help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Biophys. J. BioFAST: First Published September 7, 2007. doi:10.1529/biophysj.107.109082
© 2007 by the Biophysical Society.


A more recent version of this article appeared on January 15, 2008.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
biophysj.107.109082v1
94/2/434    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moffat, J C.
Right arrow Articles by Busath, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moffat, J C.
Right arrow Articles by Busath, D.

CHANNELS, RECEPTORS, AND ELECTRICAL SIGNALING

Proton Transport Through Influenza A Virus M2 Protein Reconstituted in Vesicles

J Craig Moffat 1, Viksita Vijayvergiya 1, Fei Philip Gao 2, Timothy A. Cross 3, Dixon J. Woodbury 1 and David Busath 1*

1 Brigham Young University
2 National High magnetic Field Lab
3 Florida State Univ.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: david_busath{at}byu.edu.

Submitted on March 22, 2007
Revised on May 2, 2007
Accepted on 13 August 2007


   Abstract
Influenza A virus M2 protein is known to form acid-activated, proton-selective, amantadine-sensitive channels. We have directly measured proton uptake in vesicles containing reconstituted M2 by monitoring external pH after addition of valinomycin to vesicles with 100-fold diluted external [K+]. Proton uptake was not significantly altered by acidification. Under neutral conditions, external addition of 1 mM amantadine produced a reduction in flux consistent with randomly ordered channels, however experimental variation is high with this method and the block was not statistically significant. Amantadine block was reduced at pH 5.4. In accord with a previous study of reconstituted M2 using a pH sensitive dye to monitor intravesicular pH (1), we conclude that bath pH weakly affects or does not significantly affect proton flow in the pH range of 5.4 -7.0 for the reconstituted system, contrary to results from electrophysiological studies. Theoretical analysis of the relaxation to Donnan equilibrium utilized for such vesicle uptake assays illuminates the appropriate time scale of the initial slope and an important limitation that must be placed on inferences about channel ion selectivity. The rise in pH over 10 seconds after ionophore addition yielded time-averaged single channel conductances 0.35 ± 0.20 aS and 0.72 ± 0.42 aS at pH 5.4 and 7.0, respectively, an order of magnitude lower than was previously reported in vesicles. Assuming complete membrane incorporation and tetramerization of the reconstituted protein, such a low time-average conductance in the face of the previously observed single channel conductance (6 pS at pH 3) implies a channel Po of 10-6 - 10-4. Based on leakage of potassium from M2 containing vesicles versus protein free vesicles, M2 exhibits ~107 selectivity for hydrogen over potassium.

Key Words: Donnan equilibrium, amantadine, channel selectivity, lipid membranes, proton uptake, single channel conductance







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the Biophysical Society.