help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published December 15, 2006. doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.081950
© 2006 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on March 15, 2007.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.081950v1
92/6/2062    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Jacquelyn S. Fetrow
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knaggs, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Fetrow, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knaggs, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Fetrow, J. S.

PROTEINS

Insights into Correlated Motion and Long-range Interactions in CheY Derived from Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Michael H. Knaggs 1, Freddie R. Salsbury Jr. 1, Marshall Hall Edgell 2 and Jacquelyn S. Fetrow 1*

1 Wake Forest University
2 UNC-Chapel Hill

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: fetrowjs{at}wfu.edu.

Submitted on January 26, 2006
Revised on March 13, 2006
Accepted on 10 November 2006


   Abstract
CheY is a response regulator protein involved in bacterial chemotaxis. Much is known about its active and inactive conformations, but little is known about the mechanisms underlying long-range interactions or correlated motions. To investigate these events, molecular dynamics simulations were performed on the unphosphorylated, inactive structure from S. typhimurium and the CheY-BeF3- active mimic structure (with BeF3- removed) from E. coli. Simulations utilized both sequences in each conformation to discriminate sequence- and structure-specific behavior. The previously identified conformational differences between the inactive and active conformations of the strand-4-helix-4 loop, which are present in these simulations, arise from the structural, and not the sequence, differences. The simulations identify previously unreported structure-specific flexibility features in this loop and sequence-specific flexibility features in other regions of the protein. Both structure- and sequence-specific long-range interactions are observed in the active and inactive ensembles. In the inactive ensemble, two distinct mechanisms based on Thr87 or Ile95 rotameric forms, are observed for the previously identified g+ and g- rotamer sampling by Tyr106. These MD simulations have thus identified both sequence- and structure-specific differences in flexibility, long-range interactions, and rotameric form of key residues. Potential biological consequences of differential flexibility and long-range correlated motion are discussed.

Key Words: Tyr 106 rotamer, active/inactive conformation, allostery, bacterial chemotaxis, correlated motion, signal transduction







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the Biophysical Society.