help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published April 28, 2006. doi:10.1529/biophysj.105.069138
© 2006 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on July 15, 2006.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.105.069138v1
91/2/694    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cecconi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Livi, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cecconi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Livi, R.

PROTEINS

Testing simplified protein models of the hPin1 WW domain

Fabio Cecconi 1*, Carlo Guardiani 2 and Roberto Livi 3

1 Istituto di Fisica della Materia (INFM)
2 Centro Interdip. per lo studio delle dinamiche complesse
3 Università di Firenze (Dip. di Fisica)

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cecconif{at}roma1.infn.it.

Submitted on June 22, 2005
Revised on August 15, 2005
Accepted on 6 April 2006


   Abstract
The WW domain of the human Pin1 protein for its simple topology and the large amount of experimental data is an ideal candidate to assess theoretical approaches to protein folding. The purpose of the present work is to compare the reliability of the chemically-based Sorenson/Head-Gordon (SHG) model and a standard native centric model in reproducing through molecular dynamics simulations some of the well known features of the folding transition of this small domain. Our results show that the Go model correctly reproduces the cooperative, two-state, folding mechanism of the WW-domain, while the SHG model predicts a transition occurring in two stages: a collapse followed by a structural rearrangement. The lack of a cooperative folding in the SHG simulations appears to be related to the non-funnel shape of the energy landscape featuring a partitioning of the native valley in sub-basins corresponding to different chain chiralities. However the SHG approach remains more reliable in estimating the {Phi}-values with respect to Go-like description. This may suggest that the WW-domain folding process is stirred by energetic and topological factors as well, and it highlights the better suitability of chemically-based models in simulating mutations.

Key Words: Phi-values, WW-domains, coarse-grained models, cooperativity, folding




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
C. Guardiani, F. Cecconi, and R. Livi
Stability and Kinetic Properties of C5-Domain from Myosin Binding Protein C and its Mutants
Biophys. J., February 15, 2008; 94(4): 1403 - 1411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
Z. Luo, J. Ding, and Y. Zhou
Temperature-Dependent Folding Pathways of Pin1 WW Domain: An All-Atom Molecular Dynamics Simulation of a Go Model
Biophys. J., September 15, 2007; 93(6): 2152 - 2161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the Biophysical Society.