| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MUSCLE AND CONTRACTILITY |
1 University of Glasgow
2 Glasgow University
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: norbert{at}elec.gla.ac.uk.
Submitted on March 16, 2006
Revised on April 11, 2006
Accepted on 30 June 2006
| Abstract |
|---|
and facilitated the recording of the time course of the change in extracellular voltage and current during subthreshold and suprathreshold stimuli. The waveform of the extracellular current and voltage in response to an extracellular depolarising stimulus comprised an initial monophasic signal followed by a biphasic signal with a delay of 2-15 ms. The latter was associated with a transient contraction and therefore caused by an action potential. The biphasic signal became monophasic after the depolarisation of one cell end by raised extracellular [K+]. This form of differential recording revealed the repolarisation phase of the action potential. At rest the sarcomere length within the gap was 12% ± 4.8% longer than outside the gap, but intracellular Ca2+ transients occurred to the same extent as that observed in the outer pools. This data demonstrates the feasibility of the use of a microfluidic bath design to limit the extracellular resistance between two ends of an isolated cardiomyocyte.
Key Words: Action Potential, Cardiomyocyte, Contraction, Electrical Stimulation, Microelectrode Array, Repolarisation
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |