help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on September 8, 2006.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.084293
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.084293v1
91/11/4180    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pandit, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Skolnick, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pandit, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Skolnick, J.
Biophysical Journal 91:4180-4190 (2006)
© 2006 The Biophysical Society

TASSER-Lite: An Automated Tool for Protein Comparative Modeling

Shashi Bhushan Pandit, Yang Zhang and Jeffrey Skolnick

Center for the Study of Systems Biology, School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30318

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Jeffrey Skolnick, Tel.: 404-407-8976; Fax: 404-385-7478; E-mail: skolnick{at}gatech.edu.

This study involves the development of a rapid comparative modeling tool for homologous sequences by extension of the TASSER methodology, developed for tertiary structure prediction. This comparative modeling procedure was validated on a representative benchmark set of proteins in the Protein Data Bank composed of 901 single domain proteins (41–200 residues) having sequence identities between 35–90% with respect to the template. Using a Monte Carlo search scheme with the length of runs optimized for weakly/nonhomologous proteins, TASSER often provides appreciable improvement in structure quality over the initial template. However, on average, this requires ~29 h of CPU time per sequence. Since homologous proteins are unlikely to require the extent of conformational search as weakly/nonhomologous proteins, TASSER's parameters were optimized to reduce the required CPU time to ~17 min, while retaining TASSER's ability to improve structure quality. Using this optimized TASSER (TASSER-Lite), we find an average improvement in the aligned region of ~10% in root mean-square deviation from native over the initial template. Comparison of TASSER-Lite with the widely used comparative modeling tool MODELLER showed that TASSER-Lite yields final models that are closer to the native. TASSER-Lite is provided on the web at http://cssb.biology.gatech.edu/skolnick/webservice/tasserlite/index.html.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
S. Y. Lee and J. Skolnick
Benchmarking of TASSER_2.0: An Improved Protein Structure Prediction Algorithm with More Accurate Predicted Contact Restraints
Biophys. J., August 15, 2008; 95(4): 1956 - 1964.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
A. Guerler and E.-W. Knapp
Novel protein folds and their nonsequential structural analogs
Protein Sci., August 1, 2008; 17(8): 1374 - 1382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
H. Zhou and J. Skolnick
Ab Initio Protein Structure Prediction Using Chunk-TASSER
Biophys. J., September 1, 2007; 93(5): 1510 - 1518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Biophysical Society.