help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published December 15, 2006. doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.098004
© 2006 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2007.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.098004v1
93/1/225    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aftabuddin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kundu, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aftabuddin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kundu, S.

PROTEINS

Hydrophobic, hydrophilic and charged amino acids' networks within Protein

Md Aftabuddin 1 and Sudip Kundu 1*

1 University of Calcutta

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: skbmbg{at}caluniv.ac.in.

Submitted on September 25, 2006
Revised on November 1, 2006
Accepted on 1 December 2006


   Abstract
The native three dimensional structure of a single protein is determined by the physico chemical nature of its constituent amino acids. The twenty different types of amino acids, depending on their physico chemical properties, can be grouped into three major classes - hydrophobic, hydrophilic and charged. We have studied the anatomy of the weighted and unweighted networks of hydrophobic, hydrophilic and charged residues separately for a large number of proteins. Our results show that the average degree of the hydrophobic networks has significantly larger value than that of hydrophilic and charged networks. The average degree of the hydrophilic networks is slightly higher than that of charged networks. The average strength of the nodes of hydrophobic networks is nearly equal to that of the charged network; whereas that of hydrophilic networks has smaller value than that of hydrophobic and charged networks. The average strength for each of the three types of networks varies with its degree. The average strength of a node in charged networks increases more sharply than that of the hydrophobic and hydrophilic networks. Each of the three types of networks exhibits the 'small-world' property. Our results further indicate that the all amino acids' networks and hydrophobic networks are of assortative type. While most of the hydrophilic and charged networks are of assortative type, few others have the characteristics of disassortative mixing of the nodes. We have further observed that all amino acids' networks and hydrophobic networks bear the signature of hierarchy; whereas the hydrophilic and charged networks do not have any hierarchical signature.

Key Words: assortative mixing, hierarchical signature, small-world, weighted and unweighted network




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. S. Bassett, E. Bullmore, B. A. Verchinski, V. S. Mattay, D. R. Weinberger, and A. Meyer-Lindenberg
Hierarchical Organization of Human Cortical Networks in Health and Schizophrenia
J. Neurosci., September 10, 2008; 28(37): 9239 - 9248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the Biophysical Society.