help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published July 29, 2005. doi:10.1529/biophysj.104.057331
© 2005 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2005.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.104.057331v1
89/4/2258    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schurr, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Aragon, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schurr, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Aragon, S. R.

BIOPHYSICAL THEORY AND MODELING

A CONTRIBUTION TO THE THEORY OF PREFERENTIAL INTERACTION COEFFICIENTS

J. Michael Schurr 1*, David P. Rangel 1 and Sergio R. Aragon 2

1 University of Washington
2 San Francisco State University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: schurr{at}chem.washington.edu.

Submitted on December 1, 2004
Revised on January 18, 2005
Accepted on 1 July 2005


   Abstract
ABSTRACT A simple and complete derivation of the relation between concentration-based preferential interaction coefficients and integrals over the relevant pair correlation functions is presented for the first time. Certain omissions from the original treatment of pair correlation functions in multi-component thermodynamics by Kirkwood and Buff (1) are also addressed. Connections between the present concentration-based quantities and the more common molality-based preferential interaction coefficients are also derived. The pair correlation functions and preferential interaction coefficients of both solvent (water) and cosolvent (osmolyte) in the neighborhood of a macromolecule contain contributions from short-range repulsions and generic long-range attractions originating from the macromolecule, as well as from osmolyte-solvent exchange reactions beyond the macromolecular surface. These contributions are evaluated via a heuristic analysis that leads to simple insightful expressions for the preferential interaction coefficients in terms of the volumes excluded to the centers of the water and osmolyte molecules and a sum over the contributions of exchanging sites in the surrounding solution. The preferential interaction coefficients are predicted to exhibit the experimentally observed dependence on osmolyte concentration. Molality-based preferential interaction coefficients that were reported for seven different osmolytes interacting with bovine serum albumin (BSA) are analyzed using the present formulation together with geometrical parameters reckoned from the crystal structure of human serum albumin (HSA). In all cases, the excluded volume contribution, which is the volume excluded to osmolyte centers minus that excluded to water centers in units of , exceeds in magnitude the contribution of the exchange reactions. Under the assumption that the exchange contribution is dominated by sites in the first surface-contiguous layer, the ratio of the average exchange constant to its neutral random value is determined for each osmolyte. These ratios all lie in the range 1.0 0.15, which indicates rather slight deviations from random occupation near the macromolecular surface. Finally, a mechanism is proposed whereby the chemical identity of an osmolyte might be concealed from partially ordered multi-layers of water in clefts, grooves, and pits, and its consequences are noted.

Key Words: Kirkwood-Buff integrals, exchange constants, osmotic stress, pair correlation functions, preferential interaction coefficients, wetting/melting scenario




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
G. Khelashvili, H. Weinstein, and D. Harries
Protein Diffusion on Charged Membranes: A Dynamic Mean-Field Model Describes Time Evolution and Lipid Reorganization
Biophys. J., April 1, 2008; 94(7): 2580 - 2597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Chopra, R. M. Dooling, C. G. Horner, and E. E. Howell
A Balancing Act between Net Uptake of Water during Dihydrofolate Binding and Net Release of Water upon NADPH Binding in R67 Dihydrofolate Reductase
J. Biol. Chem., February 22, 2008; 283(8): 4690 - 4698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
P. E. Smith
Chemical Potential Derivatives and Preferential Interaction Parameters in Biological Systems from Kirkwood-Buff Theory
Biophys. J., August 1, 2006; 91(3): 849 - 856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
C. Stanley and D. C. Rau
Preferential Hydration of DNA: The Magnitude and Distance Dependence of Alcohol and Polyol Interactions
Biophys. J., August 1, 2006; 91(3): 912 - 920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
I. L. Shulgin and E. Ruckenstein
A Protein Molecule in a Mixed Solvent: The Preferential Binding Parameter via the Kirkwood-Buff Theory
Biophys. J., January 15, 2006; 90(2): 704 - 707.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2005 by the Biophysical Society.