help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published June 30, 2006. doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.089490
© 2006 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2006.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.089490v1
91/5/L51    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by West, D. K
Right arrow Articles by Paci, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by West, D. K
Right arrow Articles by Paci, E.

PROTEINS

Prediction of the translocation kinetics of a protein from its mechanical properties

Daniel K West 1, David J Brockwell 1 and Emanuele Paci 1*

1 University of Leeds

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: e.paci{at}leeds.ac.uk.

Submitted on May 18, 2006
Revised on May 31, 2006
Accepted on 16 June 2006


   Abstract
Proteins are actively unfolded in order to pass through narrow channels in macromolecular complexes that catalyse protein translocation and degradation. Catalysed unfolding shares many features that characterise the mechanical unfolding of proteins using the atomic force microscope (AFM). However, simulations of unfolding induced by the AFM and when a protein is translocated through a pore suggest that each process occurs by distinct pathways. The link, if any, between each type of unfolding therefore, is not known. We show that the mechanical unfolding energy landscape of a protein, obtained using an atomistic molecular model, can be used to predict both the relative mechanical strength of proteins when unfolded using the AFM and when unfolded by translocation into a pore. We thus link the two processes and show that the import rate through a pore not only depends on the location of the initiation tag but also on the mechanical properties of the protein when averaged over all the possible geometries which are relevant for a given translocation initiation site.

Key Words: atomic force microscopy, coarse-grained models, mechanical unfolding, molecular dynamics, protein translocation and degradation, protein unfolding







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the Biophysical Society.