| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CELL BIOPHYSICS |
1 Washington University in St. Louis
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: elbert{at}biomed.wustl.edu.
Submitted on March 19, 2007
Revised on April 3, 2007
Accepted on 6 August 2007
| Abstract |
|---|
3 integrins, while a cyclic RGD bound through both
1 and
3 integrins. We observed increased focal adhesion formation and better long-term adhesion in flow with endothelial cells on linear RGD peptide, versus cyclic RGD, even though initial adhesion strengths were higher for cells on cyclic RGD. Addition of 100 nM S1P increased cell speed and random motility coefficients on both RGD peptides, with the largest increases found on cyclic RGD. For both peptides, much of the increase in cell migration speed was found for smaller cells (<1522 µm2 projected area), although the large increases on cyclic RGD were also due to medium-sized cells (2288-3519 µm2). Overall, a compromise between high cell migration rates and long-term adhesion will be important in the design of materials that endothelialize following implantation.
Key Words: RGD peptide, cell adhesion, cell migration, endothelial, fluid shear stress, hydrogel
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |