help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published May 20, 2005. doi:10.1529/biophysj.104.057612
© 2005 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on August 1, 2005.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.104.057612v1
89/2/895    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sokolov, I. M
Right arrow Articles by Williams, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sokolov, I. M
Right arrow Articles by Williams, M. C.

BIOPHYSICAL THEORY AND MODELING

Target search of N sliding proteins on a DNA

Igor M Sokolov 1, Ralf Metzler 2*, Kiran Pant 3 and Mark C. Williams 3

1 Humboldt University Berlin
2 Nordita
3 Northeastern University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: metz{at}nordita.dk.

Submitted on December 6, 2004
Revised on February 28, 2005
Accepted on 9 May 2005


   Abstract
At low to moderate ambient salt concentrations, DNA-binding proteins bind relatively tightly to DNA, and only very rarely detach. Intersegmental transfer due to DNA-looping can be excluded by applying an external pulling force to the DNA molecule. Under such conditions, we explore the targeting dynamics of N proteins sliding diffusively along DNA in search of their specific target sequence. At lower densities of binding proteins, we find a reduction of the characteristic search time proportional to N^{-2}, with corrections at higher concentrations. Rates for detachment and attachment of binding proteins are incorporated in the model. Our findings are in agreement with recent single molecule studies in the presence of bacteriophage T4 gene 32 protein for which the unbinding rate is much lower than the specific binding rate.

Key Words: Berg-von Hippel model, Binding proteins, DNA, Dynamics of target sequence search, First passage time, Gene regulation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
L. Shokri, B. Marintcheva, M. Eldib, A. Hanke, I. Rouzina, and M. C. Williams
Kinetics and thermodynamics of salt-dependent T7 gene 2.5 protein binding to single- and double-stranded DNA
Nucleic Acids Res., October 1, 2008; 36(17): 5668 - 5677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
L. Hu, A. Y. Grosberg, and R. Bruinsma
Are DNA Transcription Factor Proteins Maxwellian Demons?
Biophys. J., August 1, 2008; 95(3): 1151 - 1156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
T. Zhao and A. R. Dinner
Apparent Directional Scanning for DNA Repair
Biophys. J., January 1, 2008; 94(1): 47 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
C. Lou, X. Yang, X. Liu, B. He, and Q. Ouyang
A Quantitative Study of {lambda}-Phage SWITCH and Its Components
Biophys. J., April 15, 2007; 92(8): 2685 - 2693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
N. Kantarci, P. Doruker, and T. Haliloglu
Cooperative Fluctuations Point to the Dimerization Interface of P53 Core Domain
Biophys. J., July 15, 2006; 91(2): 421 - 432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2005 by the Biophysical Society.