help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published September 8, 2005. doi:10.1529/biophysj.105.064485
© 2005 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2005.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow supplemental
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.105.064485v1
89/6/4159    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KV, B.
Right arrow Articles by Vishveshwara, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KV, B.
Right arrow Articles by Vishveshwara, S.

PROTEINS

A network representation of protein structures: implications to protein stability

Brinda KV 1 and Saraswathi Vishveshwara 1*

1 Indian Institute of Science

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sv{at}mbu.iisc.ernet.in.

Submitted on April 11, 2005
Revised on May 22, 2005
Accepted on 9 August 2005


   Abstract
The present study views each protein structure as a network of non-covalent connections between amino acid side chains. Each amino acid in a protein structure is a node and the strength of the non-covalent interactions between two amino acids is evaluated for edge determination. The Protein structure graphs (PSGs) for 232 proteins have been constructed as a function of the cutoff of the amino acid interaction strength at a few carefully chosen values. Analysis of such PSGs constructed on the basis of edge weights has shown that (1) The PSGs exhibit a complex topological network behavior, which is dependent on the interaction cutoff chosen for PSG construction. (2) A transition is observed at a critical interaction cutoff, in all the proteins, as monitored by the size of the largest cluster (giant component) in the graph. Amazingly, this transition occurs within a narrow range of interaction cutoff for all the proteins, irrespective of the size or the fold topology. (3) The amino acid preferences to be highly connected (hub frequency) has been evaluated as a function of the interaction cutoff. We observe that the aromatic residues along with Arginine, Histidine and Methionine act as strong hubs at high interaction cutoffs whereas the hydrophobic Leucine and Isoleucine residues get added to these hubs at low interaction cutoffs, forming weak hubs. The hubs identified are found to play a role in bringing together different secondary structural elements in the tertiary structure of the proteins. They are also found to contribute to the additional stability of the thermophilic proteins and hence could be crucial for the folding and stability of the unique three-dimensional structure of proteins.

Key Words: Amino acid hubs, Largest cluster, Network topology of protein structures, Non-covalent interaction strength, Protein structure graphs, Stability of thermophilic proteins




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
G. Bagler and S. Sinha
Assortative mixing in Protein Contact Networks and protein folding kinetics
Bioinformatics, July 15, 2007; 23(14): 1760 - 1767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
Md. Aftabuddin and S. Kundu
Hydrophobic, Hydrophilic, and Charged Amino Acid Networks within Protein
Biophys. J., July 1, 2007; 93(1): 225 - 231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
A. Ghosh, K. V. Brinda, and S. Vishveshwara
Dynamics of Lysozyme Structure Network: Probing the Process of Unfolding
Biophys. J., April 1, 2007; 92(7): 2523 - 2535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2005 by the Biophysical Society.