help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published January 26, 2007. doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.096693
© 2007 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on April 15, 2007.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.096693v1
92/8/2694    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Braga, J.
Right arrow Articles by Carmo-Fonseca, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Braga, J.
Right arrow Articles by Carmo-Fonseca, M.

BIOPHYSICAL THEORY AND MODELING

A reaction-diffusion model to study RNA motion by quantitative fluorescence recovery after photobleaching

José Braga 1*, James G McNally 2 and Maria Carmo-Fonseca 1

1 Instituto de Medicina Molecular
2 NIH

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: josebraga{at}fm.ul.pt.

Submitted on September 11, 2006
Revised on October 25, 2006
Accepted on 5 January 2007


   Abstract
Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is a powerful technique to study molecular dynamics inside living cells. During the past years several laboratories have used FRAP to image the motion of RNA-protein and other macromolecular complexes in the nucleus and in the cytoplasm. In the case of mRNAs, there is growing evidence indicating that these molecules assemble into large ribonucleoprotein complexes that diffuse throughout the nucleus by brownian motion. However, estimates of the corresponding diffusion rate yielded values that differ by up to one order of magnitude. In vivo labeling of RNA relies on indirect tagging with a fluorescent probe, and here we show how the binding affinity of the probe to the target RNA influences the effective diffusion estimates of the resulting complex. We extend current reaction-diffusion models for FRAP by allowing for diffusion of the bound complex. This more general model can be used to fit any fluorescence recovery curve involving two interacting mobile species in the cell (a fluorescent probe and its target substrate). The results show that interpreting FRAP data in the light of the new model reconciles the discrepant mRNA diffusion rate values previously reported.

Key Words: FRAP, RNA, confocal microscopy, diffusion




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
J. Rino, J. M. P. Desterro, T. R. Pacheco, T. W. J. Gadella Jr., and M. Carmo-Fonseca
Splicing Factors SF1 and U2AF Associate in Extraspliceosomal Complexes
Mol. Cell. Biol., May 1, 2008; 28(9): 3045 - 3057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
F. Mueller, P. Wach, and J. G. McNally
Evidence for a Common Mode of Transcription Factor Interaction with Chromatin as Revealed by Improved Quantitative Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching
Biophys. J., April 15, 2008; 94(8): 3323 - 3339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the Biophysical Society.