| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* Department of NanoBiophotonics, Department of Neurobiology, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany
Correspondence: Address reprint requests to A. Egner, Tel.: 49-0-551-201-2500; E-mail: aegner{at}gwdg.de; or to S. Hell, E-mail: shell{at}gwdg.de.
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
/2 > 200 nm. Matters began to change when it became clear that the spectral properties of the fluorescence markers, in particular their molecular states, may not only be used to generate signal, but also to dramatically increase the spatial resolution (1
). For example, stimulated emission depletion microscopy (2) overcomes the diffraction limit by effectively confining the fluorescent state of the marker to a well-defined region <</2. To this end, a beam of light is used to effectively keep the marker in the ground state everywhere except at a point or line where this beam is zero (3). This concept has been extended to using any marker which can be optically kept or transferred to a dark state, in particular to photoswitchable organic fluorophores and photoactivatable proteins (3). In all cases, the subdiffraction image is assembled sequentially in time, by translating the location of the intensity zero through the sample. When assembling an image in this way the (switchable) fluorophores must undergo several off-on-off cycles.
Multiple switching is elegantly avoided if the molecules are recorded individually rather than in an ensemble. This is possible by illuminating deactivated but switchable dyes with so little activation light that only a few isolated molecules are transferred to the bright state at a time. Upon excitation, the on-state molecules can fire many fluorescent photons in a row, while their neighboring molecules remain entirely dark. Since a single molecule in the on-state already represents the smallest possible spot no additional optical confinement is needed to reduce the fluorescent spot any further. However, unlike in the ensemble case, where the position of the bright marker molecules is given by the position of the zero, the exact position of the switched-on or activated molecule is unknown. By imaging the burst of emitted fluorescence on a pixilated detector such as a camera and exploiting the a priori knowledge that the emission stems from the same point, the position of the molecule can be determined with a precision much higher than the full width at half-maximum of the point-spread function (PSF) of the imaging lens (4–9). In this way each molecule can be precisely mapped so that an image can be assembled. After recording, the molecule has to be switched off again, meaning that the molecule underwent just a single switching cycle. This single molecule recording method was termed photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM) (10), fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy (FPALM) (11), or stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) (12). Its resolution is determined by the localization precision which is given by 
with n being the number of photons detected per activated molecule. In fact, the resolution of the final image can be somewhat tuned by including only those events where n is above a certain threshold.
Implemented in a wide-field setup, this novel nanoscopy form is very powerful (13). Nonetheless it has so far entailed a number of limitations. Working with low densities of fluorescent molecules (14), it is so sensitive to diffuse background that a total internal reflection fluorescence microscope has been preferred for recording. This measure limited the method to two-dimensional samples, specifically to sectioned slices thinner than 100 nm (10). Furthermore, extremely long image acquisition times of 2–12 h were reported to form a meaningful image of biological specimens (10). We now overcome these limitations by changing both the fluorescent protein and the mode with which we record the biological sample. In particular, employing the fast reversibly photoswitching fluorescent protein (RSFP) rsFastLime (15), a variant (V157G) of the reversibly switchable fluorescent protein Dronpa (16), in combination with fast and asynchronous recording (17), accelerates image acquisition 
100-fold, cutting down the recording time to 2–2.5 min. Furthermore, our strategy reduces background, thus allowing us to image from within the interior of intact (nonsliced) cells. Because we record nontriggered, spontaneous off-on-off cycles without synchronization of the detector, we refer to this method as PALM with independently running acquisition (PALMIRA).
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
) in conjunction with a mask-fitting algorithm of the Airy spot. The CLEAN algorithm provides data segmentation whereas the localization serves to find the precise position of the emitting molecule. This interplay between the two algorithms is illustrated in Fig. 2. The subtraction of the PSF entailed by the CLEAN algorithm resulted in a more adequate treatment of slightly overlapping Airy peaks as was the case for simple connection-based segmentation procedures.
|
) and runs in the form of a fixed point iteration: At the beginning, the starting point 
is set to the center of the pixel with the highest photon count. Then, in each iteration, the center of mass 
of the data multiplied by a PSF centered at the point 
is determined. Usually, the algorithm converges after a few iterations. If after 50 iterations the path of 
is longer than the size of an Airy disk, this is considered as a divergence, and the corresponding molecule is discarded.
Drift and vibration compensation
During our typical image acquisition times of 2–2.5 min, we observed a sample drift of some tens of nanometers. Therefore, we added fluorescent microspheres to the samples. By tracking these bright particles (typically more than 2000 photons/frame), we corrected for the errors in the determined positions of individual fluorophores during the post-processing analysis.
Conventional image retrieval
In the case of negligible readout noise, the epifluorescent counterpart image to the superresolved PALMIRA image is given by the sum of the individual frames. The conventional images shown in Figs. 4 A and 5 A were therefore determined by summing up all recorded frames and setting the lowest pixel count to zero.
|
|
). The purified proteins were concentrated to 
33 mg/ml and taken up in 100 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5.
Single molecule spectroscopy
To acquire time traces of isolated molecules as shown in Fig. 3, coverslips were rinsed with deionized water for 5 min and cleaned in a low pressure plasma system (Femto-RF, Diener Electronic, Nagold, Germany). A phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-based solution with 1.27 nM rsFastLime, 0.1% (w/v) Polyvinyl alcohol (88 mol % hydrolyzed, Polysciences Europe, Eppelheim, Germany) and 0.32% (w/v) L-ascorbic acid (A.C.S. reagent, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was prepared. The pH was adjusted to 7.4. A 40-µl aliquot of the solution was pipetted onto the coverslip, which was then spin-coated for 20 s at 3000 rpm (Spin-Coater KW-4A, Chemat Technology, Northridge, CA). The overall image acquisition time was 40 s (500 frames/s) and the light intensity (488 nm) was 5.0 kW/cm2.
|
) was PCR amplified and inserted into a modified pET28 expression vector harboring a M13-GFP fusion (20) to replace the GFP coding sequence. The fusion protein was expressed in SURE E. coli cells (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA).
Thin cryosections were prepared as described previously (21,22). E. coli cells were fixed with 2% PFA (1 vol growth medium + 1 vol 4% (w/v) PFA) for 30 min at room temperature. After centrifugation, cells were postfixed with 4% and 0.1% glutaraldehyde in PBS for 2 h on ice. After being washed twice with PBS-0.02% glycine, cells were embedded in 10% gelatin, cooled on ice, and cut into small blocks. The blocks were infused with 2.3 M sucrose in PBS at 4°C overnight, mounted on metal pins and frozen in liquid nitrogen. 200-nm sections were cut at –110°C using a diamond knife (Diatome, Biel, Switzerland) in an ultracryomicrotome (Leica Microsystems, Germany) and collected using a 1:1 mixture of 2.3 M sucrose (23) and 2% methyl-cellulose containing 40 mM Cysteamine (BioChemika, 
98.0% (RT) (Sigma-Aldrich)). The cryosections were deposited on electric glow discharge (minus) treated coverslips, which were rinsed beforehand with deionized water for 5 min and cleaned in a low pressure plasma system (Femto-RF, Diener Electronic, Nagold, Germany). The mixture of methyl cellulose and sucrose which completely covered the sample was removed mechanically. A PBS (pH 7.4) based solution with 0.045% (v/v) Fluospheres (FluoSpheres carboxylate-modified microspheres, 0.2 µm, Nile red fluorescent (535/575) x 2% solids, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and 0.09% (w/v) Polyvinyl alcohol was prepared. A 40-µl aliquot of the solution was pipetted onto the sample spinning at 3000 rpm in a spin-coating apparatus.
The final image was generated by analyzing 70,000 frames. The overall image acquisition time was 140 s (500 frames/s) and the light intensity (488 nm) was 5.0 kW/cm2.
-Tubulin stained PtK2 cells
PtK2 cells were grown as described previously (24). Cells were seeded on coverslips (Menzel, Braunschweig, Germany) in a six-well plate (Nunc, Wiesbaden, Germany) and grown to a confluency of 80%.
For immunofluorescence labeling, cells were fixated for 4–6 min in ice-cold methanol and subsequently blocked for 10 min in PBS containing 1% BSA (blocking buffer). Cells were incubated with primary antibodies (2 µg/ml, anti--tubulin mouse IgG biotin conjugated, Invitrogen) diluted in blocking buffer at room temperature for 1 h followed by PBS washes and 5 min blocking in blocking buffer. For bridging the biotinylated anti--tubulin antibody with biotinylated rsFastLime, cells were incubated with Neutravidin (10 µg/ml, Invitrogen) at room temperature for 1 h followed by a short fixation with 3.7% PFA at room temperature for 5 min and subsequent PBS washes. Finally, cells were incubated with biotinylated rsFastLime (50 µg/ml, FluoReporter Mini-biotin-XX Protein Labeling Kit, Invitrogen) at room temperature for 1 h.
For sample preparation, a PBS-based solution with 0.045% (v/v) Fluospheres, 0.09% (w/v) Polyvinyl alcohol, and 0.29% (w/v) L-ascorbic acid was prepared. The pH was adjusted to 7.4–7.5. A 15-µl aliquot of this solution was pipetted onto the sample, which was then spin-coated for 40 s at 3000 rpm.
The final image was generated by analyzing 60,000 frames. The overall image acquisition time was 120 s (500 frames/s) and the light intensity (488 nm) was increased stepwise from 3.5 kW/cm2 to 5.0 kW/cm2.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
The number of emitted photons before deactivation or bleaching and thus the achievable resolution is a constant for moderate excitation intensities I, while the average on-time of a molecule, ton, is proportional to 1/I. The imaging speed can therefore be dramatically increased by simultaneously increasing I and the camera frame rate f such that ton 1/f, thus maintaining the highest activation density allowing reliable assignment of photons to individual molecules. PALMIRA also reduces background noise to a minimum: While frame rates faster than 1/ton spread bursts over several frames, increasing readout noise, slower frame rates would result in additional accumulation of background.
We used a fast CCD camera that allowed us to compress the readout process to several milliseconds. Fig. 3 shows three typical recordings of a sparse sample of the reversible photoswitchable protein rsFastLime (15) at a frame rate of 500 Hz. At this rather high frequency, our camera still operated at 97% duty cycle. The excellent signal/noise ratio of the data is evident in the time trace (Fig. 3 E). The root-mean-square of the combined background and readout noise typically averaged to <1 photon/pixel.
The data shown in Fig. 3 were recorded under pure 488 nm irradiation, which not only switches off dyes in the process of fluorescence reading but also activates dark molecules. Therefore, a dynamic equilibrium is formed during image acquisition with most of the molecules in the dark state and a small fraction of the molecules in the bright state. This fraction can be estimated from our single molecule experiments as the number of frames in which the molecule is visible, divided by the frame number of the last occurrence of such a burst from the molecule. The analysis of >600 time traces showed that the dynamic equilibrium keeps <0.2% of the rsFastLime molecules in their bright state.
This activation crosstalk keeps PALMIRA simple because, unlike in PALM or STORM, only a single laser line is used for activation and readout. Activation now occurs at arbitrary times during image acquisition, making the synchronization of illumination and image acquisition redundant. However, an activation density of 0.2% might be too high for some dense samples and would have to be reduced either by prebleaching some of the molecules or if possible by using a different excitation wavelength at which the action crosstalk between excitation and activation is different. If the activation density is lower than optimal, image acquisition can be accelerated by applying auxiliary activation light of a different wavelength. Alternatively, one can increase the excitation intensity beyond the optimum (ton < 1/f) at the expense of noise.
To explore the capabilities of PALMIRA, we first imaged 200-nm-thick cryosections of E. coli whose cytoplasmic membrane was labeled with rsFastLime (Fig. 4). We obtained the image by dividing the field of view into 20 nm pixels. Each time a molecule was located within the corresponding image region, that was brighter than the threshold, the pixel value was incremented by one. Note that this image assembly differs from that in Betzig et al. (10). In the latter the image is formed by plotting a Gaussian around each fitted position, with the standard deviation equaling the fit uncertainty. We have not followed this procedure because it tends to suggest more dynamic range than actually conveyed by the number of molecules detected. In Fig. 4 B, the dynamic range directly reflects the real number of events. In all experiments the number of photons per activation event followed geometrical distributions. In Fig. 4 B the threshold was adjusted to 22 photons tuning the resolution to an estimated 50 nm. Nonetheless, image acquisition times of 140 s yielded enough events to form clear images with sufficient dynamic range. Fig. 4 B shows that several bacteria can be identified. Their membranes are much more clearly resolved than in the conventional image from the same sample (Fig. 4 A).
There is no fundamental reason for this method to be limited to (ultra)thin samples. As long as the number of addressable molecules per unit area is small enough and these molecules are located inside a section where the shape of the PSF does not significantly change, it is also possible to record data inside whole cells or even thicker samples.
As a matter of fact, operating at the optimal frame rate and hence being less susceptible to background, PALMIRA allowed us to image stained -tubulin inside whole PtK2 cells. Fig. 5 compares wide-field (Fig. 5 A) and PALMIRA (Fig. 5 B) recordings of the same area inside the cell. While individual microtubules are not resolved in the conventional image they can be clearly distinguished in the PALMIRA recording. The resolution is even high enough to pinpoint the somewhat inhomogeneous labeling along the filaments.
The distribution of detected photons per event for the data presented in Fig. 5 is shown in Fig. 5 E. Due to the threshold of 1.5 photons in the CLEAN algorithm, detection of events with a small number of photon counts was significantly less probable. For large photon counts per event (>30), the histogram approximately follows a geometrical distribution with an expectation value of 21 photons. To estimate the resolution, we scrutinized the object indicated in Fig. 5 B showing an agglomeration of several rsFastLime proteins. The averaged x- and y-profiles (Fig. 5, C and D) reveal that the resolution can be tuned to 40 nm by only choosing events with 35 photons or more for the data representation. Note that the "gray values" in our images represent the number of single molecule events per pixel. Hence the resolution directly results from the statistics of recording many events. Higher thresholds would improve the resolution further but reduce the dynamic range.
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
It is possible that a molecule is counted more than once in our image. This is because the utilized protein is reversibly switchable and because a single burst of emission may be spread over two or more camera frames. However, the overcounting probability is the same for every molecule, ensuring that the image is an unbiased representation of the fluorophore concentration in the sample. Controlling or knowing the average number of total counts of a molecule is not required. An advantage of reversible switching is that molecules that have emitted too few photons to be registered have another chance to finally contribute to the image. Time-lapse microscopy using PALMIRA will probably benefit from reversibility, because the labeling density is much less altered after the recording. Nonetheless, PALMIRA would work equally well with irreversible switches.
In the future, individual planes inside a thicker sample will selectively be activated and imaged. This can be accomplished, for example, by multiphoton-induced activation processes. By utilizing three-dimensional position determination techniques inside these individual planes, and by combining the information from several planes, it will be possible to obtain subdiffraction three-dimensional images of, e.g., whole cells, organelles, or transparent nonbiological samples.
Higher threshold values improve the resolution at the expense of dynamic range or imaging speed. This possibility will be partially limited by the geometrical distribution of the emitted photons in a burst. Since the main factor determining the image sharpness is the label itself, the development and use of other (reversibly) switchable fluorophores with stronger photon bursts will directly result in sharper images. Our frame acquisition time of 2 ms is sufficient to collect even 100-times more photons per burst, which will lead to an overall resolution of 4 nm. Still, the use of faster detectors will accelerate PALMIRA imaging even further.
Limiting the amount of crosstalk in prospective markers is of major importance, because it will allow the imaging of dense samples without prior bleaching. The speed of the switching process itself remains of minor importance because in our asynchronous recording protocol it has no influence on the total acquisition time. Finally, our results once more underscore the huge potential of molecular photoswitching for nanoscale imaging with visible light and regular lenses.
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
Funding by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Research Center Molecular Physiology of the Brain and the European Union grant SPOTLITE is acknowledged.
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Submitted on May 9, 2007; accepted for publication July 6, 2007.
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONACKNOWLEDGEMENTSREFERENCES |
|---|
2. Hell, S. W., and J. Wichmann. 1994. Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: stimulated emission depletion microscopy. Opt. Lett. 19:780–782.
3. Hell, S. 2003. Toward fluorescence nanoscopy. Nat. Biotechnol. 21:1347–1355.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Bobroff, N. 1986. Position measurement with a resolution and noise-limited instrument. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 57:1152–1157.[CrossRef]
5. Betzig, E. 1995. Proposed method for molecular optical imaging. Opt. Lett. 20:237–239.[CrossRef]
6. Hell, S. W., J. Soukka, and P. E. Hänninen. 1995. Two- and multiphoton detection as an imaging mode and means of increasing the resolution in far-field light microscopy. Bioimaging. 3:65–69.
7. Schmidt, T., G. J. Schutz, W. Baumgartner, H. J. Gruber, and H. Schindler. 1996. Imaging of single molecule diffusion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:2926–2929.
8. Lacoste, T., X. Michalet, F. Pinaud, D. Chemla, A. Alivisatos, and S. Weiss. 2000. Ultrahigh-resolution multicolor colocalization of single fluorescent probes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:9461–9466.
9. Michalet, X., T. D. Lacoste, and S. Weiss. 2001. Ultrahigh-resolution colocalization of spectrally separable point-like fluorescent probes. Methods. 25:87–102.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Betzig, E., G. Patterson, R. Sougrat, O. Lindwasser, S. Olenych, J. Bonifacino, M. Davidson, J. Lippincott-Schwartz, and H. Hess. 2006. Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution. Science. 313:1642–1645.
11. Hess, S. T., T. P. K. Girirajan, and M. D. Mason. 2006. Ultra-high resolution imaging by fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy. Biophys. J. 91:4258–4272.
12. Rust, M. J., M. Bates, and X. Zhuang. 2006. Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). Nat. Methods. 3:793–796.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Hell, S. W. 2007. Far-field optical nanoscopy. Science. 316:1153–1158.
14. Moerner, W. E. 2006. Single-molecule mountains yield nanoscale cell images. Nat. Methods. 3:781–782.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Stiel, A. C., S. Trowitzsch, G. Weber, M. Andresen, C. Eggeling, S. W. Hell, S. Jakobs, and M. C. Wahl. 2007. 1.8 Å bright-state structure of the reversibly switchable fluorescent protein Dronpa guides the generation of fast switching variants. Biochem. J. 402:35–42.[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Ando, R., H. Mizuno, and A. Miyawaki. 2004. Regulated fast nucleocytoplasmic shuttling observed by reversible protein highlighting. Science. 306:1370–1373.
17. Geisler, C., A. Schönle, C. von Middendorff, H. Bock, C. Eggeling, A. Egner, and S. W. Hell. 2007. Resolution of /10 in fluorescence microscopy using fast single molecule photo-switching. Appl. Phys. A. 88:223–226.[CrossRef]
18. Hogbom, J. 1974. Aperture synthesis with a non-regular distribution of interferometer baselines. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 15:417–426.
19. Thompson, R., D. Larson, and W. Webb. 2002. Precise nanometer localization analysis for individual fluorescent probes. Biophys. J. 82:2775–2783.
20. Drew, D. E., G. von Heijne, P. Nordlund, and J. W. de Gier. 2001. Green fluorescent protein as an indicator to monitor membrane protein overexpression in Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 507:220–224.[CrossRef][Medline]
21. Tokuyasu, K. T. 1973. A technique for ultracryotomy of cell suspensions and tissues. J. Cell Biol. 57:551–565.
22. Tokuyasu, K. T. 1980. Immunochemistry on ultrathin frozen sections. Histochem. J. 12:381–403.[CrossRef][Medline]
23. Liou, W., H. J. Geuze, and J. W. Slot. 1996. Improving structural integrity of cryosections for immunogold labeling. Histochem. Cell Biol. 106:41–58.[CrossRef][Medline]
24. Osborn, M., W. W. Franke, and K. Weber. 1977. Visualization of a system of filaments 7–10 nm thick in cultured cells of an epithelioid line (Pt K2) by immunofluorescence microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 74:2490–2494.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  B. Huang, W. Wang, M. Bates, and X. Zhuang Three-Dimensional Super-Resolution Imaging by Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy Science, February 8, 2008; 319(5864): 810 - 813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Shroff, C. G. Galbraith, J. A. Galbraith, H. White, J. Gillette, S. Olenych, M. W. Davidson, and E. Betzig Dual-color superresolution imaging of genetically expressed probes within individual adhesion complexes PNAS, December 18, 2007; 104(51): 20308 - 20313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
