| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CHANNELS, RECEPTORS, AND ELECTRICAL SIGNALING |
1 Ottawa Health Research Inst
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cmorris{at}ohri.ca.
Submitted on July 19, 2006
Revised on August 15, 2006
Accepted on 7 November 2006
| Abstract |
|---|
Mode IIopen, and depolarization-induced deactivation (from Mode Iopen and/or from Mode IIopen). How might this impact cardiac rhythmicity? Since hysteresis patterns and "on" and "off" IHCN responses all changed with stretch, predictions are difficult. For an empirical overview, we therefore clamped patches to cyclic action potential waveforms. During the diastolic potential of sinoatrial node cell and Purkinje fiber waveforms, net stretch effects were frequency-dependent. Stretch-inhibited (SI) ImHCN2 dominated at low frequencies and stretch-augmented (SA) ImHCN2 was progressively more important as frequency increased. HCN channels might therefore contribute to either SI or SA cation conductances that in turn contribute to stretch arrhythmias and other mechanoelectric feedback phenomena.
Key Words: bilayer, channels, mechanosensitive, pacemaker, stretch, voltage-gated
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. E. Mangoni and J. Nargeot Genesis and Regulation of the Heart Automaticity Physiol Rev, July 1, 2008; 88(3): 919 - 982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Morris and P. F. Juranka Nav Channel Mechanosensitivity: Activation and Inactivation Accelerate Reversibly with Stretch Biophys. J., August 1, 2007; 93(3): 822 - 833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |