Statistical-mechanical Theory of DNA Looping

¹ Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory
² University of Texas at Dallas
³ Yale University
⁴ Univ. of Texas - Dallas

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sdlevene{at}utdallas.edu.

Submitted on July 14, 2005
Revised on October 30, 2005
Accepted on 28 November 2005

	Abstract

The lack of a rigorous analytical theory for DNA looping has caused many DNA-loop-mediated phenomena to be interpreted using theories describing the related process of DNA cyclization. However, distinctions in the mechanics of DNA looping versus cyclization can have profound quantitative effects on the thermodynamics of loop closure. We have extended a statistical mechanical theory recently developed for DNA cyclization to model DNA looping, taking into account protein flexibility. Notwithstanding the underlying theoretical similarity, we find that the topological constraint of loop closure leads to the coexistence of multiple classes of loops mediated by the same protein structure. These loop topologies are characterized by dramatic differences in twist and writhe; because of the strong coupling of twist and writhe within a loop, DNA looping can exhibit a complex overall helical dependence in terms of amplitude, phase, and deviations from uniform helical periodicity. Moreover, the DNA-length dependence of optimal looping efficiency depends on protein elasticity, protein geometry, and the presence of intrinsic DNA bends. We derive a rigorous theory of loop formation that connects global mechanical and geometric properties of both DNA and protein and demonstrates the importance of protein flexibility in loop-mediated protein-DNA interactions.

Key Words: DNA elasticity, DNA looping, DNA topoisomer, J factor, Loop-closure probability, Protein-DNA interactions

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. A. Becker, J. D. Kahn, and L. J. Maher III Eukaryotic HMGB proteins as replacements for HU in E. coli repression loop formation Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2008; 36(12): 4009 - 4021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. E. Catto, S. R. W. Bellamy, S. E. Retter, and S. E. Halford Dynamics and consequences of DNA looping by the FokI restriction endonuclease Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2008; 36(6): 2073 - 2081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Goyal, T. Lillian, S. Blumberg, J.-C. Meiners, E. Meyhofer, and N. C. Perkins Intrinsic Curvature of DNA Influences LacR-Mediated Looping Biophys. J., December 15, 2007; 93(12): 4342 - 4359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. B. Teif General transfer matrix formalism to calculate DNA-protein-drug binding in gene regulation: application to OR operator of phage {lambda} Nucleic Acids Res., June 28, 2007; 35(11): e80 - e80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. J. Gemmen, R. Millin, and D. E. Smith Dynamics of Single DNA Looping and Cleavage by Sau3AI and Effect of Tension Applied to the DNA Biophys. J., December 1, 2006; 91(11): 4154 - 4165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Vanzi, C. Broggio, L. Sacconi, and F. S. Pavone Lac repressor hinge flexibility and DNA looping: single molecule kinetics by tethered particle motion Nucleic Acids Res., July 11, 2006; 34(12): 3409 - 3420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. J. Gemmen, R. Millin, and D. E. Smith DNA looping by two-site restriction endonucleases: heterogeneous probability distributions for loop size and unbinding force Nucleic Acids Res., May 24, 2006; 34(10): 2864 - 2877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]