help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published May 25, 2007. doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.108555
© 2007 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2007.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.107.108555v1
93/7/2325    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coady, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lapointe, J.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coady, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lapointe, J.-Y.

CHANNELS, RECEPTORS, AND ELECTRICAL SIGNALING

Establishing a Definitive Stoichiometry for the Na+/Monocarboxylate Cotransporter SMCT1

Michael Coady 1*, Bernadette Wallendorff 1, Francis Bourgeois 1, Francois Charron 1 and Jean-Yves Lapointe 1

1 Université de Montréal

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: coady{at}magellan.umontreal.ca.

Submitted on March 8, 2007
Revised on April 6, 2007
Accepted on 18 May 2007


   Abstract
Several different stoichiometries have been proposed for the Na+/ monocarboxylate cotransporter SMCT1, including variable Na:substrate stoichiometry. In this work, we have definitively established an invariant 2:1 cotransport stoichiometry for SMCT1. By using two independent means of assay, we first showed that SMCT1 exhibits a 2:1 stoichiometry for Na:lactate cotransport. Radiolabel uptake experiments proved that, unlike lactate, propionic acid diffuses passively through oocyte membranes and, consequently, propionate is a poor candidate for stoichiometric determination by these methods. Although we previously determined SMCT1 stoichiometry by measuring reversal potentials, this technique produced erroneous values because SMCT1 simultaneously mediates both an inwardly rectifying cotransport current and an outwardly rectifying anionic leak current; the leak current predominates in the range where reversal potentials are observed. We therefore employed a method which compared the effect of halving the external Na concentration to the effect of halving the external substrate concentration on zero-current potentials. Both lactate and propionate were cotransported through SMCT1 using 2:1 stoichiometries. The leak current passing through the protein has a 1 osmolyte per charge stoichioimetry. Identification of cotransporter stoichiometry is not always a trivial task and it can lead to a much better understanding of the transport activity mediated by the protein in question.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the Biophysical Society.