help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on May 11, 2007.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.102137
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.102137v1
93/6/1950    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kovacs, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Abagyan, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kovacs, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Abagyan, R.
Biophysical Journal 93:1950-1959 (2007)
© 2007 The Biophysical Society

Computational Prediction of Atomic Structures of Helical Membrane Proteins Aided by EM Maps

Julio A. Kovacs *, Mark Yeager * {dagger} {ddagger} § and Ruben Abagyan *

* Department of Molecular Biology, {dagger} Department of Cell Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California; {ddagger} Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California; and § Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to Julio Kovacs, Tel.: 858-784-8904, E-mail: jkovacs{at}scripps.edu.

Integral membrane proteins pose a major challenge for protein-structure prediction because only {approx}100 high-resolution structures are available currently, thereby impeding the development of rules or empirical potentials to predict the packing of transmembrane {alpha}-helices. However, when an intermediate-resolution electron microscopy (EM) map is available, it can be used to provide restraints which, in combination with a suitable computational protocol, make structure prediction feasible. In this work we present such a protocol, which proceeds in three stages: 1), generation of an ensemble of {alpha}-helices by flexible fitting into each of the density rods in the low-resolution EM map, spanning a range of rotational angles around the main helical axes and translational shifts along the density rods; 2), fast optimization of side chains and scoring of the resulting conformations; and 3), refinement of the lowest-scoring conformations with internal coordinate mechanics, by optimizing the van der Waals, electrostatics, hydrogen bonding, torsional, and solvation energy contributions. In addition, our method implements a penalty term through a so-called tethering map, derived from the EM map, which restrains the positions of the {alpha}-helices. The protocol was validated on three test cases: GpA, KcsA, and MscL.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
P. Sompornpisut, B. Roux, and E. Perozo
Structural Refinement of Membrane Proteins by Restrained Molecular Dynamics and Solvent Accessibility Data
Biophys. J., December 1, 2008; 95(11): 5349 - 5361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Biophysical Society.