help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published March 30, 2007. doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.088856
© 2007 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on June 15, 2007.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.088856v1
92/12/4473    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Joseph Henry Levine
Leonid Mirny
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levine, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Mirny, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levine, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Mirny, L.

CELL BIOPHYSICS

Intrinsic Fluctuations, Robustness and Tunability in Signaling Cycles

Joseph Henry Levine 1, Hao Yuan Kueh 2 and Leonid Mirny 3*

1 Caltech
2 Harvard University
3 Massachusets Institute of Technology

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: leonid{at}mit.edu.

Submitted on May 12, 2006
Revised on July 21, 2006
Accepted on 16 January 2007


   Abstract
Covalent modification cycles (e.g. phosphorylation-dephosphorylation) underlie most cellular signaling and control processes. Low molecular copy number, arising from compartmental segregation and slow diffusion between compartments, potentially renders these cycles vulnerable to intrinsic chemical fluctuations. How can a cell operate reliably in the presence of this inherent stochasticity? How do changes in extrinsic parameters lead to variability of response? Can cells exploit these parameters to tune cycles to different ranges of stimuli? We study the dynamics of an isolated phosphorylation cycle. Our model shows that the cycle transmits information reliably if it is tuned to an optimal parameter range, in spite of intrinsic fluctuations and even for small input signal amplitudes. At the same time, the cycle is sensitive to changes in the concentration and activity of kinases and phosphatases. This sensitivity can lead to significant cell-to-cell response variability. It also provides a mechanism to tune the cycle to transmit signals in various amplitude ranges. Our results show that signaling cycles possess a surprising combination of robustness and tunability. This combination makes them ubiquitous in eukaryotic signaling, optimizing signaling in the presence of fluctuations using their inherent flexibility. On the other hand, cycles tuned to suppress intrinsic fluctuations can be fragile to changes in the number and activity of kinases and phosphatases. Such trade-offs in robustness to intrinsic and extrinsic fluctuations can influence the evolution of signaling cascades, making them the weakest links in cellular circuits.

Key Words: Michaelis-Menten, evolution, noise, signaling, simulations, stochastic




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
C. A. Miller and D. A. Beard
The Effects of Reversibility and Noise on Stochastic Phosphorylation Cycles and Cascades
Biophys. J., September 1, 2008; 95(5): 2183 - 2192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the Biophysical Society.