help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published June 9, 2006. doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.083469
© 2006 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2006.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.083469v1
91/5/1688    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Yanling Lu
Stephen Harding
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lu, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Harding, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lu, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Harding, S.

BIOPHYSICAL THEORY AND MODELING

Crystallohydrodynamics of protein assemblies: Combining sedimentation, viscometry and x-ray scattering

Yanling Lu 1, Emma Longman 1, Kenneth Davis 1, Alvaro Ortega 2, Gunter J. Grossman 3, Terje Michaelsen 4, Jose Garcia de la Torre 2 and Stephen Harding 1*

1 University of Nottingham
2 University of Murcia
3 SRS Daresbury Laboratory
4 University of Oslo

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: steve.harding{at}nottingham.ac.uk.

Submitted on February 16, 2006
Revised on April 17, 2006
Accepted on 24 May 2006


   Abstract
Crystallohydrodynamics describes the domain orientation in solution of antibodies and other multi-domain protein assemblies where the crystal structures may be known for the domains but not the intact structure. The approach removes the necessity for an ad hoc assumed value for protein hydration. Previous studies have involved only the sedimentation coefficient leading to considerable degeneracy or multiplicity of possible models for the conformation of a given protein assembly, all agreeing with the experimental data. This degeneracy can be considerably reduced by using additional solution parameters. Conformation charts are generated for the three universal (i.e. size independent) shape parameters P (obtained from the sedimentation coefficient or translational diffusion coefficient), {nu} (from the intrinsic viscosity) and G (from the radius of gyration) and calculated for a wide range of plausible orientations of the domains (represented as bead-shell ellipsoidal models derived from their crystal structures) and after allowance for any linker or hinge regions. Matches are then sought with the set of functions P, {nu} and G calculated from experimental data (allowing for experimental error). The number of solutions can be further reduced by the employment of the Dmax parameter (maximum particle dimension) from x-ray scattering data. Using this approach we are able to reduce the degeneracy of possible solution models for IgG3 to a possible representative structure in which the Fab domains are directed away from the plane of the Fc domain, a structure in accord with the recognition that IgG3 is the most efficient complement activator among human IgG subclasses.

Key Words: bead-shell model, hydration, immunoglobulin, uniqueness




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
Y. Lu, S. E. Harding, T. E. Michaelsen, E. Longman, K. G. Davis, A. Ortega, J. G. Grossmann, I. Sandlie, and J. Garcia de la Torre
Solution Conformation of Wild-Type and Mutant IgG3 and IgG4 Immunoglobulins Using Crystallohydrodynamics: Possible Implications for Complement Activation
Biophys. J., December 1, 2007; 93(11): 3733 - 3744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the Biophysical Society.