help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published December 30, 2004. doi:10.1529/biophysj.104.053066
© 2004 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2005.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow supplemental file
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.104.053066v1
88/3/1626    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Han, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Qu, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Han, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Qu, Z.

BIOPHYSICAL THEORY AND MODELING

Hysteresis and Cell Cycle Transitions: How Crucial is it?

Zhangang Han 1, Ling Yang 1, Robb MacLellan 1, James N. Weiss 2 and Zhilin Qu 1*

1 University of California, Los Angeles
2 UCLA School of Medicine Cardiovascular Research Laboratory

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: zqu{at}mednet.ucla.edu.

Submitted on September 15, 2004
Revised on October 6, 2004
Accepted on 16 December 2004


   Abstract
Recently, experiments have shown that cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) activity exhibits hysteresis in its response to total cyclin when cyclin is made non-degradable and controlled externally. This observation was taken to support mathematical modeling predictions regarding the underlying dynamics of the cell cycle. However, cell cycle dynamics can also be generated by other non-hysteretic mechanisms. To examine the robustness of the hysteretic response of CDK activity to total cyclin, we simulated various cell cycle signal transduction networks, and correlated the dynamics to the response function of CDK activity versus total cyclin. By randomly searching parameter space, we assessed robustness by estimating the frequency of hysteretic versus non-hysteretic dynamical mechanisms. When the dynamical instabilities were caused by feedback loops in CDK phosphorylation and dephosphorylation or by feedback between cyclin and the CDK inhibitor, the response function of CDK activity versus total cyclin correlated well with the dynamical instabilities. However, when the dynamical instabilities originated from feedback between cyclin and APC-CDH1 or RB-E2F, the response function did not correlate with dynamical instabilities. Thus, although a hysteretic response is neither necessary nor sufficient, it is in general a much more robust mechanism for generating cell cycle dynamics than non-hysteretic mechanisms.

Key Words: bistability, cyclin, cyclin-depedent kinase, dynamics, simulation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
J. Kim, T.-G. Kim, S. H. Jung, J.-R. Kim, T. Park, P. Heslop-Harrison, and K.-H. Cho
Evolutionary design principles of modules that control cellular differentiation: consequences for hysteresis and multistationarity
Bioinformatics, July 1, 2008; 24(13): 1516 - 1522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
J.-R. Kim, Y. Yoon, and K.-H. Cho
Coupled Feedback Loops Form Dynamic Motifs of Cellular Networks
Biophys. J., January 15, 2008; 94(2): 359 - 365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2004 by the Biophysical Society.