help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published August 11, 2006. doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.088641
© 2006 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2006.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.088641v1
91/9/3301    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirouac, M.
Right arrow Articles by Laprade, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kirouac, M.
Right arrow Articles by Laprade, R.

MEMBRANES

A Mechanical Force Contributes to the "Osmotic Swelling" of Brush Border Membrane Vesicles

Martin Kirouac 1, Vincent Vachon 1, Mélanie Fortier 1, Marie-Claude Trudel 1, Alfred Berteloot 1, Jean-Louis Schwartz 1 and Raynald Laprade 1*

1 Université de Montréal

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: raynald.laprade{at}umontreal.ca.

Submitted on May 9, 2006
Revised on July 10, 2006
Accepted on 18 July 2006


   Abstract
Brush border membrane vesicles and an osmotic swelling assay have been used extensively to monitor the pore-forming activity of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins. Following a hypertonic shock, Manduca sexta midgut brush border membrane vesicles shrink rapidly and re-swell partially to a volume that depends on membrane permeability and toxin concentration rather than re-gaining their original volume as expected from theoretical models. Because efflux of buffer from the vesicles, as they shrink, could contribute to this phenomenon, vesicles were mixed with a hypertonic solution of the buffer with which they were loaded. Under these conditions, they are not expected to re-swell since the same solute is present on both sides of the membrane. Nevertheless, with several buffers, vesicles re-swelled readily, an observation which demonstrates the involvement of an additional restoration force. Re-swelling also occurred when, in the absence of toxin, the buffers were replaced by glucose, a solute which diffuses readily across the membrane, but did not occur with rat liver microsomes, despite their permeability to glucose. Unexpected swelling was also observed with rabbit jejunum brush border membrane vesicles suggesting that the cytoskeleton, present in brush border membrane vesicles but absent from microsomes, could be responsible for the restoration force.

Key Words: Bacillus thuringiensis, Brush border membrane vesicles, Light-scattering assay, Manduca sexta, Membrane permeability, Pore-forming toxin







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the Biophysical Society.