help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published June 8, 2007. doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.102459
© 2007 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2007.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.106.102459v1
93/7/2519    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Matthias Gunzer
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Niesner, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gunzer, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Niesner, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gunzer, M.

SPECTROSCOPY, IMAGING, OTHER TECHNIQUES

The power of single- and multibeam 2-photon microscopy for high-resolution and high-speed deep tissue and intravital imaging

Raluca Aura Niesner 1*, Volker Andresen 2, Jens Neumann 3, Heinrich Spiecker 2 and Matthias Gunzer 4

1 Technical University Braunschweig
2 LaVision Biotec GmbH
3 Institute for Applied Neuroscience, University of Magdeburg
4 Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: raluca.niesner{at}tu-bs.de.

Submitted on December 5, 2006
Revised on March 9, 2007
Accepted on 29 May 2007


   Abstract
Two-photon microscopy is indispensable for deep tissue- and intravital-imaging. However, current technology based on single-beam point-scanning has reached sensitivity- and speed-limits as higher performance requires higher laser-power leading to sample-degradation. We utilize a multi-focal scanhead splitting a laser-beam into a line of 64 foci allowing sample illumination in real-time at full laser-power. This technology requires CCD-field-detection contrary to conventional detection by photomultipliers (PMT). A comparison of the optical performance of both setups shows functional equivalence in every measurable parameter down to penetration depths of 200µm, where most actual experiments are executed. The advantage of PMT-detection materializes at imaging depths >300µm due to a better signal-to-noise-ratio, while only CCDs allow real-time detection of rapid processes (here: blood-flow). We also find that the point-spread-function (PSF) of both devices strongly depends on tissue-constitution and penetration-depth. However, employment of a depth corrected PSF allows 3D-deconvolution of deep-tissue data up to an image quality resembling surface-detection.

Key Words: CCD, Charge Coupled Device (synonymous for CCD-camera), OHBS, Organotypic Hippocampal Brain Slices, PMT, Photo Multiplier Tube, PSF, point spread function







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the Biophysical Society.