setup is shown in Fig. 1 (solid line). The single-peaked distribution is centered around 30 ms. The size distribution obtained from the same specimen using a conventional FCS instrument (15
) of the same specimen is shown as a dotted line in Fig. 1. We see that the two size distributions are similar, except that the fiber FCS curve is peaked at a time point that is 21 times higher than that of the conventional FCS. This is due to the larger probe volume of the fiber FCS instrument, and this provides a size calibration for any unknown particle measured with this technique.
|
We then examine our ability to characterize the aggregation state of an Aβ solution by examining it in vitro, first with fiber FCS and then with conventional FCS. We prepare a 10-µM Aβ solution mixed with 100 nM rhodamine-labeled Aβ (RAβ)(both purchased from rPeptide, Athens, GA) at pH 7.4 in HEPES buffer and incubate it for 6 h at room temperature.
Fig. 2 A shows the autocorrelation data (solid squares) obtained from a fiber FCS measurement of this sample. The data are fit (solid line) with MEMFCS. The size distribution obtained from this data is shown in Fig. 2 C (solid line). The same solution then is examined by conventional FCS. The autocorrelation data and the fit are shown in Fig. 2 B. The error bars in the autocorrelation traces in all the figures are calculated from 10 identical measurements for 3 min each. The size distribution is plotted (as a dotted line) in Fig. 2 C. The abscissa denotes the hydrodynamic size in nanometers. This axis has been calibrated using the ratio of the size and the diffusion time of the beads obtained from Fig. 1. The fiber FCS data show the existence of a clear peak centered around 200 nm, and extending from
130 to
270 nm. The conventional FCS data on the other hand show a similar peak at 210 nm, but in addition, they also show a peak at 2.1 nm. The heights of the largest peaks are normalized to unity. The similarity of the second peak observed in conventional and that observed with fiber FCS establishes that the larger aggregates can be effectively seen with fiber FCS. On the other hand, it is clear that the peak at the smaller size range, which contains the monomer and the small oligomers (the calculated value of the hydrodynamic radius for the monomer is 1.7 nm), is resolved only by conventional FCS.
|
50,000 l/mol cm), and the average intensity of the excitation light in the FCS observation volume (
3 x 1025 photons/m2). The number of photons absorbed by a rhodamine label during the residence time of an aggregate (
0.5 s) is <1.2 x 105. The average number of photons absorbed by a bioconjugated rhodamine-6G molecule before photobleaching is
3 x 105 (16
We also examine a control Aβ solution that has been aged for 2 weeks, and that does not have appreciable amounts of the soluble aggregates left in it. The fiber FCS instrument does not show any appreciable correlation from this specimen (Fig. 3 A), whereas the conventional FCS experiment shows a short time correlation extending to
2 ms (Fig. 3 B). The analysis of the conventional FCS data (Fig. 3 C, dotted line) shows that the specimen only contains monomers and small oligomers, and no appreciable amount of higher order aggregates. This establishes the reliability of the fiber FCS technique to faithfully report the presence or absence of the large soluble aggregates in an aggregating amyloid-β solution.
|
Submitted on November 20, 2006; accepted for publication January 2, 2007.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Lashuel, H. A., D. Hartley, B. M. Petre, T. Walz, and P. T. Lansbury Jr. 2002. Neurodegenerative disease: amyloid pores from pathogenic mutations. Nature. 418:291.
3. Hoshi, M., M. Sato, S. Matsumoto, A. Noguchi, K. Yasutake, N. Yoshida, and K. Sato. 2003. Spherical aggregates of beta-amyloid (amylospheroid) show high neurotoxicity and activate tau protein kinase I/glycogen synthase kinase-3beta. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:6370–6375.
4. Klein, W. L., G. A. Krafft, and C. E. Finch. 2001. Targeting small Abeta oligomers: the solution to an Alzheimer's disease conundrum? Trends Neurosci. 24:219–224.[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Bucciantini, M., E. Giannoni, F. Chiti, F. Baroni, L. Formigli, J. Zurdo, N. Taddei, G. Ramponi, C. M. Dobson, and M. Stefani. 2002. Inherent toxicity of aggregates implies a common mechanism for protein misfolding diseases. Nature. 416:507–511.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Klyubin, I., D. M. Walsh, C. A. Lemere, W. K. Cullen, G. M. Shankar, V. Betts, E. T. Spooner, L. Jiang, R. Anwyl, D. J. Selkoe, and M. J. Rowan. 2005. Amyloid beta protein immunotherapy neutralizes Abeta oligomers that disrupt synaptic plasticity in vivo. Nat. Med. 11:556–561.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Yang, F., G. P. Lim, A. N. Begum, O. J. Ubeda, M. R. Simmons, S. S. Ambegaokar, P. P. Chen, R. Kayed, C. G. Glabe, S. A. Frautschy, and G. M. Cole. 2005. Curcumin inhibits formation of amyloid beta oligomers and fibrils, binds plaques, and reduces amyloid in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 280:5892–5901.
8. Jellinger, K. A. 2006. Alzheimer 100: highlights in the history of Alzheimer research. J. Neural Transm. 113:1603–1623.[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Tjernberg, L. O., A. Pramanik, S. Bjorling, P. Thyberg, J. Thyberg, C. Nordstedt, K. D. Berndt, L. Terenius, and R. Rigler. 1999. Amyloid beta-peptide polymerization studied using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Chem. Biol. 6:53–62.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Sengupta, P., K. Garai, B. Sahoo, Y. Shi, D. J. Callaway, and S. Maiti. 2003. The amyloid beta peptide (Abeta(1–40)) is thermodynamically soluble at physiological concentrations. Biochemistry. 42:10506–10513.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Garai, K., P. Sengupta, B. Sahoo, and S. Maiti. 2006. Selective destabilization of soluble amyloid beta oligomers by divalent metal ions. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 345:210–215.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Garai, K., M. Muralidhar, and S. Maiti. 2006. Fiber-optic fluorescence correlation spectrometer. Appl. Opt. 45:7538–7542.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Balaji, J., K. Garai, S. Chakrabarti, and S. Maiti. 2003. Axial resolution limit of a fiber-optic fluorescence probe. Appl. Opt. 42:3780–3784.[CrossRef]
14. Sengupta, P., K. Garai, J. Balaji, N. Periasamy, and S. Maiti. 2003. Measuring size distribution in highly heterogeneous systems with fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Biophys. J. 84:1977–1984.
15. Sengupta, P., J. Balaji, and S. Maiti. 2002. Measuring diffusion in cell membranes by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Methods. 27:374–387.[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Wennmalm, S., and R. Rigler. On death numbers and survival times of single dye molecules. 1999. J. Phys. Chem. B. 103:2516–2519.
17. Adelsberger, H., O. Garaschuk, and A. Konnerth. 2005. Cortical calcium waves in resting newborn mice. Nat. Neurosci. 8:988–990.[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Games, D., D. Adams, R. Alessandrini, R. Barbour, P. Berthelette, C. Blackwell, T. Carr, J. Clemens, T. Donaldson, F. Gillespie, T. Guido, S. Hangopian, et al. 1995. Alzheimer-type neuropathology in transgenic mice overexpressing V717F beta-amyloid precursor protein. Nature. 373:523–527.[CrossRef][Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |