help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published March 24, 2006. doi:10.1529/biophysj.105.076836
© 2006 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on June 15, 2006.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.105.076836v1
90/12/4327    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, W.
Right arrow Articles by Brooks, B. R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, W.
Right arrow Articles by Brooks, B. R

BIOPHYSICAL THEORY AND MODELING

Modeling protein conformational changes by iterative fitting of distance constraints using re-oriented normal modes

Wenjun Zheng 1* and Bernard R Brooks 2

1 NIH
2 National Institutes of Health

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: zhengwj{at}helix.nih.gov.

Submitted on October 27, 2005
Revised on December 1, 2005
Accepted on 7 March 2006


   Abstract
Recently, we have developed a normal modes based algorithm that predicts the direction of protein conformational changes given the initial state crystal structure together with a small number of pair-wise distance constraints for the end state. Here we significantly extend this method to accurately model both the direction and amplitude of protein conformational changes. The new protocol implements a multi-steps search in the conformational space that is driven by iteratively minimizing the error of fitting the given distance constraints and simultaneously enforcing the restraint of low elastic energy. At each step, an incremental structural displacement is computed as a linear combination of the lowest 10 normal modes derived from an elastic network model, whose eigenvectors are re-orientated to correct for the distortions caused by the structural displacements in the previous steps. We test this method on a list of 16 pairs of protein structures for which relatively large conformational changes are observed (RMSD>3Å), using up to 10 pair-wise distance constraints selected by a fluctuation analysis of the initial state structures. This method has achieved a near-optimal performance in almost all cases, and in many cases the final structural models lie within RMSD of 1~2Åfrom the native end state structures.

Key Words: conformational change, distance constraint, elastic network model, normal modes analysis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
G. Cui and K. M. Merz Jr.
The Intrinsic Dynamics and Function of Nickel-Binding Regulatory Protein: Insights from Elastic Network Analysis
Biophys. J., May 15, 2008; 94(10): 3769 - 3778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
W. Zheng
A Unification of the Elastic Network Model and the Gaussian Network Model for Optimal Description of Protein Conformational Motions and Fluctuations
Biophys. J., May 15, 2008; 94(10): 3853 - 3857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the Biophysical Society.