This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: biophysj.105.063479v1 89/2/796    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Halperin, A. Articles by Zhulina, E. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Halperin, A. Articles by Zhulina, E. B.

Brush Effects on DNA Chips: Thermodynamics, Kinetics, and Design Guidelines

A. Halperin ^*, A. Buhot ^* and E. B. Zhulina 

^* UMR 5819 SPrAM (UJF, CNRS, CEA), DRFMC, CEA Grenoble, 38054 Grenoble cedex 9, France; and Institute of Macromolecular Compounds of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 199004 St Petersburg, Russia

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to A. Halperin, E-mail: ahalperin{at}cea.fr.

In biology experiments, oligonucleotide microarrays are contacted with a solution of long nucleic acid targets. The hybridized probes thus carry long tails. When the surface density of the oligonucleotide probes is high enough, the progress of hybridization gives rise to a polyelectrolyte brush due to mutual crowding of the nucleic acid tails. The free-energy penalty associated with the brush modifies both the hybridization isotherms and the rate equations: the attainable hybridization is lowered significantly as is the hybridization rate. When the equilibrium hybridization fraction, x_eq, is low, the hybridization follows a Langmuir type isotherm, x_eq/(1 – x_eq) = c_tK where c_t is the target concentration and K is the equilibrium constant. K is smaller than its bulk value by a factor (n/N)^2/5 due to wall effects where n and N denote the number of bases in the probe and the target. At higher x_eq, when the brush is formed, the leading correction is where x_B corresponds to the onset of the brush regime. The denaturation rate constant in the two regimes is identical. However, the hybridization rate constant in the brush regime is lower, the leading correction being

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Li, A. Pozhitkov, and M. Brouwer A competitive hybridization model predicts probe signal intensity on high density DNA microarrays Nucleic Acids Res., November 1, 2008; 36(20): 6585 - 6591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Gong and R. Levicky DNA surface hybridization regimes PNAS, April 8, 2008; 105(14): 5301 - 5306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Fiche, A. Buhot, R. Calemczuk, and T. Livache Temperature Effects on DNA Chip Experiments from Surface Plasmon Resonance Imaging: Isotherms and Melting Curves Biophys. J., February 1, 2007; 92(3): 935 - 946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Pozhitkov, P. A. Noble, T. Domazet-Loso, A. W. Nolte, R. Sonnenberg, P. Staehler, M. Beier, and D. Tautz Tests of rRNA hybridization to microarrays suggest that hybridization characteristics of oligonucleotide probes for species discrimination cannot be predicted. Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2006; 34(9): e66 - e66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]