help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published May 19, 2006. doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.086579
© 2006 by the Biophysical Society.

A more recent version of this article appeared on August 1, 2006.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.086579v1
91/3/912    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stanley, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Rau, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stanley, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Rau, D. C.

NUCLEIC ACIDS

Preferential hydration of DNA: The magnitude and distance dependence of alcohol and polyol interactions

Christopher B. Stanley 1 and Donald C. Rau 2*

1 National Institute of Standards and Technology
2 National Institutes of Health

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: raud{at}mail.nih.gov.

Submitted on April 6, 2006
Revised on May 3, 2006
Accepted on 9 May 2006


  Abstract
The physical forces that underlie the exclusion of solutes from macromolecular surfaces can be probed in a similar way as the measurement of forces between macromolecules in condensed arrays using the osmotic stress technique and x-ray scattering. We report here the dependence of alcohol exclusion or, equivalently, the preferential hydration of DNA on the spacing between helices in condensed arrays. The actual forces describing exclusion are quite different from the commonly assumed steric crowding coupled with weak binding. For a set of 12 nonpolar alcohols, exclusion is due to repulsive hydration interactions with the charged DNA surface. Exclusion amplitudes do not depend simply on size, but rather on the balance between alkyl carbons and hydroxyl oxygens. Polyols are included at very close spacings. The distance dependence of polyol inclusion, however, is quite different from nonpolar alcohol exclusion, suggesting the underlying mechanism of interaction is different.

Key Words: DNA, hydration forces, preferential hydration




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Biophys. JHome page
B. A. Todd, V. A. Parsegian, A. Shirahata, T. J. Thomas, and D. C. Rau
Attractive Forces between Cation Condensed DNA Double Helices
Biophys. J., June 15, 2008; 94(12): 4775 - 4782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Biophys. JHome page
C. Stanley, S. Krueger, V. A. Parsegian, and D. C. Rau
Protein Structure and Hydration Probed by SANS and Osmotic Stress
Biophys. J., April 1, 2008; 94(7): 2777 - 2789.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Chopra, R. M. Dooling, C. G. Horner, and E. E. Howell
A Balancing Act between Net Uptake of Water during Dihydrofolate Binding and Net Release of Water upon NADPH Binding in R67 Dihydrofolate Reductase
J. Biol. Chem., February 22, 2008; 283(8): 4690 - 4698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Biophys. JHome page
N. N. Degtyareva, B. D. Wallace, A. R. Bryant, K. M. Loo, and J. T. Petty
Hydration Changes Accompanying the Binding of Minor Groove Ligands with DNA
Biophys. J., February 1, 2007; 92(3): 959 - 965.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Y. Sidorova, S. Muradymov, and D. C. Rau
Differences in Hydration Coupled to Specific and Nonspecific Competitive Binding and to Specific DNA Binding of the Restriction Endonuclease BamHI
J. Biol. Chem., November 24, 2006; 281(47): 35656 - 35666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the Biophysical Society.