help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published August 4, 2006. doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.090258
© 2006 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2006.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.090258v1
91/9/3170    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhou, H.-X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhou, H.-X.

BIOPHYSICAL THEORY AND MODELING

Quantitative Relation between Intermolecular and Intramolecular Binding of Pro-rich Peptides to SH3 Domains

Huan-Xiang Zhou 1*

1 Florida State University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: zhou{at}sb.fsu.edu.

Submitted on May 30, 2006
Revised on July 5, 2006
Accepted on 24 July 2006


   Abstract
Flexible linkers are often found to tether binding sequence motifs or connect protein domains. Here we analyze three usages of flexible linkers: (1) intramolecular binding of proline-rich peptides (PRP) to SH3 domains for kinase regulation; (2) intramolecular binding of PRP for increasing the folding stability of SH3 domains; and (3) covalent linking of PRP and other ligands for high-affinity bivalent binding. The basis of these analyses is a quantitative relation between intermolecular and intramolecular binding constants. This relation has the form Ki = Ke0p for intramolecular binding and Ke = Ke01Ke02p for bivalent binding. The effective concentration p depends on the length of the linker and the distance between the linker attachment points in the bound state. Several applications illustrate the usefulness of the quantitative relation. These include intramolecular binding to the Itk SH3 domain by an internal PRP and to a circular permutant of the {alpha}-spectrin SH3 domain by a designed PRP, and bivalent binding to the two SH3 domains of Grb2 by two linked PRP. These and other examples suggest that flexible linkers and sequence motifs tethered to them, like folded protein domains, are also subject to tight control during evolution.

Key Words: SH3 domain, flexible linker, intermolecular binding, intramolecular binding, proline-rich peptide







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the Biophysical Society.