help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on June 16, 2006.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.084186
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.084186v1
91/6/2337    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, R.
Right arrow Articles by Weingart, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, R.
Right arrow Articles by Weingart, R.
Biophysical Journal 91:2337-2348 (2006)
© 2006 The Biophysical Society

Subconductance States of Cx30 Gap Junction Channels: Data from Transfected HeLa Cells versus Data from a Mathematical Model

Rolf Vogel *, Virginijus Valiunas {dagger} and Robert Weingart {dagger}

* Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland; and {dagger} Institute of Physiology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to R. Weingart, Dept. of Physiology, University of Bern, Bühlplatz 5, CH-3012, Bern, Switzerland. Tel.: 41-031-631-8706; Fax: 41-031-631-4611; E-mail: weingart{at}pyl.unibe.ch.

Human HeLa cells expressing mouse connexin30 were used to study the electrical properties of gap junction channel substates. Experiments were performed on cell pairs using a dual voltage-clamp method. Single-channel currents revealed discrete levels attributable to a main state, a residual state, and five substates interposed, suggesting the operation of six subgates provided by the six connexins of a gap junction hemichannel. Substate conductances, {gamma}j,substate, were unevenly distributed between the main-state and the residual-state conductance ({gamma}j,main state = 141 pS, {gamma}j,residual state = 21 pS). Activation of the first subgate reduced the channel conductance by ~30%, and activation of subsequent subgates resulted in conductance decrements of 10–15% each. Current transitions between the states were fast (<2 ms). Substate events were usually demarcated by transitions from and back to the main state; transitions among substates were rare. Hence, subgates are recruited simultaneously rather than sequentially. The incidence of substate events was larger at larger gradients of Vj. Frequency and duration of substate events increased with increasing number of synchronously activated subgates. Our mathematical model, which describes the operation of gap junction channels, was expanded to include channel substates. Based on the established Vj-sensitivity of {gamma}j,main state and {gamma}j,residual state, the simulation yielded unique functions {gamma}j,substate = f(Vj) for each substate. Hence, the spacing of subconductance levels between the channel main state and residual state were uneven and characteristic for each Vj.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Biophysical Society.