help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published as Biophys J. BioFAST on April 18, 2008.
doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.118604
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.107.118604v1
95/3/1075    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, K. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, K. A.
Biophysical Journal 95:1075-1079 (2008)
© 2008 The Biophysical Society

Multifrequency Forcing of a Hopf Oscillator Model of the Inner Ear

K. A. Montgomery

Mathematics Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah

Correspondence: Address reprint requests to K. A. Montgomery, Tel.: 801-419-1520; E-mail: kmontgom24{at}yahoo.com.

In response to a sound stimulus, the inner ear emits sounds called otoacoustic emissions. While the exact mechanism for the production of otoacoustic emissions is not known, active motion of individual hair cells is thought to play a role. Two possible sources for otoacoustic emissions, both localized within individual hair cells, include somatic motility and hair bundle motility. Because physiological models of each of these systems are thought to be poised near a Hopf bifurcation, the dynamics of each can be described by the normal form for a system near a Hopf bifurcation. Here we demonstrate that experimental results from three-frequency suppression experiments can be predicted based on the response of an array of noninteracting Hopf oscillators tuned at different frequencies. This supports the idea that active motion of individual hair cells contributes to active processing of sounds in the ear. Interestingly, the model suggests an explanation for differing results recorded in mammals and nonmammals.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Biophysical Society.